The Risk of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Transmission Associated with the Movement of Turkey Hatching Eggs Sasidhar Malladi a, J. Todd Weaver b, Timothy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Newcastle disease (ND) outbreak in Sweden 2003 & 2004 Lena Björnerot Deputy CVO Swedish Board of Agriculture (SBA)
Advertisements

RISK ASSESSMENTS AND BUSINESS CONTINUITY FOR THE EGG INDUSTRY Sasidhar Malladi, Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Minnesota April.
Avian Influenza (AI) An Agricultural Perspective
Cleaning and Disinfection Vehicles. Overview ●Any vehicle used on infected premises or with infected animals – Trailers, feed trucks, milk trucks, carcass.
PED Producer Update Paul Sundberg DVM, PhD, Dipl ACVPM VP Science and Technology National Pork Board.
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza IN EGYPT Presentation by Prof. Dr. Hamed Samaha CVO, GOVS HPAI Technical Meeting Rome, June.
The Science of Agroterrorism Bob L. Larson, DVM, PhD, ACPVM University Extension, Commercial Agriculture Program, Beef Focus Team University of Missouri,
Poultry Biosecurity.
Poultry Health - Global Issues, Trends and Challenges Karin Schwabenbauer XIIIth European Poutry Conference, Tours FAO-Symposium.
VACCINATION as part of control measures for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1) Okti Nadia Poetri.
Biosecurity Overview. Biosecurity ●Series of management practices – Prevent introduction  Keep disease agents out of animal populations where they are.
Stefano Marangon & Ilaria Capua Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie Legnaro.
Protecting American Agriculture 1 Avian Influenza: Agricultural Perspectives & Interventions December 14, 2005.
Livestock Production Ms. Boyt
Overview of FAD and Zoo Coordination Project Overview of FAD and Zoo Coordination Project Overview of NC Containment and Response Plan for Highly Pathogenic.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
GOOD PRACTICES FOR BIOSECURITY IN THE PIG SECTOR WB/OIE/FAO guidelines.
Avian Influenza (plagiarised) Roger Bowers. Avian Influenza Bird flu Avian influenza is a disease of birds caused by influenza viruses closely related.
Foreign Animal Diseases in Poultry Angie Dement Extension Associate for Veterinary Medicine Texas AgriLife Extension Service The Texas A&M System
Pullorum- Typhoid Control Program 4-H Veterinary Science Extension Veterinary Medicine Texas AgriLife Extension Service College of Veterinary Medicine.
Biosecurity for poultry
Cleaning and Disinfection Overview. Cleaning & Disinfection (C&D) ●Stop the spread of pathogens – Inactivate or destroy microorganisms ●Vital for animal.
Wildlife Management and Vector Control for an FAD Response in Domestic Livestock Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Wildlife Management.
Wildlife Management and Vector Control During Livestock or Poultry Disease Outbreaks.
Technical support provided by: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Control Programme Threats and Problems of Bird Flu Market chain cleaning and disinfection.
Farm Visit Biosecurity CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
Innovative Strategies to Keep Products Moving in the Face of Disease or Disaster A Public/Private Partnership Model Approach 2010 Symposium on Food and.
California Department of Aging (CDA) Presentation on Disaster Preparedness and Avian/Pandemic Awareness March 23, 2006 By: Damon Nelson, Aging Program.
Vaccination Strategy Against HPAI (H 5 N 1 ) in Egypt by Ehab El Masry General Organization for Veterinary Services (GOVS) Tel:
Protecting American Agriculture 1 The Wild Bird Population: An Early Warning System for Avian Influenza Dr. Ron DeHaven Administrator USDA Animal and Plant.
PANDEMIC RISK. 3 pre-requisites for a Pandemic 1. The emergence of a new virus strain with no circulating immunity within the human population 2. The.
Avian Influenza 101 Prepared by the Indiana State Board of Animal Health May 2006.
Indispensible Partners Industry Perspective G. Donald Ritter,DVM,ACPV Director of Health Services Mountaire Farms Inc. Millsboro, DE 19966
Quarantine and Movement Control Authorities Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” [ancient proverb] Henry de Bracton, De Legibus, 1240.
Biosafety/ Biosecurity in Georgia Lela Bakanidze, Ph.D. National Center for Disease Control and Medical Statistics of Georgia Scientific Networking and.
Protecting American Agriculture 1 Avian Influenza: Agricultural Perspectives & Interventions March 2006.
BC Poultry Premise Identification Initiative Solvej Patschke M.Sc. P.Ag. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands April 11, 2006.
Quarantine and Movement Control Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
STOP AI 1a STAMPING OUT PANDEMIC INFLUENZA WORLD BANK VIDEOCONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 5, 2008.
Quarantine and Movement Control Zones, Areas, and Premises Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
ASDPE Asia Pacific Strategy for Emerging Diseases (2010) and Influenza Activities Health Security and Emergencies (DSE) WHO Western Pacific Regional Office.
Scenario 1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Risk Communicator Training for Foreign Animal & Zoonotic Disease Defense.
CONTROL OF HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA A/H5N1 IN BENIN Dr. Christophe MONSIA Director of Livestock.
Disposal Group Responsibilities and Activities Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Disposal (2012)
Breeder farms and hatchery as integrated operation By: nafise jamali Structor :Dr.golian.
Surveillance During Animal Disease Emergencies Overview.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Surveillance Part 2: Implementing Surveillance Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Figure 1 P176: A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for Salmonella and Whole Chickens at Retail Thomas P. Oscar, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 1124.
Biosecurity Training Module 2 Do NOT Bring Avian Influenza to the Site.
Day CREATING A WORLD THAT IS SAFE AND SUSTAINABLE FOR WILDLIFE AND SOCIETY Avian Influenza in Wild Birds Matching goals and methods.
1 Public Health Response to Avian Influenza Dr. Michelle Murti Medical Health Officer Fraser Health BC Zoonoses Day November
Biosecurity Training Module 1
Quarantine and Movement Control Movement Control, Permitting, and Personnel Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control.
High Path Avian Influenza (HPAI) Emergency Poultry Disease Planning (EPDP) Meeting October 1, 2015.
Evaluating the Safety of Antimicrobial New Animal Drugs with Regard to Their Microbiological Effects on Bacteria of Human Health Concern Qualitative Antimicrobial.
Escherichia coli Infections (E. coli or Colibacillosis)
Elizabeth Santini, DVM Bureau of Animal Health and Diagnostic Services 1.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Avian Encephalomyelitis (AE) (Epidemic Tremors) A Viral infection of young chicks and laying hens, characterized by ataxia, tremors of head and neck and.
Salmonella Management by Vaccination in Turkey Breeders Jim Sandstrom, DVM Epitopix, LLC.
Biosecurity Overview. Biosecurity ●Series of management practices ●Bioexclusion – Preventing the introduction onto non-infected premises ●Biocontainment.
Poultry Federation Food Safety Conference Dr. Jack Shere Acting Deputy Administrator U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection.
Highly Pathogenic Avian influenza H5N8
Michael Persia, PhD – Virginia Tech
Embryology Health Risks
Structure and Terminology
Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia
Avian Influenza: Protecting Flocks, Protecting People
« Poultry HPAI Vaccination: Decision Making »
Presentation transcript:

The Risk of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Transmission Associated with the Movement of Turkey Hatching Eggs Sasidhar Malladi a, J. Todd Weaver b, Timothy Snider a, Darrell Trampel c, Jamie Slingluff a, Shauna Voss d, Eric Gonder e, Becky Tilley e, Timothy Goldsmith a and David A Halvorson a a University of Minnesota, Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, b USDA, APHIS Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, c Iowa State University, Center for Food Security and Public Health, d Minnesota Board of Animal Health, e Butterball LLC Abstract Objective To evaluate the risk that movement of turkey hatching eggs into, within, and out of a control area during an HPAI outbreak results in the infection of susceptible poultry while considering applicable current and future outbreak preventive measures from the Secure Turkey Supply Plan. Methods Overview  The assessment follows the general principles recommended by the OIE import risk analysis guidelines. The assessment is comprised of hazard identification and two evaluation steps: (1) release assessment and (2) exposure assessment.  Release assessment evaluates the likelihood of HPAI virus being released into a hatchery through the movement of hatching eggs from breeder hen flocks located in the Control Area. Scenarios where either breeder hen or tom flocks first become infected prior to hatching egg movement for two different HPAI virus strain infectious periods were considered here.  Exposure assessment then evaluates the risk of day-old poults at the hatchery or other susceptible turkey breeder hen flocks becoming infected with HPAI virus associated with the movement of hatching eggs and egg-handling materials.  The assessment utilized a qualitative evaluation approach where the likelihoods of individual events in the pathway were rated according to a qualitative scale. The ratings were based on multiple data sources and evaluation approaches, such as literature review, expert opinion, quantitative simulation models, and past outbreak experiences.  Qualitative methods were used to evaluate exposure pathways for horizontal transmission of HPAI virus from eggs to day-old poults via movements of people and equipment in the hatchery.  A survey of turkey industry practitioners participating in the STS risk assessment workgroup was conducted regarding the perception of risk associated with hatching egg movement and past outbreak experiences where eggs were set after turkey breeder flocks had undergone AI infection. The survey provided supplementary data to validate the risk assessment results. Quantitative Simulation Methods HPAI Disease transmission model: average predicted values for a single scenario with an infectious period of 3.47 days Movement day may occur on different days post infection of the house. The box plots indicate the number of contaminated eggs produced 2-days before hatching egg movement day. Summary of Influenza Transmission Questionnaire Results Data from Avian Influenza Outbreak Experiences The emergency response in the event of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in the United States would include quarantine and movement controls for poultry products. Such measures may adversely impact business continuity of turkey hatcheries given the limited holding capacity and the loss in hatchability of eggs with extended holding. The draft Secure Turkey Supply (STS) Plan provides guidelines for the movement of turkey hatching eggs during an HPAI outbreak and aims to support business continuity while minimizing disease spread. The key outbreak measures from the STS Plan include active surveillance, holding time before egg movement, sanitization of eggs, personnel biosecurity, and cleaning and disinfection of vehicles and equipment. We evaluate the risk of HPAI spread associated with the movement of turkey hatching eggs from flocks in a Control Area. Simulation models of HPAI disease in breeder flocks and detection via active surveillance were utilized in the risk evaluation. Qualitative methods were used to evaluate exposure pathways for horizontal transmission of HPAI virus from eggs to day-old poults via movements of people and equipment in the hatchery. A survey of turkey industry practitioners participating in the STS workgroup was conducted regarding the perception of risk associated with hatching egg movement and past outbreak experiences. The risk assessment results, outbreak experiences and practitioners’ perceptions were consistent and indicate a low risk of HPAI spread due to the movement of turkey hatching eggs when outbreak control measures are strictly followed. Risk Assessment Scope The risk assessment is applicable to multiplier turkey hen flocks and off-site commercial hatcheries producing turkey day-old poults that meet all of the criteria listed below:  Participate in the USDA-APHIS National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP).  Implement the STS Plan in the event of an HPAI outbreak. The risk assessment addresses the following types of movements into, within, and outside of the Control Area during an HPAI outbreak:  Movement of hatching eggs from a turkey breeder hen flock directly to a commercial turkey hatchery.  Movement of C&D hatching egg-handling materials from the hatchery to a turkey breeder hen flock.  Semen movement from turkey breeder tom flocks to hen flocks was considered under specific scenarios to evaluate the risk associated with moving hatching eggs from hen flocks potentially infected via insemination. Breeder TOMS* Hatching eggs C&D egg handling materials Hatchery Breeder HENS ** Semen  Quantitative simulations were used to estimate the number of HPAI contaminated hatching eggs moved from infected but undetected turkey breeder hen flocks (a single house).  The stochastic disease transmission model estimates the HPAI prevalence, the disease mortality, and the number of contaminated eggs produced at various time points post infection of the flock (house).  The active surveillance model simulates disease detection via diagnostic testing, increased mortality, decrease in egg production rate or where applicable via detection in turkey breeder tom houses supplying semen to the hen flock.  Scenarios A and B consider that HPAI infection was first introduced into a turkey breeder henhouse starting with one exposed bird.  Scenario A: Asian HPAI H5N1 strains characteristics were used.  Scenario B: A longer infectious period of 3.47 days was used  Scenarios C and D, consider the possibility of semen from infectious turkey toms being contaminated and resulting in simultaneous exposure of multiple hens via insemination.  Scenario C: : Asian HPAI H5N1 strains characteristics were used.  Scenario D: A longer infectious period of 3.47 days was used Turkey industry veterinarians and avian influenza experts have stated that, vertical transmission or horizontal hatchery transmission has not been observed to-date, although there have been several LPAI outbreaks in the United States. In a survey of turkey industry practitioners in the STS risk assessment working group, respondents provided reports of 26 flocks which had undergone AI infection and where eggs from the flocks were set and not removed. There was no evidence of horizontal or vertical transmission of AI within the hatchery to day old poults in any of these instances. Chicks hatched from eggs produced by two HPAI H7N3 infected broiler breeder flocks tested negative for AI during an outbreak in British Columbia in The outbreak report of the Canadian food inspection Agency states, “Because AI does not survive long at incubator temperatures, day-old chicks are not a likely source of infection for broiler growers”. In the 1983 Pennsylvania HPAI H5N2 outbreak, eggs from four severely infected layer breeder flocks were incubated and assayed for AI virus. None of the dead embryos yielded HPAI virus in this study. Also the 214 chicks hatched from these eggs showed no sign of AI disease and had not developed AI antibodies to HPAI virus. These reports provide some validation of the risk evaluation results which indicate a negligible to low risk of day old poults at the hatchery becoming infected from hatching eggs and handling materials. The key results from the pathways evaluated in the Release Assessment section are: The predicted mean number of internally contaminated hatching eggs per movement from an infected breeder henhouse was very low under all the scenarios considered. The degree of external contamination of eggs moved from an infected breeder house is expected to be low on nest clean eggs under all the scenarios considered due to sanitizing with an approved disinfectant or chlorine rinse with the concentration equal to or greater than 200 ppm. The likelihood of egg-handling materials moved from the premises being contaminated with HPAI virus was rated to be negligible to low. The key results from the pathways evaluated in the Exposure Assessment section are: The risk of day-old poults becoming infected with HPAI virus from hatching eggs or handling materials via movements of equipment or hatchery personnel is negligible to low. The risk of day-old poults becoming infected with HPAI virus from the vehicle or driver transporting hatching eggs or materials is negligible to very low. The risk of a susceptible breeder flock becoming infected with HPAI virus from the exterior of the vehicle or driver transporting cleaned and disinfected egg-handling materials from the hatchery to a breeder farm is negligible. The risk of a susceptible breeder flock becoming infected with HPAI virus due to cross contamination of cleaned and disinfected egg handling materials from the hatchery to a breeder farm is negligible to low. Zones of an HPAI outbreak responseMovement of turkey semen and hatching eggs Conclusion In this assessment, we evaluated the risk that the movement of turkey hatching eggs from breeder hen flocks in a Control Area to commercial turkey hatcheries results in HPAI spread to day old poults in the hatchery or other turkey breeder flocks. We evaluated scenarios where the breeder hen flock became infected through semen movement from infected breeder tom flocks or where it was directly infected independent of the tom flocks. The risk assessment considered relevant current industry practices, current biosecurity measures (NPIP) as well as outbreak specific measures from the STS Plan. Overall this assessment concludes that the risk of HPAI spread to susceptible poultry associated with the movement of turkey hatching eggs into, within, and outside of a Control Area during an outbreak is negligible to low, provided that the outbreak measures from the STS Plan are strictly followed. Release and Exposure Pathways Simulated egg production rate over progressive days post infection of a breeder hen flock via insemination in different simulation iterations.