1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ATLAS PESA Meeting 20/11/02 1 To do: di-muon & full-scan triggers 1) Di-muon trigger at L=2x10 ^33, introducing full scan at lower luminosity To do: Update.

Advertisements

TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.

Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.

MICE TPG RECONSTRUCTION Tracking efficiency Olena Voloshyn Geneva University.

TDAQ week Lisbon, October HLT Algorithms Planning Discussion Discussion: (suggested timing) Aims for this meeting (2 mins) Milestones (1 min) Review.

B triggering Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa Consorzio CMS Italia Firenze 7 Sept

Report from the Muon Trigger WG Aleandro Nisati On behalf of the Muon Trigger Slice Community Muon Week, April 18° 2007.

28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.

The ATLAS B physics trigger

Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.

Muon HLT status with emphasis on  Fast for endcap Alessandro Di Mattia MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY On behalf of the HLT Algorithm Group ATLAS TDAQ week.

CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.

The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.

General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.

1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.

Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.

CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.

Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.

News from the Beatenberg Trigger Workshop Ricardo Gonçalo - 18 February 2009 Higgs WG Meeting during ATLAS Week.

Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.

1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.

Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.

The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger

MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.

Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.

Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=10 31 cm -2 s -1 Sergio Grancagnolo on behalf of the Muon Trigger software group.

ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report

TAU entered in various places. Manpower – Yan Benhammou++ (N. Guttman, N. Hod, E. Reinherz, A. Kreizel). Working on online Monitoring of TGC. Looking at.

24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.

1 “Steering the ATLAS High Level Trigger” COMUNE, G. (Michigan State University ) GEORGE, S. (Royal Holloway, University of London) HALLER, J. (CERN) MORETTINI,

Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.

LHCb Lausanne Workshop, 21st March /12 Tracking Software for DC’06 E. Rodrigues, NIKHEF LHCb Tracking and Alignment Workshop  To do list, and done.

AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.

Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.

Performance and Physics Workshop Summary: Top and Muons Sarah Allwood-Spiers Glasgow ATLAS meeting June 2008.

IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –

Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.

Vertex finding and B-Tagging for the ATLAS Inner Detector A.H. Wildauer Universität Innsbruck CERN ATLAS Computing Group on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.

GDB Meeting - 10 June 2003 ATLAS Offline Software David R. Quarrie Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Atlas CHEP‘2000 Padova, ITALY February 2000 Implementation of an Object Oriented Track Reconstruction Model into Multiple LHC Experiments.

Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.

/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.

Muon Event Filter Status Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the muon EF working group INFN Lecce & Salento University.

MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.

M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger.

S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.

G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.

1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.

USCMS Physics, May 2001Darin Acosta1 Status Report of PRS/  D.Acosta University of Florida Current U.S. activities PRS/  Activities New PRS organization.

Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.

Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.

Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.

ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.

1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.

ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.

ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,

WP8 : High Level Trigger John Baines. Tasks & Deliverables WP8 Tasks: 1.Optimize HLT Tracking software for Phase-I 2.Optimize Trigger Selections for Phase-I.

Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas

Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031

Progress with MUON reconstruction

OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS

High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis

MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification

Muon Trigger Software Status

integration in HLT-status and prospects

Samples and MC Selection

M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)

Offline framework for conditions data

K/p fakes rejection VERY Preliminary Full offline environment

Presentation transcript:

1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones

2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore A sort of interface between online and offline reconstruction It works in the HLT framework Two main working modes Seeded Reconstruction starting from RoI of previous levels. Wrapped Full reconstruction, equivalent to the offline working mode Uses the package MuonIdentification to recontruct (extrapolate) the track back to the interaction point (MuID standalone)

3 On Going work Debug of Muon vertical slice Using the “Muon features” filled by LVL2 Up to now, the seeded mode has used only LVL1 informations A first setting of the MuonVerticalSlice, that uses LVL2 informations (muFast) has been implemented and it is under test LVL1 LVL2 (muFast) Moore

4 What’s next? From close next to far next. Combined Reconstruction Use of Inner Detector(iPatRec) and MuidCombined in order to match tracks from the Inner Detector and from the Muon Spectrometer and eventually perform a global fit. Ongoing work (foreseen to have a first working version by end of February leader Michela (Napoli) Reconstruction starting from ByteStream format Ongoing work (foreseen to have a first working version by the second half of February a collaborative work Michela+Gabriella+Ketevi+Stefano Moore in TestBed (expression of interest from Pavia group: Diana, Max) Finalized for the Combined testbeam (a possible milestone ? ) Application of Steering Analysis for trigger rates using the muons vertical slice LVL1-LVL2-EF with single muons (Lecce, Napoli) RegionSelector Map extended to Endcaps and to TGC/CSC technologies (Alessandro/Roma1, Gabriella/Lecce) end of February first half of March A first round on evaluation of executions times and study of possible improvements. Isolation of possible time consuming methods and optimization (Gabriella/Lecce + Moore Offline group) (to start parallely with offline optimization, after before DC2)

5 To do Evaluation of performance degradation as a function of background intensity and probability of fakes reconstruction (rejection studies) Preliminary study “OFFLINE” with pile-up ( 100GeV + bkg) (Margherita/Lecce) - DONE fakes from K/  (GianPaolo/Napoli) -DONE Reproduce the studies in TrigMoore (ONLINE) with pile-up (Margherita/Lecce) – On Going Fakes studies are dependent on the availability of MuIDCombined Feedback for offline reconstruction Use of LVL2 informations from Tile ( At offline level there is work in progress inside the Moore group) (? Some work could start parallely)

6 Next and hopefully almost ready to start Second round of optimization of time performance and algorithms Use of LVL2 infos not used by now. Access to calibrated data (accessing times and impact on reconstruction performances) EndCaps extensions (not foreseen a large impact) Evaluation of Trigger rates for complex (physics events). Trigger Menu and reconstruction strategy as a function of time/performance Cosmics rays and commissioning phase