Atmospheric Mercury Measurements Winston Luke NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

Modeling Atmospheric Mercury Deposition to the Sounds and Other Water Bodies O. Russell Bullock, Jr. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (On assignment to the.
UPDATE ON DAQS AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS & MERCURY STUDIES NC DENR/DAQ Mercury/CO 2 Workshop Raleigh, NC April 19, 2004 Steve Schliesser Todd Crawford NC.
Contaminated Fish: The Mercury Connection. Natural Sources: Occurs naturally in soils, sediments, and rocks Volcanic eruptions Wildfires Man-Made Sources:
1 Source-attribution for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
Atmospheric Mercury Research Mark Cohen Air Resources Laboratory ARL Laboratory Review May 3-5, 2011.
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Overview of Mercury Measurements in East Asia and over the North Pacific Ocean Guey-Rong Sheu Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Central University.
GMOS: A GEO Initiative to Support the Global Treaty Nicola Pirrone GMOS: A GEO Initiative to Support the Global Treaty Nicola Pirrone GMOS Coordinator.
Washington, DC 1 AMS Public-Private Partnership Forum AMS Public-Private Partnership Forum April 22, 2008 Dr. Chet Koblinsky Director, NOAA Climate Program.
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Global Transport of Mercury (Hg) Compounds Noelle Eckley EPS Second Year Symposium September 2003 Photo: AMAP & Geological Museum, Copenhagen.
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Observing Climate Variability and Change Thomas R. Karl National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Environmental Satellite Data and Information.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
The U.S. Climate Change Science Program Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Director, Climate Change Science Program.
Evaluating the HYSPLIT-Hg Atmospheric Mercury Model Using Ambient Monitoring Data Mark Cohen 1, Winston Luke 1, Paul Kelley 1, Fantine Ngan 1, Richard.
Wet Deposition of Mercury In The U.S. Results from the NADP Mercury Deposition Network, David Gay Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL,
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
NOAA Navigation Services CO-OPS Update Richard Edwing National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Hydrographic Services.
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Report on Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units In response to 15 NCAC 02D.2509(b)
Colorado Front Range Emissions Study Regional study of the impact of oil and gas operations on ambient hydrocarbon levels in the Northern Front Range based.
Continuous measurements of the atmospheric concentrations of Reactive Gaseous Mercury (RGM), Fine Particulate Mercury (FPM) and Gaseous Elemental Mercury.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury to the Great Lakes Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, Hang Lei, Richard Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region [April 2007 summary] This summary is updated periodically, and the current version is.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Trans-Pacific Chemical Transport of Mercury: Sensitivity Analysis on Asian Emission Contribution to Mercury Deposition in North America Using CMAQ-Hg C.-J.
Descriptive Analysis Database Archive monitoring network locations, climate, emissions, wildfires, census, political, physical, and image databases Databases.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance Mercury Forum, May 10-12, 2010, Mote Marine Lab, Sarasota, Florida Atmospheric Mercury Measurements and Modeling at the Grand Bay.
Use of a global model to understand speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high- elevation sites Peter Weiss-Penzias 1, Helen M. Amos 2, Noelle.
O. Russell Bullock, Jr. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division (in partnership with the U.S. Environmental.
Xinbin Feng 1, Wei Zhu 1,2, Xuewu Fu 1, Hui Zhang 1,2 1.Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang , PR China 2. Graduate University.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
Global Modeling of Mercury in the Atmosphere using the GEOS-CHEM model Noelle Eckley, Rokjin Park, Daniel Jacob 30 January 2004.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
Why do we Measure Precipitation Chemistry? Christopher Lehmann CAL Director 2007 Field Operations Training Course.
A Framework for Monitoring March 26, Mission: Provide a national forum to coordinate consistent and scientifically defensible methods and strategies.
Modeling the Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury to Lake Champlain (from Anthropogenic Sources in the U.S. and Canada) Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources.
Conceptual Design of an Enhanced Multipurpose Aerometric Monitoring Network in Central California NOV. 15, 2002 AWMA SYMPOSIUM ON AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENT.
Intercontinental and Hemispheric Scale Transport and the LRTAP Convention Terry J. Keating, Ph.D. Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection.
Mercury Measurement Programs within NOAA/ARL Steve Brooks, Mark Cohen, Tilden Meyers, Paul Kelley, Winston Luke NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory NOAA/Air.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
1 Modeling the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of Mercury Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland Mercury Workshop, Great.
D. Gay, Schmeltz, Sharac, Nat. Tribal Conf. for Env. Management, Billings, MT, June 26, 2008, Slide 1 Current Mercury Monitoring Approaches in Tribal Country.
CEC SPA "Typhoon"Tiksi Meeting, Boulder, 7 March Experience in monitoring of airborne POPs, mercury and other metals in Russian Arctic. Perspectives.
SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF MERCURY EXPOSURE FOR U.S. SEAFOOD CONSUMERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY Noelle Eckley Selin Joint Program on the Science and Policy.
Dr. Mark Cohen NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland
Strategies For Linking Atmospheric Deposition Networks to the National Water Quality Monitoring Network Mark Nilles Office of Water Quality U.S. Geological.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
Atmospheric mercury measurements in the Gulf of Mexico and mid-Atlantic regions: Early results from an emerging monitoring network Winston Luke, Mark Cohen,
Update on the NADP Atmospheric Mercury Initiative Developing a new coordinated and collaborative approach to atmospheric mercury monitoring A Briefing.
Source-apportionment for atmospheric mercury deposition: Where does the mercury in mercury deposition come from? Mark Cohen, Roland Draxler, and Richard.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
UNEP Global Partnership on Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research - Canadian Contribution - Grace Howland Environment Canada, Chemicals Management Division.
FIVE CHALLENGES IN ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION RESEARCH 1.Exploit satellite and other “top-down” atmospheric composition data to quantify emissions and export.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
Atmospheric Deposition Unit 4451 Research on Air Pollution Distribution and Effects in California Mountains Andrzej Bytnerowicz, Michael Arbaugh, Nancy.
NOAA’s Atmospheric Mercury Monitoring in the Gulf of Mexico Region January 17,
NESCAUM MAC Meeting May 16 and 17, 2006 Newport, RI Mercury Trends Network (MTN) Is it MDN? Is it NADP? Is it USDA? Is it BLM? Is it F&WS Is it NPS? Is.
ARL Contributions to the WMO Atmospheric Deposition Program Richard S. Artz NOAA Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016.
CONSTRAINTS FROM RGM MEASUREMENTS ON GLOBAL MERCURY CHEMISTRY Noelle Eckley Selin 1 Daniel J. Jacob 1, Rokjin J. Park 1, Robert M. Yantosca 1, Sarah Strode,
UNEP Global Partnership for Mercury Air Transport and Fate Research: U
Observing Climate Variability and Change
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Presentation transcript:

Atmospheric Mercury Measurements Winston Luke NOAA/Air Resources Laboratory June 22, 2016

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, ARL has a long history of research monitoring Trend detection in response to regulatory emissions reductions and/or emissions increases (global) Local/regional/global source attribution and characterization Model evaluation Test bed for process & QA studies, method evaluation and development Why Monitor Atmospheric Mercury?

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Long-Term Mercury Monitoring (National Atmospheric Deposition Program) Wet Deposition of Hg Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) Weekly precipitation collection, analysis at a central laboratory 113 Active Sites Gas- and Aerosol-Phase Hg Atmospheric Mercury Network (AMNet) 23 Active Sites Real-time measurements of mercury species –expensive, technically challenging ARL operates 3 flagship AMNet sites (Beltsville, MD; Grand Bay NERR, MS; Mauna Loa, HI). Mauna Loa Grand Bay Beltsville

Gaseous Elemental Mercury (GEM) most of total Hg in atmosphere doesn’t easily dry or wet deposit globally distributed ARL Science Review, June 21-23, What We Measure in AMNet Gaseous Elemental Mercury (GEM) 95% + of total Hg in atmosphere largely inert: doesn’t easily deposit lifetime ~6 to 12 months globally distributed ~1.3 ng m-3 in NH Gaseous Oxidized Mercury (GOM) a few % of total Hg (pg m -3 ) oxidized Hg (HgCl 2, others) very water soluble and “sticky” lifetime of a few days in PBL bioavailable Particulate-Bound Mercury (PBM) a few % of total Hg (pg m -3 ) Hg in/on particles variable solubility atmos. lifetime ~1-2 weeks bioavailability is uncertain

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, SiteCollaborators Ambient Air MeasurementsPrecipitation Dry Deposition Other M ercury Speciation SO 2 O3O3 NO/NO y CO Black Carbon Major Ions (NTN) Mercury (MDN) Trace Metals Surrogate Surface Throughfall Meteorology Beltsville (MD)  EPA Clean Air Markets Division  Univ. of MD; Maryland DNR  AMEC Foster-Wheeler; USGS; USDA Grand Bay (MS)  Grand Bay NERR, NOAA- NCCOS  MS Dept. of Env. Quality  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mauna Loa (HI )  U.S. EPA  NOAA ESRL  Many others NOAA/ARL Measurements Measurements by Partners Mercury and Ancillary Measurements

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR), Mississippi ARL Measurement Sites precipitation collection Since 2007: A rural coastal site in the SE U.S., 5 km from the open waters of the Gulf of Mexico Meteorological measurements Mercury measurements Trace gas measurements view from the top of tower

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Beltsville, Maryland ARL Measurement Sites Since 2007: A suburban site NE of Washington, DC Also an EPA Clean Air Status and Trends Network site precipitation collection view from the top of tower

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii ARL Measurement Sites Since 2011: Located at 3,397m on the north slope of the Mauna Loa volcano Premier site for the study of background atmosphere (NOAA ESRL) Mauna Loa is also affiliated with GMOS (Global Mercury Observation System) The Mauna Loa Observatory with Mauna Kea in the background. Mercury measurements from the historic Keeling Building Mauna Kea in winter, as seen from MLO CO 2 measurement tower Copyright by Forrest M. Mims III

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Comparison Across Three Sites

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Mauna Loa Summer maxima of GOM correspond to minima in CO (driven by increased ·OH oxidation) and suggest a photochemical origin of GOM from direct oxidation (O 3 ? ·OH? Br ·?) of GEM in the free troposphere

Trends in concentrations of GEM, GOM, and PBM, and in total mercury deposition from at the Beltsville, Maryland AMNet site (see poster by Ren). ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Trend Detection

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Source Identification Marrying HYSPLIT back trajectory frequency calculations with mercury measurements at Beltsville identifies the emission source regions impacting the site. Reds/oranges indicate those regions more likely to have been encountered during high [GOM] & [PBM] events (see poster by Ren). GOMPBM

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Process Studies & Field Intensives University of Tennessee Space Institute Piper Navajo Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Technique Intercomparison at Mauna Loa Observatory Ongoing study takes advantage of Mauna Loa’s elevated [GOM] –a “natural laboratory.” Results will help to identify and mitigate or correct sources of bias and inaccuracy in current monitoring techniques. Gaseous Oxidized Mercury MLO

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Accomplishments Long term, high-quality, publicly available data sets for atmospheric chemistry trend analysis local vs. long-range transport source-receptor studies model evaluation Method development improved accuracy, operational robustness reduction of sample bias, artifact losses Advances in scientific understanding vertical distributions source characterization Inside the instrument trailer at the Grand Bay NERR mercury monitoring site

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Quality, Relevance, and Performance NOAA/ARL is a founding member of and key contributor to AMNet, and operates 3 of 23 sites in the network. ARL measurements are regarded as being of high quality, and the sites feature redundant Hg measurements. Collaborates with and secures funding from other agencies (e.g., EPA). Was instrumental in developing standard operating protocols for AMNet in 2008, and held a Mercury Measurement Workshop in Sept to revisit, assess and improve initial AMNet protocols. Provides technical guidance (with NADP and EPA partners) for development and implementation of Asia-Pacific Mercury Monitoring Network. To date, 10+ peer reviewed publications using ARL-generated data, several additional manuscripts in preparation.

Collaborations ARL Science Review, June 21-23, NOAA Grand Bay National Estuarine Reserve Nat’l Centers for Coastal & Ocean Science Earth Systems Research Laboratory (ESRL) National Weather Service (NWS) Other Federal Agencies EPA Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Department of Agriculture National Park Service U.S. Geological Survey State and Local Governments Maryland, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Texas, Alaska, Virginia, West Virginia Universities and Institutes Florida State University University of Houston University of Maryland University of Tennessee Space Institute University of Miami (Florida) Georgia Institute of Technology University of Nevada University of Illinois Valparaiso University Exploratorium (San Francisco) Industry TEKRAN Electric Power Research Institute Southern Company International European Commission/GMOS Environment Canada Asia-Pacific Mercury Monitoring Network EPA Taiwan National Central University (Taiwan) University of Toronto

Remaining Challenges ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Recent research has identified artifacts in PBM, GOM measurements (see poster by Luke). We developed calibration protocols to assess the severity of these artifacts and biases (see poster by Kelley).

ARL Science Review, June 21-23, Future Directions Evaluate, intercompare, and optimize existing measurement methods Develop new methods, e.g., – pyrolysis-difference method – relaxed-eddy-accumulation (REA) system for dry deposition Additional measurements at long-term sites Field intensives at ground (and aloft?) for process studies to address key uncertainties Analysis and publication of datasets

ARL Science Review, June 21-23,