Residential Infill Project Scale of Houses (a primer) Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 6, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Liberty District Workshop Sacred Cowshands off! Significant historic structures Mildred Terry Library The Liberty Theater Places of Worship Ma Rainey.
Advertisements

City of San José Distinctive Neighborhood Program Policy Options Outreach Presentation.
Agenda Presentation: Background Proposed Corridors Uses Standards & Building Examples Q & A Small Group Discussions Report Back.
Draft Zoning Code City Council Work Session June 21, 2007.
Pre-Application Presentation To Village of Glendale Planning Commission February 2, 2015 Village Gate Subdivision.
Proposed CBS Municipal Plan and Development Regulations Amendments for Backlot Development Municipal Plan Amendment No. 9, 2015 Development Regulations.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
1837 Pine Street Project Overview Pine Street - Site Plan 2.
City of North Richland Hills TOD Code Overview. Comments from November 20 Work Session Need to ensure the preservation of key historic assets in the Smithfield.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Springfield Zoning Ordinance Revision Project Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame April 25, 2006 Planning and Economic Development Office Sponsored by a grant.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Zoning rewrite woodside park planning dept mncppc feb 11.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Zoning Regulations Zoning authority is a “police power” granted to the City by the State. Land Development Code Purpose: To implement the City’s Comprehensive.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Parkside Development Standards Colorado Springs Together Offices Monday, September 24, 2012 Tuesday, September 25, 2012.
Community Development Department Easement Encroachment A/C Units.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Phillips Ave. Fire Station. The Fire Station: Phillips Ave. Fire Station RFP to be issued  Retain Historic Building  Allow Residential Use – Single.
An Overview of Garrett Park Building Regulations Harry Gordon, FAIA Chairman GP Setback Advisory Committee May 2009.
Housing Committee October 19, 2015 Accessory Dwelling Units Department of Sustainable Development and Construction.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Allen Variance Application No. VR-SBK Application Request  Variance for an oversized detached garage in the Single-Family Residential (SFR-3)
Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Urban Design and Livability Bruce Monighan AIA Urban Design Manager, City of Sacramento City of Sacramento Planning Academy March 16, 2016.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
Overview of Residential Reconstruction in Needham Lee Newman Town of Needham Director of Planning and Community Development.
DeSoto Hampton Corridor Revitalization Overview of Mixed Use Development.
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Narrow Lots & Skinny Lots or Land Divisions & Lot Confirmations Residential Infill Project Stakeholder Advisory Committee November 17, 2015.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus ALBRIGHT OFFICE PARK Planned Development PD Architecture and Site S Environmental.
1 Pedestrian Commercial Overlay (PCO): Potential Expansion/Creation Presentation to Ghent Business Association June 12, 2013.
The Planning & Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment Joint Workshop May 24, 2010 May 24, :00 P.M. 6:00 P.M.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
1 Zoning Application Tealwood. Tealwood : Aerial Subject.
How Closely We Live With Each Other
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Adjustment Committee Land Use Review LU AD Adjustment.
The City of Santa Cruz ADU Program. Public Education ADUs as Part of Solution Supportive Zoning Homeowner Tools Manuals Prototypes Financial Assistance.
Public Hearing Amendments to Chapter 38 Horizon West Development Standards Orange County BCC May 24, 2016.
NYC Zoning What Can I Build? TEXT SLIDE.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
GRAPHIC ANALYSIS of EXISTING DOWNTOWN DENSITY
Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone
Nonconforming Lots and Minimum Lot Sizes
Will’s Trace Subdivision
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
RSL and LR1 – Supersize! The Grand Bargain was that Single Family became Multifamily and the development capacity “give” was generally one floor. But in.
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Proposed “a” Overlay Impacts Almost All Inner Residential Neighborhoods East of the Willamette River. Now Includes Properties East of I-205 R5 = 5,000.
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment & Future Consent Application
Early Experience with HAA & SB 35 Objective Standards Requirements
City Commission Workshop
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Section 8: SIGNS.
Design Regulations Update
Presentation transcript:

Residential Infill Project Scale of Houses (a primer) Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 6, 2015

Overview  Standards vs. Review Criteria  Purpose of Development Standards  Standards addressing “scale of houses”  Purpose  Application  Data  Examples Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 2

Standards versus Reviews Standards are “clear and objective” – like a math problem: “The maximum height is 30 feet.”  Benefits: provide certainty, easy to apply 45% of the City is single-dwelling zoned 3,760 SFR permits (2013)  Limitations: inflexible, written for “normal” lots Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 3

Standards versus Reviews  Land Use Reviews are “discretionary” –like a critical thinking exercise: “Height should be consistent with the heights of adjacent buildings”  Benefits: provide flexibility, context sensitive  Limitations: can be interpreted in multiple ways, costly and time intensive to administer  130 adjustments (2013) Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 4

Oregon’s Two-Track System  ORS – local governments must apply “clear and objective standards” to housing development.  Standards and procedures can not result in unreasonable cost or delay.  May have a discretionary process if there is an alternative standards track.  Some exceptions (historic districts, e.g.) Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 5

Plan Checks  Multiple bureaus involved  BDS – zoning standards, grading, building code  PBOT – street improvements  BES – stormwater and sewer  Water – water service  Parks/Urban Forestry – street trees Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 6 zoning standards

Development Standards Purpose  Preserve the character of neighborhoods  Differentiate densities and development standards by zone  Promote desirable residential areas  Allow for development flexibility  Provide certainty Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 7

Development Standards Basic Building Form  Housing Type  Setbacks  Building Coverage  Outdoor Yard Area  Height  “BZD’s”-main entrance, windows, garages Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 8

Housing Types House Manufactured Home Attached House Duplex Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 9 Attached Duplex Multi-dwelling Structure Multi-dwelling Development

Setbacks Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 10 5’ side 5’ rear 10’ front 18’ garage Purpose: to “maintain light, air, separation, and options for privacy” “reflect general scale and placement of houses” “provide flexibility for a building to be compatible, fit the topography, and allow architectural diversity” In this example: R5 lot – 50’ x 100’

Outdoor Area Purpose: to “assure opportunities”… “for outdoor recreation or relaxation.” Residential Infill SAC Meeting| s.f. that can fit a 12’x12’ square Minimum Required Outdoor Area 12’ Min. 12” Min. Required on all Single Dwelling Zone Lots

Building Coverage Maximum coverage varies by lot size (not by zone) Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 12 On a 5,000 s.f. lot, max coverage is 2,250 s.f. (45%) Building Coverage – Lots 4,951 to 6,999 Sq. Ft. Zones R2.5, R5 and R Maximum Minimum (42% of max) Average (75% of max) Lot Line

Height Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 13 30’ Max height: RF - R5 zones is 30 feet R2.5 zone is 35 feet 2013 SFR permit data Building Heights – R5 Zone Feet Minimum Average Maximum Code Allows

Height Measurement Base Point 1 (flat lot) Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 14 5’ <10’ Midpoint of highest gable Measured Height

Height Measurement  Other roof forms Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 15

Maximum Scale House Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 16 Building coverage: 2,250 s.f. (max allowed) Height: 30 feet (max allowed)

Average Scale House (2013) Building coverage: 1,690 s.f. (75% of max allowed) Height: 24.7 feet (82% of max allowed) Average house size: 2,443 s.f. Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 17

R5 zone 4,400 s.f. lot Average height Average building coverage Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 18 Total house size 2,288 s.f. Floor to Area Ratio0.52Percent of Max Building Coverage1467 s.f.78 % (near average) Height25 ft.83 % (near average) Front setback10.5 ft.95 % Rear setback39 ft.13 % Side setback5 ft./5 ft.100%/100%

R5 zone 4,000 s.f. lot Average height Maximum building coverage Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 19 Total house size 2,340 s.f. Floor to Area Ratio0.59Percent of Max Building Coverage1875 s.f.100 % Height24.11 ft.80 % (near average) Front setback10 ft.100 % Rear setback34 ft.15 % Side setback5 ft./6 ft.100%/83%

R5 zone 3,750 s.f. lot Maximum height Average building coverage Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 20 Total house size3,715 s.f. Floor to Area Ratio0.99Percent of Max Building Coverage1510 s.f.85 % (near average) Height30 ft.100 % Front setback10 ft.100 % Rear setback5 ft.100 % Side setback5.5 ft./5.5 ft.91%/91%

Comparison along block Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 21 Max Avg Existing homes

Comparison along block Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 22

Some principles to ponder  Front yard versus back yard (semi private versus private space)  Uniformity versus variety (height, roof form, style)  Up versus out (taller or single-level living)  Natural versus built environment  Patterns (House width, spaces between, porches, alignment of facades, building orientation) Residential Infill SAC Meeting| 23