The Bullying Prevention Pack A Research Initiative to Lower Incidents of School Bullying Using Roleplay and Drama Peadar Donohoe, Doctoral Researcher,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bully Prevention Project Team Prevention/Intervention Department Student Support Services Dekalb County School System.
Advertisements

AUSTRALIAS APPROACH TO SCHOOL BULLYING AND VIOLENCE THE NATIONAL SAFE SCHOOLS FRAMEWORK.
Raising a Child through Prison Bars With financial support from the EU DAPHNE Programme European Anti- Violence Network Needs Assessment with Prison’s.
CSE/ Trafficking Safe Accommodation Fostering Provision Rachel Maloney Jane Coppock.
Sample size issues & Trial Quality David Torgerson.
Child Abuse and Neglect
Bullying: What We Know Now Stephen Erath, Ph.D. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University.
Bullying Among “Tweens” and Teens (c) 2005 Take a Stand. Lend a Hand. Stop Bullying Now! Las Colinas Middle School.
BULLYING, AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR AND HARRASSMENT AMONGST YOUNG PEOPLE IN SCHOOS: WHAT CLASSROOM STAFF NEED TO KNOW Dealing with Bullying in Schools © SAGE,
Elmwood School District Bullying prevention in our school.
Outcomes Research on School Counseling Interventions and Programs
Bullying Fact or Myth.
Bullying & Its Effects On Teaching And Learning
Using the correct vocabulary Components for getting the school programs in place: Establish a bullying prevention coordinating committee Conduct committee.
Professor Mona O’Moore Anti-bullying National Research and Resource Centre Dublin City University Ireland Sonet-Bull EU project, Liege, 27 th May,2015.
Bullying in school By: Mr. Brent Tupa P.S. 128 M.
CSD 5400 REHABILITATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HARD OF HEARING Hearing Loss and Identity Psychosocial Aspects Personal and Social Effects.
Closing the Gap Key learner relationships By Megan Ferneley & Richard Olsen.
Hackney’s Safer Schools Partnership Nicola Baboneau, Community & Partnerships, The Learning Trust.
Test your knowledge about this subject.. Question 1 Bullies get worse grades then average. FALSE: This is a common myth: In fact, bullies tend to be at.
Raising Bullying Awareness AUHSD - Savanna High School.
D IFFERENCES IN B ULLYING V ICTIMIZATION B ETWEEN S TUDENTS W ITH AND W ITHOUT D ISABILITIES George Bear, Lindsey Mantz, Deborah Boyer, & Linda Smith Results.
Violence reduction in schools workshop
An example of good practice
INTEGRATION OF ICTs IN TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN PAKISTAN
Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey, January-June,
Working Together …. …We Can Build a Community of Respect.
HOSTED BY THE BAYLOR AUTISM RESOURCE CENTER BULLYING.
An Introduction to the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Aimee Schneider, M.Ed. Certified Olweus Bullying Prevention Trainer
Legislation and Working Practices. AIM: To understand the importance of policy and legislation To identify & summarise Key legislation To examine policies.
Bullying: Effects and Intervention
Introduction Video Slide Content Links What is School Bullying? What to know about Cyberbulling Social Networking & the Effects of Cyberbullying FaceBook.
A /10 Strengthening Military Families: Current Findings and Critical Directions Anita Chandra, Dr.P.H. Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice.
Bullying and Children’s Rights: It’s not Just about Safety Debra Pepler York University & The Hospital for Sick Children.
What We Know About Child Development: An Albertan Benchmark Survey Shivani Rikhy, MPH Suzanne Tough, PhD Alberta Centre for Child, Family, & Community.
Quality, Safe Schools An Introduction for Families {Insert presenter’s name, date and training location here}
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Bullying. Participant Expectations Be punctual Be an active participant Silence cell phones Refrain from texting Demonstrate mutual respect for others.
Students Safe At School: A Proactive Approach. EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS Larry Lezotte: Effective Schools “A safe and orderly environment” is one of the 7 characteristics.
BUILDING A PROGRAM TO REDUCE ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIORS Nataša Privošnik and Greta Bratovš The Institute for Developing Personal Quality Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Domestic Violence and Mental Health Judith Fitzsimons Domestic Violence Co-ordinator Hackney Domestic Violence Team.
Implementation and process evaluation: developing our approach Ann Lendrum University of Manchester Neil Humphrey University of Manchester Gemma Moss Institute.
By: Ms. Ward. What can we do to make our classroom hate free? How can we make every person feel safe and valued? What can you do to make your own speech.
Every Child Matters. Every Child Matters Support Services Parents and Carers The Church Community Teachers and Educators Families Health Professionals.
Inclusion and Restorative Practices in education; what does it mean for teachers of Travelling children? Dr Gillean McCluskey
OBPP Overview Michael R Carpenter, Ph D
Bullying  Physical, verbal, or psychological  Intended harm  Imbalance of power  Repeated over time j.
Building School Connectedness. Building Successful Students: A Collaborative Workshop. 2/28/2013 Geoffrey Bones, Psy.D. School Psychologist Calkins Road.
Presented by: Luke Waters Todd Olson Andy Strauja Ruthanne Newman.
Let’s Talk Sex!! Straight or Alternative…. By Kim Silverthorn Project PEACE Mental Health Capacity Building In Schools Initiative.
2 Strategies for Reducing Violence. RAFT-Choose one role and use CC pgs to cite at least 3 research studies. RoleAudienceFormatTopic 1.Anger.
3/9/ “If you stop making fun of me, I promise to stop making fun of you Bullying Prevention Prevention Lynne Mayo.
Take a Stand Bully Prevention and Awareness. What is Bullying? Aggression that occurs when a child is exposed, repeatedly to negative actions by one or.
OBPP Overview Karen Dahl and Marion London Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Trainers Minnesota Elementary School.
Penn London Elementary School Olweus Committee : Dr. Holland, Suzanne Magee, Helen Arrell, Sheri Inzaina, Joanne Engel, Sue Gudmundson, Jackie Bruno, Aly.
School Bullying: A factor that negatively effects on ESL prevention Dr. Maria Maheridou Project Coordinator Experimental School of the University of Macedonia.
1 Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts.
Introduction to Human Services Unit 9 Dawn Burgess, Ed. D.
Bullying Quiz Please read the following slides and test your knowledge on this topic.
1 Whose Health Is It Anyway Smith & Goldblatt Book 2 Chapter 2 Presentation: Dr. Faisal Al-Qahtani.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 11th, 2014.
International Perceptions of Cyberbullying Within Higher Education
The Role of Public Commitment in an Academic Context
KiVa: An evidence–based programme
Understanding Bullying: Practical Problems and Implications
Davide DAL CASON Annalisa CASINI*, Catherine HELLEMANS
Lesson 2 Bullying.
Theoretical Framework
Insights from Children about Abuse and Neglect
Bullying at school.
Presentation transcript:

The Bullying Prevention Pack A Research Initiative to Lower Incidents of School Bullying Using Roleplay and Drama Peadar Donohoe, Doctoral Researcher, Trinity College Dublin; Supervisor: Dr. Carmel O’Sullivan Introduction : The Bullying Prevention Pack (BPP) puts the learners first hand experiences and knowledge about bullying at the forefront of the discussion and activities. The issues surrounding school based bullying behaviour are addressed through creating group knowledge about types of bullying, sharing personal experiences and feelings, discussing the participant players of The Bullying Circle, re-playing school-based bullying experiences in classroom role-plays, questioning received notions regarding bullying, encouraging learners to identify and use methods to prevent and stop bullying, making a pact to prevent bullying in the future and formally writing this in the form of a contract that all learners sign along with the teacher and school principal. This scaffolded, metacognitive method of addressing the bullying issue has the capacity to empower children, give them a sense of agency with the goal of creating a more harmonious school environment where children are happy to learn. The Bullying Circle (Olweus, 2003) is a name created by the world renowned researcher, Dan Olweus, to describe the roles students can play in bullying incidents. Bullying incidents are rarely just between a child who is engaging in bullying behaviour and one who is being victimised. Peers are often present and play a part. And the part they play may or may not contribute to bullying behaviour. These players include: The follower who takes part in the bullying. The supporter who encourages the bullying. The passive supporter who likes the bullying but doesn’t actively contribute. The onlooker who stays away and takes no sides. The possible defender who doesn’t like the bullying Even though they don’t realise it, onlookers may contribute to the bullying. For even if they do nothing or ignore the bullying as it’s happening, this choice to do nothing can be interpreted by the child or children doing the bullying as approval, which can make the bullying even worse for the victimised child (Salmivalli, 2004). However, when someone steps in to stop or report bullying, they are called defenders. When defenders take action, bullying often stops within 10 seconds (Craig & Pepler, 1997). Methodology and Preliminary Results: Using a mixed methodological approach incorporating both quantifiable and qualitative instruments, the chief aim of this research is to ascertain the efficacy of the Bullying Prevention Pact (BPP) by identifying if the BPP can be effectively utilised by primary school teachers to reduce bullying within the school environment. This was crucial to ascertain as the researcher has a Drama background and experience which may have aided the facilitation of the Drama components of the BPP. The study has a quasi-experimental longitudinal design which included the recruitment of a research and control school both with similar demographics and located in inner cityCork. The populations of the research and controls schools and are 53 and 61 students respectively. Preliminary Results to a Key Question How often have you been bullied in the past couple of months? RESEARCH SCHOOL TABLE I.A Percentage of pupils reporting being bullied before and after intervention How often: Before After Not at all Once or Twice Before the implementation of the Bullying Prevention Pact (BPP) it can be seen that 40.4 percent of students reported having been victimised, after the intervention 26.9 students reported having been victimised. This constituted a general reduction of 33.4 percent in reports of being victimised three and half months post intervention. There was also significant reduction in reports of bullying happening only once or twice in the past couple of months. Prior to the BPP intervention 23.1 percent of students reported that they had been bullied while post intervention 13.5 percent of students reported having been bullied. This Is a significant reduction of 41.5 percent three and half months post intervention. ) Sample Contract (used with permission Why Bullying Prevention? Legislative: Statutory responsibility for discipline and good behaviour in schools (e.g., Mandatory Discipline Policy). Social: Longitudinal research on school bullying suggests that it predicts later offending (Farrington, 1993) Health: Children who are bullied have higher levels of stress, anxiety, depression, illness and suicidal ideation (Roland, 2002) Moral: ‘Bullying behaviour is an immoral action because it humiliates and oppresses innocent victims’ (Gini, et al, 2011) Educative: Bullying can have a corrosive effect on academic achievement and lead to school avoidance (Rigby & Slee, 1999) Safety: Olweus (2003) upholds the fundamental democratic right of all students to feel safe and secure and to be spared violence and humiliation when they are at school References: Craig, W. M. and Pepler, D.J. (1997) Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2, pp.41–60. Farrington, D.P. (1993). Understanding and Preventing Bullying. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (Eds). Crime and Justice, Vol. 17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., and Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative tovictims, but lack moral compassion. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, Olweus, D. (2003). Bully/Victim problems in school: Basic facts and an effective intervention programme. In Einarsen, S. A. (ed.). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace : international perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor and Francis. Rigby, K., and P. Slee (1999). "Australia." In P. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, and P. Slee (eds.), The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-National Perspective. London and New York: Routledge. Roland, E. (2002). Agression, Depression and Bullying Others. Aggressive Behaviour, 28:3, Salmivalli, C. (2004). Consequences of school bullying and violence.