WELCOME! Employer Transportation Coordinator (ETC) Training Part 1: Orientation to the Commute Trip Reduction Law.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Advertisements

Let’s Ride! The Complete Get-to-Work Program A Central Texas Solution for: Brought to you by the Commute Solutions Coalition.
Club Ride is Coming The Club Ride team will be here on [Day, Month ##] to get you signed up as a Club Ride Member Look for the Club Ride table at [Location.
Employer-Paid Parking: A Matching Grant Employers pay for parking at work if the employee is willing to pay for driving to work Commuters who don’t drive.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER White Papers on Congestion Mitigation Strategies New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission November 20, 2007.
Icfi.com 1 Role of State Departments of Transportation in Transportation Demand Management (TDM) icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved.
Energy: Can We Get More? Can We Use Less Amy Myers Jaffe Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Houston.
NuRide Overview Presentation Click arrows to play or advance slides.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
University of Massachusetts Boston Catherine Paquette, Deputy Project Manager.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 10 Externalities from Autos.
Virginia Transit Association. WHO WE ARE The Voice of Transit in Virginia Over 30 years of experience Coalition of transit professionals from public and.
RideshareOnline.com New tools to help save money, time and the environment while helping people live more independently! Prepared for: 2010 Public Transportation.
1 Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
CLARK COUNTY CTR PROGRAM CLARK COUNTYWORKSITES Camas, Vancouver, Washougal, Unincorporated Clark County  60 CTR Affected Worksites  43 in.
TRANSPORTATION Making informed transportation choices Climate Masters Updated
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
1 1 Executive Board January 22, 2009 Update to the Regional Transportation Plan TRANSPORTATION 2040.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Florida Department of Transportation District 5 Regional Commuter Assistance Program Courtney Miller Program Manager.
Maryland’s Innovative Measures State Implementation Plan 2004 EPA Air Innovations Conference Brian J. Hug – Chief, Air Quality Policy and Planning Division.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategies February 2014.
Annoyed by high gas prices? Open your eyes to options available. Cheaper Transportation for Jefferson County Commuters.
Public Transportation
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
HR: Leading People, Leading Organizations © 2007 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: May 24, Gas Price Sample comprised of 489 randomly selected.
Monitoring: Continuous Improvements & Achieving Results Scott Copsey Travel Plan Coordinator University of Hertfordshire.
It’s Easy to Quantify Changes in GHG Emissions from Cars and Light Trucks – Right? Presented to: SACOG Panel Discussion April 16, 2009 Presented by: Bob.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
Confidential. Property of vRide, Inc. Not to be disclosed without vRide’s prior written consent. Vanpool Program.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Best Workplaces for Commuters Lucy Edmondson US Environmental Protection Agency New England Office (617)
Journey to Work Data 2000 Census. Journey to Work by Travel Mode.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
By: Christina Nahar Conservation Transport.  An effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must include: -Improved fuel economy -Reduce carbon.
Goals and Targets for CTR Plans Olympia, Washington September 26, 2014 Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation for CTR plans Recommendations.
Alternate Work Schedule Update Presented by: Robbie Berg, HR Director On November 5, 2009.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
WELCOME! Commute Trip Reduction Online Survey Briefing.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
1 Summary of Phase I – Phase III Progress and Accomplishments and Phase IV Work plan April 27, 2004.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Performance Measurement.
Burlington Transportation Alternatives Presented by: UVM Service Learners May 2004.
WELCOME! Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Survey Briefing.
OneCommute People Vanpool Management Contacts Program Management Accounts Surveys Meetings/Events Transit Passes Program Plan Actuals Mode Counts Vehicle.
Commute Trip Reduction Online Survey Briefing. The Goals of the Commute Trip Reduction Program Reduce the commute trip drive-alone rate (DAR) to major.
75% of Hudson Valley residents drive alone to work
New Yorkers have the longest commute times in U.S.
Our Suite of Services.
Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

WELCOME! Employer Transportation Coordinator (ETC) Training Part 1: Orientation to the Commute Trip Reduction Law

ETC Training: Part 1 Orientation to the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law v How effective the law has been v Why the law was passed v What the state law requires of employers v What your local CTR Ordinance requires v How to complete the annual report v What employers can do to encourage employees to use alternatives to drive-alone commuting

ETC Training: Part 2 Promoting & Implementing Your CTR Program v Sharing ideas for success v Overcoming challenges and obstacles v Offering commute subsidies u overview of transit passes u tax implications v Changing employee commute behavior v Planning your CTR promotions v Keeping records

Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law v Passed in 1991 as part of Washington’s Clean Air Act v 3 Goals: u Decrease traffic congestion u Improve air quality u Reduce fuel consumption v Revised through the CTR Efficiency Act in 2007

Commute Trip Reduction v The CTR Program removed nearly 20,000 vehicles from roadways in the central Puget Sound per average workday morning in Source: 2007 Interim CTR Report to Washington State Legislature

Commute Trip Reduction v The vehicles removed from roadways in the Puget Sound region - because of the CTR Program - reduced traffic delay by 18% on an average morning. Source: 2007 Interim CTR Report to Washington State Legislature

An 18% Decrease in Delay for Common Commutes Source: 2007 Interim CTR Report to Washington State Legislature RouteMilesCommute time saved due to CTR Program I-5 Everett to Bellevue mins. I-5 Federal Way to Seattle mins. I-90 Issaquah to Seattle mins.

Motor Vehicles Major Source of Greenhouse Gas Emissions v In Washington, more than 45 percent of greenhouse gas emissions are associated with transportation (cars, trucks, planes, and ships). v Employers who encourage employees to use alternatives to drive alone commuting can make a big difference in reducing our contribution to global warming.

Commute Trip Reduction v In 2007, CTR commuters state-wide reduced over 85,000 tons of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 equivalent) v And, over 4,000 tons of emissions of criteria pollutants (carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds, and oxides of nitrogen).

Commute Trip Reduction v In 2007, CTR commuters petroleum consumption by 7.9 million gallons, saving Washington citizens an estimated $27 million in fuel costs.* * Based on $3.50 gallon

Drive Alone Rate 1990 – 2000 v In Washington, the percentage of people who drove alone to work decreased slightly from 73.9% to 73.3%. v Washington and Oregon were the only states in the US where this dropped. In all other states, the average rate for drive-alone commuting increased. Source: US Census Data

Drive Alone Comparison

Commuters at CTR Sites who “always drive alone” Source: 2007 Interim CTR Report to Washington State Legislature

Commuters at CTR Sites who “always drive alone” Source: 2007 Interim CTR Report to Washington State Legislature

Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law It’s about creating more commute options for employees.

1997 CTR Goals v 15% reduction in drive alone commute trips by 1995 or within 2 years of a site becoming affected by the law v 20% reduction... within 4 years... v 25% reduction... within 6 years... v 35% reduction... within 8, 10 and 12 years...

Employer Requirements v Develop and submit CTR Program (must include minimum requirements. v Implement approved CTR Program. v Measure employee commute behavior every 2 years. v Submit regular CTR program reports on progress. v Act in “good faith” = work collaboratively with jurisdictions to implement a CTR Program likely to achieve CTR goals.

CTR Efficiency Act u The Act established new goals for cities: a 10% reduction in 2007 drive-alone rates by 2011 u Cities have passed the following reduction targets for 2011 on to employers: u 10% reduction in drive-alone rate or u 13% reduction in VMT from 2007 values

CTR Efficiency Act Requires newly affected employers to: v Conduct a baseline survey within 90 days of becoming a CTR-affected worksite. v Submit a completed program report to the City for review and approval within 90 days of receiving results of baseline survey.

CTR Reduction Calculations v Drive alone rate = Number of drive-alone commute trips Number of potential commute trips

CTR Reduction Calculations v Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per employee = Trips per person X Miles per trip Where: v Drive-alone trips (includes one-person motorcycle and drive-on ferry trips) = 1 trip per person v Two-person carpool = ½ trip per person v Three-person carpool = 1/3 trip per person… etc… until v Seven or more vanpools and transit (ferry, rail, bus) = 0 trip per person v Non-motorized (bike, walk) or trips not made because of telecommuting or a compressed work week scheduled day off = 0 trip per person

Employer CTR Program Must Include (at a minimum): v Designate an Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC) and display name. v Regular distribution of information to employees. v Regular report of worksite’s progress to City (includes measurement of employee commute behavior biennially). v Implement a set of CTR Program elements designed to achieve reduction goals.

Compliance with CTR Law v Failure to achieve CTR reductions goals is not a violation of the CTR Law. v Failure to develop, submit, implement a CTR Program or work collaboratively with jurisdiction to achieve CTR goals is a violation of the CTR Law.

Exemptions & Modifications Worksites may request an Employer Exemption for: v Extraordinary business circumstances (bankruptcy, layoffs, labor strike, etc.) v Worksites unable to implement any CTR program elements v Reviewed annually

Exemptions & Modifications Worksites may request Employee Exemption (or “Affected Employee Adjustment”) for CTR-affected employees who: v Work variable and rotating shifts v Must drive alone to work as a condition of employment

Exemptions & Modifications Worksite may request: v Extension for CTR deadlines v Program modification (of approved program)

Employers with Worksites in Multiple Jurisdictions v May request a consistent annual report date or survey period for all sites (across state) v May request that jurisdictions collaborate on Program Review or accept single program (not program report) for all sites IF single program is likely to achieve goals at each site

Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Incentives or subsidies for non-drive alone commuting 3.Guaranteed ride home 4.Parking management

v The CTR Survey -- two top employer actions “very likely” to increase employees’ use of an alternative commute mode: u Financial incentives u Guaranteed ride home The General Effectiveness of Program Elements

Why is Parking Important? v A 2004 study found that 86% of commuters who receive free parking from their employer drive alone to work. v Only 47% of commuters who do not receive free parking drive alone to work

The Cost of Parking Location & Type Land Cost per Acre Land Cost per Space Con- struction Costs per space Annual O&M Costs per Space Total Annual Costs per Space Suburban, surface $50,000$455$1,500$100$284 Suburban, 2- level $50,000$227$6,000$200$788 Urban, Surface $250,000$2,083$2,000$150$535 Urban, 3-level $250,000$694$8,000$250$1,071 Urban, under- ground $250,000$0$20,000$350$2,238 CBD, surface $1,500,000$7,692$2,500$200$1,612 CBD, 4-level $1,500,000$3,846$17,000$300$2,288 CBD, underground $1,500,000$0$27,000$400$3,101 Source: Victoria Transportation Institute & Rick Williams Consulting, 2005

The Price of Parking v Monthly price of structure parking -- $190 - $258 per space v Monthly price of surface parking -- $25 - $100 per space

1. Provide HOV parking for carpools and vanpools. It’s a visible reminder to employees that your company supports car and vanpooling! 2. Decrease the number of drive-alone parking spaces by increasing the number of HOV spaces. 3. Provide HOV parking discounts. If your employees currently pay for parking, offer discounts or free parking for those who carpool or vanpool. Parking Management Strategies

If providing free parking to employees is an out- of-pocket expense, then: 4. Offer a Parking cash-out to employees by providing an equivalent cash value to those who don’t use parking (bus and train riders, bicyclists and walkers, carpoolers and vanpoolers). 5. Reduce number of spaces needed for employees, freeing them up for visitors/customers and vendors or saving money for company. Parking Management Strategies

Six Steps to Develop Your CTR Program ÀConduct a CTR Survey u establish baseline u determine commute modes with greatest potential u gather employee data ÁAlign program with organizational goals or values ÂDetermine program elements ÃEstimate cost and impact of each program element ÄSell your ideas to management ÅGet approval from City for program