UKZN Employee Engagement Survey – 2013 Overall Report 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
360 degree feedback information session
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Survey of Stakeholders Survey Participants 113 participants in 2010 versus 112 in 2006.
Skoda Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
University of Louisville Employee Satisfaction Survey Presented by Dey Systems, Inc.
Voice Project Survey Report (c) Voice Project Pty Ltd & Access Macquarie Ltd – Overview Of Results Page 1 Guidelines For Interpretation Of Results.
© RPI In commercial confidence only Benchmarking Survey Overview of Results & Key Insights June 22, 2011 Presented By: Ian Citulsky, Carlson.
The Impact of Lean Six Sigma Within Best Buy’s Services Division Kristina Nordstrom University of St. Thomas May 2008.
CSU Customer Service Directorate 2004 Survey Update CAPT Larry Kirwan 16 August 2004.
Are Wells Fargo’s 401(k) Communications to Health Care Employees O(k)? Tuesday, May 15, 2007 Jennifer Cresap.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
Survey of Entering Student Engagement Survey of Entering Student Engagement SENSE: a 30,000 Ft. View.
June 23, 2011 SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce.
Incentive or Entitlement? Julie Shustrom University of St. Thomas December 16, 2004.
Human Resources Office of Summary of Results 1 University of Minnesota Morris.
Stanford Employee Survey. Topics Background, Purpose of Employee Satisfaction Surveys –Survey Specifics –Survey Participants, Spring and Fall 2010 Fall.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
© 2014 K12 Insight Parents, Students and Staff School Time Task Force Survey — Comparison Report Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools April 3 – 25, 2014.
©SHRM 2008SHRM Weekly Online Survey: February 13, Benchmarking Metrics Sample comprised of 423 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 423.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
Hannah Fox BSc MRICS Survey Consultant. Devise, disseminate, collate and analyse –Employee Survey –Employer Questionnaire Select Good Employers My Role.
SATISFACTION COOPERATION WITH RS OF SHIPPING COMPANIES, RESEARCH INSTITUTES, DESIGN OFFICES, SHIPYARDS AND ENTERPRISES IN 2007.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
GSA OGP Advisory Committee Engagement Survey ACES 2004 Overall Results September 23, 2004.
August 31, 2011 SHRM Poll: Disaster Planning in Organizations 10 Years After the Sept. 11 Terrorist Attacks.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Managerial Case Study 1 By Amy Albaugh, Michael Bolin, Yonathan Garnelo, Jason Contino.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Provider Member Surveys for Resident and Staff Satisfaction Presented By: Jocelyn Martin & Connie Wolfe May 10th, 2010.
ITS Communication Plan: Focus Group & Survey Findings Raechelle Clemmons November 25, 2008.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Human Resources Office of FACULTY Summary of Results _College of Design_FACULTY.
BMW Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Copyright, © 2004, Theresa M. Welbourne, Ph.D. 1 HR Confidence June Leadership Pulse Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report June 16, 2004.
Suzuki Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Citroen Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Customer Loyalty Programs – Increasing Customer Loyalty throughout the customer base! Paul Knott– Customer Services Director EMEA Response Center Paul.
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey.
Group Members: Teng Mei Ling031857X Chan Ren Hui031771G Siti Raudhah031569Q R.Laarvanya030886R Ong Woan Wen030954P Final Presentation!!
© British Telecommunications plc 1 Accountability OEB Top Level Flash Results January 2011.
® MTAC Satisfaction Survey May ® Respondents * 89 Respondents * Primarily MTAC representatives (64%) * Association Executives (24%)
International Conference “ АDDRESSING QUALITY OF WORK IN EUROPE”, October 2012 Employees` engagement – effects on business performance and main drivers.
2013 National Student Survey A briefing for School NSS contacts.
2005 Customer Satisfaction Study September 2005 NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Lynn Schmidt, PhD ATD Puget Sound October 21, 2014.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION GSA OGP Advisory Committee Engagement Survey ACES 2004 Overall Results October 14, 2004.
© 2014 K12 Insight Results and Analysis Campus Climate Survey – Saginaw Elementary School Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD January 27 - February 7, 2014.
© 2014 K12 Insight Results and Analysis Campus Climate Survey – Boswell High School Eagle Mountain-Saginaw ISD January 27 - February 7, 2014.
Office of Institutional Research CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY FALL, 2006.
Making It Better Planning Employee & Patient Satisfaction November 2010.
MEETING PLANNER SURVEYS Jay Gordon. Preview Our Meeting Planner Surveys Data gathered Useful information.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
© 2016 Results and Analysis: Elementary Schools Only 2016 School Quality Survey Spring ISD January 19 – 31, 2016.
Saint Joseph’s college of maine
Campus Climate Survey – Chisholm Ridge Elementary School
Campus Climate Survey – Northbrook Elementary School
Employee Engagement 2018 Example of analysis report
HUNTERSVILLE FAMILY FITNESS & AQUATICS Where greatness grows.
Employee Engagement Defined
Presentation transcript:

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey – 2013 Overall Report 1

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 2 Contents Surveying Methods & Distribution Details Comparison of Survey Elements Comparison of Survey Elements vs. SA Benchmark Element Breakdowns Findings Recommendations Way forward

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 3 Surveying Methods & Distribution Details Surveying Methods; This survey was conducted electronically, using the internet and as a medium. The survey was distributed to respondents by the means of an invite, there was a clickable link within the invite which directed them to the survey which was hosted on Pure Survey’s server. Overall Engagement Score (%) There were 63 statements with subsequent agreement factors that made use of a 4 point scale, those 63 statements were selected as the base for the Overall Engagement Score (%). All responses given for the questions were converted into a percentage of 33.3% integers. The actual responses are multiplied by each weighting, this total is then divided by the total sample. Therefore, a satisfaction Index is calculated per statement. Interpretation example: A score of 87% indicates a skew towards strongly agree / agree Distribution Details; A total of invitations were sent out on the 19 th August There were 1453 responses to the survey by the time it closed on 1 st October This equates to a response rate of 41%. Strongly Agree 100% Agree 66% Disagree 33% Strongly Disagree 0%

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 4 Comparison of Survey Elements

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 5 Comparison of Survey Elements

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 6 Comparison of Survey Elements

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 7 Comparison of Survey Elements vs SA Benchmark The Benchmark contains responses from staff across 13 different companies, the industries include banking and finance, Retail, mining and fishing in the last 12 months. Survey items differ slightly per construct.

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 8 Findings Overall results indicate that our employees are engaged although there are several areas that require development 70% of staff responded positively to the Survey, and 30% negatively. All Colleges and Departments have areas of relative strength and opportunities for development. Motivation and satisfaction are the highest scoring elements. Efficiency, Participation, Influence and Openness and Rewards and Recognition were the lowest scoring elements

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 9 Way forward Communicate results to leadership and to university at large. Focus Groups to gather qualitative data to complement survey findings and yield additional information about both drivers and inhibitors of engagement. Feedback from the Focus Groups will be collated and sustainable interventions will be proposed and implemented once approved.

UKZN Employee Engagement Survey 2013 Overall Report 10 Thank you