Worker re-entry exposure within the framework of the BROWSE project Kim Doan Ngoc  Pieter Spanoghe 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Scientific Advisory Board meeting | 31 maart 2011 Milan WP2: Data organisation and electronic platform Polly Boon.
Advertisements

ACROPOLIS WP5 – Integrated Risk Model Hilko van der Voet Biometris, DLO, Wageningen University and Research Centre ACROPOLIS kick-off meeting 7-8 June.
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Time Use Research for Exposure and Risk Assessment
Exposure model for risk assessment and registration of amateur products in France 2013 Conference on Safe and Sustainable Use of Pesticides Bratislava–
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
Farm family exposure to glyphosate Monsanto U Mn School of Public Health Rollins School of Public Health Exponent Corp. Published in Environmental Health.
Ammonia emission from standing crops and crop residues TFEIP Agriculture and Nature expert panel meeting Ghent, 2014 Jan Vonk MSc (RIVM) The Netherlands.
Use of pesticides and residues in wine Patrizia Restani SCRAISIN - March 2009 Patrizia Restani SCRAISIN - March 2009.
Operator exposure – current status and industry experience Alistair Morriss European Crop Protection Regulatory Conference 11 th – 12 th March 2015.
1 Update on Residential Pesticide Exposure Assessment Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) DoD Pest Management Workshop Naval Air Station, Jacksonville,
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
Copyright 2002 Marc Rigas Issues in Exposure Assessment Marc L. Rigas, Ph.D. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Trinity Engineering Associates | United States Environmental Protection Agency CAP88-PC V4 T RAINING Module 1.3 Downloading, Installing, and Running the.
Radon Overview Introduction: Radon and Radon Exposure Health Effects.
Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures and Environmental Releases
SPHERE: EPHA Extraordinary General Assembly SPHERE Strengthening Public Health Research in Europe Science Europe Health Gabrielle Harvey Mark.
Electronic Proposal Development and Submission Module 3 Professional Profiles Research Suite Product Support m.
WP 5 Data management & analysis Michel Bohms and Philomena M. Bluyssen – TNO Isabella Annesi-Maesano - UMPC Paris 06 Aileen Yang and Alena Bartonova –
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Product File Note Part Ecotoxicology Ilse Pittomvils Federal Public Service.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
Training Session Registration Reports – Toxicological Part Dr. Christiane Vleminckx Scientific Institute of Public Health Division Toxicology 23 October.
INTEGRATED INFORMATION E & H Action Plan Implementation.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Approaches for Evaluating the Relevance of Multiroute Exposures in Establishing Guideline Values for Drinking Water Contaminants Kannan Krishnan, Université.
PREDICTING THE CONCENTRATIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS INSIDE MUSEUM BUILDINGS: A WEB-BASED SOFTWARE TOOL DEVELOPED BY THE EC IMPACT PROJECT Declan Kruppa, Nigel.
Risk Assessments for Exposure of Deployed Military Personnel to Insecticides used for Personal Protection and Disease-Vector Management Robert K. D. Peterson.
The Online Activity Module User Account and Contact Us June 5, 2013.
Reregistration of Consumer Pesticides: US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 Mosquito.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc
Dutch plan for finalising Hair software package Alterra – Wageningen University and Research Centre Roel Kruijne Working Group Meeting on Pesticide Statistics,
GroPro, September 2008 Applying Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Select Measures for Groundwater Protection Andrew Lovett School of Environmental Sciences,
ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY RECTORATE INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCES AND MANAGEMENT (Postgraduate Institute)
ChemSTEER Chemical Screening Tool for Exposures & Environmental Releases Scott Prothero US EPA AIHCE May 25, 2000.
WP2: Cumulative dietary exposure and hazard assessment Bernadette Ossendorp en Polly Boon.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
MODULE FOUR. AIM To understand the causes and spread of infection and be able to apply the principles of infection prevention and control.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries EMISSION INVENTORY September 2012 Chisinau, MOLDOVA.
SINPHONIE WP Kick Off Meeting - Hungary WP 3.4 – Environment context and modelling To evaluate the impact of traffic from streets in the vicinity.
Worker exposure to plant protection products (PPPs) in the framework of the BROWSE project Kim Doan Ngoc Pieter Spanoghe Ghent University International.
To test the new BROWSE-PEARL model an Italian example scenario has been developed. Hourly weather data have been obtained from a weather station near Bologna.
Abstract nr The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Austin Texas, USA, June 5-10, 2011 INTERA: Integrated Exposure for.
Linking risk perceptions of the risks of pesticides with exposures: Developing risk communication for operators, workers, residents and bystanders Professor.
Developments in modelling the exposure of operators to agricultural use of PPP as part of the BROWSE project Rianda Gerritsen-Ebben, Henk Goede, Thies.
Eurostat activities concerning regional nutrient balances.
3 rd WG F meeting: CRUE ERA-Net update Andreas Pichler CRUE ERA-Net dissemination officer.
Development of improved approaches for exposure estimations of operators, workers, bystanders and residents Rianda Gerritsen-Ebben, representing BROWSE.
Chemicals Policy and Health (CP&H) Introduction to Ecetoc TRA GPS Risk Assessment and REACH/GHS implementation in practice Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May.
Coordinated action in the aviation sector to control public health threats Slides developed by the AIRSAN Coordinator, Robert Koch Institute, Germany.
Toxicity Lecture 2. The Case of Jennifer Strange YES or NO Is there a substance that is toxic at any dose? YES or NO Is there a substance that is safe.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
INTERA Stakeholder Workshop 18th of November 2011 Brussels INTERA Project BTEX case study.
BROWSE contributions improving training and awareness Conference on Safe and Sustainable Use of Pesticides June 12 th – 13 th, 2012 in Sinaia, Romania.
Probabilistic methods for aggregate and cumulative exposure to pesticides Marc Kennedy Risk and Numerical Sciences team
INTERA Stakeholder Workshop 18 th of November 2011 Brussels Dimethylfumarate (DMF) case study Araceli Sánchez Jiménez, Eelco Kuipers and Karen S Galea.
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
G. Valtchev, L.Dimitrov, M. Neshkova
Lumber Liquidators Chinese Manufactured Laminate Flooring
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
TOXICOLOGY AND RISK ASSESSMENT
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Harmonisation of exposure and risk assessment models for the BeNeKempen project Griet Van Gestel OVAM.
Nickel Risk Assessment
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences
GeoERA - GROUNDWATER VoGERA - rationale Increased pressure on deep sub-surface in Europe for energy related activities e.g. oil and gas, geothermal, energy.
Presentation transcript:

Worker re-entry exposure within the framework of the BROWSE project Kim Doan Ngoc  Pieter Spanoghe 

BROWSE Bystanders, Residents, Operators and WorkerS Exposure models for plant protection products SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Theme: Environment (including climate change) Project nr: January 2011 – 30 June 2014 Total budget 2.6m euro (EU contribution 2m) Project website: 2

BROWSE Partners: Food and Environment Research Agency, UK Alterra-PRI, The Netherlands Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Greece NIAB (The Arable Group), UK TNO, The Netherlands Ghent University, Belgium Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy University of Newcastle, UK 3

Goals of BROWSE To develop improved exposure models to assess the risks from exposure to plant protection products (PPPs) for: –Operators (WP1) –Workers (WP2) –Bystanders and residents (WP3)

Introduction Modelling approach Output

A worker exposure scenario is a combination of a crop group and a worker task harvesting orchard fruit thinning orchard fruit harvesting ornamentals harvesting soft fruit pruning orchard fruit outdoor scenarios harvesting fruiting veg harvesting grapes indoor scenarios

Exposure routes hand-to-mouth contact

Introduction Modelling approach Output

The conceptual model starts from the application application initial deposit on crop deposit on crop at re-entry concentration in air at re-entry inhalation contact with crop dermal exposureinhalation exposureoral exposure hand-to-mouth contact volatilisation and dispersion absorbed amount modelled by PEARL(-OPS)

Dermal exposure: basic model DFR Dislodgeable Foliar Residue DE Dermal exposure TC = DE (µg/h)/DFR (µg/cm²) Transfer coefficient

Dermal exposure is the result of contact with PPP residue on the crop ContactResidueDurationClothing/PPE

Dermal exposure is the result of contact with PPP residue on the crop ContactResidueDurationClothing/PPE Expressed by transfer coefficient New set of defaults based on up-to-date literature analysis Defaults from EFSA or U.S. EPA User input Expressed by dislodgeable foliar residue (DFR) Modelled by PEARL User input

Dermal exposure is the result of contact with PPP residue on the crop ContactResidueDurationClothing/PPE Expressed by dislodgeable foliar residue (DFR) Modelled by PEARL

Dermal exposure is the result of contact with PPP residue on the crop ContactResidueDurationClothing/PPE Predefined options available  linked to coverage factors and migration factors Duration of exposure Defaults based on survey data User input

IE = AirC t x BR x T (x PF RPE ) AirC t = concentration in air at re-entry (µg/m³) BR = breathing rate (m³/h) T = duration of exposure (h/d) PF RPE = penetration factor (%) Inhalation exposure is the result of the inhalation of air with PPP residues

Concentration air Breathing rate Duration Modelled by PEARL-OPS for outdoor scenarios Modified version of PEARL for indoor scenarios From Exposure Factors Handbook User input

PEAR- O provides an estimate of the DFR and the concentration in the air under outdoor conditions Regional Meteorological data over 5 year time period 6 locations in 3 EU zones Simulates one application every week in period April- September Distribution of 120 data points Acute exposure: averaged over a single day Longer term exposure: averaged over longer period

indoor provides an estimate of the DFR and the concentration in the air under indoor (greenhouse) conditions Greenhouse climate data of 1 week Based on measured data from tomato greenhouses Single point estimate Acute exposure: averaged over a single day Longer term exposure: averaged over longer period

PEARL indoor is able to provide reasonable estimates of the PPP concentrations in greenhouse air example for fenpropimorph modelled measured

Hand-to-mouth contact leads to oral exposure Exposure hands Contact Duration Defined by: Fraction of hand in contact with mouth Hand-to-mouth transfer efficiency Number of contacts – 1/hr Modelled by dermal exposure module

Four modules are combined in the software to estimate exposure from the different exposure routes ORAL EXPOSURE PEARLOPS% VOLATLISATION CONCENTRATION IN AIR % ON CROP DFR DERMAL EXPOSURE BROWSE DERMAL INHALATION EXPOSURE BROWSE INHALATION BROWSE ORAL USER INPUT OUTDOOR INDOOR

Introduction Modelling approach Outputs

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Task: harvesting Crop: apple Body parts making contact: upper body Normal clothing: long sleeved shirt and trousers PPE: none

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Assessment tab scenario selection tabs product information toxicological reference values absorption factors and inputs for oral exposure

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Scenario tab inputs for the PEARL-OPS model

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Worker tab

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Calculating...

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Results tab

Example for harvesting of orchard fruit Comparison with existing models Absorbed dose (mg/kg body weight/day) acute (1 day) longer term (1 month)

Level of conservatism Defaults provided for many parameters –aimed at overall realistic worst-case Many parameters allow user input –drop-down menu –within given range

Advantages of the BROWSE model BROWSE...has a user-friendly software? provides an estimate of DFR includes inhalation and oral exposure estimates acute and longer term exposure takes account of regional and gender differences provides defaults but also allows flexible user input

Questions?