District Local Planning Committee Orientation Part 2 Trimble County Schools Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blissfield Community Schools Strategic Plan Facilities Team.
Advertisements

February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
Design Review Planning to date Project scope summary
NEW PALTZ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan – Progress Report Summary.
 Board of Trustees - Reviewed and prioritized the needs from previous MISD facility assessment and programmatic changes in curricular and extracurricular.
Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities Branch School Funding for Construction 2012.
Remsenburg – Speonk Union Free School District Elementary School Bond Planning Presentation October 12, 2010 BBS Architects and Engineers and Triton Construction.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Jim Ned CISD School Bond Election May 8 th, 2010.
Budget Hearing South Orange-Maplewood School District March 21, 2013.
SCHOOL FINANCE EA756. Finance The budget is one of the most important legal documents of a school district. It is not a static document, but rather a.
FY 08 Superintendent’sBudgetProposal January 25, 2007.
Building Capacity Methodology Evaluation & Proposal March 22, 2012.
WCA Facilities Planning February WCA Request 2 Educational Program: The Charter School’s educational program has unique facilities needs. Key.
HAMMONDSPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL Budget Information.
Scholarship Needham Public Schools Proposed Needham High School Cafeteria & Classroom Expansion Presented to Board of Selectmen April 15, 2015.
NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS P ROPOSED C OUNTY B UDGET R EQUEST April 7, 2015.
“ Let’s Bond Together ” Issue 3 Expect….Believe….Achieve.
LEADERSHIP BILLINGS STATE OF THE DISTRICT JACK COPPS, SUPERINTENDENT Billings Public Schools January 7, 2009.
GPISD Steering Committee Recommendation We are recommending to the Board of Trustees that the Board call for a $117 million bond election to be placed.
South Kitsap School District Preliminary Budget July 17, 2013 Sandra Rotella SFO CPA Assistant Superintendent Business Operations.
Berkeley County School District FY General Fund Draft Budget Public Hearing Presentation June 25, 2013 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent Archie.
Walton County School District 5-Year Facilities Work Plan
Jan 31, 2005 Community Update. Jan 31, 2005 Thanks to the voters… Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood.
1 Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2009 February 11, 2008.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.
ACPS & City of Alexandria 1.  Long Range Educational Facilities Plan to improve facilities planning, accommodate the growing student population, and.
+ Voorheesville CSD Strategic Plan Community Forum September 30, 2015.
Saint Croix Central Task Force Findings May 2, 2012.
Brookings School District All Day Kindergarten Update Presentation Contains Projected Data.
Ridgefield School District Capital Facilities Plan March 9, 2010.
…BUILDING THE FUTURE THROUGH OUR CHILDREN! WE’VE BEEN BUSY SINCE 2005! * Built on to the H.S./M.S. * Replaced 4 roofs * Upgraded our Heating Systems*
Baraboo School District 2010 Budget Hearing & Annual Meeting Monday, July 26, 2010 Jack Young Middle School.
Community Meeting May 31, Agenda: 7:00 – 8:00 Topics to include: An overview of the “foundation funding” system of the past several years. (Mr.
LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX FOR EDUCATION TIMELINE AND PROPOSED PLANS AS OF MAY 26, 2015 *THE DISTRICT CONTINUES TO SEEK INPUT/SUGGESTIONS FROM BOARD MEMBERS,
1 Verona Board of Education Final Budget and Financial Framework March 2009.
Focus Areas Learning environments that meet the needs of today’s learners Safe and secure buildings and grounds Improve district infrastructure.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
Maintenance & Operations Replacement Levy and School Improvements Bond Election Day: February 9, 2016.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Facilities Planning Overview As a response to the Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc., the Kentucky Supreme Court, the 1990 Kentucky Education Reform.
FY 2009 Budget and Five- Year Forecast Presentation October 21, 2008 Licking Heights Board of Education Regular Board Meeting.
FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING Committee Data and Findings.
Survey Basics This survey involved 300 completed telephone interviews with registered voters in the Prescott School District. All interviews were completed.
Community Levy Information Meeting Coming Together for Kids! January 13, 2016.
West Contra Costa Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan West Contra Costa Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan.
Washington Community and Technical Colleges State Operating and Capital Budgets New Trustee Orientation January 22, 2012 Denise Graham SBCTC Deputy Executive.
Alliance Policy & Management Group TAX YEAR 2015 UPDATE SEPTEMBER 18,
SCHOOL LEVY INFORMATION Quincy School District February 2015.
Appendix A School Profile Contact Information Location History Community Student Life Student Performance Staff and Facilities.
Foley Public Schools. Truth in Taxation Timeline 2012 Pay 2013 Levy for School Year or FY2014.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
Wahoo Public School District Facility Planning Update April 18, 2016.
Quincy School District’s Vision For the Future Election Day: February 9, 2016.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 18,
Ada & Canyon Counties WEST ADA SCHOOL DISTRICT (JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2) Amended Annual Budget Proposed Annual Budget.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 28,
Proposed Budget Presentation
Overview of MSBA Building Process and Project Timeline
District Local Planning Committee Orientation Part 1 General Information Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities.
MIDDLE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Trimble County Public Schools
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
Referendum Discussion
OSPI Capital Budget School Facilities & Organization
Facilities, Planning and Construction October 24, 2016
Pillager Public School District Community Survey Results
Budget Presentation March 13, 2019.
Portville Central School District
Frontier Central School District Public Budget Hearing May 3, 2016
Presentation transcript:

District Local Planning Committee Orientation Part 2 Trimble County Schools Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities Branch 702 KAR 4:180 Planning Process

Welcome Back The presentation will now focus on information specific to your district and will include;  An “Overview” of your existing buildings  Your current District Facilities Plan  Projects undertaken since 2009  Your districts restricted funding  Added funding scenarios  Cost of delivery of services to each of your schools  Enrollment changes since 1990  Demographic Projections

An “Overview” of capacity calculations Elementary School calculation;   Only the standard classrooms are used when calculating student capacity   Classrooms for special education, music, art, science, computer labs, etc. are not used in the capacity calculation   Since only standard classrooms are used in this calculation, it is critical that the spaces and their use be accurately noted on the building inventories  The number or students to be calculated per classrooms is based on the room size (see the chart in the next slide)

An “Overview” of capacity calculations Middle and High School calculation;   Only the standard classrooms are used when calculating student capacity   Only the standard classrooms are used when calculating student capacity. Classrooms for special education, music, art, science, computer labs, Career and Technical Center/KY Tech Area Technology Center spaces, etc. are not used in the capacity calculation  The number or students to be calculated per classrooms is based on the room size, note that since students are in non standard classrooms about 25% of the time the base capacity is adjusted as shown (see the chart in the next slide)

We will now review your current District Facilities Plan (DFP) The information on your current District Facilities Plan (DFP) will give a good view of your needs as determined by the last LPC;

The first part of the DFP shows;  The date your last DFP was approved by the State Board of Education  Your current district organization and proposed district organization

The next part of the DFP shows;  Your school centers  Each schools status as a Permanent or Transitional Center  Grades served by the facility  Enrollment at the end of the previous year vs. the building capacity

The main body of the DFP focuses on the construction identified by your LPC and shows; Priority 1 – work on school facilities to be completed in the next biennium  New construction (justified by poor building replacement or growth)  Major renovation (see definition and exceptions)  Additions (justified by comparison with Model Program)

The main body of the DFP focuses on the construction identified by your LPC and shows; Priority 2 – work on school facilities to be completed after the next biennium  New construction (justified by poor building replacement or growth)  Major renovation (see definition and exceptions)  Additions (justified by comparison with Model Program)

No Priority 2 Projects

The main body of the DFP focuses on the construction identified by your LPC and shows; Priority 3 – Construction of non-educational additions or expansions (regardless of schedule) including;  Media Centers, Kitchens, Cafeterias, Gyms etc. on buildings that do not qualify for major renovation

No Priority 3 Projects

The main body of the DFP focuses on the construction identified by your LPC and shows; Priority 4 – Construction of Management support areas; (regardless of schedule) Additions, renovation or new facilities including;  Central Offices, Bus Garages, Storage Buildings etc.

The main body of the DFP focuses on the construction identified by your LPC and shows; Priority 5 – Discretionary Projects Estimated Costs of these projects will not be included in the FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT TOTAL.; Estimated Costs of these projects will not be included in the FACILITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT TOTAL.;  Athletic Facilities not part of a Capital Project  Buildings too new to qualify for Major Renovation  Additions to buildings that are not justified by comparison to the Model Programs  Minor projects

Since 2012 your district has undertaken the following projects; The next spreadsheet outlines;  Building Name  BG number which identifies the project to our office  When the project was executed  A description of the work  The total project cost including fees and other “soft” costs

Restricted Funding for School Construction Used for “Capital” construction or “major” renovation, come from multiple sources and include; Student Population Based Capital Outlay Funds Property Assessment Based Building Funds and Growth levies Facilities Support Program of KY Qualified Needs Based Qualified Needs Based KY School Facilities Construction Commission Urgent-Needs Grants All of these funding sources need to be considered during the District Facilities Planning process.

First and Second Funds to Consider Student Population Based Capital Outlay Funds Property Assessment Based Building Funds and Growth levies Facilities Support Program of KY

Third Funds to Consider Third Funds to Consider Qualified Needs Based KY School Facilities Construction Commission Urgent-Needs Grants

All of these funding sources need to be considered during the District Facilities Planning process. All of these funding sources need to be considered during the District Facilities Planning process. Let’s see how they impact

Cost of Delivery of Services Student Report Cards In addition, the LPC will want to consider the cost per pupil in each school to try to understand the forces that shape these costs

Cost of Delivery of Services Many things determine the differences; The thermal envelope and energy use The thermal envelope and energy use The age of teaching staff The age of teaching staff The number of free and reduced lunch students The number of free and reduced lunch students The grade levels served The grade levels served But the biggest determinant of the cost per student is the number of students served in each building

District Enrollment Since 1990 The following chart shows actual enrollment by year and the percentage change each year and at three, five and ten year periods.

District Demographic Projections The following chart shows demographic projects developed by the University of Louisville, Kentucky Data Center for your district for the school aged population.

Future Challenges for KY Schools Over 40% of the School Districts in the Commonwealth will experience a decline in enrollment in the next 25 years. At the same time 99% of the School Districts in the Commonwealth will experience an increase in their over 65 population that will double the population in this age group. Some districts like yours are projected to have a slight decrease in student population. Your current infrastructure will be taxed to its limits. How will you wisely deal with a PROJECTED student population and the possible decrease in funding needed to run a school system?

Future Challenges for KY Schools By working together as a team with Design Professionals, School Board Members, Administrators, Legislatures and the Public to build not only schools, but to create a comprehensive planning/business model that provides equitable and adequate educational space and responds to the needs of the community. And continue to educate students that the community are proud to support.

Thank you again for agreeing to be part of the Local Planning process for your district. If you have any questions you may phone us at; (502) You can us at;