AEMP Grade Level Collaborative Module 3 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LITERACY IN THE MIDDLE YEARS OF SCHOOLING INITIATIVE
Advertisements

Strategies and Methods
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
Non-Linguistic Representation Web 2.0 Tools Helping students understand and represent knowledge non- linguistically is the most under-used instructional.
Access Strategy: Cooperative Learning Strategies.
Session 3: UA/SDAIE Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objective Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of Curriculum, Instruction,
Teaching Language in Context First edition 1986 Third edition 2001
CA 2012 ELD Standards Session 3 ESC North 2/5/15.
MARZANO’S HIGH YIELD STRATEGIES
Writing Language and Content Objectives
Read Aloud with Accountable Talk. Norms Courtesy  Be on time  Cell phones on silent, vibrate, or off  Be mindful of side- bar conversations  Focus.
Continuing dominance of “language of instruction” debate.
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Presented By: Heather Stewart Regional Literacy Consultant Region 4 State Support Team 1.
Specific Considerations in Evaluating Teachers of ELLs Adam Bauchner Mid-State Regional Bilingual Education Resource Network.
The 6 Principles of Second language learning (DEECD,2000) Beliefs and Understandings Assessment Principle Responsibility Principle Immersion Principle.
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
Improving Literacy Instruction: Strategies for All Content Areas
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE BASES PLANNING STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE BASES PLANNING.
ELL Students What do they need?.
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
Session 1: Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) Title III Access to Core Professional.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
SIOP Overview Shelter Instruction Observation Protocol
(2) Using age-appropriate activities, students expand their ability to perform novice tasks and develop their ability to perform the tasks of the intermediate.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Lesson Plan Cycle. Six Elements in Planning the Delivery of an Effective Lesson 1.Generates students’ language through active student participation 2.Comprehensible.
Laine Ferguson 4 th Grade Class Literacy Facilitator: Susan Huntington Frank Tillery Elementary Rogers, AR January 19, 2012.
Literacy Achievement for Secondary Students Exemplary teaching behavior Domains of expertise Anne G Liguori.
Encompasses a broad, overall approach to instruction.
PSRC SIOP: Train the Trainer 2009 Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Leonardo Romero PSRC.
Second Language and Curriculum Goals. Knowing how, when, and why to say what to whom. Successful Communication:
January 2007 Copyright © 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Trecina Green, Bureau Director Office of Curriculum and Instruction Understanding How.
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
SIOP The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP)
Supporting the Development of Academic Language Jill Robbins Second Language Learning Consultants, Washington, DC.
Advanced Language Learners Levels V, VI, VII (2) Using age-appropriate activities, students master novice tasks, expand their ability to perform intermediate.
EDN:204– Learning Process 30th August, 2010 B.Ed II(S) Sci Topics: Cognitive views of Learning.
Competency 010 Presented by Elizabeth Castillo. Competency 010 The Master Technology Teacher knows how to provide professional development and support.
The importance of talking and listening for second language learners
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
Module 8 Teaching English Learners
Language & Literacy Practicum in Child Development 1.
Second Language Acquisition
This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: any public performance or display, including.
Title III Access to Core Professional Development
Culturally Responsive Teaching in Diverse Classrooms By Kenny and Maria CHAPTER 3.
Instructional Rounds: Fall 2015 Debrief A Collaborative Approach to Improving Teaching & Learning City, Elmore, Fiarman, and Teitel. Instructional Rounds.
11 TOPIC 1: INTRODUCTION TO CONTENT- BASED INSTRUCTION (CBI) IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. DEFINITION DEFINITION  CBI- the integration of a particular.
Best Practices in ELL Instruction: Multimodal Presentation Professional Development by: Heather Thomson T3 845.
Using TESOL’s Standards to Guide Instructional Design
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
AEMP Grade Level Collaboratives Module 7 Systematic Teaching of Contrastive Analysis Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition.
AEMP Grade Level Collaborative Module 8 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program.
AEMP Grade Level Collaboratives Module 4 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program.
Pedagogy As it relates to the field of linguistics.
By: Harvey Silver R. Thomas Dewing Matthew Perini.
AEMP Grade Level Collaboratives Module 6 Academic Vocabulary Development for Standard English Learners Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Language Development Among Children of Linguistic Diversity.
AEMP Grade Level Collaborative Module 2 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program.
Equity and Deeper Learning:
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Integrated and Designated ELD –
A Project LIFT Training Module
Learning and Teaching Principles
Performance Indicator D:
Developed by: Silvia C. Dorta Duque de Reyes
Section VI: Comprehension
Presentation transcript:

AEMP Grade Level Collaborative Module 3 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program Understanding and Implementing the Six Access Strategies-Part I: (Cooperative Learning, Graphic Organizers, and Contrastive Analysis)

PD Norms for Success Participate 100% of the time Be mindful of others -Put electronics on vibrate or meeting mode --Be respectful of other’s opinions Listen with a different ear, an open mind, and a receptive heart

Long Range Goals of the 8 GLC Modules: Increase knowledge and awareness of what authentic Culturally Relevant & Responsive Educational (CRRE) Practices are Build an authentic culturally relevant and responsive learning environment that teaches to and through the strengths of our students Validate and affirm the legitimacy of each student’s cultural and linguistic practices within the learning process

GLC Module 3 Objectives To develop an understanding of the relationship between the consistent use of high-yield strategies and student success To analyze how these particular research- based access strategies scaffold access to core content for SELs, ELs, SWD’s, and Gifted students.

Culturally Responsive Icebreaker

Interactivity 1-Cooperative Learning Discussion Protocol-Think-Pair-Share: 1.What is Cooperative Learning to you? 2.In what ways will the class environment support cooperative learning? 3.What protocols could be used to engage students in cooperative learning?

Why Cooperative Learning? Cooperative Learning: Cooperative Learning is one of the most researched of all teaching strategies. The results show that students who have opportunities to work collaboratively: learn faster and more efficiently increase time on task have greater retention feel more positive about the learning experience Learning Outcomes : For SELs, ELs, and Students w/Disabilities, cooperative learning promotes language acquisition by allowing students to practice their skills with more competent others. Thinking skills are promoted when students interact cooperatively with their peers to brainstorm, explain, question, disagree, socialize, persuade, and problem-solve. The Cooperative Learning Network acad.sheridanc.on.ca/scls/coop/cooplrn.htmhttp://www-

5 Elements of Cooperative Learning Cooperative efforts have been found to be more productive than individualistic efforts, especially under these five conditions: 1) Positive interdependence 2) Face-to-face interaction 3) individual-group accountability 4) interpersonal and small group skills 5) group processing Source: Johnson, David, W. (1991)

Advanced Graphic Organizers Advanced Graphic Organizers: Visual, graphic display that depicts the relationships between facts, terms, and or ideas within a learning task. This instructional tool is especially helpful to language learners. It helps them understand, construct knowledge, and organize information in advance (to set the stage for learning). Learning Outcomes: These mind maps promote active learning, develop higher order thinking and can be used to convey complex information in a easy-to-understand manner. What The Teacher Would DoWhat The Students Would Do Model the use of graphic organizers to build concept relationships Choose appropriate graphic organizers for the task at hand Independently or cooperatively utilize graphic organizers Create their own graphic organizers Utilize graphic organizers to organize their thoughts (i.e. writing process, problem solving)

Contrastive Analysis Contrastive Analysis : The systematic study of a pair of languages with a view to identifying their structural differences and similarities. Learning Outcomes: Contrastive Analysis increases SELs ability to recognize the differences between standard and non-standard language forms. SEL’s become more proficient at revising their own work for differences in grammar, vocabulary and syntax. They gain greater facility in the use of standard English structure in its oral and written forms, and have a greater appreciation and acceptance of their home language.

Interactivity 2: Send-a-Problem Half of the participants will write a phrase or sentence in Standard English while the other half will write a phrase or sentence in African American Language or Mexican American Language. Each side of the room will exchange flash cards to be translated. After each flash card has been translated the presenter will share out with the whole group what the translations are.

What The Teacher Would DoWhat The Students Would Do Gain a firm knowledge of the characteristic linguistic features of SEL languages Affirm and validate the students’ home language & culture Support Written Language development in standard English Support Oral Language acquisition in standard English Facilitate cross cultural communication competence-codeswitching Students are given opportunities contrast. listen to, and practice patterns of standard English in comparison with their home language Working on lessons that address specific features in phonetic, grammatical, and syntactic structures Practice using targeted language Choral Reading Listening to various forms of literature Conversations and discussions with standard English speakers Readers Theater Contrastive Analysis

Interactivity 3-CRRE Video Embedding Culturally Responsive Pedagogy into Core Instruction Reflection Sheet – Demonstrated CRRE (Access) Strategies Cooperative Grouping Advanced Graphic Organizers Contrastive Analysis

Sources Cole, L. (1991). Verbal Image Enhancement-Trainer’s Handbook for Dual Linguistic Instruction of African American Children. Gay. G (1999). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press Johnson, David W., et al. (1991) Cooperation in the Classroom. MN: Interaction Book Company Lemoine, N. (2001). Language Variation and Literacy Acquisition in African American Students (p ). In Harris, J., Kamhi, A. & Pollock, K. (Eds) Literacy in African American Communities. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Virginia: ASCD