Math 20/20 NEW WAYS OF TEACHING REQUIRED! IMPORTANT QUESTION How are you preparing teachers and their leaders for math standards implementation?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by: Dr. Robert Marzano, CEO, Marzano Research Laboratory Michael Toth, CEO, Learning Sciences International, provider of iObservation Education.
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Systems of Large-Scale Professional Development Sean Smith Horizon Research, Inc.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Transition To The Common Core Transforming Teaching & Learning Santa Clara County Office of Education August 27, 2012.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Educator Support & Evaluation Christa McAuliffe December 4-5, 2013.
©2004 NCEE Archived Information America’s Choice High School Design Bob Mackin, Director America’s Choice High Schools National Center on Education and.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Focus on learning Building Capacity for 21st Century Teaching and Learning ACHIEVEMENT GAP TASK FORCE Oceanside Unified School District (OUSD)
Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students MSP project meeting  January 9, 2014 MathPLUS 1 and 2.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Common Core Implementation Update Supporting College- and Career-Readiness DATAG December 2012.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Beyond the Basics -Instructional Shifts -Rigor: Depth of Knowledge -Assessment: SBAC, to CCSS -Shifts In Action: Close Reading Strategies & Text Dependent.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
In what ways do you contribute to students’ learning in mathematics? What do you think is the role of the district in improving math achievement?
The Science Content, Conceptual Change, and Collaboration (SC4) Mathematics and Science Partnership - Maine U.S. Department of Education MSP Regional Meeting.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
CAMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT – CAMAS.WEDNET.EDU. A Common Core Math Problem: Given 385 people, what will be the dimensions of an all inclusive CAMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
The “Studio” as Productive Context for Rehearsing and Refining High-Leverage Practices Teachers Development Group 2009 Leadership Seminar on Mathematics.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
SCAN SCIENCE CONTENT AND NOTEBOOKING Allen Pietrok Yamileth Shimojyo California Math and Science Project
An Illinois Math and Science Partnership collaboration with Peoria Public Schools Bradley University’s Elementary Math, Science and Technology Education.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
A Primer. What Are the Common Core State Standards? The Common Core State Standards identify what students need to know and be able to do in each grade.
Are your Math customers ready to implement the Common Core State Standards? We can help.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Moon Area School District.  tml tml 
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
Cooperating School Districts Professional Development Research Process Online Survey Results.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Common Core Standards - Implementation Timeline SCHOOL YEAR The school year will require full implementation of Arizona’s Common Core.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
A look at the School year
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
ELA and Mathematics Common Core GPS Timeline
Presentation transcript:

Math 20/20 NEW WAYS OF TEACHING REQUIRED!

IMPORTANT QUESTION How are you preparing teachers and their leaders for math standards implementation?

WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? There is a gap between where we are and where we need to be.

CHANGES IN MATH TEACHING AND LEARNING WE NEED TO SHIFT FROM…TO… Teacher as presenterStudent centered pedagogies Practice with algorithms to determine student learning Problem-solving approach to diagnose student needs Overgeneralized strategiesDifferentiated strategiesTellingQuestioning

COHERENCE SYSTEM-WIDE CHANGE

SO… WHAT’S THE SOLUTION?

REENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMPREHENSIVE SUSTAINED INTENSIVE

STANDARDS- BASED TEACHING & LEARNING SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT PERSONNEL TEACHER LEADERS TEACHERS SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS INTENSIVE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING YEAR 1

MORE THAN A PLC

RESULTS

RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY RESEARCH QUESTIONS Rimbey, K.A. (2013). From the Common Core to the Classroom: A Professional Development Efficacy Study for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. What is the relationship between PD for the CCSSM and… - teacher knowledge? - classroom practice? - student learning?

RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY CHANGES IN TEACHER CONTENT KNOWLEDGE Learning Mathematics for Teaching IRT Change Score Group Assignment

RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY CHANGES IN TEACHER’S KNOWLEDGE OF THE STANDARDS Online Sorting Task Net Growth Group Assignment

RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY CHANGES IN CLASSROOM PRACTICE Reform Teacher Observation Protocol Mean RTOP Score Matched Pairs

STANDARDS- BASED TEACHING & LEARNING SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT PERSONNEL TEACHER LEADERS TEACHERS SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS INTENSIVE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING MATH 20/20 YEAR 1

STANDARDS- BASED TEACHING & LEARNING STUDENT MATERIALS SUPPORT LEADERSHIP FAMILY ENGAGEMENT OPTIONS PROFESSIONAL LEARNING SUSTAINABILITY FOR NEW LEARNING YEAR 2+

TAKING MATH 20/20 TO SCALE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS – REGIONAL CENTERS

TIMELINE

LEA RESPONSIBILITIES

DELIVERABLES

COST STRUCTURE YEAR 1 - INTENSIVE PD Nine or More Teachers per Grade Level: – Consultant: $5,900 per cohort – Materials: $200 per teacher – License Fee: $250 per school Eight or Fewer Teachers Per Grade Level: – $800 per teacher – License Fee: $250 per school

INTENSIVE PD – COST SCENARIOS* YEAR 1 - *PLUS SUB COSTS 30-teacher cohort - $11,900 + license fee 20-teacher cohort - $9,900 + license fee 15-teacher cohort - $8,900 + license fee 12-teacher cohort - $8,300 + license fee 10-teacher cohort - $7,900 + license fee 8 teachers (individual) - $6,400 + license fee 6 teachers (individual) - $4,800 + license fee 2 teachers (individual) - $1,600 + license fee

COST STRUCTURE YEAR 2 - SUSTAINABILITY All Components: $1,700* – Liaison Visits – Teacher Workshops – Leadership Seminars – Student Materials – Family Engagement Options *Add $300 for 20 or more teachers

QUESTIONS?