High School State of the Schools. Foley High School Staff Development Goals for 2012-13 Goal #190% of FHS teachers will participate in a building in-service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Advertisements

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PORTFOLIO.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
PLC’s who, what, when, how, why.
SCHOOL PLAN Madison Park Middle School
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Presented By: Nora Jaramillo, MJ Boyter, Kristin Carter. Reem Kievit, Crystal Rivera, Matt Craft, Robert Garcia.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
Durham – A 21 st Century School! “Techno-rich!” SMARTboard in every room 477 computers available to staff and students! Student response systems in each.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Kalaheo High School Home of the Mustangs!. Strive High Data 87.4% Graduation Rate 78% Reading Proficiency (above state median) 45% Math Proficiency (below.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Agenda New Teacher Induction
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
School year end report  Devoted time to reviewing data  Require research based strategies  Began imbedding Common Core into lesson plans  Observed.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous Improvement Report for Triton School.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Fowlerville Community Schools: Implementing the Formative Assessment Process 2009 MERA Conference.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
Curriculum Mapping Wednesday October 29 Pierre High School.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Office of Service Quality
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
Peer Coaching Program Monica Gardelli Franco
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Standard 1: Teachers Demonstrate Leadership a. Teachers lead in their classrooms.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Bull Run Middle School School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.
Student Engagement Betz Elementary.
Presentation transcript:

High School State of the Schools

Foley High School Staff Development Goals for Goal #190% of FHS teachers will participate in a building in-service focusing on technology and how to implement that technology within their classrooms throughout the school year. Goal #295% of FHS teachers will participate in professional learning communities and building in-service opportunities addressing current trends in education that will promote throughout the school year. Goal #395% of FHS students and staff will be provided with opportunities to promote better awareness of violence prevention (bullying, harassment, hazing, etc.) both in and out of the school setting throughout the school year.

 Finding: 93% of staff participated in technology training throughout the school year.  Impact on Student Learning: New technology strategies were used to engage students more effectively.  Impact on Teacher Practice: Teachers were allowed time to discover new technology programs to use in their classrooms. Goal #1 90% of FHS teachers will participate in a building in-service focusing on technology and how to implement that technology within their classrooms throughout the school year.

 Finding: 95% of staff participated in professional learning communities and building in- services.  Impact on Student Learning: Incorporated new strategies into the classrooms by staff that participated in professional learning communities and in-services.  Impact on Teacher Practice: Enhanced teaching strategies and promoted professional collaboration. Goal #2 95% of FHS teachers will participate in professional learning communities and building in-service opportunities addressing current trends in education that will promote professional collaboration and will implement newfound strategies within their classrooms throughout the school year.

 Finding: 95% of high school students and staff participated in violence prevention opportunities.  Impact on Student Learning: Students were given strategies and ideas to use to help reduce bullying and harassment that occurs within the school and daily life settings.  Impact on Teacher Practice: Incorporated new strategies into their classrooms to help promote violence prevention. Goal #3 95% of FHS students and staff will be provided with opportunities to promote better awareness of violence prevention (bullying, harassment, hazing, etc.) both in and out of the school setting throughout the school year.

FHS Building Goals Goal 1: 90% of FHS members will participate in a departmental or individual technology enrichment and learn how to implement that technology within their classrooms throughout the school year. (District AIM II: Goal 2 and 3) Goal 2: 95% of FHS staff members will participate in professional learning communities or building in-service opportunities to deepen the understanding around these following questions: (District AIM II: Goal 2 and 3; AIM III: Goal 7)  What do we want students to know?  How do we know the students know it?  What do we do if the students do know?  What do we do if the students don’t know? Goal 3: 95% of FHS students and staff will promote better awareness of violence prevention (bullying, harassment, hazing, etc.) both in and out of the school setting with a focus on social media throughout the school year. (District AIM I: Goal 1)

Goal #1 Individual Staff and Building Level Departments will meet with DTTI and the District Technology Director to explore, plan, and implement technology into their content area. In-service training will be presented in the following areas: Advanced Google apps., movie making/editing, flipped classroom, “Flubaroo” - makes and corrects tests & quizzes, Polleverywhere.com (formative assessments), and more. Goal #2 PLC’s will be conducted with a focus on identifying how our curriculum and instructional practice meets these four questions:  Department level meetings to review student data points (MCA, PLAN, ACT, EXPLORE)  Review curriculum documents to identify what we want students to know.  Align student assessments with student outcomes (Common Assessments).  Explore enrichment and acceleration opportunities for students.  Identify students who are struggling and look at RTI opportunities. Goal #3 T.B.D. – The March building in-service will be utilized to reach this goal. To accomplish our goals we will

 Student achievement is high at FHS as evidenced by our ACT ‘Composite’ results below.  Student ‘membership’ and ‘attendance’ remain excellent.  Graduation Rate continues well above 90%.