Critical thinking in the context of biology CETL Workshop February 25, 2015 Ben Montgomery NSE (Biology)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Essence of Critical Thinking the reasoned identification and evaluation of evidence to guide decision making analysis the form and content of evidence.
Advertisements

Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
As a result of activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop: abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry. understandings about science inquiry.
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
Nassau Community College THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK G eneral E ducation A ssessment R eview Kumkum Prabhakar, Assistant Professor of Biology.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms
Historical Thinking Skills
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Techniques for Improving Student Learning Outcomes Lynn M. Forsythe Ida M. Jones Deborah J. Kemp Craig School of Business California State University,
Research & Statistics Student Learning Assessment comparing Online vs. Live (Face to Face) Instruction.
Psychology and Scientific Research. Experimental Science Definition: inquiry in seeking facts and the search for truth through testing of theories and.
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
Critical Thinking Skills for all Subjects
Ideas to Action Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement Patricia R. Payette, Ph.D. January 9, 2008.
Assessment Report Department of Psychology School of Science & Mathematics D. Abwender, Chair J. Witnauer, Assessment Coordinator Spring, 2013.
Clickers in the Classroom Monday Models Spring 08 source:
PDI January 6, 2011 Emily Morgan.  Writing and Discussion: Why do we assign writing?  A.D.D.I.E  Assignment Writing Workshop  Writing Resources Please.
RATING THE PROFESSOR TA & PFF Workshop– Spring 2011 Artze-Vega.
CS 347: Operating Systems  In this course, we reason about effective performance of a computer system  The emphasis of this course is on –Concepts –Techniques.
Critical Thinking: Using Reflection Friday, 21 st November 2008.
Improved Performance and Critical Thinking in Economics Students Using Current Event Journaling Sahar Bahmani, Ph.D. WI Teaching Fellow INTRODUCTION.
Assessing Critical Thinking Skills Dr. Barry Stein - Professor of Psychology, Director of Planning, Coordinator of TTU Critical Thinking Initiative Dr.
Engaging First Year Biology Majors in/with the Scientific Literature Jodie Krontiris-Litowitz Youngstown State University.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Opening Day Presentation V. Jaramillo & A. Cadavid A. Ryan-Romo & F. OW Assessment Basics.
-SLO Development Progress -SLO Activity -Assessment Progress -Support Needs.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
ACT Science Prep Tips and Tricks.
Teaching the Science Base of MCH Donna Strobino, PhD.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
NTeQ: Designing an Integrated Lesson
Critical Thinking Through Reflection & Self Assessment Pamela L. Stamm, PharmD, CDE, BCPS Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice Auburn University Harrison.
Presented by: Devonna Abner Kelly Philbeck. Step 1: Determine needs Step 2: Create specific learning goals based on pre- assessment Step 3: Create and.
Application Skills Skills For Answering Application Question An Open Source Education Project.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
EDU 8603 Day 6. What do the following numbers mean?
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
By Elisa S. Baccay. The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage students’ development of critical thinking, problem.
Chemistry Assessment Update C101-Lecture C121-Laboratory Chemistry department expanding into C100-Lecture C120 Laboratory Assessment Committee Mandate.
NESCent Postdoc Professional Development Series on Effective Teaching and Learning Session 7 – Testing, Assessment and Grading October 20 th, 2006 NESCent.
How does the definition match your thoughts? How does the definition differ from your thoughts? Assessment Definition Assessment is the ongoing process.
Barriers to EBP Prepared by: Dr. Hoda Abed El-Azim.
 The teacher is the decision maker and it is her job to decide on what units to include during the year or what tomorrow’s lesson plan will be.  Thought-out.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2004 University of Pittsburgh 1 Principles of Learning: Accountable Talk SM Accountability to the Learning Community.
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT/PSAT Key Changes.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Category 1 Category 2Category 3Category.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
1 Guess the Covered Word Goal 1 EOC Review 2 Scientific Method A process that guides the search for answers to a question.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
Depth of Knowledge Vocabulary LIST 1 OBJECTIVE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS LESSON IS TO HELP STUDENT LEARN HOW TO DISSECT LANGUAGE IN ORDER TO BETTER UNDERSTAND.
Day 16 Objectives SWBATD analysis by identifying an author’s implicit and stated assumptions about a subject, based upon evidence in the selection. Language:
A research and policy informed discussion of cross-curricular approaches to the teaching of mathematics and science with a focus on how scientific enquiry.
Mary McClure, EdD, LPC Class 3. Multiple approaches to instruction are probably appropriate… Diversity of student populations is increasing – more inclusive.
Writing Learning Outcomes Best Practices. Do Now What is your process for writing learning objectives? How do you come up with the information?
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
Essay Writing Tips for Writing Essays POL No Simple Answers… Unfortunately there is no simple answer to how to write an essay. However, there are.
PowerPoint & Evaluating Resources PowerPoint & Evaluating Resources Mike Spindler & Emma Purnell.
Questioning Strategies
A Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
Statement of Teaching Philosophy
Teaching Undergraduate Statistics without Math
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Critical Thinking Study Skills Academy 2016/17.
Critical Thinking Skills In English
Historical Thinking Skills
Building Better Classes
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Presentation transcript:

Critical thinking in the context of biology CETL Workshop February 25, 2015 Ben Montgomery NSE (Biology)

Critical thinking in context of biology I.What is critical thinking II.Making time for critical thinking III. Structured thought exercises

What is critical thinking? Workshop description: – “thinking critically about issues, taking a position on an issue, and drawing from their readings and research to make arguments and solve problems”

Other definitions “conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to reach an answer” "disciplined thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence” "includes a commitment to using reason in the formulation of our beliefs” “thinking about one's thinking in a manner designed to organize and clarify, raise the efficiency of, and recognize errors and biases in one's own thinking.”

What is critical thinking? Traditional emphasis of Introductory Biology

Flipped classroom makes time for critical thinking Faculty are uncertain about “how thinking- skill development can be integrated into a course without sacrificing its content” -Tyser & Cerbin 1991

Flipped classroom makes time for critical thinking Lecturing is slow; reading is fast Content initially presented in structured reading assignments – require students to demonstrate knowledge, understanding, and simple higher-level skills Comprehension tested with online quizzes, in- class activities

Making time to think in the classroom Uses of class time: – Assessing understanding – Reinforcing ideas – Practicing higher-level skills

Critical thinking in the classroom Conceptual / modeling exercises Emphasize making inferences/predictions based on assumptions Based on scenarios explained on 1-page handouts Group work A subset of assignments are graded

Critical evaluation of scientific claims Does the evidence support the claim being made? Is effect large enough to matter? Are results relevant to actual health question?

Specific questions to ask: 1.What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? 2.Is evidence based on correlation or causation? 3.What is the inference space? 4.How large is the effect? 5.How large of a population was tested? 6.Is the effect statistically significant?

Questions to ask: 1. What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? - What is affiliation of researcher? - Who funded research? Is conflict of interest likely? 2. Is evidence based on correlation or causation? 3. What is the inference space? 4. How large is the effect? 5. How large of a population was tested? 6. Is the effect statistically significant?

Questions to ask: 1. What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? 2. Is evidence based on correlation or causation? - Did the researchers manipulate independent variable or use natural variation? 3. What is the inference space? 4. How large is the effect? 5. How large of a population was tested? 6. Is the effect statistically significant?

Questions to ask: 1. What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? 2. Is evidence based on correlation or causation ? 3. What is the inference space? - What is study population (gender/sex, age, ethnicity, current health condition, etc)? - What range of variation in treatments or conditions were subjects exposed to? 4. How large is the effect? 5. How large of a population was tested? 6. Is the effect statistically significant?

Questions to ask: 1.What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? 2.Is evidence based on correlation or causation? 3.What is the inference space? 4.How large is the effect? 1.What is baseline measurement? 2.By what absolute amount did the baseline measure change? 5.How large of a population was tested? 6.Is the effect statistically significant?

Questions to ask: 1.What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? 2.Is evidence based on correlation or causation? 3.What is the inference space? 4.How large is the effect? 5.How large of a population was tested? 6.Is the effect statistically significant?

Questions to ask: 1.What are the credentials & motivation of the person making the claim? 2.Is evidence based on correlation or causation? 3.What is the inference space? 4.How large is the effect? 5.How large of a population was tested? 6.Is the effect statistically significant?

Teaching evaluation skills Powerpoint & discussion format – Present each criterion – Present results from studies where each limitation is important – Ask students to evaluate examples and identify the relevant limitation

Assignment for assessment Choose a popular press article about 1 specific health-related study. Assess whether article provides suitable information according to each criterion – Tried essay format; now use list of question and answers Comment and follow up with similar assignment Short excerpt version suitable for exams

Students’ abilities to evaluate articles Fall 2014: – Assignment 1: Mean 67.8; Median 69.0 – Assignment 2: Mean 73.8; Median 75.0

Lessons Careful article selection is key Time consuming when each student choses a different article – Instructor selects or instructor selects from among student submissions Peer-reviewed articles are too hard at Intro level Repeated use of class time is needed