GISMO Flights 07-08 Plans and Objectives. Technical Objectives for April ’07 Experiment 1) Acquire data over the May 2006 flight line to compare high.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology The NASA/JPL Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar System (AIRSAR) Yunling Lou Jet Propulsion.
Advertisements

“Flight Test Is As Flight Test Does” Guide to Safe and Effective Flight Test George Cusimano Flight Test Safety Workshop 5 May
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Motion of Glaciers, Sea Ice, and Ice Shelves in Canisteo Peninsula, West Antarctica Observed by 4-Pass Differential Interferometric SAR Technique Hyangsun.
Aural Null Procedures Air Search Module 9 of CASARA ELT Training Plan.
Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping
Understanding crevasses: Introduction
BIIR Cost Preview Preparatory Materials. BIIR Can Help Answer These Science Questions Refined science questions derived in part from the St. Petersburg.
Global Ice Sheet Interferometric Radar NASA ESTO IIP Ohio State Univ., JPL, Univ. Kansas, VEXCEL Corp., E.G&G Corp., Wallops Flight Facility.
Global Ice Sheet Mapping Orbiter Understand the polar ice sheets sufficiently to predict their response to global climate change and their contribution.
Ventures Proposal Science Objectives and Requirements.
Global Ice Sheet Mapping Observatory (GISMO) Ohio State Univ., JPL, Univ. Kansas, VEXCEL Corp., E.G&G Corp., Wallops Flight Facility.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
Tuning in to UHE Neutrinos in Antarctica – The ANITA Experiment J. T. Link P. Miočinović Univ. of Hawaii – Manoa Neutrino 2004, Paris, France ANITA-LITE.
Surface Based Sounding SAR Update May 3, PRISM SAR Radar system installed on Tucker Sno-Cat at Summit, Greenland.
Basal Ice Imaging Radar Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University Jet Propulsion Laboratory Wallops Flight Facility Remote Sensing Solutions.
IPY Satellite Data Legacy Vision: Use the full international constellation of remote sensing satellites to acquire spaceborne ‘snapshots’ of processes.
Warm-Up – 8/28 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What flight control surface is used to pitch the.
Interferometric Sounder Concept for Ice Sheet Mapping Review, Simulations, Spaceborne System, Future E. Rodriguez Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Company Confidential GISMO Radar Review GISMO Processor and Results August 7, 2007.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
1 of 22 Glaciers and Ice Sheets Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
GISMO Team Meeting JPL January 31, February 1, 2007.
GISMO Airborne Experiment Planning Proposed Greenland 2006 Campaign WFF Meeting Feb GISMO Team K.Jezek, E. Rodriguez, P. Gogineni, J. Curlander,
Chapter 19 Weather Detection.
Glaciers and Ice Sheet Interferometric Radar April 2007 Planning Meeting Wallops Flight Facility October 10, 2006.
 A glacier is a thick mass of ice, composed of compacted and recrystallized snow that forms over thousands of years.  Glacier only flow or move over.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
ICEQUAKES Mathieu Doucette EPSC 330 – Term Presentation.
Uses of Geospatial Soils & Surface Measurement Data in DWR Delta Levee Program Joel Dudas
Synthetic Aperture Radar Specular or Bragg Scatter? OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001.
Using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2.
InSAR and LIDAR Lecture 8 Oct 13, 2004.
An Overview of Glaciers and Icesheets Mapping Orbiter (GISMO) & Global Ice Sheet Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Ohio State University University of Kansas.
GISMO Review Summary June 11, Key Results Left-right filtering works. Doubles the swath width Ray bending broadens azimuth point target response.
Water Vapor In The Atmosphere: An Examination For CARMA Phase Correction Y.-S. Shiao, L. W. Looney and L. E. Snyder Department of Astronomy University.
Planetary InSAR Summary Presented by Pete Mouginis-Mark
Scott Hensley, Howard Zebker, Cathleen Jones, Paul Lundgren, Eric Fielding, Thierry Michel and Bruce Chapman.
September 07 Airborne Experiment. September 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable.
ASIRAS Pre Report ● Part 1: ASIRAS campaigns 2004 ● System characteristics ● Data acquisition ● Part2: preliminary data processing report ● GPS processing.
GISMO Simulation Status Objective Radar and geometry parameters Airborne platform upgrade Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling.
Technical University of Denmark Radars and modifications IIP KU Team.
Technical University of Denmark Radar Deployment and Results IIP Team.
May 2006 Navigation John Sonntag EG&G Technical Services, Inc. 10 October 2006.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
How does InSAR work? Gareth Funning University of California, Riverside.
InSAR Application for mapping Ice Sheets Akhilesh Mishra Dec 04, 2015.
Field Experiment Planning. Field Experiment Constraints Greenland airborne deployment to facilitate logistics Measured ancillary data where possible (e.g.
GISMO Navigation John Sonntag EG&G Technical Services, Inc. 31 January 2007.
Proposed Flight Lines (note that these were amended subsequent to the meeting)
Proposed Flight Lines. April 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable 6, 6 hour flights.
Lecture 8: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
GISMO Team Meeting May 3, 2006 Vexcel Corporation.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Active Remote Sensing for Elevation Mapping
© Crown copyright Met Office Wind and turbulence measurements on the BAe146 Phil Brown, OBR Conference, Dec 2012.
A Concept for Spaceborne Imaging of the Base of Terrestrial Ice Sheets and Icy Bodies in the Solar System Ken Jezek, Byrd Polar Research Center E. Rodriguez,
2003 Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Remote Sensing INGV Digital Elevation Model of the Alban Hills (Central Italy) from ERS1-ERS2 SAR data Andrea.
Layover Layover occurs when the incidence angle (  ) is smaller than the foreslope (  + ) i.e.,  <  +. i.e.,  <  +. This distortion cannot be corrected!
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
January 07 Action items Documentation on the refence locations onboard the aircraft including navigation system center Table of Calibration parameters.
Interferogram Filtering vs Interferogram Subtraction
AMPS DMSP WMC CReSIS IREP Program at Univ. of Tasmania - Dan Steinhoff
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the Inner Core of Hurricane Nobert
Proposed Flight Lines.
Throttle, Yaw, Pitch, Roll
Presentation transcript:

GISMO Flights Plans and Objectives

Technical Objectives for April ’07 Experiment 1) Acquire data over the May 2006 flight line to compare high and low altitude observations and to compare interferometry acquired with different baselines. Are results consistent with theory? 2) Acquire data at 150 MHz and 450 MHz along every flight line and compare backscatter and interferometric frequency response? Are the results consistent with theory? 3) Acquire data over areas where we expect to find subglacial water. Is water detectable either from backscatter maps or from topography? 4) Acquire data over regions of increasing surface roughness. This may require observations over heavily crevassed shear margins such as those found around Jacobshavn Glacier. Can we successfully implement interferogram phase filtering? 5) Acquire data for tomographic analysis 6) Investigate repeat pass interferometry over repeat periods of days. 7) Verify volume clutter is weak (all snow zones) 8) Collect data over thick and thin ice to test for absorption effects

April 07 Experiment P-3 flights from Thule and Kangerdlussuaq 150 MHz and 450 MHz Radars Maximum altitude allowable 6, 6 hour flights available with existing budget

Constraints on Flight Operations Fly at maximum allowable altitude Limit flight duration to allow for daily data Q/A and experiment modifications (about 6 hours assuming 150 Gb/hour and 3, 300 Gb disks) Allow enough field time to repeat flight lines Fly over high and low clutter areas Fly over areas where some information on basal properties is known VHF and UHF radars cannot operate simultaneously – repeat P-band and VHF along same track to within 30 m Schedule 2 to 4 repeat flights at 30 m horizontal offsets for tomography

Aircraft Navigation Expected Performance 20 m ground track repeatability 0.02 degree post flight knowledge on aircraft roll and pitch 1 degree post flight knowledge on yaw