LUR 00-00414 CU MS EN EV AD Powell Butte Conditional Use Master Plan (as approved by the Land Use Hearings Officer) Water system improvements Seismic upgrades.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting April 10, 2006 Thunderbird Conservation Park Update.
Advertisements

Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
Planning & Community Development Department Maranatha High School Master Plan City Council Meeting December 15, 2014.
What is a master plan? Creates the long-term vision for the University’s land and physical resources. Lays foundation for development plan, but is not.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
January 29, 2008 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA # SE , 12/6/07 APPLICANT: Ganesh Bansrupan.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
Master Plan Update Chapter 213 of the Local Government Code provides that Cities may engage in Comprehensive Planning which may:  include but not be limited.
Ryan’s Landing Master Planned Development Application No. RZ-PUD
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
NBOZ Northlake Boulevard Overlay Zoning District Village of North Palm Beach Landscape Element Requirements.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) DECEMBER 20, 2011.
Riverside Overpass Master Planning Presenters: Sally Swanson & Magdy Abdalla June 11, SALLY SWANSON ARCHITECTS, INC. Riverside Elementary School.
City of West Linn Bolton Reservoir Replacement Planning Commission Hearing July 1, 2015 Presented by: Thomas P. Boland, P.E. Murray, Smith & Associates,
November 18, 2008 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA #SE , 9/4/08 APPLICANT: Avalon School.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Butterfly Village (PLN080209) Monterey County RMA- Planning Director July 30, 2008.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
WEST BERKELEY PROJECT Master Use Permits (MUP) May 15, 2012 Response to Concerns & Issues.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
FEBRUARY 21, 2012 BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA # SE , Nov. 03, 2011 APPELLANT/APPLICANT: CHANTEL PRESTON.
Community Development Department GEA AUTO SALES Special Exceptions to allow automotive repair and maintenance and vehicle sales.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
Laguna Canyon Creek Protection and Restoration. Major Watercourse Laguna Canyon Creek is a major watercourse. The City identifies it as that and treats.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
LOCATIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA FOR UTILITY SCALE PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR FACILITIES.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN & RZ-OTH
City of Dunnellon Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Future Land Use Element  Conservation Element  Concurrency Management System.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Amendment.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
1 City of Portland City Council Public Hearing on an Appeal of the Land Use Hearings Officer’s Decision Presentation by BDS Staff: Mark Walhood, City Planner.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Adjustment Committee Land Use Review LU AD Adjustment.
South Waterfront Greenway Design Guidelines Portland Design Commission Briefing April 3, 2008.
JUNE 18, 2013 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , MAY 2, 2013 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: JAIGOPAUL BISNAUTH.
PUD Mike Awe for Sanctuary Mission. SUBJECT PROPERTY S S S S S S S M M M M C C C C C C C.
July 4, 2017 AURORA UNITED CHURCH + SOUTHBOUND DEVELOPMENT LTD Yonge Street, 55&57/57A Temperance Street, 12&16 Tyler Street General Committee Meeting.
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
Land Use Regulations March 28, 2017.
Portuguese American Cultural Center Property Rezoning to
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
WVAR Sierra RV S. Virginia Street (old 395 S)
Concept Plan for Proposed Park Near Hopewell School
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing February 2, 2011
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Tam O’Shanter Rezoning
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
URBAN TRAIL PROJECT UPDATES
City Council Meeting April 29, 2019
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Michele Norton, Planner City of North Port
Washoe County Board of Adjustment October 4, 2018
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Presentation transcript:

LUR CU MS EN EV AD Powell Butte Conditional Use Master Plan (as approved by the Land Use Hearings Officer) Water system improvements Seismic upgrades to the existing underground water storage reservoir. Construct two new underground reservoirs on the Butte. Construct two new conduits to the new 50 mg reservoir (water supply from Bull Run and emergency overflow to Johnson Creek). Construct a conduit connecting the 20 mg reservoir to the regional water supply system. Construct a new pump station and hydropower generator. Park improvements Construct five new trails and close and revegetate several unauthorized trails. Construct a grass amphitheater for an outdoor teaching area near the existing parking area. Replace the caretaker’ home. Construct a 5,000 square-foot maintenance building and a 40,000 square foot storage area. Construct an information kiosk. Pave the upper gravel parking area. Modify restroom facilities to comply with ADA standards. Designate a 100+-acre area in the southeast of the park for wildlife. Restrict visitor access. Mitigation Improvements (Environmental Violation) Remove Himalayan Blackberry and English Ivy from five areas south and east of the Park and north of Johnson Creek. Plant native trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Construct split-rail fence and information kiosk east of the Park boundary in Site 4 Middle. Remove small shed from Site 2.

History Application made July 2000 Application complete April 2002 Hearing before Land Use Hearings Officer May 2002 Decision July 2002 Appeals made by Pleasant Valley and Centennial Nieghborhood Associations July 2002 Appeal hearing before City Council October 2002

Appeal Issues Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Association  Noncompliance with Zoning Code Chapters (Conditional Uses) and (Conditional Use Master Plans)  Adjustment to tree removal regulations should be limited to species on the Nuisance Plant List.  Noncompliance with G.2(b) for Environmental Violation review.  Noncompliance with A.1(c) for Environmental Review for Master Plan development.  Would like reinclusion of the Mitigation Bank into the Master Plan (removed by the Land Use Hearings Officer). Centennial Neighborhood Association  Violation of A-D because there is no mention of a water treatment plant for Phase I.  Noncompliance with for tree removal.  The proposed maintenance yard size and location is not justified.  Oppose the use of herbicides for vegetation removal.

Approval Criteria (for Plan elements approved by the Land Use Hearings Officer) Code SectionReview Uses in the Open Space Zone (Conditional Uses) Rail Lines and Utility Corridors (Conditional Uses) Conditional Use Master Plans A-C, E-GEnvironmental Review Approval Criteria Adjustments Goal 6Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan

Site Location in the City

Powell Butte and Surrounding Area SE Powell Boulevard SE Foster Road Springwater Line Johnson Creek SE 136th Avenue SE Jenne Road SE 174th Avenue

General Zoning

Master Plan Site Boundaries and water supply projects

Main Entrance at SE 162nd Avenue and SE Powell Boulevard

Neighborhood to the North of Powell Butte

Entry on the North Side of Powell Butte Park

Northwest Corner of Powell Butte

View of Neighborhood West of Powell Butte

Park Entry on the West Side

Southwest Corner of Powell Butte

Newly-Acquired Property on the South Side of Powell Butte

Residence on the South Side of Powell Butte

Springwater Trail and South Side of Powell Butte

East Side of Powell Butte

Commercial Development Northeast of Powell Butte and Residential Development Beyond

Powell Butte Park Entry

Water Reservoir Development Seismic upgrades to the existing reservoir New 50 million gallon reservoir west of the existing one New conduits to the new reservoir New 20 million gallon reservoir New pump station/hydropower generator

Existing 50 Million Gallon Reservoir

Reservoir Above-Ground Structure

Proposed 50 Million Gallon Reservoir Location

Proposed 20 Million Gallon Reservoir Location

Pipeline Location for the 20 Million Gallon Reservoir

Pump Station/Hydropower Generator Location

Pipeline Right-of-Way East of Powell Butte Park

Pipeline Right-of-Way East of Powell Butte

Outfall Structure

Park Improvements Five new trails, close and revegetate several trails Grass amphitheater New caretaker’s home Maintenance building and storage area Rebuilt parking area Remodeled restrooms Restricted wildlife area Invasive tree removal (Adjustment)

Parking Lot Amphitheater Maintenance Facility Major Above Ground Facilities main entrance Restrooms Caretaker’s Residence

Parking Lot and Proposed Amphitheater Location

Existing Horse Trailer Parking Lot and Residences Beyond

Caretaker’s House to be Replaced

Restroom Facilities to be Upgraded

Unimproved Trail

“Volunteer” Trail Branching Off Main Trail

Invasive Hawthorne Trees in the Meadow

Environmental Violation and Adjustment Remove Himalayan blackberries and English ivy Plant native trees, shrubs, groundcover Construct fencing Remove shed (all mitigation actions are completed)

Pipeline Area of Tree Cutting Environmental Violation and Adjustment Request Powell Butte Park Johnson Creek SE Jenne Road

Pipeline Right-of-Way East of Powell Butte Park

Johnson Creek Adjacent to the Pipeline Right-of-Way

Pipeline Right-of-Way

Appeal Issues and Hearings Officer Response  Noncompliance with Zoning Code Chapters (Conditional Uses) and (Conditional Use Master Plans) No specific details were given as to why the decision does not comply. The Hearings Officer decision details how all approval criteria for the Conditional Use and Conditional Use Master Plan are met.  Adjustment to tree removal regulations should be limited to species on the Nuisance Plant List. No reason was given as to why tree removal should be limited to nuisance species. Findings of the Hearings Officer concluded that removal of non- nuisance species was appropriate and necessary in order to develop water facilities on the Butte (particularly the pump station).  Noncompliance with G.2(b) for Environmental Violation review. The Hearings Officer determined that removal of non-native nuisance plants, replanting with native plants, and opening a forested area provide increased habitat for meadow wildlife, increased diversity of food (plants), and increased scenic values.

Appeal Issues and Hearings Officer Response (continued)  Noncompliance with A.1(c) for Environmental Review for Master Plan development. The Hearings Officer determined that restoration and replanting of disturbed areas will provide adequate mitigation and met this criterion (conditions I and J). In addition to and beyond the required mitigation, future reviews are included in the Plan to ensure no net loss of resource values (condition H).  Would like reinclusion of the Mitigation Bank into the Master Plan (removed by the Land Use Hearings Officer). There was not enough information on the mitigation bank to determine that it met the applicable approval criteria. As details of the mitigation bank are developed, the applicant will request an amendment to the Master Plan.  Violation of A-D because there is no mention of a water treatment plant for Phase I. The water treatment plant is not part of the Master Plan because: (1) need of the treatment plant has not been established; (2) preferred location of the treatment plant has not been chosen; and (3) any construction of the treatment plant would be beyond the ten-year lifespan of the Master Plan. A possible water treatment plant on Powell Butte was mentioned in the Master Plan for compliance with C as a “…possible future use.”

Appeal Issues and Hearings Officer Response (continued)  Noncompliance with for tree removal. The Hearings Officer determined that, because of the need for regrading of the area around the pump station and its parking area, and for maintenance-related activities for the pipeline (resulting in the environmental violation), the Adjustment to allow tree cutting beyond the limits set in the Johnson Creek Basin Plan District were justified.  The proposed maintenance yard size and location is not justified. The applicant submitted justification for the maintenance yard. The Hearings Officer determined that there was sufficient justification for a 40,000 square-foot yard and approved the Plan element. No reason was given as to how the Hearings Officer’s conclusion and decision was in error.  Oppose the use of herbicides for vegetation removal. Herbicide application per se is not prohibited within an Environmental Zone, as long as it is used only to remove targeted vegetation (in this case non- native nuisance plants), and not surrounding plants.

Conclusion The Master Plan is an update and expansion of one adopted by City Council in 1996 that never received land use approvals. The Plan is generally renovation, relocation, replacement, or expansion of existing water supply and recreation development and activities. The Plan includes a maintenance program to enhance scenic and natural resources. Implementation of the Plan will have little impact on the surrounding area after construction. Park facilities are only a moderate expansion of fairly low-impact recreation activities, so any increase in traffic, noise, and other impacts to the neighborhood should be negligible. Environmental impacts are offset by restoration and ongoing enhancement and maintenance. Because of the large scale of the Master Plan, it is not possible to have the details necessary to give full land use approvals at this time. Future land use reviews will be necessary, and are outlined in the Plan.

Recommendation Uphold the Land Use Hearings Officer’s Decision to Approve: – Conditional Use Master Plan for Powell Butte Park and surrounding area. – Environmental Review for both proposed development and vegetation removal violations. – Adjustment to A to allow removal of trees greater than six inches in diameter. – Approvals are subject to conditions generally: Updating the plan and site plan Modifying development standards Modifying approval criteria for future reviews Constructing transportation access improvements Specifying planting and restoration requirements