Cutting the environmental cost of food production Study Webcast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System of Environmental and Economic Accounts The SEEA 2003 Revision Mark de Haan Statistics Netherlands London Group WIOD Conference Vienna 26 May 2010.
Advertisements

Extending the external costs framework Prof. Anil Markandya University of Bath External costs of energy and their internalisation in Europe Dialogue with.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
SAVE FOOD – Global Initiative on food losses and waste reduction
Exploring potential to link smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya with carbon markets Andreas Wilkes UNIQUE forestry and landuse GmbH
Why Turkey is interested in NCA? Arzu ÖNSAL Ministry of Development 29 June 2014.
Water: Impacts, Risks and Opportunities in our Supply Chain Vevey, 22 March 2012 Carlo Galli.
AGA’s Programme on Livestock in Climate Change December 1 st, 2009 Pierre Gerber Livestock Policy Officer, AGAL.
Natural capital, ecosystem services and the UK dairy industry Les Firbank Firbank Ecosystems Ltd & University of Leeds.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Importance and Uses of Agricultural Statistics Section B 1.
Presentation of the joint study Dr Richard Mattison, CEO Trucost Plc
IMS Member Commitments Jurgen Preugschas, IMS Executive Committee International Meat Secretariat Ottawa, Canada October 2013.
Agricultural Solutions to Support Food Security, Sustainability & Animal Welfare Mia MacDonald COP 17 - Durban December 2,
Economics of Land Degradation Initiative Richard J. Thomas ELD Scientific coordinator United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health.
How can the water footprint contribute to the formulation of a national climate change adaptation strategy? Adaptation Workshop, 2 nd Nov. 2011, Nicosia.
1950: 2.5 billion people. 2000: 6 billion people.
Virtual Water Trade to Japan and in the World. 2 “Required water” …the water that is used in the production process of agricultural or industrial goods.
5 th Meeting of the UNCEEA June 23-25, New York Pablo Munoz and Brad Ewing Harmonizing the National Footprint Accounts with the System of Integrated Environmental.
TRANSFORMING CAPABILITY SUPPORT MATERIALS LEADING VISION CREATION Triple Bottom Line Introduction The triple bottom line is synonymous with sustainability.
Global Futures and Strategic Foresight and the IMPACT Model Keith Wiebe International Food Policy Research Institute Workshop on Integrating Biodiversity.
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
Environmental sustainability: a feed and livestock industry perspective Nick Major EU Food SCP RT Plenary meeting 20 November 2013.
Arjen Hoekstra UNESCO-IHE, Delft, Netherlands ( The role of virtual water transfer in water management.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
Dutch Enviromental Accounts and policy demands Geert Bruinooge Deputy Director General Statistics Netherlands.
10 th Meeting of the UNCEEA, New York, June 2016 System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Development.
World Resources Institute Corporate Ecosystem Services Review Training How to Use the ESR.
Conservation Agriculture in Vietnam Presented by Duong Ngoc Thi, Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development.
Exploring the use of water pricing as a policy tool to improve water resource use efficiency in the agricultural sector FAO, OECD and IWMI Session: “Drops.
The objective of this presentation is to gain an understanding of sustainable agriculture and discuss the roadmap to move in this direction.  Agriculture.
ARGENTINA MEETING WITH SAUDI ARABIAN DELEGATION OCTOBER 12, 2010 ARGENTINA.
Ecosystem Services: Perspectives on the Bottom Line for Business and Industry Marcus Lee, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment FIDIC 2005, 6 September, Beijing.
SESSION 2 Identifying Synergies Among MEAs Using IEA Tools.
IUCN, WBCSD, Sep 2007 Markets for Ecosystem Services: New Challenges and Opportunities for Business and the Environment.
Capacity Development for the CDM (CD4CDM) First National Workshop - SURINAM Sustainable Development Impact Evaluation Miriam Hinostroza.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
ISI Durban 57 th Session of the International Statistical Institute, August 2009 Ivo Havinga Chief of Economic Statistics Branch UN Statistics Division.
OVERVIEW OF THE ROLES OF VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AFLATOXIN CONTROL IN TANZANIA RAYMOND N. WIGENGE DIRECTOR OF FOOD SAFETY TFDA.
Can Biofuels be Sustainable in an Unsustainable Agriculture? Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel Chad M. Hellwinckel American Chemical Society.
Measuring Progress towards Green Growth through indicators OECD work UNCEEA Sixth meeting New York, June 2011.
The Methodology of APEC Food Losses Assessment Emily Ching-Cheng CHANG Research Fellow Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica APEC Seminar on “Strengthening.
World Food Day World Food Day 2015 is an occasion to focus the world’s attention on the crucial role played by social protection in eradicating.
Michigan State University 21 st April 2014 Understanding the impact of the supply chain Dr. James Salo SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, NORTH AMERICA TRUCOST.
The Mosaic Company: GHG Emissions and Energy Bryan Valladares Sustainability Analyst, Sr. The Mosaic Company.
CCD COP Rio Pavilion Special Event 15 October 2015 Chizuru Aoki GEF Secretariat Sustainable Development Goals and Synergy.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
1 External Costs: A Tool for Internalizing Imported Pollution Ari Rabl Ecole des Mines de Paris Damage cost of pollution = external cost Imported pollution.
The SEEA revision Key issues and outcomes Mark de Haan.
SPI4 Green Module “Green Index”. Green? > Environment! We can agree that our lives depend on a healthy environment The quality of the environment is under.
Sustainability in the Supply Chain 5 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. SUPPLEMENT.
© 2016 Global Market Insights. All Rights Reserved Bio fertilizers market size to reach $1.66 billion by 2022.
THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT STATE AND OUTLOOK 2015 Green Economy at EEA.
Bell Work Define what you think an indicator is.
Environmental Performance Prepared for CFOA, London, 28th January 2010 By Matt Farnsworth: Environment & Sustainability Manager, Nottinghamshire.
The Increasing Relevance of Virtual Water
Investing in Natural Capital
Powerpoint Jeopardy Development Agriculture Industry
Cost of Production: Uses and Users
Fish Trade, SDG 14 and Fisheries Subsidies
Global Livestock Development with Special Focus on Latin America
Helping people and organizations thrive
SPC - FAO Discussion on developing a Concept Note
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND PRODUCTIVITY
SPC - FAO Discussion on developing a Concept Note
OECD Green growth strategy Measuring progress through indicators
Satellites and beyond GDP
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY
Climate Change Statistics for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
MarketsandMarkets Presents Agricultural Biologicals Testing Market worth 1.12 Billion USD by 2021.
Presentation transcript:

Cutting the environmental cost of food production Study Webcast

United Nations agency specialized in food and agriculture and representing 194 member nations seeking to achieve food security for all. Global leader in valuing natural capital and quantifying the economic consequences of natural capital dependency. Nadia El-Hage Scialabba Senior Natural Resources Officer FAO, Rome Libby Bernick Senior Vice President North America Trucost Richie Hardwicke Food and Agriculture sector lead –EMEA Trucost INTRODUCTION Chris Baldock Senior Analyst Trucost

Why FAO commissioned this work? What are the study findings? Objectives, Scope, methods and data What is the environmental cost of food production? What are the opportunities for more sustainable food production? What can you do? WEBCAST AGENDA

WHY FAO COMMISIONED THIS WORK?

FAO Guidelines on Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA) include, among others: Good Governance dimension (1/4 SAFA Dimensions) Holistic Management (1/21 SAFA Themes) Full-Cost Accounting (1/116 SAFA Indicators) Sustainability Management Plan (1/2 Holistic Management indicators) SAFA Stakeholders unanimously requested, in March 2013, that joint work be undertaken to develop practical ways for full-cost accounting for improving their triple bottom line assessments and reporting Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

Food Wastage Footprint: Full-Cost Accounting (FAO, 2014) quantified environmental externalities and social wellbeing lost due to environmental degradation: Economic costs: USD 1055 billion (market value and subsidies) Environmental costs: USD 696 billion (air, land, water, biodiversity) Social costs: USD 882 billion (livelihoods, health, conflicts) Methodological questions and uncertainties led to meeting the relatively small international community working on similar topics, such as TEEB, NCC and Trucost FAO seeks to: Raise enterprises awareness on the inter-dependency between production and natural resources (Nature’s free inputs) Inform policy-makers in natural capital impacts, with a view to build synergies across agriculture and environmental constituencies Improve data sets: UN System of Environmental and Economic Accounting since 2012 => towards SEEA Agriculture

THE STUDY FINDINGS OBJECTIVES, APPROACH, METHODS, DATA

OBJECTIVES Raise awareness of the invisible environmental costs of industrial food production Present an indication of the magnitude, location specificity and source of these costs Provide an example of a frameworks that can be used to measure the net environmental benefits associated with improvements in agricultural management practices Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

SCOPE High –level materiality approach Assessment covered 4 crops -wheat, maize, soy and rice 4 livestock commodities cow/beef, cow/dairy, pork and poultry Covered industrial, large scale, intensive farming practices in over 40 countries Included 80% of total production of each commodity Accounted for the costs associated with both the cultivation phase as well as the supply chain associated with each individual commodity Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

Crops ImpactFarming Supply Chain GHGs (from energy & non-energy sources) ✓✓ GHGs (from land clearing) ✓✓ Air pollutants ✓✓ Land pollutants ✓✓ Water pollutants ✓✓ Water consumption ✓✓ Land use change ✓✓ Livestock IMPACTS Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

METHODS - QUANTIFICATION Farming Emissions are estimated by applying emissions factors that are: Country-specific Commodity specific Emissions factor examples are: tonnes CO2 per kg of meat m3 water use per kg crop Emissions factors are sourced from a variety of sources (see next slide) Supply Chain Emissions are estimated by applying environmental intensities to financial transactions in Trucost’s input-output model Environmental intensities Emissions calculated per unit of revenue Sources include FAO, IEA, EIA, USGS, LCA data… Input-output model Financial flows across 531 sectors US Bureau of Economic Analysis Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

DATA Non-energy related emissions FAOSTAT emissions database – country- specific Energy related emissions Agri-footprint – country-specific Ecoinvent – country-specific Water consumption Mekonnen and Hoekstra (2010) – country- specific Land Use Livestock: FAO SOL-model – country- specific Crops: FAOSTAT Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

METHODS - VALUATION A literature review was conducted in order to understand the magnitude of each environmental impact on receptors such as crops, ecosystems, human health and materials. Secondary literature was used to estimate the social cost of these impacts – natural capital valuation The valuations reflect the impact on ecosystems and the damage to human health. Value transfer techniques were applied to make the valuations country-specific. Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

THE STUDY FINDINGS RESULTS

Study reveals $3 trillion environmental cost of industrial farming On average: 68 percent of the impacts of livestock production can be attributed to operational activities taking place on the farm. 77 percent of the natural capital costs of crop production occur on the farm Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

TOP 10 OPERATIONAL AND SUPPLY CHAIN NATURAL CAPITAL COSTS OF CROP PRODUCTION BY COUNTRY CROPS

OPERATIONAL NATURAL CAPITAL INTENSITY OF CROP COMMODITIES (USD OF IMPACTS PER TONNE OF PRODUCTION) COMMODITY IMPACTS MATERIALITY

TOP 10 OPERATIONAL AND SUPPLY CHAIN NATURAL CAPITAL COSTS OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION BY COUNTRY LIVESTOCK Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

 Beef: Holistic grazing management vs. conventional cattle grazing in Brazil  Rice: System of rice intensification (SRI) vs. conventional rice farming in India  Soy: Organic farming vs. conventional soybean farming in the USA  Wheat: Organic farming vs. conventional wheat farming in Germany IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITES EXIST Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

CASE STUDY SRI RICE IN INDIA MONETARY VALUE OF THE OPERATIONAL IMPACTS CAUSED BY PRODUCING ONE TONNE OF RICE IN INDIA Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

WE ALL HAVE A PART TO PLAY Source: Natural Capital Coalition Food and Beverage Sector Guide: The Food and Beverage Value Chain Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

DECOUPLING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

STANDARDISED FRAMEWORKS TO MEASURE IMPACT AND DEPENDENCY Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

THREE QUESTIONS 1. What is our interaction with Natural capital? 2. How do these impacts and dependencies drive risks and opportunities ? 3. How do these risks and opportunities effect the economics of our business or country Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

1.What is our interaction with Natural capital? Source: Natural Capital Coalition Food and Beverage Sector Guide: Materiality Matrix for the value chain of barley used to produce beer Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

2.How do these impacts and dependencies drive risks and opportunities ? Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do RISK AND OPPORTUNITY CATAGORIES Operational X Legal/ Regulatory X Marketing and product Reputational X Financial X

3.How do these risks and opportunities effect the economics of our business Why FAO commissioned the work – The study - What can you do

United Nations agency specialized in food and agriculture and representing 194 member nations seeking to achieve food security for all. Global leader in valuing natural capital and quantifying the economic consequences of natural capital dependency. QUESTIONS Nadia El-Hage Scialabba Senior Natural Resources Officer FAO, Rome Libby Bernick Senior Vice President North America Trucost Richie Hardwicke Food and Agriculture sector lead –EMEA Trucost Chris Baldock Senior Analyst Trucost