Working with the WISP & Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 21, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HEARTH Webinar Part II This is Part II of the webinar providing an overview of the local implementation of the HEARTH Act. Thank you for watching, the.
Advertisements

2014 HUD Data Standards. New & Active Clients All ESG, CoC and SSVF funded agencies are required to begin collecting data on new and active clients based.
SSVF Program Launch: Establishing Services in Compliance with Goals and Regulations Practice Area 1: Outreach, Engagement and Admission.
Austin/Travis County CoC PSH Bonus SEPTEMBER 22,2014.
Homeless Assistance in Ohio Changes in the 2012 Consolidated Plan.
VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKGROUP Reallocate $ for more community based housing Need rapid rehousing dollars Adjust current grant to allow for more.
Continuum of Care (CoC)  Promotes community-wide commitment to the goal of ending homelessness.  Provides funding for efforts by nonprofit providers.
Safe Harbors Quarterly Partner’s Meeting November 17, Building.
Coordinated Assessment: Understanding Assessment Tools 1 Kim Walker & Norm Suchar November 2013.
June 25, Agenda Status of PIT methodology Night of Count – dates & times Geography – locations Survey Tool Post Count Process, requirements, deadline.
Creating a Unified Person-Centered Housing and Homelessness System February 2015.
Coordinated Entry.  Helping people move through the system faster  Sends households to intervention best fit from the start  Reduce new entries into.
Virginia Learning Collaboratives Reducing Family Homelessness in Virginia: A Rapid Re-Housing Approach.
Federal and State Funding Shifts to Rapid Re-Housing: The Positive Impact on Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing Programs Audio Conference sponsored.
Updates: - PSH Centralized Housing Registry - ID Taskforce OAKLAND COUNTY ALLIANCE FOR HOUSING DEBRA HENDREN, COMMUNITY HOUSING NETWORK.
HUD’s Homeless Assistance Ann Marie Oliva. Overview of Presentation Update on Status of Regulations FY 2013 and FY 2014 Budgets and Implications Policy.
2014 Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) Data Standards for ESG Presented by Melissa Mikel September
HPRP Reporting Training For Quarterly Reporting Nov. 20 th wilderresearch.org.
Thursday, September 3, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based.
Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.
2016 Emergency Shelter & Housing Assistance Program Information Meeting October 20, 2015.
HOMELESS VERIFICATION FORMS GRANTEE WORKSHOP Anna Jacobsen City of Pasadena.
CAHS Process Flow operator completes pre-screen for shelter eligibility 3a operator transmits screening document over secure network to.
ORGANIZING THE FRONT DOOR: COORDINATED ASSESSMENT Emily Carmody & Corey Root NCCEH Rebecca Pfeiffer City of Charlotte.
FY 2015 Continuum of Care Application Priorities and Process Presentation to the Lake County Coalition for the Homeless April 7, 2015.
Brap & Shelter Plus Care Programs. BRAP Bridging Rental Assistance Program.
December 15,  Point in Time Count  AHAR  Chronic Homelessness – final definition  Orange County Rapid ReHousing applications  Upcoming Calendar.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
The HEARTH Academy System Assessment and Design October 2010.
HMIS and PSH: Receiving Referrals from the One List Ending Veteran Homelessness Initiative.
Ann Oliva, Director Brett Gagnon, Program Specialist Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs HEARTH Act: Continuum of Care Program.
INTRODUCTION TO THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM Wisconsin Balance of State Continuum of Care.
Debriefing Rapid Rehousing Work Groups FRIDAY, 4/15/2016.
2014 HMIS Data Standards Overview HMIS Data Standards Background – Key resources – Implementation Timeline – Revision Process Overview of Key.
Balance of State Coordinated Entry List Holder Training Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator Jesse Dirkman, ICA March 10, 2016.
Balance of State Coordinated Entry Non-WISP Referral Form Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator Jesse Dirkman, ICA March 14, 2016.
EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUUM OF CARE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR COORDINATED ENTRY Status: Approved by Eastern PA CoC Governing Board on October 19, 2015 Revised:
Thursday, March 1, Agenda Status of Post Count Process Common Issues/Errors HMIS data Non-WISP data HIC Deduplication Impact of Service Based Counting.
Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (SPDAT) Introduction to SPDAT & Training Protocol.
Managing the Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 27, 2016.
Eligible Costs – Rental Assistance & Rapid Re-housing (RRH) 24 CFR CFR
Regional Approaches to Coordinated Assessment, Prioritization and Housing Placement Eddie Barber, Simtech Solutions Inc. Gary Sanford, Metro Denver Homeless.
Reallocation and Prioritization
Shelter Participation in Coordinated Entry
2017 Continuum of Care: New Project Informational session
Norm Suchar Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs
Mountainland Continuum of Care
2017 HIC & PIT January 26, 2017.
2017 Continuum of Care Funding Cycle.
Building an Effective Homeless Response System
HMIS Data Standards 2017 Changes
Presented by - CARES, Inc. August 17, 2017
Types Of Prioritization & Matching Primarily two: Bucket Prioritization Continuous Prioritization.
Understanding safety planning
Balance of State CoC Competition: Scoring Tool and Threshold
Maine CoC Coordinated Entry
Ending Family Homelessness in Cuyahoga County
Domestic Violence (DV) Bonus FY 2018 an introduction & REVIEW
Coordinated Entry System
Let’s get people some bus passes!
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
Working Together: Domestic Violence and Homelessness Services Coordination: Connecticut’s Approach July 25, 2018.
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
2:12 Envisioning an Effective Systemic Response to Rural Homelessness
Louisiana Housing Authority
Ending Homelessness & Coordinated Entry
CoC Competition FY19 Overview
Coordinated Entry - Supporting DV Survivors: Innovative Practices/ Emerging Best Practices Series: Connecticut’s Approach September, 2018.
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
HMIS Support.
Presentation transcript:

Working with the WISP & Non-WISP Prioritization List Carrie Poser, COC Coordinator April 21, 2016

Agenda Overview Prioritization Review (PSH, TH, RRH) Perspective of a Housing Provider – “I have an opening. Now what?” WISP Prioritization List Non-WISP Prioritization List Contact Accept or Decline

Coordinated Entry Coordinated Entry is Not:  A specific tool  What you have already been doing  One agency’s responsibility  About putting your clients into your program  A fix for lack of resources  A wait list Coordinated Entry is:  A system  A method of prioritizing clients based on need  An entire local continua’s responsibility  About housing people with the greatest need into any eligible program  An opportunity to discuss community needs and resources  An active list of people in need of housing services

Written Standards – Order of Priority All 3 main project types have written standards and an order of priority. Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH): Chronic status (includes disability and length of homelessness) & VI-SPDAT score Transitional Housing (TH): Homeless category, Disability, & VI-SPDAT score Rapid Re-housing (RRH): VI-SPDAT The written standards cover more than prioritization. The prioritization is a key component of the coordinated entry process.

Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Chronic status priority – 12 month consecutive or 4 times in 3 years totaling 12 months or more (new definition) VI-SPDAT score (must be 8+) or VI-F-SPDAT score (must be 9+) Length of homelessness used as a tie-breaker

Transitional Housing (TH) Priority: Category 1 or 4 homeless status Disability (adult) VI-SPDAT score (must be 8+) or VI-F-SPDAT score (must be 9+) Length of homelessness used as a tie-breaker

Rapid Re-Housing (RRH) VI-SPDAT score & VI-F-Score (must be at least 4) Requirements – Category 1 Length of homelessness used as a tie-breaker

“I have an opening. Now what?” Housing Provider Type If the housing provider is an agency that does not use WISP, they must contact a partner agency that uses Service Point to run the WISP Prioritization list for families & singles. If the housing provider is an agency that uses WISP, they must run the Prioritization list for singles and families. Based on the project type (PSH, TH, RRH), the staff will take the first person off the WISP list and note their “numbers” or “information.” Then, the staff person must contact the List Holder for their continua. Based on the project type (PSH, TH, RRH), the List Holder will be asked if the highest person is higher in priority than the WISP person. This will involve asking about VI-SPDAT score, length of homelessness, disability, chronic status, etc.

If the person on the WISP list has higher priority scores, then the opening is offered to that person. To document, staff should follow the ICA instructions and process for accepting referrals in Service Point. If the person on the Non-WISP list has higher priority scores, then the opening is offered to that person. To document, staff should contact the List Holder and get the referring agency contact information and unique ID for the person and let the List Holder know that the referral is “accepted.” List Holder should following the instructions and process for completing the “Housing Action” tab on the Non-WISP Prioritization List.

“I have the name. Now what?” The Housing Provider must contact the actual person or referring agency to get contact information for the person. When talking to the potential client, the client could: Refuse the project or agency offering the service Accept Decline as they have already found a solution to their situation Each situation requires action on the part of the Housing Provider.

Client Refuses Regardless of why the refusal occurs, if the client wishes to remain on the list – then: WISP referral – follow ICA instructions regarding a declined referral, add notes, and re- add the referral. Non-WISP referral – contact List Holder with information for the List Holder to update the Non-WISP Prioritization list to decline the referral, add notes, and re-add the referral.

Client Accepts If the client accepts, then the agency moves forward with the verification process. ALL clients must have the following verified through documentation (as is required): Homeless Verification Chronic Homeless Verification Disability Verification Length of Homelessness

Client Declines – found a different solution If the client has found a different solution or no longer wants to remain on the list: WISP referral – follow ICA process to marking the client as housed (if applicable) Non-WISP referral – contact List Holder to document the client is housed (if applicable)

“What if I can’t contact the person?” The Balance of State policy is that an agency should attempt three separate times over two weeks to contact the person at the top of the list. These three separate time should be documented. This is a minimum time frame. If your LCAS has agreed to a longer time frame, you must following those parameters. After using due diligence, if the agency can still not get a hold of the client – they must document in WISP or contact the List Holder to document on the Non-WISP Prioritization list.

Role of the Agency Application There have been many questions about the role an Agency Application plays in enrollment of eligible clients. If a person is the highest priority for housing and the eligibility factors (homeless status, disability, chronic homeless status) are verified – there should be no reason to deny a client. What is the purpose of the application? If the purpose of the application is to gather additional collateral information, your staff must ensure the application process does not add an obstacle to obtaining housing.

List Holder Disclaimer The List Holder CANNOT release the access of the list. The List Holder CANNOT download the list to share. The List Holder CANNOT out the information about the people on the list. The List Holder CAN provide the next highest prioritized person’s information, referring agency, and unique ID.

NOTICE It is prohibited for any HUD-funded homelessness assistance programs to serve individuals and/or families experiencing homelessness or who are at imminent risk of homelessness, without the household first going through the Coordinated Assessment System and receiving a referral to the Prioritization List.

QUESTIONS?

Resources All Balance of State COC information pertaining to Coordinated Entry system is located on the BOS website: This includes: The Coordinated Entry Policy The Coordinated Entry 101 webinar and slides Transitional Housing Prioritization webinar and slides List-Holder/DLA Training: Managing the Non-WISP List webinar & slides NON WISP Referral Form Training webinar & slides BOS Pre-Screen Form (revised) Paper version and fillable version of the VI-SPDAT version 2.0 Paper version and fillable version of the VI-F-SPDAT version 2.0 HUD brief on Coordinated Entry