Starting note on gearshift issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Advertisements

flat belt + wind tunnel method
Working Paper No. WLTP-09-07e 1 Agenda item 5: Progress report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IG meeting, 14.
WLTP drive trace normalization
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
WLTP-11-12e Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce wind tunnel method road load.
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, section 2 Use of the gearbox, required data.
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
WLTP-10-11e 1 By H. Steven Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written in.
Working Paper No. WLTP rev1e 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IWG meeting,
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e short 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) draft 1. Proposals for adoption 2. Discussion points.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Revision of ECE R41 ASEP Concept for Motorcycles By Heinz Steven
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP gtr Annex 9 Determination of Method Equivalency - Progress Report
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
WLTP-DHC Gear shift analysis Proposed by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden.
WLTP-11-5e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert
Improvement of Family definitions
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Proposal for a mid vehicle concept
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
RDE Regulation Random Cycle, Cycle Generation
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Current status of WLTP-DHC
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
Full load curve proposal
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Document TYREGTR Agenda item 4.4
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
WLTP-27-03e gear shift issues
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-10e
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Additional discussion points from the gearshift issues task force
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Presentation transcript:

Starting note on gearshift issues WLTP-14-05e Cycle / gearshifting Starting note on gearshift issues Heinz Steven 27.04.2016 1

Carry over item from phase 1b According to the Excel sheet “WLTP Phase 2, working items and schedule “nmin_drive” is listed as carry over item from phase 1b. It is further expressed that the work should be continued based on the latest VCC proposal. The members of the phase 1b gearshift issues task force were already contacted and informed that the work needs to be continued on a short time base, because this task is dedicated to phase 2a. 2

Further issues to be discussed Meanwhile OEMs and other parties started testing vehicles according to GTR #15 and, as could be expected, some people found problems. These problems are mainly related to paragraph 4 of annex 2 of GTR #15 “Additional requirements for corrections and/or modifications of gear use”. But in addition to that one OEM found driveability problems, which could be related to the low engine speed end of the wot power curve. And one OEM brought up a problem, where the technical design of the drivetrain is not covered by annex 2 of GTR #15 at all. 3

Amendment for nmax With the Informal document GRPE-72-10-Rev.2 the text in annex 2 indent (g) was supplemented as follows: (g) nmax nmax_95, the minimum engine speed where 95 per cent of rated power is reached, min-1. If nmax_95 is less than 65 per cent of nrated, nmax_95 shall be set to 65 per cent of nrated. If 65 per cent of nrated x ndv3 / ndv2 < 1,1 x (nidle + 0.125 × ( nrated -nidle )), nmax_95 shall be set to 1,1 x (nidle + 0.125 ×( nrated -nidle )) x ndv2 / ndv3 The text in red colour needs to be added in Informal document GRPE-72-10-Rev.2. 4

Additional requirements, phases Paragraph 4 of annex 2 of GTR #15 starts with the following: The initial gear selection shall be checked and modified in order to avoid too frequent gearshifts and to ensure driveability and practicality. An acceleration phase is a time period of more than 3 seconds with a vehicle speed ≥ 1 km/h and with monotonic increase of vehicle speed. A deceleration phase is a time period of more than 3 seconds with a vehicle speed ≥ 1 km/h and with monotonic decrease of vehicle speed. It needs to be assessed, whether more than 3 s is appropriate or whether it needs to be reduced or deleted. 5

Additional requirements, rank order Calculations for N2 vehicles with extremely “short” transmission ratios, where the maximum speed of the vehicle is determined by the engine speed limiter in the highest gear and not by the road load resistance led to inconsistencies in the gear sequence calculation. In order to eliminate these inconsistencies, the rank order of the additional requirements for corrections and/or modifications of gear use need to be rearranged as follows: (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) --> (a), (b), (f), (c), (d), (e) (a), (b) are related to accelerations, (c) to (d) are related to decelerations and (f) is related to the replacement of too short gear sequences. 6

Additional requirements, clearer text And old (c), new (d) should be amended as follows: ……If the duration of a gear sequence is 2 seconds, it shall be replaced by gear 0 for the 1st second and for the 2nd second with the gear that follows after the 2 second period. The clutch shall be disengaged for the 1st second. Example: A gear sequence 5, 4, 4, 2 shall be replaced by 5, 0, 2, 2. It needs to be clarified that this requirement shall only be applied, if the gears before and after the 2 second period are > 0. 7

Additional requirements, clearer text And old (e), new (f) should be amended as follows: If the deceleration phase is the last part of a short trip shortly before a stop phase and the second gear gear in this phase would only be used for up to two seconds, the clutch may be either disengaged or the gear lever placed in neutral and the clutch left engaged. (Examples: A gear sequence of : 4, 0, 2, 2, 0 for the last 5 seconds before a stop phase shall be replaced by 4, 0, 0, 0, 0. A gear sequence of 4, 3, 3, 0 for the last 4 seconds before a stop phase shall be replaced by 4, 0, 0, 0.) A downshift to first gear is not permitted during those deceleration phases. The proposed modifications are indicated in red. 8

Driveability problems One OEM reported driveability problems. The problems are related to the low engine speed range, where the wot power increases rapidly with increasing engine speed. Figure 1 shows an example. Accelerations starting at engine speeds in the red part result in poor repeatability. This issue should be more deeply discussed in the gearshift issues task force. One solution could be to increase the safety margin for such parts of the wot curve. 9

Driveability problems Figure 1 10

Gear specific wot power curves One OEM reported, that there might be vehicles in future, that have gear specific wot power curves. This is not covered by GTR #15. In principle, this problem can be solved but makes things much more complex and complicated. 11

Combination of downscaling and speed cap Another issue, that needs to be clarified, is an annex 1 related issue: the combination of downscaling and speed cap. The authors interpretation of annex 1 of GTR #15 is as follows: A vehicle gets downscaling, when the ratio between the maximum power required within the WLTC and rated power exceeds the threshold value listed in paragraph 8.3 of annex 1 of GTR #15. This results in a modified (downscaled) cycle. If the maximum speed of the cycle exceeds the maximum speed of the vehicle, paragraph 9 of annex 1 of GTR #15 needs to be applied. 12

Combination of downscaling and speed cap This will then lead to a capped speed cycle based on the downscaled cycle. It needs to be discussed, whether this interpretation is right or not and whether the text in annex 1 should be modified to be more precise. 13

Thank you for your attention! End Thank you for your attention! 14