1 Diocesan Canonical Changes Duncan A. Bayne Vice-chancellor Diocese of Olympia 206 329-3217 Title IV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

County Election Protests, and Candidate Challenges Hearings and Their Appeal Don Wright SBE Statewide Training March 31, 2010.
The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Courts and the Quest for Justice. In Theory: Courtroom Ideals  Courts have extensive powers in our criminal justice system.  The courts legitimacy is.
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
OVERVIEW OF THE FLORIDA BAR DISCIPLINE SYSTEM November 30, 2006.
Practicing With Professionalism.  The Florida Bar spotlight  Resources available to Florida Bar members  Disciplinary process  Avoiding/Limiting Bar.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Actuaries.
Superintendent Hearings David V. Cirillo, Esq. Assistant Director Personnel & Labor Relations July 30, 2009.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
NLRB Representation Case Rule Changes. Overview of Presentation  Procedural History  Changes – Filing the Petition – Initial Processing – Pre-Election.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
The Division of Student Affairs University of North Carolina Wilmington.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
SILC ORIENTATION. Department of Health & Human Services Administration for Community Living Independent Living Administration Centers for Independent.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
ARBITRATION & MEDIATION IN US & TURKEY Tuncay YILDIRAN Supervisor Pf.William C.TYSON.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
DISCIPLINE & DUE PROCESS 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations.
Filing of Complaint Caparell & DiGregorio will file your complaint and related documents with the Plymouth Probate and Family Court which, in turn, assigns.
By Bob Bass Allison, Bass & Associates, LLP
The Trusted Voice of San Diego Real Estate THE REALTOR® CODE OF ETHICS The Code of Ethics imposes duties above and in addition to those imposed by law.
The Education Act 2002 & School Staffing Regulations 2009 (as amended 2012 and 2013) Responsibilities for Governors in respect of Staff.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
Legal Document Preparation Class 12Slide 1 Functions of the Discovery Process Narrow the issues –After investigation, you can more easily determine which.
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
Proposed By-Law Revisions: General Additions & Changes August 2015.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
1 DISPUTE SETTLEMENT THROUGH ADJUDICATION N D Sharma.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
A&D 101 A Beginner’s Guide to understanding the A&D process.
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
1 Eleventh National HIPAA Summit The New HIPAA Enforcement Rule Gerald “Jud” E. DeLoss, Esq. General Counsel Fairmont Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, P.A.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Ted Allen Supervising Prosecutor Region of York September 2014.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Investigations Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.) authorizes the Inspector General to conduct.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
PRE-SUIT CONSIDERATIONS
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Parochial Church Council & Synod Members Orientation Summit
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
TitLE IV Overview.
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
INDUCTION SESSION DIOCESAN SYNOD
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE COMPLAINTS
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Presentation transcript:

1 Diocesan Canonical Changes Duncan A. Bayne Vice-chancellor Diocese of Olympia Title IV

2 Matters for Diocesan Canon Attention Selection of players; removal Extend privilege on communications beyond that required by state or federal law Whether a member of Standing Committee may serve on Disc. Board How vacancies on Disc. Board are to be filled Whether and how diocese participates with other dioceses in disciplinary process Challenges to sitting members of a panel Changes to allocations of costs, expenses and fees to certain parties

3 Canonical Choices Mandatory: –Disciplinary Board: number and manner of selection –Church Attorney selection Mandatory, but, if not, default provisions --Filling vacancies on Disc. Board --Manner of challenges

4 (Canonical Choices cont.) Permissive: Removal of Ch. Att. For cause Selection of Conference Panel Selection of Hearing Panel Selection of Intake Officer Scope of privileged communication Time for electing Pres. Of Disc. Bd. Eligibility of St. Com. to serve on Disc. Bd. Allocation of costs

5 Disciplinary Board Not fewer than seven(7) persons. Seven allows minimum staffing; if want/need latitude for vacancies or disqualifications, then allow for more. Selected as determined by diocesan canon: – election by convention; –appointment by Diocesan followed by approval by convention; --appointment by Diocesan without further action

6 (Disciplinary Board cont.) Both lay and clergy; must be majority of one clergy If want one or more Standing Committee member(s) on Disc. Board must so provide by diocesan canon No Chancellor, Vice-Chancellor, Advisor, Conciliator, Church Attorney, Intake Officer or Investigator may serve

7 (Disciplinary Board cont.) Diocese should provide by canon for filling vacancies on Disc. Board; if not, Diocesan appoints. Members of Disc. Board should be members of Diocese, except with multi-diocesan agreements. Canons need to provide transition between diocesan convention and the effective date of the revisions (July 1, 2011) Canons should provide for a system of challenges to any member of any panel of the Disc. Board

8 President of Disc. Board President selected by Board from among the members of Disc. Board –Within 60 days of election unless other provisions made by canon –Canons will need to provide for transition period between initial election and effective date of revisions (July 1, 2011) –No maximum term specified for either President or members of the Disc. Board, nor whether reelection annually is required; if desired should be provided by diocesan canon

9 (President of Disc. Board cont.) President: –Selects members of Conference Panel and Hearing Panel in a given case –Serves as member of Reference Panel with Bishop and Intake Officer –Acts as the appeals person if complaint is dismissed by Intake Officer

10 (President cont.) –Decides with the rest of Reference Panel how to refer a complaint not dismissed by Intake Officer Appropriate pastoral response only Conciliation Further investigation Referral for possible agreement with Diocesan for discipline

11 Intake Officer Selected by Diocesan after consultation with Disc. Board, unless otherwise selected per diocesan canon May be more than one Initial point of contact of information concerning Offenses One of three members of Reference Panel

12 (Intake Off. Cont.) Makes initial investigation Prepares Intake Report – copies to Reference Panel and Church Attorney Makes initial determination whether information, if true, may constitute an Offense or not

13 (Intake Off. Cont.) If IO wants to dismiss, Bishop may object If no objection IO notifies Complainant of dismissal and right to appeal within 30 days to President IO assists Complainant in preparing appeal statement President acts within 30 days of receipt to affirm or overrule the dismissal

14 (Intake Off. Cont.) If IO determines information (if true) would constitute an Offense, intake report is forwarded to Reference Panel

15 Reference Panel The Intake Officer, President of Disc. Board and Diocesan Bishop (unless Title IV duties assigned to a different bishop) President rules on appeals of dismissals On basis of intake report decides –No action beyond pastoral response –Refer to conciliation –Refer for further investigation –Refer to Diocesan for possible agreement on discipline –Refer to Conference Panel

16 Conference Panel One, two or three members of Disc. Board selected by President unless diocesan canons otherwise require To conduct informal and conversational closed hearing; no record is kept, no witnesses called to testify

17 (Conf. Panel cont.) To direct who shall appear in order to promote the purposes of the Title; Respondent and Church Attorney must attend; Complainant may attend or send Advisor Shall give notice to Respondent, Respondent’s Advisor (if any), Complainant, Complainant’s Advisor If any), Investigator, Church Attorney of time and place of hearing

18 (Conference Panel cont.) May issue Accord or Order –Dismissal; if dismissal, Order includes the reasons and any findings which exonerate the Respondent –Referral for conciliation –Referral to Hearing Panel –Issuance of an Order

19 (Conf. Panel cont.) An Order from a Conference Panel can be refused by either Respondent or Church Attorney Written notice of refusal within 15 days to president of Conference Panel Disciplinary matter goes to Hearing Panel for further action

20 Hearing Panel Acts as trial court. Three members of Disciplinary Board selected by President, unless other manner of selection is provided by diocesan canon. Issues notice to Respondent, Respondent’s Advisor, Church Attorney, Complainant requiring written response by Respondent to the charges within 30 days or a finding of default may occur; also failure to attend or participate in any scheduled hearing may result in default

21 (Hearing Panel cont.) Church Attorney and Respondent may agree on discovery plan; if no agreement president of Hearing Panel decides Discovery may include –Oral or written deposition testimony –Requests for production of documents –Requests for admissions of fact Discovery may not include written interrogatories

22 (Hearing Panel cont.) Testimony shall be under oath, subject to cross-examination, and recorded. Hearing Panel sole arbiter of weight, credibility and reliability to be given to all testimony and other evidence. President of Hearing Panel shall regulate hearing so as to promote full disclosure of relevant facts, including admission of hearsay if otherwise appropriate.

23 (Hearing Panel cont.) Hearing Panel confers privately and either: –Issues an Order of Dismissal which includes reasons and may contain exonerating findings –Issues an Order other than Dismissal which then goes to the Bishop for further action

24 Advisor Canon 2. A person designated to support, assist, consult with and advise a Complainant or Respondent. Canon Bishop required to make an Advisor available to Respondent not later than the earliest of –Reference for conciliation or to either panel –Imposition of restriction on ministry or placement on administrative leave –Any interrogation or request for a statement or other information from a Respondent

25 (Advisor cont.) Bishop shall make Advisor available to Complainant not later than the earliest of –Forwarding of Intake Report to Reference Panel –Complainant’s appeal of a dismissal –Bishop’s designation of an Injured Person as a Complainant

26 (Advisor) Diocese to pay reasonable costs and expenses of proffered Advisor. Neither Respondent nor Complainant required to accept proffered Advisor, but if select another, then must pay own expenses All communications between Respondent or Complainant and their respective Advisors is privileged.

27 Church Attorney One or more attorneys selected pursuant to diocesan canon to represent the Church; an independent prosecutor not answerable to ecclesiastical authority. –Who selects? Licensing and jurisdiction not specified; could be from a different diocese Canon may also provide process for removal for cause

28 (Church Attorney) Acts as independent prosecutor representing the Church with appropriate powers necessary to do so, including independent determination whether and how to proceed Does not report to, or take direction from, any body but may consult with the Conference Panel

29 Challenges Diocese to provide by canon for a system of challenge; if no such canon, then Church Attorney or Respondent may challenge for conflict of interest or undue bias; remaining board members rule on the challenge Self-disqualification of bishop or panel member “where impartiality may reasonably be questioned”

30 Investigator A person with (a) sufficient knowledge, experience and training to conduct investigations, and (b) familiarity with the provisions and objectives of Title IV. Appointed by the Bishop Diocesan with consultation with the President of the Disc. Board

31 Conciliator A person skilled in dispute resolution and without conflict of interest in the matter Appointed by the Bishop Diocesan All communications are confidential If agreement, Accord is prepared; otherwise matter is referred back to Reference Panel

32 Expenses Canon Except as varied by Title IV, diocesan canon, or terms of an Order or Accord, all costs, expenses and fees shall be the obligation of the party which incurs them.