1. Appeal Tutorial Date: 2006-19-07 Authors: July 2006 Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July 2006
Appeal Tutorial
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Harry Worstell, AT&T
John Doe, Some Company

2. Appeal Tutorial July 2006 Appeal brief
Prior to an appeal, a significant attempt should be made to resolve concerns informally
If the informal attempts to resolve a concern are unsuccessful and a formal complaint is filed
Appeal brief
Appellant shall file a written appeal brief with the WG Recording Secretary within 30 days after the date of notification/occurrence of an action or at any time with respect to inaction.
Appeal brief shall :
State the nature of the objection(s) including any resulting adverse effects
The clause(s) of the procedures or the standard(s) that are at issue
Actions or inaction that are at issue
The specific remedial action(s) that would satisfy the appellant’s concerns
Previous efforts to resolve the objection(s) and the outcome of each shall be noted.
Harry Worstell, AT&T

3. July 2006 Appeal brief (cont)
Appellant shall include complete documentation of all claims in the appeal brief.
Within 20 days of receipt of the appeal brief Recording Secretary :
shall send the appellant a written acknowledgment of receipt of the appeal brief
shall send the appellee (the Chair of the TG/WG at issue or the LMSC Chair) a copy of the appeal brief and acknowledgment,
shall send the parties a written notice of the time and location of the hearing (“hearing notice”) with the appeals panel
Hearing with the appeals panel shall be scheduled at the location set for, and during the period of, the first LMSC plenary session (nominally Wednesday evenings) that is at least 60 days after mailing of the hearing notice by the EC Recording Secretary
Harry Worstell, AT&T

4. July 2006
Reply brief
Within 45 days after receipt of the hearing notice
Appellee should send the appellant and EC Recording Secretary a written reply brief
Appellee shall specifically addressing each allegation of fact in the appeal brief to the extent of the appellee’s knowledge
Appellee shall include complete documentation supporting all statements contained in the reply brief
Harry Worstell, AT&T

5. July 2006 Appeals Panel IEEE 802 WG/EC Chair
Shall appoint from the appeals pool an appeals panel consisting of:
A chair
Two other members of the panel
Who have not been directly involved in the matter in dispute
Who will not be materially or directly affected by any decision made or to be made in the process of resolving the dispute
At least two members shall be acceptable to the appellant
At least two shall be acceptable to the appellee
If the parties to the appeal cannot agree on an appeals panel within a reasonable amount of time, the whole matter shall be referred to the full CAC/EC for Consideration.
Harry Worstell, AT&T

6. July 2006 Conduct of the Hearing Hearing shall be open
Except under the most exceptional circumstances
At the discretion of the EC chair
Appellant has the burden of demonstrating
Adverse effects
Improper actions or inaction
The efficacy of the requested remedial action
Appellee has the burden of demonstrating
The committee took all actions relative to the appeal in compliance with its procedures
The requested remedial action would be ineffective or detrimental
Each party may adduce other pertinent arguments,
Harry Worstell, AT&T

7. Conduct of the Hearing (cont.)
July 2006
Conduct of the Hearing (cont.)
Members of the appeals panel may address questions to individuals before the panel
Appeals panel shall only consider documentation included in the appeal brief and reply brief, unless
Significant new evidence has come to light; and
Such evidence reasonably was not available to the appellant or appellee, as appropriate, at the time of filing; and
Such evidence was provided by the appellant or appellee, as appropriate, to the other parties as soon as it became available.
Information shall be provided at least two weeks before the date of the appeals panel hearing.
Harry Worstell, AT&T

8. Appeals Panel Decision
July 2006
Appeals Panel Decision
Appeals panel shall
Render its decision in writing within 30 days of the hearing
Stating findings of fact and conclusions
With reasons there for, based on a preponderance of the evidence
Consideration may be given to the following positions, among others, in formulating the decision
Finding for the appellant,
Remanding the action to the appellee, with a specific statement of the issues and facts in regard to which fair and equitable action was not taken
Finding against the appellant,
with a specific statement of the facts that demonstrate fair and equitable treatment of the appellant and the appellant’s objections
Finding that new, substantive evidence has been introduced
remanding the entire action to the appropriate group for reconsideration
Harry Worstell, AT&T

9. Request for Re-hearing
July 2006
Request for Re-hearing
Decision of the appeals panel shall become final 30 days after it is issued
unless one of the parties files a written notice of request for re-hearing prior to that date with the WG/EC Recording Secretary in which case the decision of the appeals panel shall be stayed pending review by the CAC/EC at its next meeting
At that time, the CAC/EC shall decide
To adopt the report of the appeals panel, and thereby deny the request for re-hearing; or
To direct the appeals panel to conduct a re-hearing.
Further complaints if a re-hearing is denied shall be referred to the Computer Society SAB.
Harry Worstell, AT&T

10. July 2006
Harry Worstell, AT&T