OLD LORDSBURG HIGH SCHOOL HISTORIC PROPERTIES PROCEDURE INITIATION Hosted by Lordsburg Municipal Schools and Public School Facilities Authority at Central.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.
Advertisements

Smart Growth Update VCARD May 23, Growth Management & Schools during 2005 Volusia County Council adopts new school impact fee. School Board of Volusia.
Introduction to Records Management Policy
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
Josh Metz, Associate Planner Consistency Determination: City of Seaside – 2013 Zoning Code Text Amendments.
U.S. 421 Bridge DES# Thursday, July 17, :30 p.m. Frankfort Community Public Library 208 West Clinton Street, Frankfort, IN.
HERITAGE - LOCAL GOVERNMENT by Susan O’Neill. Heritage - Local Government Strategic heritage planning – identifying and listing heritage items and translating.
Proposed Budget Presentation APRIL 21, 2015.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Department of Defense Real Property Inventory (RPI) Initiative: Historic Status Data Element Brian Lione Department.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Sourcing and Contracts Management System (CMS) Solution Request for Proposal FQ
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
West Contra Costa USD Update on Bonding Capacity Waiver Presentation to the Board of Education May 28, 2014.
CDBG 2015 Technical Compliance. Sections 4.4 – 4.7 Handbook & Application 4.4 – 4.6: Projects 4.7: Residential Rehab Programs.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
Long Range Facility Planning assisted by Silver Falls School District.
Idaho Statewide Interoperability Executive Council.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Transportation Enhancement Funds Workshop April 19, 2004 MAG Saguaro Room.
Discussion and Possible action on the historic designation by the City of Laredo Landmark Board on certain LISD Schools.
The KwaZulu-Natal Planning and Development Act APPLICATION PROCESS Schedule 1.
Saving places. WHY A CHAPTER ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES in the MASTER PLAN ?  A Master Plan is required by Zoning  A Historic Resources Chapter is to aid.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK MARCH 24, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESCIND RESOLUTION NO AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE RULES GOVERNING THE PASADENA.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
1 School District of Osceola County Facilities, Planning, Maintenance & Construction Monthly Update – April 2007 Construction Workshop 24 April 2007.
Watershed Planning. Watershed Definition A watershed is a landscape surface area that surrounds and drains into a common waterbody such as a lake, small.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Amending the Regional Agreement Presentationby Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools 1.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
1 School District of Osceola County Facilities, Planning, Maintenance & Construction Monthly Update – June 2007 Construction Workshop 26 June 2007.
UPDATING RIGHT OF WAY MANUALS FLORIDA’S PROCEDURES.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
1 School District of Osceola County Facilities, Planning, Maintenance & Construction Monthly Update – March 2007 Construction Workshop 27 March 2007.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Program Overview: HPF Grants to Tribes 1. National Historic Preservation Act Enacted in 1966 to Establish a Program for the Preservation of Historic Properties.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Sealed Bids Unit 5.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Efforts to Make Utah’s General Adjudications More Efficient: Special Masters and Statutory Revisions.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Susquehanna County Kick-Off Meeting April 28, 2016.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Program Overview: Tribal Preservation Program and HPF Grants to Tribes
CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
EMA Board Nominations.
Office of the State Engineer-Interstate Stream Commission Litigation & Adjudication Program Business Application Modernization Roadmap (Project Initiation,
Board Organizational Meeting
2020 Census New Construction Program U. S
Presentation transcript:

OLD LORDSBURG HIGH SCHOOL HISTORIC PROPERTIES PROCEDURE INITIATION Hosted by Lordsburg Municipal Schools and Public School Facilities Authority at Central Elementary Gym Thursday, April 14, 2016, 6 PM Facilitated by Brian Conway and Tina Reames

INTRODUCTION Old Lordsburg High School also referred to as The Enrichment Center Listed on New Mexico State Register of Cultural Properties, National Register of Historic Places Lordsburg Five Year Facilities Master Plan PSFA Historic Properties Procedural Policy Determine Historic Preservation of Historic Structure

Agenda Purpose of Study and Kick-Off Meeting Participant and Stakeholder Introductions Existing Plans and Information Overview of the Historic Old Lordsburg High School Process: PSFA Historic Properties Procedural Properties Timeline

Participants Lordsburg Municipal Schools New Mexico Public School Facilities Authority New Mexico Historic Preservation Division The Planning Site, P.C. in association with Cherry/See/Reames Architects P.C. Public Participants

Existing Information Lordsburg Five Year Facilities Master Plan Application for Registration, New Mexico State Register of Cultural Properties City of Lordsburg 2011 Comprehensive Plan Update 2010 Lordsburg Enrichment Center Conditions Assessment, NMSU Dept. Of Engineering Technology and Surveying Engineering

Overview of the Historic Old Lordsburg High School Constructed 1916, expanded 1928, approx 20,000 sf. High School for 38 years till 1952, then Jr. High for 19 years till 1971, then the Enrichment Center for a few more years (60 years of service) Abandoned image of Old Lordsburg High School (Hidalgo Heritage Historical Society)

Overview of the Historic Old Lordsburg High School CPRC reviewed 06/21/2013 for NMS Register of Cultural Properties listing Nominated for listing on National Register of Historic Places 2015 (not on register yet) Insurance premium of +/- $12,000 annually image of Old Lordsburg High School ( _high_school,_E_center_1.JPG)

HP PSFA Process Include Historic Preservation in PSFA Standard Contract Official THPO? Follow Process with THPO similar to SHPO Follow Process with SHPO Received Federal Funds for Facility? Follow Process per CFR Section 106 Request SHPO determine if project encompasses Historic site, + inquire on GRANT opportunities; SHPO respond in 30 days Tribal Lands? Consult SHPO Invite SHPO to meeting Historic Properties Exist? Follow Standard PSFA Process Follow New Mexico Title 4 Process Coordinate Requirements and Procedures Municipal or Historic District? Yes No Yes + Yes PSFA Master Plan Process No Program Statement RASC Requirements Consult SHPO Invite SHPO to Meeting Schematic Design RASC SHPO determine adverse effects, consult on options Consult SHPO PSFA Design Process Application of HP Design Standards Design Development RASC Application of HP Design Standards Submit Design to SHPO A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.5 B.1D.2 D.1 D.2 D.3 D.5 D.4D.5 D.4 D.5 Present to School BoardDisposal/Demolish Remodel/Renovates SB approves FMP Disposal/Demolish PED Approval (for Active Schools) SB approves FMP Renovate/ Remodel FMP Determine Reuse, Document Determination M.1 M.2 M.3

School District Hold Public Hearing. Maintain Record of Alternatives. Keep record open for 15 days School District determine Alternatives Prudent/Feasible. Provide written record of determination. A/E certify. Notify SHPO SHPO may suggest alternatives Incorporate Alternatives w/ SHPO CPRC Appeal in regularly scheduled public meeting. Follow Statutory Disposal Process SHPO concur/dissent in 45 days in writing. School District advertise Public Hearing 30 days in advance. Invite SHPO, Annotate School Board Approval Accept CPRC? Alternatives Available? SHPO may file injunction Incorporate SHPO Guidance Court Adjudication Incorporate SHPO Guidance Proceed with Design Development Proceed with School Board approved plan Alternatives Prudent and Feasible?. Dissent Resolution No + SHPO No Yes No Concur YesDissentYesNo+ SHPO Conduct Additional Public Meeting – Alternatives? Yes R.2 R.3 R.4 D.5 M.3 R.4 R.5 R.6 D.5 Yes SHPO Notified Proceed with School Board approved plan SHPO respond in 30 days - Adverse Effect No Yes D.9R.1 R.2 CD/Bid Doc RASC Proceed to Construction D.6 D.7 Incorporate Alternatives w/ SHPO R.3 M.2 Yes Incorporate Alternatives w/ SHPO R.5 No Proceed with School Board Approved Plan M.2 +SHPO Incorporate Alternatives w/ SHPO R.6 Proceed with Design Development D.5

Timeline Kick – Off Review of Master Plan with School District, identify alternatives available within MP analysis Submittal of Master Plan Recommendations to HPD SHPO to Respond with determination of Adverse Effect Public Hearing

PSFA Historic Properties Procedural Policy PSFA_2016_Historic_Properties_Procedural_Poli cy.pdf