Dr.F. Arteche EMC DEPFET Project: A general overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY Dr. Donald Church Senior Staff Engineer International Rectifier Automotive Systems November 17, 2005.
Advertisements

Conducted Immunity IEC
5 th ILD Workshop Orsay, 23 rd -25 th May 2011 D. Moya, J. Duarte, I. Vila, A. Ruiz - IFCA (CSIC-UC) F. Arteche, C. Esteban - ITA Strip FTD Readiness for.
Design of a Low-Noise 24 GHz Receiver Using MMICs Eric Tollefson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Advisor: Dr. L. Wilson Pearson.
Analog Basics Workshop RFI/EMI Rejection
Designing a EMC Compatible Electronic Meter using AD7755 a.
© 2013 Atmel 1 SAM D21 Peripheral Touch Controller Noise Immunity.
ESE – Andrew Rusek Applications of Computer Modeling in Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Tests (Part1) P8. Field Pattern of Three Radiating.
Current research work and plans Zbigniew M. Jóskiewicz Wroclaw University of Technology Institute of Telecommunication and Acoustics Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego.
Split, 12 December 2005 University of Zagreb Slide 1 Chip level EMC measurements and simulations “Impact of Communications Technology to EMC“, COST 286.
EMC Technology Roadmapping: A Long-Term Strategy Marcel van Doorn Philips Applied Technologies EM&C Competence Center Eindhoven, The Netherlands, March.
EMC review for Belle II (Grounding & shielding plans) Sub-systems ( XXXXX)
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
Introduction to Computer Technology
Experimental Area Meeting V. Bobillier1 Good connection to earth (in many points) of every metallic parts to be installed in the cavern is very.
TCCA Aircraft Certification
ITAINNOVA TA: Scientific & Administrative issues Electromagnetic Compatibility Facility for electronics noise and grounding diagnostics (WP12 – Task 12.2)
Electromagnetic Compatibility of a DC Power Distribution System for the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland.
F. Arteche, C. Esteban Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón D. Moya, I. Vila, A. L. Virto, A. Ruiz Instituto de Física de Cantabria Powering requirements and.
1 4. EMC measurement methods. 2 Why EMC standard measurement methods Check EMC compliance of ICs, equipments and systems Comparison of EMC performances.
Origin of Emission and Susceptibility in ICs
Investigating EMC policies for the SKA Paul van der Merwe Prof. HC Reader Stellenbosch University.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
Purpose This course discusses techniques for analyzing and eliminating noise in microcontroller (MCU) and microprocessor (MPU) based embedded systems.
1 Outer Tracker Front-End Layout Distribution of Signals and Bias NIKHEF/HeidelbergOctober 2002.
Overview of the ATLAS Electromagnetic Compatibility Policy G. BLANCHOT CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 10th Workshop on Electronics.
MICAS Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) Design-In for EMC on digital circuit December 5th, 2005 Low Emission Digital Circuit Design Junfeng Zhou.
Course Introduction Purpose
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
The Aspect of RF & EMC in Today’s World National University of Singapore B.Tech (Electronics) EE1001E:Emerging Technology in Electrical Engineering 19.
Electromagnetic Compatibility Test for CMS Experiment. Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab F. Arteche, F. Szoncso, - CERN.
Etienne CARLIER, LBDS Audit, 28/01/2008 LBDS Environmental Aspects EMC, radiation, UPS… Etienne CARLIER AB/BT/EC.
CARDIAC meeting – 30 Sept 05 M3R3-M5R3-M5R4 FEE status.
Definitions Electromagnetic Compatibility : (EMC) The capability of electrical and electronic systems, equipment, and devices to operate in their intended.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
P. Aspell CERN April 2011 CMS MPGD Upgrade …. Electronics 2 1.
F. Arteche EMC issues for Tracker upgrade. 1 de 19 CMS / ATLAS Power working group Paris- France, 23 September 2009 OUTLINE 1. Introduction. 2. EMC strategy.
Barcelona 1 Development of new technologies for accelerators and detectors for the Future Colliders in Particle Physics URL.
A common 400 Hz AC Power Supply Distribution System for CMS FEE. Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab. F. Arteche, F. Szoncso, - CERN.
Compilation of Dis-/Advantages of DC-DC Conversion Schemes Power Task Force Meeting December 16 th, 2008 Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH.
Peter Sharp CERN CMS Tracker Summary of the Tracking Trigger Working Group Peter Sharp 21 November 2008.
Research activities at ITA for future accelerator M. C. Esteban.
F. Arteche, C.Esteban, (ITA) I.Vila(IFCA) Electronics integration studies for CMS tracker upgrade.
Pixel power R&D in Spain F. Arteche Phase II days Phase 2 pixel electronics meeting CERN - May 2015.
GROUNDING, SHIELDING & COOLING ISSUES ON LHCb ELECTRONICS AT THE LHC PIT 8 V.Bobillier, J.Christiansen, G.Corti, D.Lacarrère, R.Lindner, L.Roy, E.Thomas,
Preliminary conducted noise test results for LV power supplies Bruno Allongue CERN-PH-ESS Fernando Arteche Imperial College – CERN 21 January 2005.
F. Arteche EMC studies for CMS tracker upgrade Status & Plans.
CERN – 7 Oct 04 1 LHCb Muon Grounding Anatoli Katchouk CERN Alessandro Balla, Paolo Ciambrone, Maurizio Carletti, Giovanni Corradi, Giulietto Felici, Rosario.
Noise propagation issues in complex power cables for HEP detectors M. Iglesias, I. Echeverria,F. Arteche 12 th Meeting of the Spanish Network for future.
Dr. F.Arteche Instituto Tecnológico de Aragón (ITA) Belle II: Grounding and Electronics Integration Issues.
1 John McCloskey NASA/GSFC Chief EMC Engineer Code 565 Building 29, room Fundamentals of EMC Dipole Antenna.
PXD – DEPFET PS noise emission tests Mateo Iglesias Fernando Arteche.
EMC issues for cabling and racks layout design. (Belle II – Grounding) F.Arteche.
By Prof. Dr. Mousa A. Abd-Allah Electromagnetic Compatibility.
F. Arteche EMC: Electronics system integration for HEP experiments (Grounding & Shielding)
Belle-II bKLM RPC Readout Power & Ground Discussion 12 th Belle II General Meeting Gerard Visser Indiana University CEEM 7/24/2012.
EMC review for Belle II (Grounding & shielding plans) PXD system - July 2012 Dr. Fernando Arteche.
Piero Belforte, HDT 1997, THRIS (Telecom Hardware Robustness Inspection System) Project as CSELT-HDT cooperation: Achieving global hardware robustness in electronic systems.
Piero Belforte, CSELT 1999: AEI_EMC_, EMC basics by Flavio Maggioni.
IEEE NPEC SC2 Equipment Qualification Electromagnetic Compatibility Compliance Type Test-Design Considerations- Installation and Mitigation Standard/Guidance.
Entrance to EMI.
No Lab Assignment for Next Week Mandatory Attendance
AIDA WP12.2 : Detector Characterization Facilities EMC characterization Fernando Arteche.
EMI studies of different switched converters: setup and lessons learnt
EMC Lab presentation.
No Lab Assignment for Next Week Mandatory Attendance
Compilation of Dis-/Advantages of DC-DC Conversion Schemes
Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab. F. Arteche , F. Szoncso, - CERN
FEE Electronics progress
The Best Value in Electronic Test & Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Dr.F. Arteche EMC DEPFET Project: A general overview

1 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May 2011 OUTLINE 1. Motivation 2. Main goals 3.WP description –WP1: Grounding & shielding strategy –WP2: Immunity issues of DEPFET –WP3: Noise emissions of PS units –WP4:Noise propagations issues 4. Schedule 5.Project management

2 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May MOTIVATION DEPFET detector is very complex FEE (Sensor, DCD,DHP,DHH) –It may be sensitive to EM noise –It may radiates ( HF clocks and signals) Power supplies It emits EM noise Cable & connectors It may propagate EM noise inside/outside FEE area

3 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May MOTIVATION Describing the electromagnetic (EM) environment of DEPFET detector is important to determine and solve problems related to –Electromagnetic interference –Grounding & Shielding It will help to ensure the correct integration of the system in the Belle II experiment. Experience gained in previous detectors showed that an EM analysis helps a lot during the design & commissioning stage of detectors –It saves time and money –It helps to conduct robust designs

4 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May MAIN GOAL The goals of the proposed research project are to conduct studies and measurements to establish a map of: –EM emissions and susceptibilities of sensitive electronics. This map will be used to: –To systematically approach the grounding design –To quantify the immunity /emission of the electronic systems to integrate safely the DEPFET detector. This is the first time that this kind of mapping will be implemented in a pixel detector –Studies conducted previously in Tracker and calorimeters

5 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WORKING PACKAGES The project has been divided in four working packages –WP1: Grounding and shielding strategy for DEPFET: Coordination & Policy –WP2: Immunity issues of DEPFET FEE: Susceptibility curves of DEPFET system. –WP 3: Noise emissions of PS units: FEE noise immunity and PS noise emission coordination –WP4: Noise coupling path characterization between FEE and Power units: Noise propagation issues

6 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP1: Grounding strategy It is focused on grounding and shielding aspects. It plans to define: –Safety grounding –Signal or ground reference plane –Grounding topologies These issues will be used to verify: –Electrical safety issues –Identify possible ground loops –Identify EMI sources –Identify EMI victims

7 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP1: Grounding strategy The main tasks of this WP are: –T1.1: Definition of the base line for the grounding and shielding strategy for DEPFET. Coordination between mechanical and electrical engineering aspects –T1.2: Coordination of DEPFET grounding policy with other sub-detectors. Important collaboration with Belle II It will issue two versions of the grounding document –First version: General issues – Main rules Some open questions –Second version Final grounding – End of the project

8 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP2: Immunity issues of DEPFET FEE The main goal of this WP is to define the susceptibility level of DEPFET FEE to –Radio frequency perturbation –Transient perturbation. A set of test will be performed in an EMC unit –Immunity test to RF disturbances –Transients immunity test No noise Noise

9 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP2: Immunity issues of DEPFET FEE This EMC unit is defined by the minimum structure that may obtain good results to extrapolate results for the whole detector (same topology) CMS HCAL:1RBX (12 chips-12 chanels) CMS Tracker: 1Petal (50 chips-6000 chanels) …¿¿DEPFET ??... 1 Module /half ? Power supply DAQ system.. Test set –up preparation complex

10 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP2: Immunity issues of DEPFET FEE These tests allow quantifying the system sensitivity to conductive noise to define: –The output noise level of power supplies, –The magnitude of external EM fields –Ground currents The main tasks of this WP are: –T2.1: Immunity noise currents. –T2.2: Susceptibility curves characterization of DEPFET system to noise currents –T2.3: Definition of key design issues such as filtering, grounding connection points, and shielding strategy to improve the immunity of DEPFET FEE. Evaluation of grounding and shielding topology.

11 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP3: Noise emissions of Power units The main goal of this WP is to measure the noise emission level of the power supply units It will help to define the compatible levels with the FEE. These set of tests are complementary to those performed in WP2 The main task of this WP are : –T3.1 Conducted noise test sep-up definition it should be complementary to immunity test –T3.2 Conducted noise emission level definition for DEPFET system. –T3.3 Filtering layout and connections. It is required a prototype of the power units –Special test set –up

12 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP4: Noise propagation issues. The main goal of this WP is to define the key parameters and the configuration of the power distribution network to minimize the conducted noise. These studies and analysis will be based on: –Real tests –Numerical models developed in MATLAB codes. It will help to addresses the effect of power cables on the noise propagation and the impact that those cables have in the selection of: –EMI filters for the FEE low-voltage input –Conducted emission levels required for the power supplies.

13 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May WP4: Noise propagation issues. The main tasks of this WP are : –T4.1 Development of Multi-Transmission Line model for the DEPFET system power network based on MATLAB code. –T4.2 Characterization of DEPFET power cables: L,C,R and G matrices measurement or simulation. –T4.3 Characterization of CM & DM transfer function of DEPFET cables. Impact of filtering and grounding and shielding strategies. A set of cable prototypes will be required –An schematic may be enough

14 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May SCHEDULE WP1 – Nov 2011 WP2 – Dec 2012 WP3 – April 2012 WP4 – April 2013 Kick-off: May 2011 WP milestones are flexible Depends on the DEPFET project WPs are quite independent Order may change

15 de 16 7th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Ringberg Castle, May PROJECT MANAGEMENT The project will be carried out by Electrical engineering group from Aragon Institute of Technology (ITA) –Experienced people in EMC issues Project coordinator –Dr. Fernando Arteche Test & analysis group –C. Esteban & N. Dominguez Simulation group –I.Echeverria & M. Iglesias VERY IMPORTAT –Collaboration with DEPFET groups Test set –up preparation ( detector, PS, DAQ,..) Information

5.PROJECT MANAGEMENT EMC- URE group –10 persons + lab support EMC - Facilities –Faraday cage –One semi-anechoic chamber 3m & 10m –Spectrum analyzers –Current probes & Antennas –Surge & Burst & ESD generators –Amplifiers (kHz-GHz) Electronic Lab - Facilities –Boards designs –Power supplies –Programming controllers 16 de 16