Human Service Transportation Plan (HSTP) Champaign Urbana Workshop 9/18/12 1

2 C-U HSTP’s 2008 Adoption: Past Study Area Included…

New Study Area  2010 Census Release Tolono Added Applications Impacted in 2014  LRTP Update MPO Boundary Update 3

Workshop Purpose  MAP 21 Moving Ahead for Progress– Federal Transportation Bill Update Federal Transportation Bill Update  July 6 th, 2012 signed into law  Coordination Mandate  Funding (Section 5310, Section 5317, Section 5316)  Impacts Services on State Cycle in 2014  Capturing Progress & Performance  What it means on the ground level. 4

Plan Outline  MAP 21- Transportation Bill Overview  Demographics  Mobility Today  Mobility Tomorrow  Appendices  Program of Projects  Transportation Directory 5

Demographics  Maps (By Block Group) & Tables of Socio- Economic Data -  Seniors (+65)  Individuals with Disabilities  Individuals with Low Income  Zero Vehicle Households  Minority Populations African Americans Hispanics 6

Mobility Today  Plan Development  Coordination Progress/Successes  Transportation Services  Current Coordination  Major Trip Generators  Major Employers  Needs, Gaps, and Duplication 7

Major Trip Generators 8 Classification of Major Trip Generators Source: Business Analyst ArcGIS Interactive maps online Map 10 & Map 11

9

10 Interactive Map Online at: Interactive Map Online at:

Major Employers 11 Source: Business Analyst ArcGIS Interactive maps online Map 12

12

13 Interactive Map Online at: Interactive Map Online at:

Transportation Services Chart of providers within covers -  Urbanized Area Public Transit – Route Map  Rural Area Public Transit – Service Area Map  Human Services Transportation – Service Inventory  Student Transportation - School District Map  Private Transportation - Intercity Bus Provider Map Transportation Directory  Online 14

C-U MTD Urban Public Transit (Section 5307) 15

CRIS Rural Transit (Section 5311) 16

HSTP Region 8 Public Transit Providers Section 5311 & Section

HSTP Region 8 Public Transit Systems – 3 Urban 7 Rural Region-Wide Mobility Manager TRIP:

19 Private (Intercity Bus)

Mobility Today  Needs, Gaps, and Duplication  See handouts  Survey Responses (Few)  Problems with last minute trip accommodations  Hours of Operation  Funding Restrictions  Lower Volunteer Rates  Reliable Vehicles  Accessible Vehicles 20

Mobility Tomorrow  Recommendations  Goals  Objectives  Strategies  MOEs  Funding Sources 21

Mobility Tomorrow  Goal 1 – Improve accessibility, affordability, availability, & reliability of transportation services for people with disabilities, seniors & low-income individuals within existing budget constraints in the Champaign-Urbana area.  Goal 2 - Maximize the resources available for special needs transportation through coordination in planning, service delivery, & reporting. 22

23 Goals: End state brought about by the implementation of the HSTP. Objectives: Sub-goals that help organize the implementati on into manageable parts. Strategies: Specific action items to achieve objectives. Measures of Effectiveness: Data used to evaluate progress toward goals and objectives. Missing in Previous Plan

 What is a measure of effectiveness (MOEs)?  Methods of evaluating achievement of goals & objectives  What is a smart objective =  Specific, Measurable, Agreed, Realistic, Time-Bound. 24 MOE & SMART Objective

25 Example Goal: Transportation services increase. Objective: Job Access Routes increase by 5% by Strategy: Identify top 5 employers most likely to need job related route(s), develop applications & increase services. Measures of Effectiveness: Job related trips are recorded. (increase positive, decrease negative)

Mobility Tomorrow Previous priorities set by short, mid, & long term objectives & strategies. What really are our priorities today?  What are our priorities in the short term?  What should be our priorities in the long term? See Chart Provided in Handouts (Large Page) 26

Is your objective SMART?  Specific – Is the desired outcome clearly written?  Measurable – Can it be measured quantitatively and evaluated? If so, how?  Agreed – Was there consensus among partners?  Realistic - Can it be reasonably be accomplished?  Time-Bound – Did you set a timeframe to complete performance? 27