 In a small group create a definition of rigor as it applies in education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Advertisements

Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: a LISREL analysis 指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Critical Thinking. Definition: Evaluating whether we should be convinced that a claim is true or that an argument is good. It’s also about formulating.
Cognitive Demands Revealed. Cognitive demands Describe the cognitive expectations associated with a learning task, the thinking that goes along with the.
University of Delaware What Is a Good PBL Problem? Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Research Basics PE 357. What is Research? Can be diverse General definition is “finding answers to questions in an organized and logical and systematic.
University of Delaware What Is a Good PBL Problem? Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Problem-Based Learning: From Ideas to Solutions through.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Daniel Fasko, Jr., Ph.D..  Definition of Critical Thinking  Critical Thinking Skills  Critical Thinking Dispositions  Instructional Strategies  Assessment.
AIG PD The Gifted Learner in the 21 st Century A Total School Approach Critical Thinking.
Effective Questioning in the classroom
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
What elements of cognitive tools support higher level thinking? By: Asha, Heidi, and Roshni.
2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning: Using Student Engagement To Support Active Learning and Assessment January 2013.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Chapter 2 Critical Thinking and Effective Writing Skills for the Professional Accountant.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & INSTRUCTION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNER JUNE 15-17, 2009 HOPE BROWN, HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE, ST. EDMOND, FORT DODGE VALERIE JERGENS,
LinearRelationships Jonathan Naka Intro to Algebra Unit Portfolio Presentation.
Robin Sabo, Clear Creek ISD. What is rigor? Or is rigor more that that But what about in education? Harder Challenging Focused on higher thinking levels.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Standards for Mathematical Practice #1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. I can: explain the meaning of a problem. choose the right.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Thinking Critically About How We learn. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.2 | 2 Albert Einstein: “Education is what is left after.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
K-12 Technology Literacy Curriculum and Assessment.
1. 4:00 – 4:05 PM Welcome 4:05 - 4: 20 PM Starter Activity 4: :00PMTypes of thinking& infusing thinking 6:00 - 6:15PMPrayer Break 6:15- 7:15 PM.
4.8 Writing Equations from Patterns A very useful problem-solving strategy is look for a pattern. When you make a conclusion based on a pattern of examples,
Year 8 Revision Questions. Today’s Aims To think about how we answer questions To create a fun revision tool To recap our knowledge with the tool!
Chapter 2 Critical Thinking and Effective Writing Skills for the Professional Accountant.
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
EXTENDING COMPREHENSION ELICITING ENCOURAGING ELABORATING INFERERENCE SKILLS.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
INQUIRY AND CRITICAL THINKING What is inquiry??? Simply put…. CRITICAL THINKING….
7 Themes. Chronological Reasoning 1. Historical Causation: relationships among multiple historical causes and effects, distinguishing between those that.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Understanding W-H-Y Unit Portfolio Presentation Lorrie Forbus.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
College Expectations with High School Skills: What is a well-educated high school graduate? Texas High School Project.
Fall 2012 Gifted Directors’ Meeting Cheryl Franklin-Rohr & Wendy Leader.
BY: MIA SASFAI THE TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES Benjamin Bloom.
An Introduction to the Colorado Assessment Standards Reading - Writing - Communicating.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Argumentation and Critical Thinking.
Story Problems…Solved
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
The creativity of Italian Educational System
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
COMMUNICATOR Applies effective reading skills to acquire knowledge and broaden perspectives Employs active listening strategies to advance understanding.
Historical Thinking Skills
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
DATABASES AS MINDTOOLS
Synthesis Evaluation Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

 In a small group create a definition of rigor as it applies in education.

Rigor can be defined as: a quality of instruction that requires students to “construct meaning and impose structure on situations rather than expect to find them already apparent.” Resnick, L. (1987) found in How to Plan Rigorous Instruction by Robyn Jackson, 2011

Have students who:  Can solve real-world problems  Use metacognition  Persist and are resilient  Own their learning  Use thinking skills to evaluate, analyze, and synthesize information  Deal with uncertainty and ambiguity

Challenging Difficult ◊ Requires students ◊ Unclear to develop new instructions understandings ◊ Don’t have ◊ Has students work in enough their zone of proximal support, development background, (Vgotsky) skills, or time to do

 Starting point for rigorous instruction  Characteristics Thinking skills are measured not only facts Is a learning experience that deepens student understanding Requires information to be applied in a real-world or unpredictable situation

 Have Implicit Meaning  Contain Ambiguity  Are Layered  Are Complex

 Use of logic is required to determine meaning from the information presented  Relevant concepts are derived from the information in the materials  Analysis and synthesis are used to reach logical conclusions

 Open to multiple interpretations  Require weighing of several possibilities to determine an answer  Use comparing and contrasting thinking skills to evaluate evidence and ideas  Learn to see information from multiple perspectives

 Uses two or more thinking processes in sequence to solve a problem  Develops methodologies of intellectual inquiry  Requires deductive or inductive reasoning skills  Is increasingly more cognitively demanding – requires peeling back of layers to determine an answer

 Has multiple parts which may or may not be sequential  Requires seeing patterns and understanding of relationships  Promotes the understanding of interrelated concepts

 Grade and age appropriateness  Relevant and related to students’ lives  Build students’ capacity to deal with rigorous materials over time  Connects directly to learning standards and goals  Matches the content of summative assessments

When choosing materials think of the kinds of thinking you are trying to develop in students and then select materials designed to promote these thinking types.