Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PORTFOLIO.
Advertisements

Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Differentiated Supervision
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview August 4, 2015 and August 10, 2015 Presented by: Jennifer Briggs.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Unpacking the Rubric for Educators Winter 2012.
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Presentation transcript:

Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013

2 Agenda Context, purpose and overview Collecting evidence

3 Strengthening educator effectiveness is a critical piece of a district-wide effort to improve learning for students Coach, develop and evaluate educators based on a clear vision of strong instruction Implement a consistent, rigorous curriculum built on common standards with common unit assessments Deploy data that is timely, accurate and accessible to make decisions for students, schools and the district Strengthen social, emotional and academic safety nets and supports for all students The work

4 SEEDS is a completely new evaluation system SEEDS’ purpose is development and continuous improvement Educators are empowered through a self-assessment and an ability to collect evidence All educators will have a minimum of one student learning goal and a minimum of one professional practice goal Includes short, frequent, unannounced observations Educators receive one of four performance ratings Phased in over three years: – level 4 schools – district-wide – includes district determined measures of student learning

5 SEEDS provides an opportunity to move our district in an exciting direction A system that: Encourages development and continuous improvement Aligns with and reinforces the educator goals Empowers educators Is driven by data and evidence Enables more accurate assessments through short but frequent observations Where we are nowWhere we are going A system that: Focuses on compliance Lacks connection to the educator’s goals Is done to an educator Excludes student learning and growth Relies on scripted, announced observations

6 The SEEDS framework consists of five key features Statewide Standards and Indicators Three categories of evidence to assess performance A statewide performance rating scale Four educator plans Five-step evaluation cycle Five features of the new evaluation framework

7 Today we will equip educators on collecting evidence Continuous Learning Today’s Focus

8 Why do we collect evidence as educators? It empowers the Educator and allows the Educator to be part of the evaluation process. The Educator has the opportunity and responsibility to provide artifacts and evidence of practice that the Evaluator might not have been able to observe. Standards III and IV are difficult to observe in the classroom; therefore, the Educator is responsible for collecting and presenting evidence to the Evaluator relating to fulfilling professional responsibilities and family outreach and engagement. The Educator is encouraged to collect evidence for Standards I and II as well. It will help the Evaluator have a more accurate picture of the Educator’s performance.

9 Agenda Context, purpose and overview Collecting evidence

10 Both the evaluator and the educator are responsible for implementing the Educator Plan Evaluators’ responsibilitiesEducators’ responsibilities Provide feedback for improvement Ensure access to resources and supports Collect evidence on educator performance against the rubric and progress toward goals through: Unannounced observations Announced observations Improve practice by using the rubric as the definition of a proficient/exemplary educator Pursue the attainment of goals Collect evidence on: Engagement with families (Standard III) Fulfillment of professional responsibilities (Standard IV) Student learning and professional practice goals Welcome to include information on Standards I and II of the rubric

Importance of Strategically Collecting Artifacts OR 11 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

12 What types of artifacts count as evidence?

13 Strategies for collecting evidence 1. Identify common artifacts to collect Educators should discuss with Evaluators what common artifacts are most important and are expected to collect, e.g. lesson plans 2. Think about the evidence that is important for your evaluator to see Educators are encouraged to summarize evidence for evaluators to see that they think reflects the strengths in your practice. For example, educators do not have to include documents from every parent communication they send, but could present a log of their communications with parents. 3. Think about evidence that applies to multiple indicators/standards Collecting evidence that pertains to multiple indicators and/or standards reduces your workload to document. 4. Collaborate with colleagues Educators are encouraged to share examples of high-quality evidence during faculty or team meetings to share best practices.

14 Exercise: Evidence Collection for Student Learning and Professional Practice Goals Student Learning Goal Each of my Intermediate and Advanced ELL students will demonstrate mastery of science content standards based on multiple assessments throughout the year. Professional Practice Goal In order to build mastery of science content by ELLs, we will work to consistently identify and teach symbols, key terms, and other domain specific pedagogical techniques and additional resources to ensure comprehension. Task: Divide group in to two parts, break down each goal and identify specific pieces of evidence that could be provided to the Evaluator to successfully demonstrate meeting each goal. * SMART Goals provided by DESE, Module 5: Gathering Evidence

15 Exercise 2: Evidence Collection for Student Learning and Professional Practice Goals Grade 2 Student Learning Goal 100% of all students (number of students) will increase at least 1 point on text based responses. __% (number of students) of the students will score a 3 out of 4 on text based responses by June Professional Practice Goal During this year, I will learn and appropriately use three effective rituals, routines and responses from Doug Lemov’s Teach Like a Champion to prevent behaviors that interfere with student learning as measured by a reduction of student disciplinary reports.

16 Exercise: Brainstorm evidence you might present Review the evidence collection guide. Using the table on the next slide, brainstorm the types of evidence that you might collect for the following categories: Standard III: Family and Community Engagement Standard IV: Professional Culture Are there any ideas in addition to the appendix guide that you could provide? Identify artifacts that could serve as evidence for multiple indicators. Share your thoughts with a neighbor. Did you brainstorm similar evidence? Source: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

17 Exercise: Evidence to collect on Standards III and IV Standard III Family and Community Engagement Standard IV Professional Culture

18 SEEDS Information Sessions 01/23/13 02/27/13 03/20/13 04/10/13 05/23/13 Sign up through MLP