DOMA and Prop 8 Series: Public Benefits Changes for Legal Services Cathy Sakimura, Family Law Director, National Center for Lesbian Rights Amy Williams,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United States v. Windsor What your Louisiana LGBT clients need to know.
Advertisements

The Senior Citizens’ Law Office Presents An Informational Discussion Of SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND BENEFITS IN NEW MEXICO February 25, 2014 – New Mexico State.
Eng 1:1 ‘So,who’s gonna be the husband this time?’ - beyond passing equality legislation Hans Ytterberg Ombudsman against Sexual Orientation Discrimination.
To protect the confidential and proprietary information included in this material, it may not be disclosed or provided to any third parties without the.
Tuition Waiver informational portal. What would you like to know? Everything! I am viewing this presentation for the first time. I have already viewed.
Philine Tran. Defense of Marriage Act H.R th Congress (1995–1996 ) federal law that denies federal recognition of same- sex marriages and authorizes.
+ The Fight for Gay Rights From Stonewall to Marriage Equality.
UNIT VI – THE U.S. CONGRESS (12), & LGBT RIGHTS PART 1 – LGBT RIGHTS Advanced Placement ® American Government and Politics.
The DOMA Decision: An Update As of 1/14/14 Charlotte Cathro, CPA Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C.
Service Provider Title VI Training Civil Rights Act of 1964 Presented By: Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Chapter 8 Same Sex Couples and Families
Civil Unions and Gay Marriage Sydney Cantor. Historical Background 1951: The first national gay rights organization formed 1973: Homosexuality is removed.
The Name Equality Act of 2007 AB 102 (Chapter 567, Statutes of 2007)
FAFSA AND THE OVERTURNING OF DOMA: WHAT TO DO? Marie Johnson and Dot Brauer of the University of Vermont 2014 EASFAA Conference.
Driving Uncertainty into Opportunity Family Dynamics What defines a family- Presented by: Nathan R. Basford, Jr. Florida State University.
The California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act (AB 205) Implications for Student Financial Aid.
The California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act (AB 205) Implications for Student Financial Aid 2004 CASFAA Conference.
Title Goes Here Presented By: MIN S. SUH, Shareholder Philadelphia Supreme Court Decision on DOMA – What are the Practical Immigration Implications and.
It’s a Whole New World: Estate and Tax Planning for Same-Sex Couples after the Demise of DOMA Hawaii Estate Planning Council September 26, 2013 Susan von.
Maximizing Tax Benefits and Credits for Persons With Disabilities.
Seminar on free movement of same-sex families
Gay Marriage NATHANIEL MOODY NELLIE CALKINS MATTHEW HP.
Session #31 FAFSA Free Application for Federal Student Aid Angela Smith Bob Tschinkel.
Straight Talk on Gay Marriage. What Do We Mean By Marriage? The legal union of a couple as husband and wife - Black's Law Dictionary 8 th Edition Declared.
College Goal Sunday Advanced Training An Overview of Unique Situations and Commonly Asked Questions.
*Lesbian, gay, and bisexuals deserve the same respect, recognition and protection as opposite.
SHRM 2012 Tri-StateConference April 25-27, 2012 Rebounding: HR’s Pivotal Role in the New Business Playbook Sheraton Springfield Hotel & MassMutual Convention.
SAME-SEX PARENTS IN HUNGARY: LEGAL SITUATION AND POLITICAL DEBATES Tamás Dombos Háttér Support Society for LGBT People in Hungary.
Business & Personal Law Lincoln High School.  The body of law that deals with: ◦ Marriage ◦ Divorce ◦ Custody ◦ Adoption ◦ Child Support ◦ Paternity.
Social Security Administration Yolanda York
Navigating FMLA Issues After the Fall of The Defense of Marriage Act Navigating FMLA Issues After the Fall of The Defense of Marriage Act NJBIA Employment.
Same-Sex Couples and Families
Current Issues in Civil Rights. Affirmative Action Affirmative action – preferential practices should be used in hiring.
LGBT Workforce and Service Population Initiatives Human Resources and Administration Office of Diversity and Inclusion 0.
Linda Watts | Ruth Wagner
TAX-AIDE Same Sex Marriage Filing Rules ● Banned by CO constitution in 2006, but same sex marriage effectively legalized 10/6/2014 when US Supreme Court.
United States vs. Windsor By: Taylor Beshel. U.S. vs. Windsor Argued: March 27, 2013 Decided: June 26, 2013.
0 THE ILLINOIS CIVIL UNION ACT Christopher Clark Senior Staff Attorney Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund and Rosemary Mulryan Mulryan & York October.
Massachusetts Registry of Vital Records and Statistics June, 2007 Extending Marriage Benefits to Same-Sex Couples: Massachusetts
A case for mutual recognition Silvan Agius, Policy Director, ILGA-Europe LGBT Intergroup meeting 21 st October 2010, European Parliament (Strasbourg)
Principles of SSI Unit 8. Medicaid eligibility SEC [42 U.S.C. 1383c] (a) The Commissioner of Social Security may enter into an agreement with any.
10 th Amendment Justin Kubek and Randall Jennings.
FUEL UP FOR A NEW DAY: The Supreme Court Ruling on Same Sex Marriage Kendrick E. Webb Webb & Eley, P.C. Post Office Box Montgomery, Alabama
1993: Hawaii Supreme Court rules that forbidding same-sex couples to marry is unconstitutional sex discrimination under the equal rights provisions of.
Employee Benefits Legal Update Inland HR Management Conference Diane V. Dygert Ben Conley.
Homosexuality and The Government By, Mary Tuske.
June 16, Rules Governing Mid-Year Cafeteria Plan Election Changes Stacy H. Barrow, Esq. Proskauer Rose LLP June.
Presented by: Nathan R. Basford, Jr. The Florida State University Tallahassee, Fl.
FAFSA LINE-BY-LINE 1. About the FAFSA It’s free to everyone It collects ‘base year’ income (e.g., 2014 for the award year). Everything else.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
U.S. Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Decision and What It Means for UNC Charlotte U.S. Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Decision and What It Means for.
Strengthening Partnerships: Shaping the Future Portland, OR June 6 th – 10 th, 2004 Same-sex Marriages: The Oregon Vital Records Experience Jennifer A.
Marriage & Partnership Heather Lee & Victor Sevilla.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6/I, Tue 11:30-12:30 Session 5.
NJ Special Handling Document on TaxPrep4Free.org
FEDERAL POLICY UPDATE: LGBTQ HEALTH Kellan Baker, MPH, MA February 5, 2016.
Equal Protection or Substantive Due Process?  The Court has alternated in their analyses in the Sexual Orientation cases.  In the Obergefell decision,
Till Death Do Us Part By Dawn Harrington. Mickie and Lois met in 1986 while working for the Tampa police department, both were officers and friends, eventually.
U.S. History Unit 7 Terms #1-13 Civil Rights. What are Civil Rights? Civil Rights refer to the positive acts a government takes to protect us against.
Understanding Social Security & SSI Presented by Matthew D. Lane, Jr.
Timeline and Discussion (Timeline from Sam Jose Mercury News)
FSA Conference Updates
Same Sex Marriage Same sex marriage couples lose government
Marriage Rights GOVT 2305, Module 5.
Issues in Same Sex Marriage and Domestic Partners
Same-sex marriage 1993: Hawaii Supreme Court rules that forbidding same-sex couples to marry is unconstitutional sex discrimination under the equal rights.
Marriage Rights October 12, 2017.
The Supreme Court of the
Litigation on a national level – recognizing birth certificate indicating two mothers in Poland Anna Mazurczak.
June 2013 Supreme Court Ruling
Presentation transcript:

DOMA and Prop 8 Series: Public Benefits Changes for Legal Services Cathy Sakimura, Family Law Director, National Center for Lesbian Rights Amy Williams, Managing Attorney, Legal Services of Northern California

U.S. v. Windsor (DOMA) The Supreme Court ruled that section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. Section 3 of DOMA previously prohibited the federal government from respecting marriages between same-sex spouses.

Hollingsworth v. Perry (Prop 8) The Supreme Court held that the proponents of Prop 8 did not have standing to appeal the district ruling striking down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional. The result is that the district court opinion in Perry stands. The district court ruled that Prop 8 is unconstitutional and enjoined the state from enforcing the ruling. On June 28, 2013, the Ninth Circuit lifted the stay on the Perry ruling, and same-sex couples began marrying throughout the state. The proponents of Prop 8 have asked the CA Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandate stopping CA from following the Perry injunction. The Court refused to stay marriages as the proponents requested but has not yet decided whether or not it will consider the case.

CA law applies equally to same-sex spouses All validly married same-sex spouses (regardless of where or when they married) should have their marriages fully respected in California for all purposes. There should be no difference in how the law applies to same-sex and different-sex spouses. Forms and statutes still contain discriminatory language, but the effect of the Perry ruling should require all laws to be equally applied. However, all non-biological parents must still get adoptions or parentage judgments to ensure their rights are respected in every state, even if they are on the child’s birth certificate. This is necessary even if parents live in California.

Federal rights of same-sex spouses in CA All same-sex married spouses living in California should be fully respected as married by the federal government for all purposes. Agencies may take some time to change forms and procedures, but all agencies must fully recognize the marriages of CA same-sex spouses. Agencies must recognize that same-sex spouses have been married since their date of marriage, but application deadlines and age requirements still apply. Some agencies may provide special enrollment periods, but questions remain regarding retroactive application.

Specific federal programs Social Security is still awaiting guidance/changes in systems. Social Security is currently holding claims for spousal benefits, but all married spouses in CA must be respected. Medicare’s definition of spouse is tied to Social Security. Department of Defense has issued guidance that all validly married couples will be recognized regardless of where they live (spouses who move will retain benefits). Same-sex spouses must file federal income taxes as married. This will affect their eligibility for many income-based programs. Being recognized as married may not be financially advantageous for many couples, particularly for SSI recipients, and couples who are not married should be advised that they may lose benefits if they marry.

State-run federal programs: Medi-Cal, CalWORKS Medi-Cal and CalWORKs previously did not recognize marriages between same-sex spouses because of Section 3 of the federal DOMA. Now that this law has been struck down, these programs should fully recognize marriages between same-sex couples. Medi-Cal will change in 2014 after ACA implementation, but same-sex married couples should be treated exactly the same as different-sex married spouses. This may not be financially advantageous for many couples, and couples who are not married who receive these benefits should be advised that they may lose benefits if they marry.

CA Registered Domestic Partners California domestic partnerships will not be converted into marriages. Couples may be both married and in a registered domestic partnership (with the same person). It is unclear which federal spousal benefits will apply to RDPs. Social Security and Medicare may apply, but other benefits likely will not. We are awaiting guidance regarding tax filing status for RDPs from the IRS, but it is likely that they will not file taxes jointly. This will affect income eligibility for Medi-Cal and exchanges under the ACA, as well as other programs. RDPs who want federal recognition should marry. However, depending on what benefits they receive, marrying can be financially disadvantageous.

Same-sex couples living in other states Most states do not respect marriages between same-sex spouses. Some federal benefits will apply to same-sex spouses regardless of where they live: immigration, veterans and military benefits, spousal benefits for federal employees. Some federal benefits will most likely not apply to same-sex spouses living in states that do not respect their marriages: Social Security, SSI, Medicare. We do not yet know whether many federal benefits will apply to same-sex spouses in states that do not respect their marriages, but the White House has instructed agencies to fully implement Windsor and is urging broad application. When spouses move, if they are already receiving benefits, they may not lose benefits, but they may not be able to apply if they have not yet begun receiving benefits (depending on the program and situation).

More information sFAQ.pdf sFAQ.pdf For free technical assistance with any cases involving an issue related to sexual orientation or gender identity, contact: or

Presenters Cathy Sakimura, Family Law Director, National Center for Lesbian Rights: Amy Williams, Regional Counsel, Legal Services of Northern California,