1 Performance Management at University of Portland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Performance Appraisals
Providing Feedback to Employees
Performance Management
Performance Management
Performance Management
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
1 Performance Assessment Process: The Reviewer’s Perspective May 2014.
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Introduction Performance appraisals, reviews and evaluations are all terms used to describe a process for documenting and communicating employees’ performance.
Performance Management 2012 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”
Performance Evaluation/Management Training
Performance Management
Performance Appraisals How Not to Hate Them. Why We Hate Them 1. They are a lot of work. Going back over the last year, remembering the highs and lows.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PRE-TEST WELCOME BACK! WELCOME BACK! Supervisor Essentials.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Appraisal System Update
WHAT TO SAY AND HOW TO SAY IT. Conducting Performance Reviews.
Performance Appraisal
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
System Office Performance Management
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
Performance Evaluation Process June 19th and June 26 th.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Performance Management
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Who is Sinking Your Boat?
Lecture 23.
18 Evaluating Staff Performance.
Performance Management 2010  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
1 © 2008 EAPtools.com Evaluating Performance. 2 4 Give employees ongoing feedback on their performance so that they always know what they’re doing right—and.
Performance Management Open Information Session for Individual Contributors.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
Session 2.5: Performance Management Module 2: Managing Human Resources Leadership and Management Course for ZHRC Coordinators and HTI Principals, and ZHRC/HTI.
1 Performance Management Program SETTING OBJECTIVES COACHING EVALUATING GIVING & RECEIVING FEEDBACK.
Difficult Employees. SOME OTHER OPTIONS IN DISCIPLINE 1. Demotion 2. Transfer 3. Performance improvement plan.
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
4/00/ © 2000 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Effective Communication Skills.
/0903 © 2003 Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Coaching Techniques.
Office of Human Resources1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 2008 AT HKS.
Successfully Conducting Employee Performance Appraisals Wendy L. McCoy Director HR & Benefits Florida Conference of The United Methodist Church.
City of Kamloops COACHING GUIDE PWABC Conference – September 2015 Jennifer Howatt, BBA, CHRP Human Resources Advisor.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Performance Management At Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa Community College.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
1 Chapter 19: Evaluating Performance Coaching Essentials of Performance Evaluation Making the Evaluation The Appraisal Interview Follow-Up Legal Aspects.
Joint Warfare Analysis Center 360 Degree Feedback Process Rater Orientation.
Welcome to the DET INSPIRE Lunch N Learn Lunch Learn Do.
1 Performance Management at University of Portland.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
© Copyright by CEO Support Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
1 Performance Management at University of Portland.
Department of Human Resources
Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Annual Reviews.
“Leadership Workshop Series” PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL April 20, Sep-18.
Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Management at University of Portland

2 Agenda What is Performance Management? Elements of a Performance Management –Communication –Documentation Elements of Performance Appraisal –Information type –5 Point Rating Scale Annual Performance Review Process/Timeline Examples of Annual Performance Reviews Tips for writing Performance Reviews: –Narrative –Meeting

3 What is Effective Performance Management? Ongoing Based on Setting Clear Expectations Supported by Feedback on Performance Expectations –Recognition –Development –Notice of Valid Concerns and Opportunity for Improvement

4 Importance of Timing & Communication Regular Meetings Address accomplishments and concerns as timely as possible If not meeting expectations, clarify and explain consequences of lack of improvement, and include time frame when appropriate –Follow up with employees in regular 1:1 meetings during the improvement period –If necessary, work with HR on an out of cycle message Be Respectful Keep it confidential Practice active listening People hear messages in different ways

5 Documentation The Performer –Recognition –Drop File –Growth and development –Annual performance evaluation The Under-Performer (Partner with Human Resources) –Give notice of concerns and provide opportunity for improvement –Documentation –Follow-up –Includes performance messages and formal disciplinary action –Annual performance evaluation

6 Information Used in Reviewing Performance Job Description and Annual Goals Manager’s Direct Experience and Observations Manager’s “Drop File” Employee Self-Evaluation Form 360 Degree Feedback received from check-in discussions with subordinates, peers, and key partners

7 Philosophy of a 5-Point Rating Scale Philosophy –Assess against the job’s expectations –Be honest when indicating your rating; inflated ratings will hurt the whole team Importance of delineating different performance levels –Clear understanding of the meaning of each rating level –Delivering the right message for a rating of “Meeting Expectations/Successful” Consistent use of 5-point rating scale cross campus –Ratings will be tracked in Banner

8 5 Point Rating Scale Defined Outstanding (Work with HR) –Reserved for exceptional performance in all areas of the job Exceeding Expectations –Employee is going above and beyond on a consistent basis in many areas of the job Successful/Meeting Expectations –The employee is successfully meeting all requirements of the position. Below Expectations (Work with HR) –A signal that performance improvements are needed in some areas. Improvement Required (Work with HR) –Employee is likely already on a Performance Improvement Plan and his/her job is in jeopardy.

9 Support for Ratings is Critical Supporting Evidence should be provided for ratings to illustrate the reasons for the rating. –Examples of accomplishments –Customer accolades or complaints –Efficiency metrics or improvements –Documented performance coaching or disciplinary action

10 Suggested Timeline for Annual Review Process March - April: Manager and Employee review current job description for accuracy, Employee completes a Self-Evaluation, Manager seeks peer/customer feedback, reviews own ‘drop file’, and drafts the review content. May: Manager writes the review, work with your reporting officer on department results, schedule 1:1 meetings with your staff. June: Deliver review in 1:1 meeting, Evaluations submitted to HR for scanning into employee electronic central files, and entered in Banner for tracking. Last week in June: Salary letters will be sent to officers for July distribution. July: Salary increases are effective July 1. Some staff offices have an accelerated schedule & start in January

11 Example in Action - Outstanding Employee: Wally Pilot Position: Wally Pilot is the face of and inspiration for our dynamic NCAA Division 1 teams. He is responsible for accompanying teams to all events, increasing crowd enthusiasm, and posing for photo ops. Accomplishments: 1) Traveled to 16 cities and 3 foreign countries for events this year 2) Increased crowd participation by 15%, above his goal of 10% 3) Attended 256 photo opportunities with Alumni, up from 180 last year. 4) Increased number of “Friends” on Facebook by 25% over the prior year Strengths: Wally takes pride in his role. He watches video of his performances to ensure he is consistently exceeding crowd expectation. He has a friendly and approachable demeanor and receives many compliments from parents about his interaction with children at the games.

12 Example in Action – Improvement Required Employee: Spike the Bulldog (Gonzaga University) Job Description: Spike the Bulldog is the mascot for our NCAA Division 1 teams. He is responsible for accompanying teams to all events, increasing crowd enthusiasm, and posing for photo opportunities. Development Areas: 1) Spike must improve his attendance at games and continue to work on timeliness. He received a written warning after being found asleep on the bus during two away games in March. He also arrived late to 6 games in January and was put on an Improvement Plan earlier in the year. He failed to reach any of his appearance goals this year. 2) Spike needs to work on being more approachable to children for photo opportunities. Photo ops were down by over 20% this season. Parents have reported that Spike has been too aggressive with smaller children, causing them to cry or hide from him.

13 Writing the Annual Performance Review Review job description for accuracy and make updates as needed HR Template available (for Staff positions) Resource Books on Hand in HR Office – Available to Borrow! HR will help craft and edit the content of your performance evaluations at your request, please allow for 2 day turnaround Any “Below Expectations/Improvement Required” evaluation must be reviewed by HR and next level manager prior to delivery All evaluations should be reviewed by the next level manager before delivery

14 Caution in Writing Annual Performance Reviews Halos and Horns: too much focus on one aspect of performance (either good or bad) Hero or Villain: rating everyone above average to avoid conflict or rating everyone low because no one can meet your high standards Lack of Evidence: rate the entire year, not isolated events, and provide clear examples to support ratings above or below a “Meeting Expectations/Successful” Hollow Criticism: sandwiching negative comments between positive ones without constructive advice on how to improve

15 Caution in Writing Annual Performance Reviews Gut Feeling –Comments without supporting evidence Length of Service Trap –Rating dedication versus performance Legal Issues: See HR for Coaching

16 Holding Successful Evaluation Meetings Schedule in advance, meet in private, and be on time Set a positive tone, build rapport with a friendly welcome Allow ample time for the discussion Outline the agenda for the meeting Use active listening, hear what the employee has to say or what their questions are During a difficult message, stick to “Just the Facts: –Follow the order of the evaluation document –Don’t get emotional –Allow direct reports to make a case, and if they have ample evidence, consider adjusting the review If the staff member is highly agitated, stop the meeting and resume the next day

17 Keys to Delivering the Message Don’t blame others for the message and don’t deliver it unless you have bought into it. –“I only rated you this way because my manager told me to.” Treat the employee with respect and professionalism. No Surprises! –Major performance concerns should have been addressed prior to delivery of the annual evaluation. Come prepared with Examples Engage in Active Listening

18 Probationary Period Evaluations Newly hired staff are subject to a 90 day probationary period. Positions in Physical Plant and Public Safety may have a longer probationary period. Managers should review job description and set expectations upon start date. Proactive engagement for concerns/performance issues A performance review should be completed at the end of the probationary period to assess progress. Consult with HR if there is a concern that the employee will not pass the probationary period.

19 HR is Here For You! HR is here as a partner to advise and assist you, so please reach out to us! Together we can… –Meet to discuss issues and plan of action –Create or edit specialized content for evaluations or other written performance documents –Provide coaching on how to deliver the appropriate message –Participate in your meetings with employees as needed to ensure smooth communication between parties –Provide exempt/non-exempt testing for positions –Prepare compensation analysis Franklin Felizardo,