SWA Progress Review Initial Framing Ken Caplan & Leda Stott 12 November 2013 SWA Partnership Meeting 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Disaster Reduction: A Tool for Sustainable Development Presentation at the Africa Regional Consultation on Disaster Reduction A Preparation for the WCDR.
Advertisements

Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Good governance for water, sanitation and hygiene services
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
Progress Toward Impact Overall Performance Study of the GEF Aaron Zazueta GEF Evaluation Office Hanoi, March 10, 2010.
Results Reporting by Donor Agencies (DAC/WP EFF – Cluster MfDR) Presented by Adrian Maître, SDC, and Daniel Low-Beer, GFATM EU Expert Group on Results,
Best practice partnership models
Determining CLIMASP Competencies Jerash University Development of Interdisciplinary Program on Climate Change and Sustainability Policy- CLIMASP Development.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
CHILD POVERTY AND DISPARITIES REGIONAL TECHNICAL WORKSHOP Kathmandu, 7-9 May 2008 PAKISTAN PROGRESS REPORT.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
" ICT SUPPORT FOR UNIVERSALISATION OF SECONDARY EDUCATION“ Ashish Garg Asia Regional Coordinator Global eSchools and Communities Initiative 27 th May 2009,
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Apia, Samoa 15 to 17 October 2013 Cross-Cutting Capacity Development Strategy – GEF 5.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Strategic partnerships Elaine Paterson Fund Development Committee Chair and Monjeya ElGhadamsy Committee Member.
Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Euei1. 2 Facilitation Workshop and Policy Dialogue Maputo April 2005 Enrico Strampelli European Commission DG Development.
Developing Indicators
Learning journey Part 1: Welcome and introduction Part 2: Concepts, evidence, and good practice: Addressing gender-based violence and engaging men and.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
APACE Commissioning Event 30 April 2012 THE POLICE AND CRIME PLAN John Smith Chief Executive, Avon & Somerset Police Authority.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
Global Assessment and Analysis of Sanitation and Drinking Water ( GLASS) Ghana Process Briefing and Launch 12 th Sept, 2013 Coconut Grove Hotel Accra 1.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
1 APPROACH FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STRATEGIC AND ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLANS.
Supporting Development of Organisational Knowledge Management Strategy NHS Librarians Meeting 3 rd June 2010.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
Using results frameworks to shift the focus of evaluation to a strategic level Emerging research on the principles underpinning results frameworks Kate.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Advocacy and Partnerships for the MDGs 2 April 2009 Paris, France.
Nutrition, AAP and the XCIs A project led by HelpAge International, the Global Nutrition Cluster and UNICEF Barb Wigley.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
With Ticon DCA, Copenhagen DC and Ace Global Evaluation of the International Trade Centre Overview, Key Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations Presentation.
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
Towards a Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) for water sector in Lesotho Prepared by T.W. Sepamo Principal Engineer Water and Sanitation. Prepared for EUWI –
Advancing learning through service Tamara Thorpe Trainer | Coach | Consultant Region 2 NAFSA Albuquerque, NM.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Project Planning and Management Gail Campbell and Tom Broadhurst.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
"Learning and achievements of SWA Global platform and its relevance to achieving Hygiene and Sanitation Development in India" India WASH Summit 17 th February.
SWA’s Role in Improving Aid Effectiveness in the WASH sector SWA Country Processes Task Team Geneva, November 2013.
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions How the ILO works at a national level.
SAFE toward a WORLD for children Five-Year Strategic Plan
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
A COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING LANGLEY HALL PRIMARY ACADEMY 14 JULY 2017 Clive Haines & Rebecca Walker.
Environment and Development Policy Section
Cycle of Political Dialogue – Meetings in 2016
SWA Progress Review Initial Framing
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

SWA Progress Review Initial Framing Ken Caplan & Leda Stott 12 November 2013 SWA Partnership Meeting 2013

Aims of review To strengthen the SWA Partnership with recommendations for how it can better achieve intended outcomes and overall mission.

Our premise Partnerships involve two or more organisations that enter into a collaborative arrangement based on: 1. synergistic goals and opportunities that address particular issues or deliver specified tasks that single organisations cannot accomplish on their own as effectively; and 2. whose individual organisations cannot purchase the appropriate resources or competencies purely through a market transaction. Source: Building Partnerships for Development & AccountAbility

Our premise Ultimate effectiveness and impact (sustainability) rests upon institutionalized mechanisms and practices. As partnerships are dynamic, it is important to remember that: 1. the basis of legitimacy changes over time. 2. at certain points the partnership will need to transition or may no longer be necessary.

What will we be looking at? How is the SWA partnership doing in three key areas: Progress towards achieving objectives (Impact) Logic and appropriateness of existing activities, operational management and governance arrangements (Effectiveness / Efficiency) Strategic direction & relationship to other processes

What will we be looking at? The impact of the SWA Partnership  Contribution to universal access to sanitation and water services  Intensity and quality of SWA interventions within and between priority areas: – Getting sanitation and water on the political map – Endorsing and supporting the global monitoring landscape – Strengthening country processes How partners work together to achieve this impact  Governance arrangements and minimization of transaction costs  Efficiency and effectiveness of partner relationships  Delivery and measurement of activities (where feasible)  Added value of partnership

Key discussion areas Partner incentives Risks and benefits of participation for partners & ability to make and deliver on commitments Partnership accountability Systems and procedures in place for ensuring compliance, transparency and responsiveness Strategic direction Contribution of SWA in key priority areas

“Mutual” Accountability Clarity around who the partnership is accountable to and why Satisfaction with governance, decision-making, management and operational systems Systems and procedures in place for ensuring: – Compliance – whereby partners and SWA more generally are held to account for its/their own commitments – Transparency – whereby SWA gives an account of its strategic goals and links between goals and activities – Responsiveness – whereby SWA (through component parts) takes account of and balances decisions around recommendations made by its constituencies and evidence derived from SWA or other initiatives

How will we work? Use of critical friend model Critical friends: generate information through confidential (as required) discussions that offer new perspectives or ideas ask challenging but constructive questions to understand the logic and appropriateness of SWA strategy, mechanics, etc. make recommendations as a function of a supportive and objective overview

How will we work? Phase 1: November February 2014 Desk review - familiarization, comparison with similar global partnerships Consultations with: -SWA Partners (including management groups & individuals) -Data gathering from 10 selected countries (potential for 2 visits) -GLAAS and key players in global monitoring environment -Partners engaged in NPRI country dialogues -Wider stakeholders Phase 2: March - June Review of preparations for HLM Post-meeting review of HLM Follow-up in selection of countries/agencies making HLM commitments -Review of responses to draft report

What will we produce? Report with conclusions and recommendations for publication after 2014 HLM. Report will include: Lessons learned Indicators for success Guidance on future development of SWA

For more information: Ken Caplan WASH specialist Leda Stott Partnership specialist