1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WV High Quality Standards for Schools

Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.

© 2010 Learning Sciences International Bering Strait School District Demographic Information  Covers 88,000 square miles.

Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.

Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.

APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.

Professional Growth and

National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.

Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.

Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

Those Who Can, Teach 10th Edition Kevin Ryan and James M. Cooper

Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.

The Webster Groves School District’s Journey to a More Effective Evaluation Process September, 2014.

Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.

Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.

What should be the basis of

performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC

Professional Growth= Teacher Growth

Differentiated Supervision

Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.

© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Session Materials  Wiki

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.

Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)

Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.

APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.

 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.

The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.

The Art and Science of Teaching: What can schools and districts do to develop highly effective teachers? Robert J. Marzano Margaret McInteer.

Examining Student Work and Data Professional Learning Community Action Teams PUSD Instructional Services-PLC Action Team Training Fall 2008.

Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.

Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.

Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.

Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.

DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.

Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment

HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Learning Goals & Scales EAGLE POINT ELEMENTARY SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 SCHOOL PRESENTATION.

TLE The Basics…. Who is here today? Corner 1- New to OKCPS Corner 2- New to Teaching Corner 3- New to Oklahoma Corner 4- New to the U. S.

Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.

Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.

Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.

Recognitions and achievements Teacher of the MonthTeacher of the Month Staff Member of the MonthStaff Member of the Month BandBand VolleyballVolleyball.

ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.

Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.

Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching An overview by Olivia L. Boucher Robert J. Marzano Tony Frontier David Livingston Robert.

Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White

INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM

Previewing New Content

Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria

Promoting Reflective Practice Local District 6 February 18, 2005

BECOMING A REFLECTIVE TEACHER

PLC Design and Expectations: A Small School’s Focus on Synergy

NJCU College of Education

Helping Students Process New Information

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Presentation transcript:

1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3

Causal Links to Student Achievement Common Language of Instruction Domain One Domain Two Domain Three Domain Four

The Marzano Art and Science of Teaching Framework: Domain 1 3

The Marzano Art and Science of Teaching Framework: Domains 2-4

Observation Feedback Feedback is necessary for teacher growth

The Power of Feedback

A System of Feedback

8 DOMAIN 2

Domain 2 Planning and Preparing Planning and Preparing for Lessons and Units 42. Effective Scaffolding of Information with Lessons 43. Lessons within Units 44. Attention to Established Content Standards Planning and Preparing for Use of Resources and Technology 45. Use of Available Traditional Resources 46. Use of Available Technology Planning and Preparing for the Needs of English Language Learners 47. Needs of English Language Learners Planning and Preparing for the Needs of Students Receiving Special Education 48. Needs of Students Receiving Special Education Planning and Preparing for the Needs of Students Who Lack Support for Schooling 49. Needs of Students Who Lack Support for Schooling

Feedback on Planning Questions to consider: Is there planning evidence for intentional use of 7 addressing content elements aligned with student outcomes? Is there planning for monitoring of the desired effect of the elements? Is there planning evidence for the unique needs of students?

Domains 2-4 Levels of Performance Element 42 - Effective Scaffolding of Information within Lessons Not Using (0)Beginning (1)Developing (2) Applying (3) Innovating (4) The teacher makes no attempt to perform this activity. The teacher attempts to perform this activity but does not actually complete or follow through with these attempts. The teacher scaffolds the information, but the relationship between the content is not clear. Within lessons, the teacher organizes content in such a way that each new piece of information clearly builds on the previous piece. The teacher is a recognized leader in helping others with this activity.

Domain 2 TAT

Sources of Evidence for Domain 2 Planning and Preparing Planning conference or similar dialogue with teacher Pacing guides, curriculum map Teacher artifact (PPT or slides from lesson, game templates) Student artifacts Direct classroom observation Lesson study Lesson planning documents including group lesson planning Common assessments How could a teacher show evidence for the elements in Domain 2?

Planning and Preparing for Lessons and Units TAT

Planning and Preparing for Uses of Resources and Technology TAT

Planning and Preparing for the Needs of Students TAT

Processing: Domain 2 How do these elements relate to or support Domain 1? How can you plan to give teachers focused feedback in Domain 2 throughout the year?

18 DOMAIN 3

Domain 3 – Reflecting on Teaching Ability and willingness to examine one’s own teaching practices in a metacognitive manner

Domain 3 Reflecting on Teaching Developing and Implementing a Professional Growth Plan 53. Developing a Written Growth and Development Plan 54. Monitoring Progress Relative to the Professional Growth and Development Plan Evaluating Personal Performance 50. Identifying Areas of Pedagogical Strength and Weakness 51. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Individual Lessons and Units 52. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Specific Pedagogical Strategies and Behaviors

Sources of Evidence for Domain 3 Reflecting on Teaching Self-reflection Reflection conference Professional growth plan Documentation of conferences and discussions in iObservation Student data folder Data/Assessment analysis Brief commentary by teacher with corroboration How could a teacher show evidence for the elements in Domain 3?

Evaluating Personal Performance A necessary component of continuous improvement TAT

Developing and Implementing a Professional Growth Plan TAT

Processing: Domain 3 How do these elements relate to or support Domains 1 and 2? How can you plan to give teachers focused feedback in Domain 3 throughout the year?

25 DOMAIN 4

Domain 4 Collegiality and Professionalism are the context in which the other domains function. Teachers engage in specific activities that create a professional environment that fosters teachers’ development.

Domain 4 Promoting a Positive Environment 55. Promoting Positive Interactions with Colleagues 56. Promoting Positive Interactions about Students and Parents Collegiality and Professionalism Promoting Exchange of Ideas and Strategies 57. Seeking Mentorship for Areas of Need or Interest 58. Mentoring Other Teachers and Sharing Ideas and Strategies Promoting District and School Development 59. Adhering to District and School Rule and Procedures 60. Participating in District and School Initiatives

Sources of Evidence for Domain 4 Collegiality and Professionalism Documentation of conferences and discussions in iObservation Minutes/agendas from school and district committees Lesson study, book study or RTI meeting documentation Presentations from staff, team, PLC meetings Evidence log for parent phone calls, after school tutoring, mentoring sessions, etc. Parent/teacher conference documentation Documentation of attendance at PTA/PTO meetings, school concerts, sporting events Documentation of participation in professional development opportunities Brief commentary by teacher with corroboration How could a teacher show evidence for the elements in Domain 4?

Promoting a Positive Environment TAT

Promoting Exchange of Ideas and Strategies All teachers have strengths and weaknesses and can serve as mentors and be mentored by others. TAT

Promoting District and School Development TAT

Processing: Domain 4 How do these elements relate to or support Domains 1, 2 and 3? How can you plan to give teachers focused feedback in Domain 4 throughout the year?