Scientific Roadmap towards Height System Unification with GOCE 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Th. Gruber (1), R. Rummel (1), M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nordic Geodetic Commision, WG for Geodynamics, Annual Meeting 2005, Masala /Finland, May 3-4 Fennoscandian Uplift Observed with Absolute Gravity Measurements.
Advertisements

Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
VORF: Vertical Offshore Reference Frame
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
An example of gravimetric geoid computation: The Iberian Gravimetric Geoid of 2005.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 23 The gravity.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Geoid improvement over Alaska/Yukon area by GRACE and GOCE models X Li 1, JL Huang 2, YM Wang 3, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 3 1 ERT Inc USA 2 Geodetic Survey.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Civil Engineering Department Geographic Information Systems Spatial Referencing Lecture 4 Week 6 1 st.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Estimates of Global Sea Level Rise from Tide Gauges Sea level trend,
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
1 Geoid and Geoid Change: Discussion Topics Roger Haagmans, Boulder, 21October 2009.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
PRS92 Bonifacia Daet Sylvia Esperanza
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
Representing the Earth
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
What does Height Really Mean?. How We Measure Height Heights are generally measured against one of two different reference frames (datums). 1.Gravity.
Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid
Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.
Spectral characteristics of the Hellenic vertical network - Validation over Central and Northern Greece using GOCE/GRACE global geopotential models Vassilios.
Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
AUSGeoid Richard Bean Robyn Stevens 26 May Geoid 3D surface of equal gravity (Equipotential) Not smooth like an ellipsoid Transformation needed.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid
Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Progress towards a common North American Geoid in 2012 Daniel Roman, Yan Wang & Xiaopeng Li National Geodetic Survey Geosciences Research Division.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
Nic Donnelly – Geodetic Data Analyst 5 March 2008 Vertical Datum Issues in New Zealand.
The use of absolute gravity data for validation of GOCE-based GGMs – A case study of Central Europe 1), 2) Walyeldeen Godah 2) Jan Krynski 2) Malgorzata.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
Determination of the Mean Dynamic Topography at the Coast using the Geodetic and Ocean Approaches and Consequences for Worldwide Height System Unification.
GOCE/GRACE GGM evaluation over Greece with GPS/Leveling and gravity data G.S. Vergos, V.D. Grigoriadis, I.N. Tziavos, D.A. Natsiopoulos, E.A. Tzanou.
GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical.
Evaluation of the Release-3, 4 and 5 GOCE-based Global Geopotential Models in North America M. G. Sideris (1), B. Amjadiparvar (1), E. Rangelova (1), J.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
B. Amjadiparvar(1), E. Rangelova(1), M. G. Sideris(1) , C. Gerlach(2)
Satlevel Collocation Model for Adapting GEM 2008 to Regional Geoid: A case Study of Yanbu Industrial City in Saudi Arabia Kamorudeen Aleem Department of.
Vertical datum unification on Iberia and Macaronesian islands with a local gravimetric geoid. First results J. Catalão(1), M. Sevilla(2) 1) University.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Difference between GPS ellipsoid and sea level heights (N)
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region
Fundamentals of Geodesy
Presentation transcript:

Scientific Roadmap towards Height System Unification with GOCE 5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Th. Gruber (1), R. Rummel (1), M. Sideris (2), E. Rangelova (2), P. Woodworth (3), C. Hughes (3), J. Ihde (4), G. Liebsch (4), A. Rülke (4), Ch. Gerlach (5), R. Haagmans (6) (1) Institute for Astronomical and Physical Geodesy, Technical University Munich, Germany (2) Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Canada (3) National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom (4) Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie (BKG), Frankfurt/Main, Germany (5) Kommission für Erdmessung und Glaziologie, Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Munich Germany (6) European Space Agency, The European Space Research and Technology Centre, Noordwijk, The Netherlands ESA Project: Support to Science Element (STSE) GOCE+ Theme 1: Height System Unification (HSU)

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Outline Upper-Rhine Bridge; Germany – Switzerland: 27 cm height offset applied with wrong sign  Problem Overview  Essential Tasks (Scientific Roadmap)  Diagnosis of Height Systems  Global Height System Unification  Ocean Levelling  GNSS/Levelling in well surveyed Land Areas  GNSS/Levelling in sparsely surveyed Land Areas  Conclusions

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, GOCE Equipotential Surface (long wavelengths) Local Vertical Datum (Equipotential Surface) Local Physical Height True Equipotential Surface (short wavelengths) Local Geoid Height GOCE Physical Height Omission Error Problem Overview Vertical Datum A Vertical Datum C A C B Vertical Datum B GPS Benchmarks Tide Gauge Benchmark Levelling Network GOCE Geoid Height

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Essential Tasks The geopotential and geoid improvements resulting from GOCE are the basis of a reassessment of global height systems Diagnosis of existing height systems by comparison with GOCE geoid

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Diagnosis of Height Systems Diagnosis of existing Height Systems by Comparison of GPS/Levelling with GOCE Geoid Reference: Long-wavelength errors of the US vertical datum (Wang et al., 2012) Australian GPS/Levelling vs. GOCE-TIM5 GeoidUS GPS/Levelling vs. GOCE-TIM5 Geoid Canadian GPS/Levelling vs. GOCE-TIM5 Geoid

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Diagnosis of Height Systems Diagnosis of existing Height Systems by Comparison of GPS/Levelling with GOCE-TIM5 Geoid for some European Countries France UK Germany Italy Netherlands 40 cm 30 cm 25 cm 40 cm 5 cm

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, GOCE Equipotential Surface (long wavelengths) Vertical Datum A Vertical Datum C A C B Vertical Datum B GPS Benchmarks Tide Gauge Benchmark Levelling Network Regional Height Reference Surface (Geoid?) Scientific Roadmap – Diagnosis of Height Systems GOCE Physical Height Regional Height

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Diagnosis of Height Systems Diagnosis of existing Height Systems by Comparison of GPS/Levelling with GOCE-TIM5 - before and after subtracting a regional Correction Surface GPS-Lev. Geoid Differences Correction Surface Residual Differences What causes these systematic differences: GOCE geoid, Levelling or GPS Heights? GOCE geoid error is below 2 cm globally – cannot be the reason. Levelling is sensitive to systematic distortions – most likely the main reason. Observation GPS height error 1-2 cm randomly distributed – cannot be the reason. But what about the coordinate frames?

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Diagnosis of Height Systems Impact of Coordinate Frame Transformations on GPS Heights (Study performed by G. Liebsch, BKG) GPS and geoid heights need to be in a consistent frame. GOCE geoid heights refer to CoM. GPS heights refer to an ITRFxxxx with a center of origin which is not consistent to CoM. ITRF2008 is known to be close to CoM. ITRF1989 (ETRF1989) to ITRF2008 offset is (x,y,z): cm 7 parameter Helmert transformation (plus linear trends) result in height change of up to 7 cm in Europe (see figure). When GPS and GOCE geoid heights are jointly used in GPS-Levelling this needs to be taken into account.

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Essential Tasks The geopotential and geoid improvements resulting from GOCE are the basis of a reassessment of global height systems Realization of a globally unified height system but confined to a global set of primary stations (national datum points, fundamental stations, primary tide gauges, primary clocks). Global Height System Unification Diagnosis of existing height systems by comparison with GOCE geoid (100 km)

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Global Height System Unification Observed Geoid Height referring to vertical Datum A Geoid Height Offset of vertical Datum A wrt. “mean” Geoid. Geoid height from GOCE model Residual geoid height (omission) Observation Equation from spirit levelling referring to height datum A (e.g. tide gauge) from GNSS positioning referring to a specific ellipsoid Computed Geoid Height referring to “mean” Geoid Geoid Height System Offset wrt. Geoid

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Global Height System Unification per degree from degree (to infinity) Omission error can be estimated from EGM2008 and/or residual terrain modelling Omission Error

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Global Height System Unification GOCE –TIM5 Model truncated at D/O 200

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Global Height System Unification GOCE Geoid Australia (Mainland) -101 England -34 Germany USA (1999) USA (2009) -11 Greece -72 Japan -2 Canada -59 Brazil GOCE-TIM5 (0-200) & EGM2008 ( ) +4 GOCE Geoid Australia (Mainland) -97 England -34 Germany USA (1999) USA (2009) -15 Greece -67 Japan +11 Canada -52 Brazil GOCE-TIM5 (0-200) Results from Rapp (1994) (Bulletin Geodesique 69, p.26-31) based on JGM-2 / OSU91A and Geoid Heights on Doppler Stations

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Essential Tasks The geopotential and geoid improvements resulting from GOCE are the basis of a reassessment of global height systems Realization of a globally unified height system but confined to a global set of primary stations (national datum points, fundamental stations, primary tide gauges, primary clocks). Open Oceans and Coastal Zones Global Height System Unification Diagnosis of existing height systems by comparison with GOCE geoid (100 km) Realization of a globally consistent model of mean dynamic ocean topography at tide gauges and at sea (Ocean Levelling).

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Ocean Levelling Sea level slope at tide gauges along the east coast of North America from classical geodetic leveling (top: USA in red, Canada in blue), from an ocean circulation model (black) and from GNSS-Levelling based on GOCE DIR5 & EGM2008 (bottom: red & blue) (Study performed by Phil Woodworth, NOC)

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Essential Tasks The geopotential and geoid improvements resulting from GOCE are the basis of a reassessment of global height systems Realization of a globally unified height system but confined to a global set of primary stations (national datum points, fundamental stations, primary tide gauges, primary clocks). Open Oceans and Coastal Zones Global Height System Unification Well Surveyed Areas (Land) Diagnosis of existing height systems by comparison with GOCE geoid (100 km) Realization of a globally consistent model of mean dynamic ocean topography at tide gauges and at sea. Regional geoid based on GOCE model. Establishment of national or regional height systems at primary points (first and second order) based on the technique of “GNSS-leveling”.

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Well Surveyed Areas GOCE Equipotential Surface (long wavelengths) True Equipotential Surface (short wavelengths) True Geoid Height GNSS Receiver GOCE Geoid Height h N GOCE N Assumptions: (1)Network of permanent, high quality GNSS stations. Observation of h (2)GOCE geopotential/geoid model. Determination of N GOCE (3)Regional gravity and topographic data. (4)Refined GOCE geoid model leading to a regional geoid. Determination of N (5)Consistent reference frames for h and N GOCE / N H H = h - N H = h - N GOCE Omission Error = N - N GOCE

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Mean Differences of GOCE TIM5 and GPS-Levelling Geoid Heights & Omission Error from EGM2008 from D/O 181 to 2190 with omission error (signal) w/o omission error (signal) Guam Marianas Samoa Guam & Marianas Scientific Roadmap – Well Surveyed Areas

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Essential Tasks The geopotential and geoid improvements resulting from GOCE are the basis of a reassessment of global height systems Realization of a globally unified height system but confined to a global set of primary stations (national datum points, fundamental stations, primary tide gauges, primary clocks). Open Oceans and Coastal Zones Global Height System Unification Well Surveyed Areas (Land) Sparsely Surveyed Areas (Land) Diagnosis of existing height systems by comparison with GOCE geoid (100 km) Realization of a globally consistent model of mean dynamic ocean topography at tide gauges and at sea. Establishment of national or regional height systems at primary points (first and second order) based on the technique of “GNSS-leveling”. Establishment of a master plan: realization of datum point first-order GNSS reference points diagnosis of regional gravity and/or leveling and/or topographic data base

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Scientific Roadmap – Sparsely Surveyed Areas Model Equipotential Surface Model Geoid Height GNSS Receiver h N Model H Height of Mount Everest: h = m (average from GPS and classical techniques for snow surface) (Chen, J. et al, 2006, Science in China; doi: /s N GOCE = m N EGM = m (GOCE-TIM5 d/o 280) (EGM2008 d/o 2190) this leads to heights above sea level: H GOCE = m H EGM = m Ellipsoidal Height Height above Sea Level Large uncertainty in omission error estimate due to lack of gravimetric data. N GOCE/EGM = m (GOCE-TIM5 d/o 200 & EGM2008 d/o ) Model geoid height for H=0 Model geoid height from height anomaly and correction terms (c.f. Rapp, 1997, JoG). N EGM/Rapp = m (EGM2008 d/o 2190) H EGM/Rapp = m H Chen = m (based on local geoid)

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Conclusions  The GOCE geoid represents a reference for global and regional height systems with unprecedented spatial resolution.  GOCE enables the diagnosis of systematic distortions in existing height systems.  GOCE enables global height system unification if the omission error at height reference stations can be quantified.  The GOCE geoid supports results obtained from ocean models at tide gauges.  GOCE supports GNSS/Levelling.  In well surveyed areas a GOCE based regional geoid and consistent reference frames shall be used.  In sparsely surveyed areas the GOCE geoid in many cases represents the best possible reference surface. Data for regional geoid modelling have to be acquired.

5th International GOCE User Workshop, Paris, Final Remark Project results are available at the following web-site: