Sausalito Essential Services Funding Measure Proposal Investing in the Quality of Sausalito’s Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town of Moraga: 2012 Revenue Measure Feasibility Survey May 2012.
Advertisements

Increasing the Navajo County Expenditure Limit: Key Information for Voters “Proudly Serving, Continuously Improving”
Legislative Committee on Education Capital Funding Needs July 15, 2014.
1. 2 Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
1 Measure M Investment Plan Update. 2 Measure M: A Contract With the Voters Approved by 55 percent of voters in November 1990 after two failures One-half.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
Once again the State adopted a budget without realistically solving its own major deficit problem. “Mid-Year Triggers” is the latest catch phrase for.
United Way of Northern Arizona 2013 Community Impact Forum.
0 RBC contracted with Public Opinion Strategies to conduct a telephone survey in Douglas County School District, Colorado. The survey was completed April.
1 PROPOSITION 63 The Mental Health Services Act Community Mental Health Providers, Consumers and Families, and Other Supporters of Increased Funding for.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
Cambrian School District Parcel Tax. November 2010 Timeline June Public outreach to parents, teachers, staff Public outreach to external community members.
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
TOWN OF FAIRFAX Local Sales Tax : A Community Discussion TOWN OF FAIRFAX.
BLAINE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
City of Fillmore Proposed Sales Tax Initiative Election November 8, 2011.
A Survey of Voter Attitudes in Douglas County, Colorado #12459 May 25-26, 2010.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
Voluntary Disclosure Systems  State and City Voluntary Disclosure Procedures Should be Uniform  Procedures, Requirements, and Allowances Should be Codified.
California Foundation for Commerce & Education May 2008 Internet Survey of California Business Executives’ Attitudes June 5, 2008.
Legislative Update July 2013 Victoria Lincoln Government Relations Advocate
Fresno County Library Revenue Measure Survey Survey Conducted March 9-14, 2012.
San Marino Unified School District Second Interim Financial Report and Long Range Financial Projections March 11, 2008.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
State and Local Government Budgets Chapter 14 Section 3 and Chapter 25 Section 2.
Survey conducted: May 14-19, Key Findings Two-thirds of respondents perceive that the City is headed in the right direction. Six out.
Energy and Public Agencies CALAFCO 2010 Annual Conference October 8, 20109:00 a.m.
1 West Contra Costa Unified School District January 4, Budget Update.
Survey Conducted: April 6-10, & May 4, 2014 City of Sausalito Community Survey Summary of Results May 27, 2014.
FY 2011 Organizational Initiatives October 12, 2010.
City of Indio Community Survey SUMMARY PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL June 16, 2010 Presented by: Rick Sklarz, Senior Researcher.
PROTECT CALIFORNIA’S KIDS SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE Association of California School Administrators April 14 th 2016.
Sanitary Sewer Fee Study March 4, Summary Sausalito’s 75-year-old sewer system is old and deteriorated. While the current rates have allowed the.
San Anselmo Financial Advisory Committee Community Survey Priorities & Recommendations May 14, 2013 Members Matt Brown Liz Dahlgren Gage Houser Christopher.
Special Library Levy November 18, 2004 State Library of Iowa and Iowa Library Service Areas.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
Sausalito Fire Services: Ensuring Informed Decision-Making Through Effective Community Outreach and Education March 8, 2011.
– Review/2017 Renewal? Referendum Fund  Current referendum of $3,500,000 was passed by SACS taxpayers on April 21, 2009 with 70.49% constituent support.
FALL 2014 City of Artesia: Fiscal Challenges and Measure Y Information.
LAND USE AND REVENUE FY 2013 – 2014 REVENUES ANALYSIS.
City of Oakland FY Midcycle Budget June 7, 2016.
¼ cent Sales Tax Referendum Quick Facts ►¼ cent sales tax generates approximately $460,000 for Bladen County Citizen education paid for by Bladen County.
Madison County Schools Facility Sales Tax April 2017
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
Methodology Survey of 402 randomly-selected Larkspur residents
City of Tucson: Financial Sustainability Plan
Information About Measure S
DRAFT FY Resource Allocation Plan / Two Year Plan
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
City of chandler Home RULE
City Council Item 11 March 5, 2018
Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City, Kansas
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 26, 2018 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF PASADENA OF THE.
Labor Negotiation Kick-off
Methodology 1172 online and telephone interviews with voters likely to cast ballots in November 2018 in Petaluma This sample included a sub-sample of 949.
DRAFT FY Resource Allocation Plan / Two Year Plan
General Fund Fiscal Outlook
Public Hearing Sanitary Sewer Fees
Fiscal Year 2019 Recommended Operating Budget
Maumelle’s Financial Future
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATED TO THE CALLING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER.
Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019 Recommended Operating Budget
Discussion regarding implementation of Measure J
2018 Open Space Bond August 2, 2018.
City of Jacksonville: June 6, 2019 Council Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Sausalito Essential Services Funding Measure Proposal Investing in the Quality of Sausalito’s Future

Current levels of service are adequately funded The budget is structurally balanced and sound However, future additional resources are required to address needed infrastructure investment while maintaining the long-term financial viability of the City Funds needed to maintain/repair aging storm drains, neighborhood streets, and broken sidewalks 2 City Services Needs

Reforms for Long Term Financial Viability The City has already made key reforms to maintain long-term financial viability City Council enacted sweeping and award-winning pension reform that has manifested significant results: Lowered annual pension costs by $1 million Lowered future growth rate of pension costs so that current levels of service are adequately funded Eliminated multi-millions of dollars in past and future pension liabilities As attested to by the City’s Actuary, Sausalito’s pension reform exceeds that of other California local government efforts. City Council will continue to seriously examines policies and legislation that address employee pensions and reforms. Even with these reforms/savings, the City needs additional funds to address local services and infrastructure needs Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future

Two-thirds of respondents continue to feel that things in Sausalito are on the right track– a fantastic finding. Do you feel things in the City of Sausalito are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things have gotten off on the wrong track?

If the election were held today, do you think you would vote “Yes” in favor of this measure or “No” to oppose it? Initial Vote After Information Community supports the general sales tax funding essential services and projects throughout the survey. Total Yes Total No Undecided

Community Supports many types of essential services and projects including: Total Impt. 92% 91% 95% 94% 91%

Town of Corte Madera ½¢ City of Fairfax ½¢ City of Larkspur ½¢ City of Novato ½¢ Town of San Anselmo ½¢ City of San Rafael ¾¢ Marin County City of Cotati ½¢ City of Healdsburg ½¢ City of Rohnert Park ½¢ City of Santa Rosa ½¢ City of Sebastopol ¾¢ City of Sonoma ½¢ Sonoma County City of Half Moon Bay ½¢ City of San Mateo ¾¢ San Mateo City of Antioch ½¢ City of Concord ½¢ City of El Cerrito 1¢ City of Hercules ½¢ City of Moraga 1¢ City of Orinda ½¢ City of Pinole ½¢ City of Pittsburg ½¢ City of Richmond ½¢ City of San Pablo ½¢ Contra Costa ~140 California Cities have add-on Sales Tax including: Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future Novato ½¢San Rafael ¾¢ Corte Madera ½¢ San Anselmo ½¢ Fairfax ½¢ Larkspur ½¢ City of Albany ½¢ City of San Leandro ¼¢ City of Union City ½¢ Alameda

Transaction and Use (Sales) Tax Participant Diversity Excludes groceries and prescription medicine Residents, workers, businesses, visitors Diverse tax base ensures tourists pay their fair share for their impact on infrastructure and services Impact on Low / Fixed Income Residents Primarily consume non-taxable goods and services Tax base is weighted towards discretionary income purchases Impact on Business Community Tax paid by purchasers rather than businesses Business-to-business transactions Anecdotal evidence points to little impact on business profitably Impact on Residential Community Most residential non-discretionary income spending is tax-exempt (e.g., groceries, prescription medicine, mortgages, rent, utilities, services, etc.) Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future

Transactions and Use (Sales) Tax Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future

Election Procedures / Timeline Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future Last date to submit ballot measure to County of Marin. 5 PM deadline for submission to City Clerk rebuttals to arguments. Sales Tax effective date. July 8, 2014 July 22, 2014 August 8, 2014 August 18, 2014 August 25, 2014 November 4, 2014 April 1, 2015 Report to City Council on Transaction and Use Tax. 5 PM deadline for submittal to City Clerk of ballot arguments for/con; and, City Attorney impartial analysis. General election Resolution calling for consolidation of election, ½¢ Sales Tax Ordinance.

Capital Infrastructure Needs The City does not currently have the funds to adequately address critical infrastructure needs. Maintaining and Repairing 85-year-old Storm Drains Storm drains are completely deteriorated/rusted through Upgrades are needed to prevent pollutants, garbage and sediment from entering Richardson’s Bay Maintaining and Repairing Neighborhood Streets and Fixing Broken Sidewalks Deteriorating streets on steep hillsides create hazardous conditions Crowded sidewalks must be maintained for pedestrian safety and access for seniors and the disabled. Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future

Proposal for Enhanced Revenues Sausalito constituents place a high value on maintaining the City’s fiscal stability and place a high priority on a number of key services. In order to improve essential City services that impact Sausalito’s quality of life, by almost a two-to-one margin a solid majority (61%) of constituents say they would be supportive of a potential temporary local sales tax measure to address community needs. The City of Sausalito Essential City Services ½¢ Sales Tax Measure should generate approximately $1 million annually. Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future

A Temporary Local Sales Tax Generates Local Funds for Local Needs Would ensure a guaranteed source of local funding to improve essential City services that cannot be taken by Sacramento Tax dollars would be spent locally for Sausalito residents With tens of thousands of tourists coming to Sausalito each year to shop, would ensure that out-of-towners pay their fair share for the strain they place on local services when they visit our city Is not applied to food purchased as groceries or prescription medication Recommended fiscal accountability provisions: Requiring independent financial audits with public review Including a sunset/is temporary Requiring all funds to remain in Sausalito Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future

Recommended Motions Investing in the Quality of Sausalito's Future Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Sausalito, move to: 1.Approve a resolution to call an election to be held on November 4, 2014 submitting to the voters an ordinance imposing a one-half cent (½¢) transactions and use (sales) tax for general purposes to be administered by the California State Board of Equalization. 2.Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance of the City of Sausalito adding Chapter 3.06 to Title 3 of the Sausalito Municipal Code Imposing a Transactions and Use Tax to be Administered by the State Board of Equalization (November 4, 2014 Ballot)