ABC School Data Wall 2013-2014. Our priorities for 2013-2014 District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
10/27/14 LaGrange School District 105 First Quarter Goals Update
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Professional Learning Communities at Work
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
Presented By: Nora Jaramillo, MJ Boyter, Kristin Carter. Reem Kievit, Crystal Rivera, Matt Craft, Robert Garcia.
What should be the basis of
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Clarifying Retreat.
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
Northpoint Elementary School School Improvement Plan for January 8, 2013 School Board Meeting.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Beyond the Basics -Instructional Shifts -Rigor: Depth of Knowledge -Assessment: SBAC, to CCSS -Shifts In Action: Close Reading Strategies & Text Dependent.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
1 CSIP: Clarifying Retreat June TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal Staff Development Objectives.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
TRACKING AND REPORTING PROGRESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AmeriCorps Program Directors’ Kickoff: 2015 –
DLP Assignments October 23, 2013 Karen Lea Branch NCSU NELA Cohort III.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Welcome to our Back to school Morning Benchmark School “Learning for All” OUR BELIEFS…  ALL CHILDREN CAN LEARN AND EXPERIENCE SUCCESS HOW…
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Making DATA Actionable… School Improvement and Student Success Timberlane Regional School District Christi Michaud Director of Data, Assessment, and Accountability.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
Harvest Ridge School Improvement Plan Update January 17, 2014.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
October 17, What is the primary purpose(s) and responsibility of our committee?
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Problem Solving Process.
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Southmoreland Primary Center
Welcome and Announcements
School Improvement Team Winter Retreat February 26,2018
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Jayhawkville Central High School
Fallsmead Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

ABC School Data Wall

Our priorities for District Goals – 1) Ensure individual students continuously exhibit academic and personal growth. 2) Develop a facility plan to support academic growth and community partnerships. 3) Increase stakeholder participation in activities which support student development.

Building Data - Reading Data Sources : –Measures of Academic Progress ( MAP ) –Nebraska State Accountability ( NeSA ) –District Assessments –Grade Level Assessments –Common Formative Assessments Using the Using Data to Guide Action for School Improvement ( data guidebook ) processes and tools, our SIP Team and PLCs analyzed district, building and classroom data to determine areas of strength & need in reading

Priorities identified and rationale Reading –K – 1 – 2 –Etc. Second area of building focus –Climate and Culture –Rationale : Based on perception surveys completed by students, parents and staff in Spring 2013, our building School Improvement Committee identified this as a second area of focus. Specific areas :

Building Goals Reading : All students will meet or exceed individual projected growth targets on MAP Reading from Fall 13- Spring 14, by focusing on areas of need as indicated on MAP goal strands, by grade level. Strategies : ( As indicated by grade level ): –Involving students in monitoring their own growth ( example : L to J ) –Targeting Plus Time interventions to individual student needs, and using developmentally appropriate & skill - specific intervention strategies, specified in grade level PLC SMART Goals –Periodic progress monitoring – District SIP / PLC process checkpoints

Reading Growth - MAP ABC

Reading Data - MAP Grade Level Phonologi cal Awareness Phonic s Concepts of Print Vocabular y & Word Structure Comprehensi on Writing KX X X indicates low goal area, relative to building grade level average & + indicates high goal area, relative to building grade level average

Reading Data-Building Reading Benchmark Assessments District pre-tests Other

Kindergarten

First Grade - example Reading - –Rationale : Spring MAP – Focus on Concepts of Print – this was the lowest performance area for 1 st grade students at ABC School for Spring 2013 MAP testing, based on 1 st grade average ( median ), and was the lowest goal area for 3 out of 4 1 st grade classes in our building. Second academic area : Writing –Rationale : Our Spring 2013 First Grade data ( specify ) indicated student achievement in the area of writing skills was below expectations, relative to their other academic development. Upon analyzing the data, we identified word choice as an area of student need. The Writing goal area from Spring 2013 MAP for Primary Grades was also a low goal performance area for 1 st grade.

Second Grade Reading Second Academic Area: Math

Third Grade Reading Second academic area: Math

Fourth Grade Reading Second Academic Area: Writing

Fifth Grade Three classrooms’ performance on teacher-developed reading pre-test, including 4 categories of items aligned with 4 goal areas from state standards

Art/Music/PE Reading Second Academic Area - content

Guidance Guidance : Guidance content vocabulary Second academic area : Student Engagement Team SMART Goal Strategies and Action StepsResponsibilityTimeline Evidence of Effectiveness Our Reality: 20% of 5 th grade students are proficient on the 5 SLANT behaviors. Our goal: Counselors will monitor student performance of SLANT behaviors. 70 % of 5 th grade students will be proficient on the use of 5 SLANT behaviors. 1. Pre observation of SLANT behaviors 2.In-service teachers 3.Implement SLANT behaviors -sit up straight -lean forward -ask questions -nod your head -track the speaker 4. Post observation Guidance Counselors Students Teachers Sept. Observation November: SLANT Check February: SLANT Check April: Post Observation -Observations -discussions -post observation -teacher feedback

October Update – Building Progress Kindergarten –Reading : Increase in measured reading comprehension from 28% meeting expectation to 41% meeting expectation –Second academic area : Writing : Update…. First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Fourth Grade Fifth Grade

Summary Building Goal – Reading –What is our progress at checkpoint 1? – 2? – 3? –End of year ? Second Goal Area – School Climate / Culture –What is our progress at checkpoint 1? – 2? –Etc ?

Checkpoint – Q 1 What have we learned ? ( example statements ) –Our efforts are paying off ! 5 of 6 grade level PLCs reported making expected gains at end of Q 1 on reading goals 3 of 6 grade level PLCs reported making expected gains in the area of improved school climate / culture –Based on our data, 2 nd grade team will revise their end - of - year goal upward, as they expect to meet their goal by end of 2 nd Quarter. Other teams will retain goals they have set. –All grade level teams feel they have identified the appropriate strategies to impact reading achievement – 2 of 6 grade level PLCs will revise their approaches to grouping students for Plus Time Evidence : –Qualitative ( Pictures, work samples / exemplars, teacher and student perception data, parent surveys, etc ) –Quantitative ( numeric data : MAP, CFA, pre & post - testing, formative assessment data collected on a weekly or bi - weekly basis ( PLC by PLC ), etc.