Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MARKOV ANALYSIS Andrei Markov, a Russian Mathematician developed the technique to describe the movement of gas in a closed container in 1940 In 1950s,
Advertisements

Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 7 Probability.
Decision Theory.
1 1 Slide © 2001 South-Western College Publishing/Thomson Learning Anderson Sweeney Williams Anderson Sweeney Williams Slides Prepared by JOHN LOUCKS QUANTITATIVE.
Decision Analysis. What is Decision Analysis? The process of arriving at an optimal strategy given: –Multiple decision alternatives –Uncertain future.
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc1 Supplement 2 – Decision Analysis A set of quantitative decision-making techniques for decision situations where uncertainty.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Decision analysis: part 2
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or.
Chapter 7 Decision Analysis
Chapter 4 Decision Analysis.
1 1 Slide Decision Analysis Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Decision Analysis Chapter Outline n Structuring the Decision Problem n Decision Making Without.
1 1 Slide © 2009 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
ISMT 161: Introduction to Operations Management
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Decision Tree Analysis. Decision Analysis Managers often must make decisions in environments that are fraught with uncertainty. Some Examples –A manufacturer.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
1 Markov Chains (covered in Sections 1.1, 1.6, 6.3, and 9.4)
. Computational Genomics Lecture 7c Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) © Ydo Wexler & Dan Geiger (Technion) and by Nir Friedman (HU) Modified by Benny Chor (TAU)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.A – 1 Operations Management Module A – Decision-Making Tools PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of.
Chapter 5 Probability Models Introduction –Modeling situations that involve an element of chance –Either independent or state variables is probability.
Hidden Markov Models Fundamentals and applications to bioinformatics.
Tutorial 8 Markov Chains. 2  Consider a sequence of random variables X 0, X 1, …, and the set of possible values of these random variables is {0, 1,
Introduction to decision modelling Andrew Sutton.
Engineering Economics in Canada Chapter 12 Dealing with Risk: Probability Analysis.
MBA201a: Decision Analysis. Professor WolframMBA201a - Fall 2009 Page 1 Decision tree basics: begin with no uncertainty Basic setup: –Trees run left to.
Operational Decision-Making Tools: Decision Analysis
Markov Chains Chapter 16.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western EMGT 501 HW Solutions Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 9 Chapter 12 - SELF TEST 18.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.A – 1 Operations Management Module A – Decision-Making Tools © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany.
1 Chapter 3 Structuring Decision. 2 Structuring Decisions Learning Objectives Fundamental steps in model creation Identify and structure values and objectives.
MA - 1© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Decision-Making Tools PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, Eleventh Edition.
CS6800 Advanced Theory of Computation Fall 2012 Vinay B Gavirangaswamy
1.3 ORGANIZATIONAL PLANNING & DECISION MAKING INTRODUCTION TO DECISION TREES (HIGHER LEVEL CONTENT)
Dimitrios Konstantas, Evangelos Grigoroudis, Vassilis S. Kouikoglou and Stratos Ioannidis Department of Production Engineering and Management Technical.
“ The one word that makes a good manager – decisiveness.”
Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.
Decision Trees and Influence Diagrams Dr. Ayham Jaaron.
Decision Analysis H.Malekinezhad Lecture 2. Definitions A decision is a choice between alternatives based on estimates of the values of those alternatives.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
1 1 Slide Decision Theory Professor Ahmadi. 2 2 Slide Learning Objectives n Structuring the decision problem and decision trees n Types of decision making.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Risk 1 By Isuru Manawadu B.Sc in Accounting Sp. (USJP), ACA, AFM
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
Monte Carlo Methods Versatile methods for analyzing the behavior of some activity, plan or process that involves uncertainty.
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition,  2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement S2 Decision Analysis To.
Choice under uncertainty Assistant professor Bojan Georgievski PhD 1.
Courtesy of J. Akinpelu, Anis Koubâa, Y. Wexler, & D. Geiger
Probabilistic Scenario Analysis Institute for Water Resources 2009 Charles Yoe, PhD
1 CONTEXT DEPENDENT CLASSIFICATION  Remember: Bayes rule  Here: The class to which a feature vector belongs depends on:  Its own value  The values.
Introduction to Probabilistic Analysis Introduction to Probabilistic Analysis The third phase of the cycle incorporates uncertainty into the analysis.
A - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall A A Decision-Making Tools PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations.
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Amity School Of Business Operations Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH.
1.6 Organisational planning and decision making By the end of the lesson, you should be able to: Analyse and interpret business plans Compare and contrast.
1 1 © 2003 Thomson  /South-Western Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Pay Off Table and Decision Tree.
DECISION MODELS. Decision models The types of decision models: – Decision making under certainty The future state of nature is assumed known. – Decision.
Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.
Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13 Decision Analysis n Problem Formulation n Decision Making without Probabilities n Decision Making with.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Decision Analysis Building the Structure for Solving.
Decision Tree Analysis. Definition A Decision Tree is a graphical presentation of a decision-making process within a business which aims to highlight.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
OPERATIONS RESEARCH.
Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.
Steps to Good Decisions
Supplement: Decision Making
CONTEXT DEPENDENT CLASSIFICATION
Presentation transcript:

Business Modeling Lecturer: Ing. Martina Hanová, PhD.

- by Nature of the Environment:  Stochastic - means that some elements of the model are random. So called Probabilistic models developing for real-life systems having an element of uncertainty.  Deterministic - model parameters are completely defined and the outcomes are certain. In other words, deterministic models represent completely closed systems and the results of the models assume single values only.

Stochastic Processes Xj(t) j = 1, 2,...n - the realization stochastic process

states E1, E2,.... Em - random phenomena - states Markov property the distribution for the variable depends only on the distribution of the previous state Markov chain – Finite Markov chain

states E1, E2,.... Em - random phenomena - states Markov property the distribution for the variable depends only on the distribution of the previous state Markov chain – Finite Markov chain

 transition matrix of conditional probabilities after k-steps: States: 1. transient 2. recurrent (refundable): - periodic (with regular return) - aperiodic (irregular return) 3. absorbent (non-refundable)

 The probabilities of weather conditions (modeled as either rainy or sunny), given the weather on the previous day, can be represented by a transition matrix:transition matrix  The matrix P represents the weather model in which a sunny day is 90% likely to be followed by another sunny day, and a rainy day is 50% likely to be followed by another rainy day.

 The weather on day 0 (today) is known to be sunny. This is represented by a vector in which the "sunny" entry is 100%, and the "rainy" entry is 0%: The weather on day 1 (tomorrow) can be predicted by: Thus, there is a 90% chance that tomorrow will also be sunny.

Company placed on the market a new product and explores its success, in terms of sales which can be characterized as follows: - product is considered to be successful if in specified time sells more than 70% of the production - product is deemed to have failed, if in specified time sell less than 70% of production.

 E1 - the product is successful  E2 - the product is unsuccessful Changes to the success of the product examine after months, or step = 1 month. Suppose that it is a finite Markov chain with states E1, E2,... Em.

If the product is successful in the first month, with probability 0.5 and remain successful in the next month. If not, with probability 0.2 will become successful in the next month. Transition matrix: E1 E2

 ergodic Markov chains  absorbing Markov chain Example: At the beginning in the first month, found 75% of the success of the product

vector of the absolute probabilities after 1-month: vector of the absolute probabilities after 2-month: vector of the absolute probabilities after 3-month:

 revenue matrix R  mean values ​​ of the immediate revenue  expected total revenue after k-steps

k v1nv1n 0710,412,7214,71616,61518,48420,345 v2nv2n 0-0,21,042,7124,5146,3548,20610,062 From the results above, we see that the difference between revenues of states E1 and E2 after specified number of steps is close to the value of Could be interpreted as the initial state of a successful product brings in each month at units higher revenue than the initial state of an unsuccessful product. At the same time we can see a constant increase in the values of expected returns, which reached to the level of This feature is related with the limit properties described process.

State i Alternativ hE1E1 E2E2 E1E1 E2E2 E 1 (succesfull) 1no advertising0, advertising0,80,2142 E 2 (unsuccessful) 1no advertising0,20,83 2advertising0,30,72-3 Enterprise started an advertising campaign. Successfulness of successful product in the first month increase to 80%. On the other hand, if the sale was at the beginning unsuccessful, its success is increased just to 30%. The task is to determine the optimal alternatives that lead to the highest expected revenues. Input data are as follows:

Final step: determine the optimal path vector of corresponding alternatives From the results we can see that after 3 th step the process is stabilized, so that optimal decision is uses the second alternative - advertising. For the enterprise is optimal decision to implement an advertising campaign to increase the success of a new product. kk ,620,8428,66435,75642, ,21,966,12411,38617,

A major goal of the decision tree analysis is to determine the best decisions.  a model for a sequential decision problems under uncertainty  describes graphically the decisions to be made, the events that may occur, and the outcomes associated with combinations of decisions and events  probabilities are assigned to the events, and values are determined for each outcome.

Decision trees offer advantages over other methods of analyzing alternatives.  Graphic - represent decision alternatives, possible outcomes, and chance events schematically.  Efficient - quickly express complex alternatives clearly, compare how changing input values affect various decision alternatives.  Revealing - compare competing alternatives—even without complete information—in terms of risk and probable value.  Complementary - use decision trees in conjunction with other project management tools: evaluate project schedules. Expected Value (EV) term combines relative investment costs, anticipated payoffs, and uncertainties into a single numerical value. The EV reveals the overall merits of competing alternatives.

Decision tree Decision tree is a diagram of nodes and connecting branches. Nodes Nodes indicate decision points, chance events, or branch terminals. Branches Branches correspond to each decision alternative or event outcome emerging from a node.

Decision trees have three kinds of nodes and two kinds of branches. 1. Decision node - Root node represents the first set of decision alternatives. Is shown as a square, lead to two or more possible outcomes.  decision branches The set of alternatives must be:  mutually exclusive  collectively exhaustive

2. Chance node - Event node is a point where uncertainty is resolved. Is shown as a circle, lead to two or more possible outcomes.  event branches - representing one of the possible events that may occur at that point. probability. Each event is assigned a subjective probability. The sum of probabilities for the events in a set must equal one.

 decision nodes and branches represent the controllable factors in a decision problem;  chance nodes and branches represent uncontrollable factors in a decision problem.  decision nodes and chance nodes are arranged in order of subjective chronology.

3. Terminal node – Endpoint is the endpoint of a decision tree, shown as a triangle or rhombus.  the payoff value at the endpoint represents the value of the decision-making criteria in three ways: - directly, the exacting value - simple formula - model

 the method known as rollback determines the single best strategy.  The rollback algorithm, sometimes called backward induction or "average out and fold back,"  determining the certain equivalent rollback values for each node.

 At a terminal node, the rollback value equals the terminal value.  At an event node, the rollback value for a risk neutral decision maker is determined using expected value (probability-weighted average); the branch probability is multiplied times the successor rollback value, and the products are summed.  At a decision node, the rollback value is set equal to the highest rollback value on the immediate successor nodes.