1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Advertisements

June 6, 2013 SURFACE RECLAMATION OF THE CAPTAIN JACK MILL SUPERFUND SITE Nick Anton, CDM Smith Todd Bragdon, CDM Smith Mary Boardman, CDPHE Joy Jenkins,
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
J-Field Edgewood Aberdeen Proving Ground. Description From 1940 to 1970s, the Army disposed of chemical agents, high explosives and chemical wastes. APG.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Environmental Protection Commission Overview Vision: Environmental Excellence in a Changing World.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (ABL)
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.
Further Site Investigation Sutton Walls Former Landfill
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
Federal Mogul Department for Environmental Protection Kentucky Division of Waste Management February 10, 2015 Presented by Chris Jung To Protect and Enhance.
Environmental Geotechnology Presentation Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Airport Road Waste Disposal Area April 28, 2005 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance To be used this field season by DEC and consultants Initial focus on soil, groundwater, and vapor intrusion Future versions.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation NYSDEC Public Meeting September 12, 2013 Brooklyn Navy Yard, Building 92 Former Kent Avenue Site 500 Kent.
Power Plant Construction and QA/QC Section 9.4 – Solid Waste Management Engineering Technology Division.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
RBES Guiding Principles The Department will comply with the requirements of the nation’s environmental laws and regulations. However, the requirement to.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
I.Summary of technical guideline II.Reviews III.Recommendations.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2004 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Great Lakes Visitors Center.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Former DuPont Barksdale Works Project Update December 14, 2006 Great Lakes Visitors Center DuPont CRG.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority Articulating aesthetics Monday 24 August 2015 Andrew Pruszinski.
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
Today’s Topics Hartford Iron site assessment Cleanup to date Cleanup steps to come What can you do.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
Deanna Streifel Environmental Engineering Officer Arnprior Waste Disposal Site Annual Monitoring Results.
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
Environmental Considerations prior to purchasing Properties Sabine E. Martin, Ph.D., P.G. Center for Hazardous Substance Research Kansas State University.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Draft Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan Draft Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan Schlage Lock and.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Using Insurance to Fund Brownfield Development Technical Issues Geoff Glanders, President August Mack Environmental, Inc.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Welcome.
Soil processes and trace metals
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator
Brownfield Corrective Action with Revised RRS
Forum on the strategies for the management and development of contaminated sites in Taiwan Shian-chee Wu October 25, 2007.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

1

2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2

3 BGOU Overview The Burial Grounds Operable Unit includes the following Solid Waste Management Units SWMU 2 SWMU 3 SWMU 4 SWMU 5 SWMU 6 SWMU 7 SWMU 9 SWMU 10 SWMU 13* SWMU 30 SWMU 145 *Recently added to scope. 3

4 BGOU Overview Burial grounds are old landfills; some date to the plant’s first years of operation Contain sanitary waste, hazardous waste, radioactive waste, and pyrophoric uranium 4

5 Remedial Investigation Purpose The purpose of the Remedial Investigation is to identify data available and the additional data required to support an assessment of risks to human health and the environment to support future decisions regarding the selection of actions to reduce these risk. 5

6 Burial Grounds Operable Unit Work Plan for RI approved November 2006 established data needs for BGOU Remedial Investigation included sampling beneath SWMU 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 30, and 145 (data gaps were identified for these units) SWMU 4 had no data gaps identified SWMU 13 sampling plan in review SWMUs 9 & 10 are permitted landfills closed in place with subtitle D caps (previous SI in 2004) 6

7 SWMU 2 - C-749 Uranium Burial Ground SWMU 3 - C-404 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Burial Ground SWMU 4 - C-747 Contaminated Burial Yard and C-748-B Burial Area SWMU 5 - C-746-F Burial Yard SWMU 6 - C-747-B Burial Ground SWMUs 7 and 30 - C ‑ 747 ‑ A Burial Ground and Burn Area and the area beneath SWMU 12 SWMU 13 – C-746-P/P1 Scrapyard buried metal SWMU Area P (residential/ inert borrow area) and old North- South Diversion Ditch (NSDD) Remedial Investigation Scope 7 Names & Locations of Burial Grounds

8 196 soil samples; 31 groundwater samples 32 angled borings (60 ft vertically) 6 vertical borings to 15 ft 3 vertical borings to base of RGA (~100 ft) Sampled for Volatile organics Semivolatile organics PCBs Radionuclides Metals Historical sampling data Remedial Investigation 8 Additional sampling will be conducted in area identified by plant worker as possibly containing buried material (SWMU 13) and will be included in the FS.

9 9 BGOU Conceptual Model RGA UCRS

10 Modeled Points of Exposure (POE): SWMU boundary Plant boundary Property boundary Little Bayou Creek Ohio River Estimated contaminant concentrations at these points used in risk assessment POEs follow the Risk Methods Document RGA Flow Paths

11 Remedial Investigation Data 11 Subsurface soil analytes frequently detected above screening levels (Screening levels are based on background levels or risk based no action levels for excavation worker) Source AreaMetalsOrganic Compounds Radionuclides SWMU 2Arsenic, Iron, Manganese, Vanadium-- SWMU 3Arsenic-- SWMU 4Iron, Manganese, Vanadium Th, U, 234 U, 238 U SWMU 5Iron, Manganese, Vanadium-- SWMU 6Iron, Manganese, Vanadium-- SWMU 7Arsenic, Iron, Manganese-- 235/236 U SWMU 30Iron, Manganese-- 235/236 U SWMU 145Arsenic Th -- = none U = uranium 228 Th = thorium U = uranium Th = thorium /236 U = uranium-235/236 Frequently detected means 50% of all samples were detected above the screening level.

12 Remedial Investigation Data 12 UCRS groundwater analytes frequently detected above screening levels (Screening levels are based on background levels or risk based no action levels for excavation worker) Source AreaMetalsOrganic CompoundsRadionuclides SWMU 2 Beryllium, Iron, Manganese, Uranium 1,1-DCE; TCE 234 U, 238 U SWMU 3Iron, ManganeseTCE 234 U SWMU 4Arsenic, Iron, Lead, Manganesecis-1,2-DCE; TCE-- SWMU 5 Iron, Lead, Manganese, Molybdenum -- SWMU 6 Iron, Lead, Manganese, Molybdenum, Uranium Tc, 234 U, 238 U SWMU 7 Arsenic, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel TCE; Vinyl chloride 222 Rn, 234 U, 238 U SWMU 30 Arsenic, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Uranium, Vanadium U, 238 U SWMU 145Iron, Manganese Rn, 238 U DCE = dichloroethene TCE = trichloroethene RN = radon

13 Remedial Investigation Data 13 RGA groundwater analytes frequently detected above screening levels (Screening levels are based on background levels or risk based no action levels for excavation worker) Source AreaMetalsOrganic CompoundsRadionuclides SWMU 2 Arsenic, Beryllium, Iron, Manganese, Vanadium 1,1-DCE; TCE 234 U, 238 U SWMU 3Manganese-- SWMU 4ManganeseChloroform, TCE-- SWMU 5Lead, Manganese-- SWMU 6Lead, ManganeseTCE -- SWMU 7Arsenic, Iron, ManganeseTCE -- SWMU 30ManganeseTCE-- SWMU 145--

14 Environmental media (subsurface soil and groundwater) have been impacted by releases of contaminants at all of the BGOU SWMUs. TCE trends in the RGA indicate that TCE DNAPL is present at SWMU 4 and in the vicinity of the shared border between SWMUs 7 and 30. Concentrations of TCE at SWMU 4 suggest that TCE DNAPL may be present both in the waste cells and underlying soils of the UCRS and in the matrix of the RGA. TCE trends at SWMUs 7 and 30 indicate that the TCE DNAPL source is likely constrained to the UCRS soils. 14 Remedial Investigation Results

15 D1 RI Report submitted to EPA and Kentucky on 7/25/08 Feasibility Study due 60 days after RI Report approved (Target date: February 2009) FS will evaluate methods to achieve cleanup goals as determined by DOE, EPA, and Kentucky FS recommends best method to achieve the cleanup goal for each SWMU Recommendation forms basis for Proposed Plan/Record of Decision Proposed Plan and ROD scheduled in 2010 Public comment period begins when proposed plan issued 15 BGOU Schedule