Generalisation & Aggregation SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME [6.1] [ Sustainable Energy Systems] Philipp PREISS Universitaet Stuttgart Brussels, February 17,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The CAFE baseline scenarios: Air quality and impacts
Advertisements

Ecological Economics Lecture 10 Tiago Domingos Assistant Professor Environment and Energy Section Department of Mechanical Engineering Doctoral Program.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no EMEP data on the web SR Tables National reports Michael Gauss.
Italian Agency for New Technology Energy and the Environment Italian-Polish workshop, Warsaw, 17th of March, 2006 The MINNI Project: An Integrated Assessment.
RAINS1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 7, The RAINS model Memorandum No 37/99 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
P. D. Hien, V. T. Bac, N. T. H. Thinh Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission.
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
1 Non-linear effects in modelling PM 10 and PM 2,5 contributions from anthropogenic sources Clemens Mensink, Felix Deutsch, Jean Vankerkom and Liliane.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
LINKING EUROPEAN, NATIONAL & CITY SCALES UK National Focal Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling Helen ApSimon and Tim Oxley, Imperial College in.
th February 2008The EcoSenseWeb model The EcoSenseWeb integrated model First CEEH Energy Externality Workshop Roskilde,
“Acid” in the Atmosphere Pollution and Impact on Ecosystems.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright URBAN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY MODELLING AT THE METEOROLOGICAL OFFICE Dick Derwent Climate Research Urban Air Quality Modelling.
Improving regional air quality model results at the city scale : results from the EC4MACS project INERIS : Bertrand Bessagnet, Etienne Terrenoire, Augustin.
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
The robustness of the source receptor relationships used in GAINS Hilde Fagerli, EMEP/MSC-W EMEP/MSC-W.
Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling (TFIAM) 40th session, May 2011, Climate and Pollution Agency (KLIF), Oslo. Analyses of the attainability.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Modelling the spatial distribution.
SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.
Surface ozone trends in a changing climate Camilla Andersson, Magnuz Engardt & Joakim Langner.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
The “Impact Pathway Approach” – so called, “ExternE Methodology” to Estimate Impacts and External Costs. Application in North Africa Methodology, Limits,
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
Reinhard Mechler, Markus Amann, Wolfgang Schöpp International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A methodology to estimate changes in statistical life.
Baseline projections of European air quality up to 2020 M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, K. Kupiainen, W. Winiwarter,
Modelling of Acid deposition in South Asia Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) Introduction to Acid deposition.
2006  MEADOWBANK GOLD PROJECT Cumberland Resources Ltd. AIR QUALITY EIS.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
Lecture notes 2, 4910 spring 2005, The RAINS model Transboundary pollution  UN 1972 conference on the human environment: States have...the responsibility.
Network for the support of European Policies on Air Pollution The assessment of European control measures and the effects of non-linearities.
Monitoring and Modelling in the Malé Declaration Kevin Hicks Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), UK Bangkok, March 2008 Malé Declaration 6 th Monitoring.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
Modelling perspective: Key limitations of current country projection data in transboundary modelling activities. What improvements are needed? Jan Eiof.
Slide 1 Galveston Bay Atmospheric Deposition Study Anil K. Katamreddy CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Fall 2003 University of Texas at Austin.
ExternE _ The ExternE-Approach for Calculating External Costs – Methodology and Preliminary Results Peter Bickel IER - University of Stuttgart, Germany.
Environment 1 The current work on Air Quality Indicators Best needed “ Population exposure” vs. Best available “Population weighted concentrations” Ute.
Attaining urban air quality objectives- links to transboundary air pollution Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated Assessment.
A critical evaluation of country-dependent impact factors for acidification in Europe summary of a scientific paper submitted for review -Do Not Quote.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
11 September 2015 On the role of measurements and modelling in Dutch air quality policies Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of Future Year Results to Boundary Conditions Jim Boylan, Talat Odman, Ted Russell February 6, 2001.
Evaluation of Polyphemus for 2004 Janusz Zyśk, Yelva Roustan, Artur Wyrwa, Denis Quelo. Atelier Polyphemus Champs-sur-Marne, 28th October 2008.
11 September 2007 How do the dispersion calculations in the IIAS work? Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute January 2008.
Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.
A.Ricci - 17/02/09 Introduction to NEEDS SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME [6.1] [ Sustainable Energy Systems] Andrea Ricci, ISIS Brussels,
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
The CAMS Policy products
SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
SHERPA for e-reporting
A 1-year simulation of atmospheric concentrations and deposition over Europe and UK Alan Cocks, Vicky Lucas, Ian Rodgers, and Ian Teasdale RWEInnogy Environment.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Conference on Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emission Projections
Changes to the methodology since the NEC report #2
The CAFE baseline scenarios: Air quality and impacts
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
Update on activities of Bulgaria within/related to EMEP
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Summary of discussion (1)
Presentation transcript:

Generalisation & Aggregation SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME [6.1] [ Sustainable Energy Systems] Philipp PREISS Universitaet Stuttgart Brussels, February 17, 2009

Emissions Physical Impacts Transport and chemical Transformation Monetary Evaluation Impact Pathway Approach Calculation is made twice: with and without project! Differences of Physical Impacts

●Ideally, site specific marginal damage costs are calculated ●However, i.Policy questions need more general answers, such as, external costs per kWh from coal fired power stations, i.e. an average for country or EU ii.Input data is not site specific, for example, emissions from up- and downstream processes for construction of photovoltaic iii.Damage factors, such as [Euro per tonne SO2] are needed as input for different models (energy, economic, etc.) iv.Sophisticated dispersions models are costly in CPU time ●Solution:  Site dependent, i.e. country specific damage factors Trade-off: Accuracy vs. Applicability

Regional Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling Example: one SR-matrix:  due to 15% emission reduction of SO2 in one region  concentration increment prim. and sec. pollutant in each 50 x 50 km grid cell  delta concentration per unit of emission  Generalisation & Aggregation  [Euro per tonne] Regional modelling with EMEP/MSC-West Eulerian dispersion model from MET.NO  Source-Receptor (SR)-matrices for EU maritime divided in 66 sub-regions - 5 different meteorological years  averaging the results - 2 different background scenarios = present & future emissions - emissions form all sources and high stacks separately

Background Emissions (SO 2, NO x, NH 3, NMVOC) grid for Europe ca. 50km * 50km -15% SO 2 in sub-region 4,d Sketch Source Receptor Matrices Approach ΔConc. sulphates ΔConc. ozone & & % NO x in sub- region 4,d & & % xy in sub- region i,j ……….

SR-matrices for 66 sub-regions

Prim. & sec. pollutants [µg/m3] [mg / m2] [ppb*day] ShortcutComment aNH 4 ammonium particles (ammonium nitrate and sulphate) aNO 3 nitrate part. With diameter below 2.5µm DDEP_OXNtotal dry deposition of oxidized nitrogen DDEP_RDNtotal dry deposition of reduced nitrogen DDEP_SOXtotal dry deposition of sulphur pNO 3 nitrate part. with diameter above 2.5 a. below 10 µm SIAsecondary inorganic aerosols SO 4 sulphate, includes also ammonium sulphate SOMO35sum Over Means Over 35 ppb tNO 3 tNO 3 is total coarse and fine nitrate aerosols WDEP_OXNwet deposition of oxidized nitrogen WDEP_RDNwet deposition of reduced nitrogen WDEP_SO x wet deposition of sulphur PPM 25 & PPM co primary particles with diameter below 2.5 µm

 AccExp SO 4 2- [ pers * µg/m³]  0.16 YOLL  ca. 6,400 Euro Example for Sulphates Exposure due to 1 t SO 2 Emission in S-Germany

Euro per Tonne (all sectors) in 2025 (selected countries)