The Colorado Growth Model 1.What is the Colorado Growth Model and how is it different from other growth models? 2.How are student growth percentiles interpreted.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Impact on Student Learning The conversation is about multiple indicators for this category BUT Few if any places actually have viable multiple indicators.

Advertisements

School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.

The Colorado Growth Model Module 1: What it is & What it means Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2009 Version 1.2.

+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,

Summer Copyright (c) 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved. All names and data used in this presentation are fictitious.

The Idaho Growth Model Changing Conversations about Education Richard J. Wenning & Damian W. Betebenner

PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.

Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability

Nevada Transitioning from measuring status and reporting AYP, to measuring growth and reporting on School Performance.

Using the WV Growth Model to Measure Student Achievement Nate Hixson Assistant Director, Office of Research.

Discriminant Analysis To describe multiple regression analysis and multiple discriminant analysis. Discriminant Analysis.

Norms & Norming Raw score: straightforward, unmodified accounting of performance Norms: test performance data of a particular group of test takers that.

Standardized Test Scores Common Representations for Parents and Students.

AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades Arizona Department of Education Presentation to the NCAASE Committee ASU Washington Center, Washington D.C. March 7, 2012.

Nevada’s Growth Model Richard N. Vineyard, Ph.D. Asst. Dir. Assessment Nevada Dept. of Education.

Barbara J Pettitt, MD Emory University Dept. of Surgery Atlanta GA April 24, 2015.

Chapter 14 Understanding and Using Standardized Tests Viewing recommendations for Windows: Use the Arial TrueType font and set your screen area to at least.

Educational Psychology, 11 th Edition ISBN © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Classroom Assessment, Grading, and Standardized.

Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Student Growth Percentiles 1.

Including a detailed description of the Colorado Growth Model 1.

Addressing Student Growth In Performance Evaluation For Teachers and Administrators Patricia Reeves.

Kansas: Where We Are and Where We Are Going Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE KAMSA Conference.

CHANGING CONVERSATIONS ABOUT EDUCATION The Hawaii Growth Model Next-Generation Design & Performance Richard J. Wenning The SchoolView ® Foundation Changing.

Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.

Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.

How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?

R IVERWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL. Interpreting Scores Score Range is from 2.0 – 8.0 The total raw score for each test is calculated by a “rights-only”

PPT Presentation Template: This PPT includes all slides to present a district or building level overview of PVAAS. This was used with a district- wide.

Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.

Colorado Growth Model Basics October Colorado Growth Model Welcome Agenda: ◦ Index cards for questions ◦ Overview of basic ideas within growth model.

School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.

Policy Considerations for Indiana’s A-F School Accountability Model October 15, 2014.

Measured Progress ©2012 Student Growth in the Non-Tested Subjects and Grades: Options for Teacher Evaluators Elena Diaz-Bilello, Center for Assessment.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

We are a Title I school What does this mean?. We are Title I because… Our school has a high number of students who are eligible for Free and Reduced Price.

MELS 601 Ch. 7. If curriculum can be defined most simply as what is taught in the school, then instruction is the how —the methods and techniques that.

2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.

Grade/School Level WVEIS Based Reports School Level Growth Model Summary.

Student Achievement Dashboard Training. Objectives ●PWBAT understand the purpose for using the dashboard to analyze student achievement ●PWBAT understand.

Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.

Growth and Goals Measures of Academic Progress ® (MAP ® ) Measures of Academic Progress, MAP, and DesCartes: A Continuum of Learning are registered trademarks.

Access and Resources Title I School Improvement Grant Writing Workshop October 10, 2012.

STUDENT GROWTH GOALS PART 2- “HOW MUCH GROWTH”. LAST WEEK Who: 8.1- the 9 th grade team 6.1- the 9 th grade class 3.1 –the Special Eduction/ELL/LAP students.

Florida Association of Science Supervisors Presentation November 3, 2005 Orlando, Florida.

Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.

PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.

2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.

Standardized Testing. Basic Terminology Evaluation: a judgment Measurement: a number Assessment: procedure to gather information.

March 26, 2012 North Scott School Board Presentation.

October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

October 24, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Accountability and Reporting Oregon Department of Education.

Quick and flexible access to Stanford 10 results.

LISA A. KELLER UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Statistical Issues in Growth Modeling.

Evaluating Growth Patterns. Setting the Stage  Welcome/Introductions  Structure for the day  Materials review R A M Materials Reports Activity M A.

Georgia Student Growth Model Training Webinar Welcome! Please use the Audio Setup Wizard in the Tools Menu to configure and test your audio settings before.

TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)

Growth: Changing the Conversation

Chapter 5 Interpreting and Summarizing Published Research

Local Growth Models for Accountability

New Statewide Accountability System

South Dakota’s Growth Model

School Growth Tools Moving Your Numbers

Normal Probability Plot

Cardinal Convo April &

Understanding and Using Standardized Tests

Formative Assessments Director, Assessment and Accountability

Briefing on Development of Performance Frameworks

Interpreting & Summarizing

Presentation transcript:

The Colorado Growth Model 1.What is the Colorado Growth Model and how is it different from other growth models? 2.How are student growth percentiles interpreted at the individual and aggregated levels? 3.How can a normative growth model support criterion-referenced interpretations? 4.How are the data displayed and made available to stakeholders?

What is the Colorado Growth Model and how is it different from other growth models? Growth as an interpretation of current year score – is it expected, or unusual? Quantile regression model using only prior scores as variables (no demographics etc.) Percentiles of growth – a normative measure based on concept of academic peers Comparison to other growth models

How are student growth percentiles interpreted at the individual and aggregated levels? At individual level – probability and comparison with academic peers At district, school, other groups – median Used for accountability calculations as well as less high stakes interpretations

How can a normative growth model support criterion- referenced interpretations? Using the growth model’s knowledge to predict likelihood of future scores – the concept of catching up/keeping up/moving up (Being on track to attain or maintain proficiency)

How are the data displayed and made available to stakeholders? Online application (“public” and “private” versions) Individual student reports (provided to districts) School and district growth summary reports Raw and aggregated data available in files

The Colorado Growth Model is open source Three other states have adopted its calculation method (Arizona, Massachusetts, Indiana) using the open source R package Several others are considering its adoption We are building the web application to enable the display of multiple states’ data (requires a creative commons agreement with the state of Colorado)

For more information me at