1 Impedance-related and others collective effects Impedance-driven collective effects/Instabilities –Single-Bunch (very high priority) –Multiple-bunch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCESS FRAMEWORK Lecture - 3. Topics covered PROCESS FRAMEWORK PROCESS MODELS DIFFERENCE.
Advertisements

February 7, 2007-Beijing (Zisman-DR) Global Design Effort 1 Damping Ring EDR Plans Michael S. Zisman, Jie Gao, Susanna Guiducci, Andy Wolski DR Area System.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Damping Rings Baseline Lattice Choice ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
GDE Meeting B Barish 16-Aug-05 The GDE – who, what and how? The BCD – what is it? Internal Organization toward BCD What do we want out of Snowmass? How.
1 SOFTWARE PRODUCTION. 2 DEVELOPMENT Product Creation Means: Methods & Heuristics Measure of Success: Quality f(Fitness of Use) MANAGEMENT Efficient &
Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory DVA-1 Reflector Development Timeline Gary Hovey NRC-HIA Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observaotry.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC09 and GDE AAP Review Meeting - Tsukuba, Japan 1 GDE ACCELERATOR ADVISORY PANEL REVIEW CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Global Design Effort 1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Overview A. Enomoto, J-L. Baldy, V. Kuchler GDE.
2011 Damping Rings Lattice Evaluation Mark Palmer Cornell University March 8, 2011.
PowerPoint Presentation for Dennis, Wixom, & Tegarden Systems Analysis and Design with UML, 3rd Edition Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights.
Towards a Coordinated R&D Plan for ILC Damping Rings Impedance Issues Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute 28 September, 2006.
Global Design Effort BDS KOM Opening remarks/comments from EDR Project Management SLAC Marc Ross / Nick Walker.
Introduction to Discrete Event Simulation Customer population Service system Served customers Waiting line Priority rule Service facilities Figure C.1.
ILC Damping Rings R&D Meeting: Cornell, September 2006 Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute 26 September, 2006.
DVA Series Work Flow P. Dewdney Apr 15, SPDO DVP Work Flow 2 DVA-1 CPG.
Summary of Impedance Session  Where do we stand? A summary of progress since the CS and RDR (see also C. Ng’s and G. Stupakov’s talks on Day.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
Slide 1 Project Management Chapter 4. Slide 2 Objectives ■ Become familiar with estimation. ■ Be able to create a project workplan. ■ Become familiar.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Philip Burrows SiD meeting, Chicago 15/11/081 Progress on the LoI Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Hiro Aihara, Mark Oreglia.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 3 Managing the Information Systems Project 3.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design.
ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop, KEK, Dec 18-20, 2007 Status and Plans for Impedance Calculations of the ILC Damping Rings Cho Ng Advanced Computations.
How to Prepare a Good Tempus Proposal Dr. Said Hammad Princess Summaya University.
Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density.
Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
10/9/2007 Global Design Effort 1 Optical Matching Device Jeff Gronberg / LLNL October 9, 2007 Positron source KOM - Daresbury This work performed under.
ILC Damping Rings Electron Cloud Working Group Meeting Introduction S. Guiducci (LNF) ECLOUD10, Cornell 13 October
Introduction and Charge Barry Barish GDE Meeting Frascati 7-Dec-05.
Damping Ring ImpedanceK. Bane 04/05/2007 ILC DR Impedance Group At SLAC a group has been meeting bi-weekly for ½ year to study ILC DR broad band impedance.
1 The ILC Control Work Packages. ILC Control System Work Packages GDE Oct Who We Are Collaboration loosely formed at Snowmass which included SLAC,
DRWS07 KEK Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop December, 2007 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK,
DR Layout Description ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
Global Design Effort September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review R&D Programme (Tools) Eckhard Elsen GDE DESY.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
Costing review Extract from slide of Philippe: The Panel was impressed by the quality of the presentations and degree of detail to which the value.
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
1 The next steps – focusing points Define the scope, strategy and cost of the project implementation. Main input: The evolution of the physics findings.
PM Report AS ILC PAC (19-20 May) Agenda: –Akira, Rongli, Hitoshi H, Marc, Nick, Toshiaki, Mark P., Peter G. –Nick will report on Design –Marc.
WP2: Beam dynamics and optics Workflow between Work Packages 1 O. Brüning – BE-ABP WP2 HL-LHC meeting 17. November 2011.
Proposal for ESS DTL Roadmap. Divide Into Four Phases 1.Conceptual Design Phase (In progress) 2.Technical Design Phase 3.Prototyping Phase 4.Construction.
R&D GOALS AND MILESTONES TOWARDS A TECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT TDR (2008) First Intnl. Teleconference Ecloud, Impedance/Instabilities - M. Pivi, SLAC 31 October.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 Main Linac EDR: Cavity & Cryomodule Discussion Lutz Lilje DESY.
1 R&D Plans for Impedance Driven Single-Bunch Instabilities (WBS 2.2.1) M. Venturini ( presented by M. Zisman) LBNL LCWS07 DESY, Hamburg May 30 - June.
Recent Progress Haisheng Xu. Outline Check the calculation of wake potential (together with Paolo) – Analytical method – PyHEADTAIL – mbtrack – elegant.
LIU-SPS Beam Dynamics WG E. Shaposhnikova LIU-SPS coordination meeting
N.Solyak, RTMLLCWS’08, Chicago Nov.16-20, RTML progress 2008 Nikolay Solyak.
19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel.
Welcome to the 3 rd LOW  RING workshop in Oxford 8-10 July 2013.
July 11, 2008M Ross for PM - ILC GDE - ILCDR08 closeout 1 GDE Program for the ILC Technical Design Phase Marc Ross for: Akira Yamamoto, Nick Walker GDE.
Oct 22 Group Leaders Planning meeting
LCWS11 AWG9 PARALLEL SESSION SUMMARY
Main Linac EDR: Cavity & Cryomodule Discussion
WP1 INERTIA Framework Requirements, Specifications and Architecture
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Session Introduction & Damping Rings Baseline Lattice Decision
R&D GOALS AND MILESTONES TOWARDS A TECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT TDR (2008)
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Impedance-related and others collective effects Impedance-driven collective effects/Instabilities –Single-Bunch (very high priority) –Multiple-bunch (high priority) Other Collective effects –CSR (moderate priority) –Space charge (moderate priority) –IBS (moderate priority) –Tousheck lifetime (moderate priority) [Ion effects (very high priority)] In these telemeetings we’ll keep focus on very high or high priority items (without forgetting the others)

2 Impedance Issues: milestones outlined at ILCDR06: 1.Produce initial technical designs for: (a) vacuum system (~ 2 years for ~ 2 FTEs), and (b) RF cavities (> 2 years). 2.Produce preliminary impedance model based on general specifications and scaling from existing machines/designs. (~ 1 year time frame for 1 FTE). 3.Make preliminary estimates of thresholds, growth rates, HOM heating etc. based on preliminary impedance model. (~ 1 year time frame) 4.Construct detailed impedance model based on initial technical designs for vacuum system and RF cavities (as information from milestone 1 becomes available; ~ 1 year) 4½. Specify feedback system model. 5.Characterize the impedance-related collective effects. (follows 4; ~ months) 6.Specify revised design parameters, and produce optimized technical designs (low risk and cost) for vacuum system and RF cavities. (following TDR) 7.Produce revised impedance model and updated characterization of impedance-related collective effects. (following TDR) 8.Prototyping and testing (in parallel with 6 and 7). Slide by A. Wolski (ILCDR06 Summary Talk) Slide by A. Wolski (ILCDR06 Summary Talk)

3 Matching R&D objectives and proposed activities Task Force S3 will soon start to work on –Identifying possible gaps and overlaps of efforts –Harmonizing activity proposals –Prepare detailed DR Global R&D Plan Harmonization will involve direct communications with various groups that have proposed activities These telemeetings should provide ground for discussion of Task Force S3 proposals, and provide feedback We should give some thought to how we will structure the coordination of people from different institutions working on the same or related topics. One of the challenges is to keep the flow of communication going. This is critical because of the natural inter-dependency between many activities (e.g. machine components design and optimization, impedance modeling, estimates of instabilities …)

4 The Baseline Configuration Study Report (Feb. 06) identified the microwave instability as the potentially most critical impedance-driven instability (hence the very high priority mark) Assessment based on –very rough estimate of the total impedance –very rough determination of current threshold for instability (based on some variant of the Boussard criterion) What we need (and eventually want to do) is clear: –Come up with a reasonably accurate model of the impedance (or wake potentials) based on E&M Mafia-style calculations of critical machine components (for some components an analytical-formula based description may be adequate) –Simulate the dynamics using the above accurate impedance model Some ideas on how to go about modeling longitudinal single-bunch instabilities

5 Setting a path toward goal 1.Identify all sources of potentially harmful impedance. Identify people responsible for design, modeling of machine components 2.Construct impedance (wake potential) models for specific components based on analytical formulas and impedance calculations carried out for existing machines. 3.Progressively replace models of specific components with more accurate numerical models as they become available. –Numerical models initially based on designs scaled from other machines will eventually reflect the technical design for the ILC DR’s components 4.Keep updating the estimates of the instability threshold, learn about sensitivity to impedance model, feedback information to machine component-designers Creating a space on the ILC-DR wiki site to keep all available info up to date would be very useful

6 1. Identify impedance sources … Maintain a database with updated info for relevant components including: currently best available impedance model; names of contact people for conceptual, technical design, and impedance calculation Filling this table should be one of first tasks. Filling this table should be one of first tasks. “Rank” specifies a tentative assessment of impact on dynamics (to be used as a guideline to set priorities in our studies) “Rank” specifies a tentative assessment of impact on dynamics (to be used as a guideline to set priorities in our studies)