Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Technology Transfer Conference By: James Zargan and Al Larkin Date: April 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAA Office of Airports Airport Fuel Storage and Handling
Advertisements

29 th Annual Airports Conference Hershey, PA Kenneth Jacobs FAA Airport Engineering Division March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety.
Presented to: 2012 FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: Al Larkin, FAA Airport Technology R & D and Josh Davis, SRA Date: April 25, 2012 Federal.
MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS
Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center AIRPORTSAFETYTECHNOLOGYRESEARCH 29 th Annual Airport Conference February 28 – March.
Presented to: 2012 FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: Al Larkin, Airport Technology, R & D Date: April 25, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
O’Hare Modernization Project Reflective Cracking and Improved Performance of Grooved Asphalt July 20 th, 2006 Research Overview Hyunwook Kim, Research.
Yakima Air Terminal/McAllister Field Master Plan Airport Board Briefing May 21, 2012 YAKIMA AIR TERMINAL | McALLISTER FIELD | Yakima, WA 1.
Presented to: FAA Airport Pavement Working Group By: Murphy Flynn Date: April 24, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Construction Update.
COMFAA 3.0 Update Airport Pavement Working Group
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Wake Vortex R&D Status Briefing NBAA Convention.
Ornulv (Arnie) Sonsteby, PE Penn State / FAA Airport Conference 2007
FAA/Asphalt Institute Airport Pavement Workshop October 18-20, 2011 Newport Beach, California The Benefit of Runway Grooving Hector Daiutolo 1.
Quintin Watkins,P.E. Prime Engineering, Inc., Atlanta, GA
Presentation By: Timothy W. Neubert, MBA, A.A.E.
Presented to: Airport Pavement Working Group By: Jeff Gagnon, P.E. Manager ANG-E262 Date: April 24, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Airport Pavement.
Significant Work. Extraordinary People. SRA. CC6 Distress Mapping Pavement Working Group 2012 SRA International Federal Aviation Administration April 24.
Project Manager: Tim Brown Project Editor: Tabatha Doughty Project Engineer: Drew Furry Project Engineer: Jim Walter.
FAA Runway Friction Program
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: Pennsylvania State University 2010 Airports Conference By:Al Larkin, Project Manager for Non- Destructive.
Gerard van Es 58th annual Business Aviation Safety Seminar
Airport Lighting Brett Malloy
OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT AGENCY DEPARTURE & CONTINGENCY PROCEDURES CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS CW3 MICHAEL R. JEWETT OSAA FLIGHT STANDARDS.
Mark George Survival Factors Division
Aurora Automated Inspection Capabilities on Concrete Ties and Fastener Systems Gregory T. Grissom, P.E. Vice President – Engineering GREX - Georgetown.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5370-2F Operational Safety on Airports During Construction Presented to: Eastern Region 35 th Annual.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
Self Inspection Program
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Airport Inspection & Maintenance at General Aviation Airports Airport Compliance Airports Conference.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration 2012 ACA Annual Conference David F. Cushing, Manager, LAX-ADO Wednesday, September 11, 2013 Construction.
Presented to: 2012 FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: Al Larkin, Qingge Jia, FAA Airport Technology R & D, and Jason Tarby, SRA Date: April.
Presented to:FAA field personnel By:AOSC Date:February 17, 2006 Presented to:FAA field personnel By:AOSC Date:February 17, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Best Practices Air Quality Issues 2010 Hershey Conference Maria Stanco, AEA Environmental.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration National Airport Pavement Test Facility Update Airport Pavement Working Group Don Barbagallo April.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Runway Incursion Prevention Airport Design – AC 150/5300 Change - 17 Presented to: Eastern.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Non-Aeronautical Use of Hangars Update
Background Numerous FAR’s mandate fire protection in aircraft powerplant fire zones Parts 23, 25, 27, 29, 33… FAR Part 1 Section 1.1 – Definitions and.
Skip Hudspeth and Gordon Hayhoe 112/20/2015. Pavement Roughness Subjective Pilot Rating Study Phase I - Develop a surface roughness model on the B
Jeffrey L. Rapol Qiang Wang Jeffrey L. Rapol, Civil Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Airport Engineering Division, AAS Independence Ave,
HIGH TIRE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE PERMANENT DEFORMATION USING CUSTOMIZED ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER April 22, 2010.
1 COMPARISON OF MPD VALUES FROM HIGH- SPEED LASER MEASUREMENTS WITH MPD FROM TWO STATIONARY DEVICES Rohan Perera, PhD, PE Soil and Materials Engineers,
Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference By: Gordon Hayhoe, FAA AJP-6312, WJHTC Date: April 20, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration AIRWORTHINESS Positive Safety Culture Failure to Follow Procedures 1 R1.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Organizational Culture Confusing & Unclear Procedures Revision 1, 11/08/2012.
Federal Aviation Administration Wiring Test 0 Federal Aviation Administration Pat Cahill AJP-632; Fire Safety Team Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Paved Runway Condition Assessment Matrix and New Winter Operations AC Overview Title too wordy.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
________________________________________________________ GBI Cost Analysis SAE Advances in Aviation Safety April 11th, 2000 SAE Advances in Aviation Safety.
1 Field validation of constructed sub-grade and pavement John S. Popovics Jeffery Roesler Marshall Thompson David Lange Robert Rodden Yi-Shi Liu Department.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Aviation’s Impact on the Economy Airports Conference Diane Crean, AEA Deputy Administrator April.
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
Ohio Aviation Association Airport Airspace Zoning Ohio Airports Conference April 12 and
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration RPD 151 (RPA S5.1) Evaluation of In-Pavement Light Fixture Designs and Performance REDAC Subcommittee.
Federal Aviation Administration Infra-Red Requirements for developing a Elevated LED High Intensity Runway Edge Light, L-862(L) (HIRLs) with IR emitter.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Ohio Aviation Association Airspace Protection Ohio Airports Conference April 12 and
Quantity Calculations Module 3. Quantity Calculations  Specifications  Post Bid Quantity Calculations  Production Quantity Calculations –Checking Yield.
Airport Pavements Lexington, KY.
Hangar Use Policy Winter Operations and Field Condition Reporting
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
New Approach Aircraft specific tables and charts
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
RUNWAY OBSTRUCTIONS.
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: 2010 FAA Worldwide Technology Transfer Conference By: James Zargan and Al Larkin Date: April 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements Pavement Groove Measurement Methods

2 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Presentation Outline FAA Rationale for Groove Requirements Previous FAA Pavement Grooving Standards Current FAA Pavement Grooving Standards Groove Measuring Methods Comparison of Manual versus Automated Groove Measurements Summary Acknowledgements

3 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April FAA Airport Pavement Grooving Requirements Paragraph 2-15 of FAA AC 150/ C states: “Cutting or forming grooves in existing or new pavement is a proven and effective technique for providing skid- resistance and prevention of hydroplaning during wet weather.” “Grooving of all runways,.. serving..turbojet aircraft, is considered high priority safety work and should be accomplished during initial construction.”

4 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April FAA Airport Pavement Grooving Requirements, cont. Paragraph 2-16 of FAA AC 150/ C suggests considering the following for other runways: - History of aircraft hydroplaning, - annual rainfall rates and intensity, - surface abnormalities impeding runoff, - surface texture such as contaminant, - crosswind effects, - dropoffs at the end of the runway safety areas, etc.

5 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Previous FAA Groove Standards

6 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Current FAA Groove Standards

7 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Field Measuring of Pavement Grooves In September 2008, representatives from a US airport contacted the FAA to help resolve a dispute between the airport and a contractor constructing a runway. The dispute centered on whether the contractor saw-cut the grooves in rigid pavement according to the AC. The challenge to the FAA was to determine an appropriate method of measuring the constructed grooves for compliance with the AC.

8 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Field Measuring of Pavement Grooves Furnish a grooving profiling procedure of the runway. This procedure would have to determine the necessary sample size to ensure a statistically significant confidence level. A 12,000 ft. runway can have approximately 95,000 grooves, this procedure had to accommodate a similar population.

9 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Groove Measurement Methods Two methods were identified; a manual method measuring the depth, width, and separation of individual grooves using a depth gage and calipers and, a method using a laser displacement sensor affixed to a passenger vehicle. both methods were compared to each other on the same slab and in the same line.

10 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Manual Groove Measurement

11 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Manual Groove Measurement Tools

12 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Manual Depth Gage Measurements Groove Measurement Worksheet Distance Depth by Groove Between Width Gage SELCOM Number (in.) ProFAA (in.)

13 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Laser Groove Measurement

14 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Laser Displacement Sensor Specifications Manufacturer/Model: LMI Selcom /325 Spot size: 0.04 in (1mm) Range: 8 in. (200mm) Resolution: in (0.049mm) (12 bits) Primary sample rate: 32 kHz Storage sample rate: 8 kHz (11 samples/in at 40 mph) New system samples and stores at 64 kHz

15 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April ProGroove Grooving Data A 13,000 ft runway has about 104,000 grooves.

16 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Example Groove Plots Example zoomed plot over about 35 feet. Close-up zoomed plot of standard grooves.

17 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Comparison of ProGroove and Manual Groove Calculation at ACY – Runway 4

18 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Current FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements Instruments for measuring groove width and depth must have a range of at least 0.5 inches and a resolution of at least inches. Gage blocks or gages machined to standard grooves width, depth, and spacing may be used. Instruments for measuring center-to-center spacing must have a range of at least 3.0 inches and a resolution of at least 0.02 inches.

19 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Current FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements The Engineer will measure grooves in five zones across the pavement width. Measurements will be made at least THREE times during each day’s production. Measurements in all zones will be made for each cutting head on each piece of grooving equipment used for each day’s production.

20 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Current FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements The five zones are as follows: Zone 1 Centerline to 5 feet left or right of the centerline. Zone 2 5 feet to 25 feet left of the centerline. Zone 3 5 feet 25 feet right of the centerline. Zone 4 25 feet to edge of grooving left of the centerline. Zone 5 25 feet to edge of grooving right of the centerline. Width or depth measurements less than inches shall be considered less than 3/16 inches. Width or depth measurements more than inches shall be considered more than 5/16 inches. Width or depth measurements more than inches shall be considered more than 1/4 inches.

21 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Comparison of Previous and Current Groove Standards

22 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Current Groove Measurement Methodology

23 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Summary The revision to FAA AC 150/ E, Standards for Specifying Construction of Airports, dated 9/30/2009 clarifies the following grooving requirements: - combined rigid and flexible in one section, - established criteria for acceptance testing equipment and the procedure for groove measurement in the field for acceptance, - augmented existing PWL acceptance standards for pavement grooving.

24 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Pavement Grooving Requirements April Acknowledgements Mr. Jeffrey Rapol, AAS-100 SRA International