Hatchery Reform in the Pacific Northwest: Applying Science to Hatchery Management Applying Science to Hatchery Management, August 2008 Hatchery Scientific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.
Advertisements

Develop Local Okanogan Steelhead Brood Stock Proposal # Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Fishery Management Overview - Context Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Strategic Hatchery Management Roadmap to Success Don Campton U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, OR.
Conserving Americas Fisheries U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Columbia River Fisheries Program Office Future of Our Salmon A Vision of Restoration in the.
OKANOGAN RIVER SPRING & SUMMER/FALL CHINOOK
Future of our Salmon A summary of the origins and legal fundamentals of the role of artificial production in the Columbia River Presented by: John Ogan.
Upper Willamette River Recovery Planning WITHIN OUR REACH New Partnerships for a Healthier Willamette December
Rachel C. Johnson Cramer Fish Sciences & University of California Davis The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: Can hatchery and natural.
Reduced Recruitment Performance in Natural Populations of Anadromous Salmonids Associated with Hatchery- reared Fish Pacific Coast Steelhead Meeting –
Crystal Springs Hatchery Facilities
Federal Concerns Regarding Hatchery Steelhead Spawning in the Wild NOAA Fisheries Salmon Recovery Division.
Atlantic salmon in Maine: How the structured decision making process has been used to refocus management activities for recovery and restoration Meredith.
Management strategies for balancing hatchery functions with natural fish protections Brad Cavallo.
Coho Reintroduction in the Upper Columbia: Using Adaptive Management to Achieve Success Fisheries Resource Management Yakama Nation.
The National Aquaculture Policy and The State Shellfish Initiative Perry Lund Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program 17 November 2011.
Salmon recovery does not just mean more fish Management decisions are driven by politics & logistics—science can only contribute if we provide technically.
Decisions in the Face of Uncertainty Cedar River Sockeye Hatchery Proposed Adaptive Management Plan.
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH OF KALAMA RIVER STEELHEAD WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE KALAMA RESEARCH TEAM PAT HULETT CAMERON SHARPE CHRIS WAGEMANN.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
1 Legal Basis, Endangered Species Act and Hatchery Reform Heather Bartlett, Hatcheries Division Manager.
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
Atlantic Salmon Recovery Framework Briefing for Regional Director November 1, 2010.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
IN PUGET SOUND & COASTAL WASHINGTON Hatchery Reform February 2003.
Mass Marking and Electronic Recovery of CWTs In the Pacific Northwest Ron Olson Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Olympia Washington.
Conservation of Lake Sammamish Kokanee A Briefing for the City of Bellevue Planning Commission David St. John – Lake Sammamish Kokanee Work Group
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Agenda Overview of meeting topics 9:30 AMIntroduction and Agenda Review 9:45 AMSelect Regional Allocation Option and Process Steps for 2006 SRFB Funding.
Management & Recovery Implications Of Wild/Hatchery Steelhead Interactions Within A Large, Complex Watershed Research Partners: WDFW Skagit River System.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
Evaluation of Recovery Options for Cheakamus River Steelhead Josh Korman Carl Walters Steve Martell Eric Taylor.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange Habitat Issues.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Lake Sammamish Kokanee: Bringing Them Back from the Brink A Presentation for the Rotary Club of Issaquah David St. John – Government Relations Administrator.
Puget Sound Salmon Hatcheries April 2003 Puget Sound Salmon Hatchery Management Decision Making ESA & NEPA Processes Independent Scientific Review Process.
1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation.
Joe Bumgarner Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
Hatcheries as Habitat, Integrated vs. Segregated Hatchery Programs, and Rehab for Hatchery Fish John Carlos Garza Southwest Fisheries Science Center &
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Implementing Hatchery Reform The Dawn of a New Beginning or more of the same old thing? Mike Delarm NOAA Fisheries.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
Pacific NW and California Hatchery Reviews Similarities and Differences.
Settlement Agreement “The emphasis of this Agreement is …restoration and recovery of wild, indigenous salmon runs, including ESA-listed and unlisted.
Overview of the Process
Hatchery Reform and Implications to Steelhead Management
Steelhead Viability: Where are we now and where are we going?
Washington State Steelhead Status Review
West Coast Steelhead Meeting March 10, 2004 Port Ludlow, Washington
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
Goals and Objectives Conservation: 1) increase population viability (abundance, diversity and spatial distribution) by moving to a locally adapted fall.
Presentation transcript:

Hatchery Reform in the Pacific Northwest: Applying Science to Hatchery Management Applying Science to Hatchery Management, August 2008 Hatchery Scientific Review Group

WDFW Tribe USFWS

1.helping to conserve naturally spawning populations; and 2.supporting sustainable fisheries. The Hatchery Reform Project is a systematic, science-driven review of hatchery programs to achieve two goals:

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Puget Sound Columbia River Unaffiliated John Barr (Vice Chair) Lee Blankenship (Vice Chair) Trevor Evelyn, Ph.D. Lars Mobrand, Ph.D. (Chair) Lisa Seeb, Ph.D. Steve Smith William Smoker, Ph.D. Agency Donald Campton, Ph.D. Mike Delarm Dave Fast, Ph.D. Thomas Flagg Jeff Gislason, Ph.D. Paul Kline Conrad Mahnken, Ph.D. George Nandor Peter Paquet, Ph.D. Paul Seidel

GOALS SCIENTIFIC DEFENSIBILITY INFORMED DECISION MAKING Principles for Hatchery Management

Priorities for Implementing Hatchery Reform Broodstock management Compliance with environmental regulations

Historical hatchery problem: Unknown gene flow between two environments Hatchery spawn Wild spawn ? ? Unknown gene flow

HSRG 101 Broodstock Management Strategies –Integrated, Segregated Population Designations –Primary, Contributing, Stabilizing

Integrated Goal: 1 population, 2 environments Solution: Genetically Integrated or Segregated Broodstocks Hatchery Wild HatcheryWild Segregated Goal: 2 populations, 2 environments IntegratedSegregated

Genetic risks vs. gene flow Hatchery Wild Integrated HatcheryWild Segregated Natural Spawning Genetic Risk :

HSRG 101 Broodstock Management Strategies –Integrated, Segregated Population Designations –Primary, Contributing, Stabilizing

Population Designations Why are they important? –Describes different levels of risk tolerance. –Not all populations are created equal. –Evaluation - apples to apples. –Balance - helps to ensure an ESU has diversity, spatial structure, resiliency.

Population Designations What the HSRG uses –Primary—biologically significant, core, key, highly viable, important to recovery. Historically were a large segment of the population structure. Need to be at low risk of extinction. –Contributing– of some significance, are viable but lower in abundance than Primary. Contribute to diversity. –Stabilizing—a population, but may not have ever been a large segment of the population structure.

Definition of Terms pNOB=% Natural Origin fish in the hatchery broodstock pHOS=% Hatchery Origin fish on the spawning grounds PNI = pNOB/(pNOB+pHOS)

Designation Standards Primary Integrated hatchery programs: PNI > 0.67; pHOS <30% Segregated hatchery program: pHOS < 5% Contributing Integrated hatchery programs: PNI > 0.50; pHOS <30% Segregated hatchery program: pHOS < 10% Stabilizing Integrated hatchery programs—current condition Segregated hatchery programs—current condition

Progress The HSRG has completed reviews of populations and hatchery programs for anadromous salmonids in Washington's Puget Sound and Coast (State, Federal Tribal) Resulted in 1181 recommendations

Progress for Columbia River The HSRG moved to the Columbia in fall It has completed field reviews of populations and hatchery programs for anadromous salmonids. –Draft Final products by October 2008 –Report to Congress due December 2008

Keys to Conservation Develop local broodstocks (even if not native) –Increased performance Control risks to natural populations caused by the unintended presence of hatchery-origin adults on spawning grounds –Acclimation –Adult recapture facilities –Use selective fisheries (gear or time and area) –Reduce program size –Wild Fish Management Zones

Keys to Conservation cont. Develop properly integrated hatchery programs or - maintain effective, segregated hatchery programs (HSRG has no preference) Place the resources in the hands of the managers to complete facility and monitoring reforms

Background - Importance of Habitat Benefits associated with habitat improvement increase as Hatchery Reforms are made by providing better adapted fish to occupy the new (better) habitat.

Estimated harvest under current and HSRG management scenarios