M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Development of New SPR-based Kaon, Pion, Proton, and Electron Selectors Kalanand Mishra University.
Advertisements

Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
NA60 results on charm and intermediate mass dimuon production in In-In 158 GeV/A collisions R. Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon) on behalf of the NA60 collaboration.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
QCD Meeting October 1, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
Zhengyun YOU, FVTX Review Nov FVTX Software and Simulation Zhengyun You Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Charm and intermediate mass dimuons in In+In collisions R. Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon) on behalf of the NA60 collaboration Quark Matter 2005, Budapest Motivation.
M. Brooks, LANL 1 Physics and Simulation Status and To-Dos Physics Section could probably use a top-down re-write. Most of the info is probably there but.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
Preliminary studies on Muon System software alignment LHCb week CERN May 29-th, June 2-nd 2006 Stefania Vecchi INFN Bologna Wander Baldini INFN Ferrara.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
Simulation and Analysis of VTX03 and Upgrades to LASS Ryan Page.
MuID Software Status/Future Plan Yajun Mao (RIKEN/CIAE) PHENIX Muon Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Dec. 16, 2000.
M. Brooks, 29-Jan-02 P-25 Review South Arm: Hardware and Analysis Status Brief overview of muon arm Physics goals-->implied performance requirements Status.
T.Dorigo, INFN-Padova1 Studies of the Muon Momentum Scale M.De Mattia, T.Dorigo, U.Gasparini – Padova S.Bolognesi, M.A.Borgia, C.Mariotti, S.Maselli –
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
 production in p-A and In-In collisions Motivation Apparatus Collected data Results for     Ongoing work for    KK Alessandro De Falco – University.
1 FVTX Simulation and Analysis Software Zhengyun You Los Alamos National Laboratory Nov
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Z′ Mass Reach MC Analysis USCMS meeting Brown University May 6 – 8, 2010.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Experience from analyzing pp collisions in ALICE Konstantin Mikhaylov ITEP, Moscow K.Mikhaylov, ITEP Alice Week, CERN October
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
IITF and UPCs UPC Specific Requirements Processing  0 analysis e + e - analysis (by Vladimir Morozov) Conclusions Spencer Klein.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
STAR Simulation. Status and plans V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
A. Pulvirenti - Resonances measurement in pp and PbPb with ALICE 1 Outline The Study of Short-Lived Resonances with the ALICE Experiment at the LHC Ayben.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
Reduction of background in observation of W – decay using FVTX tracker Abraham Meles New Mexico State University DNP2012 – Newport Beach, CA. Oct 25, 2012.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
BES III Software: Beta Release Plan Weidong Li 19 th October 2005.
Muon Reconstruction and Vertex Constraint Giovanni Abbiendi Bologna CMS meeting, 20 November 2007.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
C.Cheshkov 15/09/2005 Weekly Offline Meeting
B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
STAR Geometry and Detectors
J/: towards first physics results/first paper
J/   analysis: preliminary results and status report
Samples and MC Selection
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 1 Muon Analysis Work Getting Code ready for first data pass - DONE Get ready for second pass on DSTs - muon identification road finding redone, muon tracker track finding redone tracks will be refit, ghost rejection, etc. reapplied possibly more information provided for  /  separation Work to do: Set alignment (within tracker, tracker to MuID, tracker to vertex) major geometry problems identified and fixed (we think) major misalignment problems identified (z, radial shifts) and looking at applying corrections and seeing how new spectra look software written to extract final alignment constants (3 translations and 3 rotations) working on re-running p-p field-off data to check alignment corrections, etc. refine muon road finding event mixing software put together by Jason to do this work. Nominally working so thinks he can work on tuning road finding now/soon refine muon track finding similar to above: tools put in place to mix Monte Carlo events and “evaluate” and expect to put time into tuning now/soon determine what  /  separation data required and produce it Andy has started looking at single particles run through simulations and expects to have some results soon For p-p, also want event reconstruction with no vertex done properly Modified code already to properly weight (not) the vertex; looking at reconstructing with constraint that dimuons both come from same vertex

M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 2 Muon Analysis Work Monte Carlo studies required for physics results road and track finding efficiencies compare like-sign background subtraction to event mixing to determine backgrounds (in dimuon spectra) understand  /  decay muon contributions to single muon spectra Tools required: mixing Monte Carlo with Monte Carlo and mixing Monte Carlo with real events Monte Carlo with Monte Carlo working, Jason already completed bulk of work required for real events. Ming volunteered to oversee modifications needed for MuTr; expect work to be sufficient for MuID Code required: PISA geometry matches real geometry: MuID material changes to be committed by Laurence Probably want some slight modification of tracking chambers to match alignment results detector response matches real data Modified MuTr code to allow Ming to tune charge distributions. Should be able to complete soon. MuID thinks code is o.k. as is Need final road/track finding software in place By definition, will be done at time of second pass on data Real data analyses required: extract MuID efficiencies from real data (well on its way to being done) extract MuTr efficiencies and resolution from real data (tools in place, need to do some analyses with higher statistics, cuts, etc. to determine final answers)

M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 3 Muon Analysis Work Event Production Expect to request large set of HIJING events for Monte Carlo-Monte Carlo event mixing. Sean is gathering requests for generating signal events and expect to produce grid of events which will be sufficient for all Monte Carlo studies: single , ,  and J/  events (or possibly mix muons to give J  s  bin in p, theta, z_vertex Signal events will be mixed with real data events as well as Monte Carlo events

M. Brooks, 28-Mar-02 Heavy/Light meeting 4 Other Run parameters for production agreed upon Re-reconstruction macro for second pass put together and checked by a number of people Ming is overseeing DST output Jason is overseeing nanoDST output Nicki looking at resurrecting event display work Steve, Vince and company determining “status” of each run (to be used to select “golden” runs for analyses and for determining what run-by-run detector parameters need to be taken into account when doing MC studies) Andrew/Jason have put together QA software to be run during production to check status of data