THE K + -NUCLEUS MICROSCOPIC OPTICAL POTENTIAL AND CALCULATIONS OF THE CORRESPONDING DIFFERENTIAL ELASTIC AND TOTAL REACTION CROSS SECTIONS V.K.LUKYANOV,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BigBite K.Egiyan Probabilities of SRC in Nuclei Measured with A(e,e / ) Reactions K. Egiyan (Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia and Jefferson.
Advertisements

Nuclear Physics and its peaceful applications Presented by Dr Hoda Abou- Shady.
1 Eta production Resonances, meson couplings Humberto Garcilazo, IPN Mexico Dan-Olof Riska, Helsinki … exotic hadronic matter?
Spectroscopy at the Particle Threshold H. Lenske 1.
Modified Moliere’s Screening Parameter and its Impact on Calculation of Radiation Damage 5th High Power Targetry Workshop Fermilab May 21, 2014 Sergei.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
Mean field description of the nucleus-nucleus optical potential Institute for Nuclear Science & Technique Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission (VAEC) Dao Tien.
Deeply Bound Pionic States in Sn at RIBF N. Ikeno (Nara Women’s Univ. M1) J. Yamagata-Sekihara (IFIC, Valencia Univ.) H. Nagahiro (Nara Women’s Univ.)
Antiprotons for Nuclear Structure Investigations H. Lenske Institut für Theoretische Physik, U. Giessen.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
Kˉ- 4 He, Kˉ- 3 He interactions at low energies Vera Grishina (INR RAS, Moscow, Russia) University of Bonn, Germany August 31 – September 5, 2009.
Direct Reactions. Optical model Represent the target nucleus by a potential -- Attenuation length.
Proton, Pion and Kaon Transparency Measurements Overview of existing (& new kaon!) transparency data Questions: A-dependent analysis – any improvements.
1. Introduction 2.     3.  p    n 4.     5.     A   A 6. Discussion 7. Summary Bosen Workshop 2007 Review on.
Bound-Free Electron-Positron Pair Production Accompanied by Coulomb Dissociation M. Yılmaz Şengül Kadir Has University & İstanbul Technical University.
9/2/2013PHY 711 Fall Lecture 31 PHY 711 Classical Mechanics and Mathematical Methods 10-10:50 AM MWF Olin 103 Plan for Lecture 3: Chapter 1 – scattering.
Nucleon Optical Potential in Brueckner Theory Wasi Haider Department of Physics, AMU, Aligarh, India. E Mail:
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Cross section for potential scattering
Reaction cross sections of unstable nuclei Contents What is reaction cross section (  R )?  R Effective matter density distributions of unstable nuclei.
Α - capture reactions using the 4π γ-summing technique Α. Lagoyannis Institute of Nuclear Physics, N.C.S.R. “Demokritos”
Pornrad Srisawad Department of Physics, Naresuan University, Thailand Yu-Ming Zheng China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing China Azimuthal distributions.
LBL 5/21/2007J.W. Holt1 Medium-modified NN interactions Jeremy W. Holt* Nuclear Theory Group State University of New York * with G.E. Brown, J.D. Holt,
Scattering Experiment Monoenergetic particle beam Beam impinges on a target Particles are scattered by target Final state particles are observed by detector.
Shanghai Elliptic flow in intermediate energy HIC and n-n effective interaction and in-medium cross sections Zhuxia Li China Institute of Atomic.
Nucleon-nucleon cross sections in symmetry and asymmetry nuclear matter School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, , China Hong-fei.
Spin-orbit potential in 6 He studied with polarized proton target 2007/6/5, INPC2007 Satoshi Sakaguchi Center for Nuclear Study, Univ. of Tokyo.
Breakup reaction for polarimetry of tensor polarized deuteron beams 1 A.P. Kobushkin Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics Metrologicheskaya str.
Self-similarity of hadron production in pp and AA collisions at high energies D.A. Artemenkov, G.I. Lykasov, A.I. Malakhov Joint Institute for Nuclear.
F. Sammarruca, University of Idaho Supported in part by the US Department of Energy. From Neutron Skins to Neutron Stars to Nuclear.
Extended optical model analyses of elastic scattering and fusion cross sections for 6, 7 Li Pb systems at near-Coulomb-barrier energies by using.
Neutral pion photoproduction and neutron radii Dan Watts, Claire Tarbert University of Edinburgh Crystal Ball and A2 collaboration at MAMI Eurotag Meeting.
Takuma Matsumoto (Kyushu Univ.) K. Minomo, K. Ogata a, M. Yahiro, and K. Kato b (Kyushu Univ, a RCNP, b Hokkaido Univ) Description for Breakup Reactions.
RCNP.08 Breakup of halo nuclei with Coulomb-corrected eikonal method Y. Suzuki (Niigata) 1.Motivation for breakup reactions 2.Eikonal and adiabatic approximations.
Potential Approach to Scattering of Exotic Nuclei Goncharov S.A.
M. Matsuo, PRC73(’06) Matter Calc. Two-particle density.
1 Nuclear Reactions – 1/2 DTP 2010, ECT*, Trento 12 th April -11 th June 2010 Jeff Tostevin, Department of Physics Faculty of Engineering and Physical.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
Separation of Flip and Non-Flip parts of np→pn (0º) Charge Exchange reaction at energies 0.55 – 2.0 GeV R.A. Shindin NN formalism and Charge Exchange process.
Interactions of low-energy anti-kaons with lightest nuclei Vera Grishina (INR RAS, Moscow) Moscow, September 17-20, 2009 XII International Seminar on Electromagnetic.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #6 Monday, Sept. 15, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University.
Marilena Avrigeanu28th Int. Workshop. on Nuclear Theory Rila Mountains 2009 α - particle Optical Potential for astrophysical studies M. Avrigeanu and V.
Three-body force effect on the properties of asymmetric nuclear matter Wei Zuo Institute of Modern Physics, Lanzhou, China.
Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics V.Varlamov, EMIN-2009 (21 – 26 September) 1 V.A. Chetvertkova, B.S. Ishkhanov,
Quark Matter 2002Falk Meissner, LBNL Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration Quark Matter Coherent.
PKU-CUSTIPEN 2015 Dirac Brueckner Hartree Fock and beyond Herbert Müther Institute of Theoretical Physics.
Reaction cross sections of carbon isotopes incident on proton and 12 C International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, Japan June 3-8, 2007 W. Horiuchi.
Pion-Induced Fission- A Review Zafar Yasin Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan.
PROPERTIES OF HIGH-ENERGY ISOSCALAR MONOPOLE EXCITATIONS IN MEDIUM-HEAVY MASS SPHERICAL NUCLEI M. L. Gorelik 1), S. Shlomo 2), B. A. Tulupov 3), M. H.
Comparison of quasi-elastic cross sections using spectral functions with (e,e') data from 0.5 GeV to 1.5 GeV Hiroki Nakamura (Waseda U). Makoto Sakuda.
Faddeev Calculation for Neutron-Rich Nuclei Eizo Uzu (Tokyo Univ. of Science) Collaborators Masahiro Yamaguchi (RCNP) Hiroyuki Kamada (Kyusyu Inst. Tech.)
Important role of three-body repulsive force effect in nuclear reactions Takenori FURUMOTO (Osaka City Univ. ) 19th International IUPAP Conference on Few-Body.
Transport properties of nuclear matter within Brueckner-Hartree-Fock Hongfei Zhang ( 张鸿飞) Lanzhou University Aug. 3, 2015 PKU-CUSTIPEN Workshop on " Advances.
Crystal Ball Collaboration Meeting, Basel, October 2006 Claire Tarbert, Univeristy of Edinburgh Coherent  0 Photoproduction on Nuclei Claire Tarbert,
A. Dokhane, PHYS487, KSU, 2008 Chapter1- Neutron Reactions 1 NEWS Lecture1: Chapter 0 is already on my Website.
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Lab Frame and Center of Mass Frame 2.Relativistic.
Study of microscopic complex potentials for nuclear scattering reaction Takenori Furumoto (Ichinoseki National College of Technology) YIPQS International.
V. Nuclear Reactions Topics to be covered include:
The Analysis of Elastic pp Scattering in the Forward Direction for PAX Experiment Energy Range. S.B. Nurushev, M.F. Runtso, Moscow Engineering Physics.
Mean free path and transport parameters from Brueckner-Hartree-Fock
3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Fig. 2. Feynman diagrams for $K^{+}p$ elastic scattering
PHL424: Semi-classical reaction theory
Satoshi Adachi Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP),
Deeply Bound Mesonic States -Case of Kaon-
PHL424: Rutherford scattering discovery of nucleus
PHL424: Semi-classical reaction theory
K+ - Scattering from Nuclear Targets
Presentation transcript:

THE K + -NUCLEUS MICROSCOPIC OPTICAL POTENTIAL AND CALCULATIONS OF THE CORRESPONDING DIFFERENTIAL ELASTIC AND TOTAL REACTION CROSS SECTIONS V.K.LUKYANOV, E.V.ZEMLYANAYA, K.V.LUKYANOV Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna , Russia; K.M.HANNA Math. and Theor. Phys. Dep., NRC, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt

On the Kaon interaction with nuclei p=uud n=udd - weaken K + N interaction - strong K - N interaction Comparison of total cross sections at T ~ GeV  K+N ~ 10 mb  NN ~ 50 mb ~ 100 mb The mean free path in nuclear matter l K+N ~ 5-6 fm l NN ~ fm ~ 0.8 fm Thus a folding potential is available for K + A interaction

k lab > m K+ = GeV The semi-relativistic wave equation with U=U opt +U c k – relativistic momentum in c.m. system – relativistic correction factor - (non)relativistic reduced mass, M 1 =  1 * m 1 Relativization approach for K + + A scattering

Microscopic optical potential (OP) Microscopic OP obtained in *) from the optical limit of the Glauber theory  =k/E - relative velocity in the system – the KN total cross section =Re F K (0)/Im F K (0) – with F K, the KN amplitude  (q) – unfolded nuclear form factor  *) Phys.At.Nucl. 69 (2006) 240

The K + N scattering amplitude The K + N scattering amplitude is parameterized as follows For example, in the case of k lab =0.8 GeV/c one has K

Input values for K C, 40 Ca Relativistic momentum in c.m. system Correlation factors Ingemarsson, 1974 Faldt, Ingemarsson, Mahalanabis, 1992 Goldberger, Watson, 1964 (r1) (r2) (r3) (r4)

Calculated microscopic OP (at  r =1)

Differential elastic cross sections K Ca (0.8 GeV/c)  r = 367 mb  r (  r =1) = 245 mb

Differential elastic cross sections K C  r (  r =1) = 93 mb  r = 125 – mb  r exp = 140 – 155 mb

Role of the U 2 /2E corrections in the full OP  r (635) = mb  r (715) = mb  r (800) = mb

Effect of density distributions on cross sections Phys.At.Nucl, 67 (2004) Nucl.Phys. A 717 (2003) Nucl.Phys. A 438 (1985)  r (635) = % mb  r (715) = % mb  r (800) = % mb

The surface term (-gr dU/dr) of OP g = 0  r = 130 mb g = 0.06  r = 140 mb g = 0.13  r = 153 mb  r exp = 155 mb

Effect of (-gr d(Im U)/dr) on cross sections g = 0  r = 125 mb g = 0.07  r = 140 mb  r exp ~ 140 mb g = 0  r = 129 mb g = 0.1  r = 149 mb  r exp ~ 150 mb

Summary zMicroscopic model of OP doesn’t use free parameters zRelativistic effects are very important to get the agreement with the existing experimental data zProblem is still open on the “in-medium” effects on K + N amplitude zModel can be improved by addition the surface terms to optical potential zModel is proved to be a workable one for predictions of the K + +A scattering cross sections.

Thank you !