doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 1 IEEE Regulatory SC DRAFT Teleconference Plan and Agenda Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 AgendaRich Kennedy, BlackBerry Corporation Abstract This presentation is the plan for the September 26, 2013 IEEE Regulatory Standing Committee teleconference. September 2013 Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Assign a recording secretary Administrative items Nanjing meeting summary ITS / DSRC coexistence Tiger Team R&O/FNPRM/NOI FCC on RF Exposure Ofcom consultations –The future role of spectrum sharing for wireless data services –TV White Spaces: approach to coexistence REMINDER: Compliance with EU rules in 2.4 and 5 GHz bands AOB Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry Corporation September 2013 Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Administrative Items Required notices –Affiliation FAQ - –Anti-Trust FAQ - –Ethics - –IEEE Working Group Policies and Procedures - and-procedures.doc and-procedures.doc Chair and Secretary –Chair is Rich Kennedy (BlackBerry) –Peter Ecclesine will act as Recording Secretary Please send an to the addresses below to have your attendance recorded Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry Corporation September 2013 Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 5 SC Operating Rules Anybody can vote, present, and make motions Participation in SC during WG Plenary or Interim counts towards voting rights All motions must pass by a 75% majority

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings l All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. l Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. l Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. l Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. l Technical considerations remain primary focus l Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. l Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. l Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry Corporation September 2013 Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Introduction Purpose –Improve the working relationship between the technical experts and the regulatory specialists, especially when it comes to critical technical issues Scope –The group will review new regulatory changes or impending changes affecting standards –Each meeting will focus on the most critical issue at the time Critical Issue Focus –Direct impact on IEEE current and future standards –Response/Input deadlines –Coordination with IEEE (RR-TAG) –Coordination with the Wi-Fi Alliance Outputs from this group must go through Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry Corporation September 2013 Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Nanjing Meeting Summary Discussed regulatory summaries for US, Canada and the EU Discussed FCC proceedings and –Opening the 5 GHz bands –RF Exposure DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team discussion (lively) –One proposal received so far –Will update FCC on joint Automotive/Wi-Fi industry interference mitigation development in December September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda ITS / DSRC Coexistence Tiger Team What should be the outcome from the group? –Set of coexistence requirements for in the 5 GHz band with ITS safety of life and property communications in the 5.9 GHz band –Form a group to provide a formal interface to other organizations in the automotive industry, NHTSA, DOT and other ITS players What is the required milestone timeline –Dependent upon the FCC et al, progress on the rollout of the standards, technologies and laws –Outcome of experiments prior to rulemaking; proof of concepts –August 21, 2013 completion of project; data to follow –CAMP/DOT testing and validating Last TT meeting September 6 th at 1:00pm ET –Minutes: 11-13/1071r0 –Next meeting September 27 th at 1:00pm ET September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 9

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Ofcom Consultation #1 The future role of spectrum sharing for wireless data services Publication date: 9 August 2013 Closing Date for Responses: 9 November 2013 Website: sharing/?utm_source=updates&utm_medium= &utm_campaign=spectru m-sharing sharing/?utm_source=updates&utm_medium= &utm_campaign=spectru m-sharing Consultation document: sharing/summary/Spectrum_Sharing.pdf sharing/summary/Spectrum_Sharing.pdf September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #1 Questions The future role of Wi-Fi in helping to meet the demand for wireless data services Question 1: How is demand for indoor wireless data connection speeds and capacity likely to develop over the next 5–10 years? Question 2: Will an extension of the 5 GHz band be required if Wi-Fi is to play a sustainable role in meeting the growing demand for indoor wireless connectivity? Question 3: Are there other types of indoor wireless applications will require access to alternative spectrum other than that provided by the licence exempt 2.4 and 5 GHz bands used by Wi-Fi? Question 4: What role do you think Wi-Fi will play in providing wireless broadband connectivity outdoors over the coming 5-10 years? Question 5: Will the increased deployment of Wi-Fi access points outdoors create a risk of reduced quality of service performance over the longer term and, if so, will approaches to coordinate access point performance be able to mitigate this risk? Question 6: Will improved approaches to accessing spectrum in licence exempt bands be needed in the longer term to maintain the quality of service achievable for outdoor public mobile broadband and/or M2M services? If so, which approaches are most likely to be adopted and how likely do you think they are to be successful in improving access to spectrum?

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #1 Questions [2] Increasing spectrum supply and better managing its use Question 7: Which frequency bands are most likely to be best suited to providing geographical shared access, including via a geolocation database approach, for use by mobile broadband, for example small cells and M2M applications? Question 8: Would access to these bands best be realised through licensing or licence exemption? Question 9: Do you believe that tiered shared access to a range of spectrum bands has a role in meeting demand for mobile and wireless data and, if so, which applications and devices do you think will be particularly suited to this access model? Question 10: Do you believe DSA could play an important future role in the future in enabling a better quality of service and low barriers to spectrum access alongside conventional licensed and LE spectrum approaches? Question 11: What barriers still remain to the realisation of cost-effective sensing appropriate for low-cost consumer devices and what activities are ongoing to try to address them? Question 12: Over what timescales could DSA become a mass market proposition? Question 13: What role should Ofcom play, if any, to support the development of DSA and relevant technologies? Question 14: Do you have any other views on any of the issues discussed in this consultation?

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #1 Questions [3] Supporting innovation through short-term access to shared spectrum Question 15: What are the frequency bands that would be of most value for R&D purposes? Question 16: What are the potential benefits of using a geolocation database approach for short-term access to spectrum for R&D and how would you see this working from a practical perspective? Are there alternative approaches that could deliver similar benefits? Question 17: What characteristics do you view as important to researchers in arrangements to facilitate temporary access to spectrum for research and development purposes?

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Ofcom Consultation #2 TV White spaces: approach to coexistence Publication date: 4 September 2013 Closing Date for Responses: 15 November 2013 Website: space- coexistence/?utm_source=updates&utm_medium= &utm_campai gn=white-spaces-condoc space- coexistence/?utm_source=updates&utm_medium= &utm_campai gn=white-spaces-condoc Consultation document: coexistence/summary/white-spaces.pdf coexistence/summary/white-spaces.pdf September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 14

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #2 Questions Q1: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach to ensuring a low probability of harmful interference to DTT services? Please state your reasons for your comments. Q2: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach to ensuring a low probability of harmful interference to PMSE services? Please state your reasons for your comments. Q3: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach to ensuring a low probability of harmful interference to 4G services above the UHF TV band? Please state your reasons for your comments. Q4: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach to ensuring a low probability of harmful interference to services below the UHF TV band? Please state your reasons for your September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 15

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #2 Questions [2] Question T1: Do you have any comments on our proposal to cap the maximum in-block EIRP of all WSDs at 36 dBm/(8 MHz)? Question T2: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for calculating WSD emission limits, as expressed in Equation (4.3), in relation to DTT coexistence calculations? Question T3: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for dealing with the uncertainty in the locations of DTT receivers in relation to DTT calculations? Question T4: Do you have any comments on our proposed target of a 10% likelihood of a 1 dB rise in the noise-plus-interference floor at the edge of DTT coverage? Question T5: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for calculating coupling gains in relation to DTT calculations? Question T6: Do you have any comments on our proposed protection ratios in relation to DTT calculations? Question T7: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for dealing with the uncertainty in the locations of WSDs in relation to DTT calculations? Question T8: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for calculating WSD emission limits, as expressed in Equation (5.2), in relation to PMSE coexistence calculations? September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 16

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #2 Questions [3] Question T9: Do you have any comments on the PMSE wanted signal power levels that we propose in relation to coexistence calculations? Question T10: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for calculating coupling gains in relation to PMSE calculations Question T11: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for dealing with the uncertainty in the locations of WSDs in relation to PMSE calculations? Question T12: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for dealing with the uncertainty in the locations of PMSE receivers in relation to PMSE calculations? Question T13: Do you have any comments on our proposed approach for the derivation of WSD-PMSE coupling gains for non-geolocated slaves in relation to PMSE calculations? Question T14: Do you have any comments on our proposed protection ratios in relation to PMSE calculations? September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 17

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Consultation #2 Questions [4] Question T15: Do you have any comments on our assessment that a margin for uncertainties in radio propagation is not necessary given the proposed parameters for derivation of coupling gains in relation to PMSE coexistence calculations? Question T16: Do you have any comments on our proposed WSD emission limits in relation to PMSE use in channel 38? Question T17: Do you have any comments on our proposal not to permit WSDs to operate in channel 60? Question T18: Do you have any comments on our proposal that, if the unwanted emissions limit (over MHz) in the draft ETSI standard (EN ) is tightened by 8 dB, there should be no further restrictions on the operation of WSDs in relation to services below the UHF TV band? Question T19: Do you have any comments on our proposal that, if unwanted emissions limit (over MHz) in the draft ETSI standard (EN ) is not changed, there should be restrictions on the in-block powers of WSDs in channels 21 to 23? September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 18

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda EN & EN Reminder Most recent versions contain issues that must be considered –2.4 GHz “Adaptivity” requires all devices to utilize CCA mode 1 only –5 GHz Adaptivity also requires ED –Power/PSD testing requires complex and or expensive tests These versions become mandatory on January 1, 2015 Wi-Fi and BT industries should get behind new versions that would begin voluntary status the same day –EN v1.9.1 –EN v1.8.1 September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 19

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda Any Other Actual Business September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 20

doc.: IEEE /1245r0 Agenda References R&O/FNPRM/NOI FCC – Ofcom future spectrum sharing consultation – sharing/summary/Spectrum_Sharing.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/spectrum- sharing/summary/Spectrum_Sharing.pdf Ofcom TV White spaces: approach to coexistence – coexistence/summary/white-spaces.pdfhttp://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/white-space- coexistence/summary/white-spaces.pdf EN v1.8.1 – 8v010801p.pdfhttp:// 8v010801p.pdf EN v1.7.1: – 3v010700o.pdfhttp:// 3v010700o.pdf September 2013 Rich Kennedy, BlackBerry CorporationSlide 21