NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Catalina Island Meeting May, Proton Drivers for Neutrino Factories: The CERN Approach Presented by B. Autin, CERN.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Nufact09-IIT 107/24/2009 Project X and a Muon Facility at Fermilab Milorad Popovic FNAL.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Proton Driver Status ISIS Accelerator Division John Thomason.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Fermilab and Muons Booster, Proton Driver (MECO, PRISM/PRIME, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, PRISM/PRIME David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG05.
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
1 Muon Acceleration and FFAG II Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC NuFact06 Summer School August 20-21, 2006.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
December 5, Chuck Ankenbrandt Fermilab Muon Collider Design Project X as a Hi-Rep-Rate Driver for a Muon Collider Chuck Ankenbrandt.
Proton Drivers & Muon Sources at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
Recent RF Development at Fermilab Weiren Chou and Akira Takagi Fermilab, U.S.A. July 7, 2003 Presentation to the FFAG03 Workshop July 7-12, 2003, KEK.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
FFAG Accelerators for Proton Driver Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France April 12-17, 2007.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Proton FFAG Accelerator R&D at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Fermilab Proton Driver Project Weiren Chou for Bill Foster Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim,
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
1 M. Popovic If You Build It, They Will Come 8GeV CW Linac: A Staged Approach Milorad Popovic, Fermilab June 26, 2012.
Overview of the Project X RD&D Plan Sergei Nagaitsev AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
Fermilab and Muons Proton Driver (for ν-Factory, μ + -μ - Collider, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Barrier RF Stacking Weiren Chou and Dave Wildman Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany,
Lecture17(Course Summary).PPT - E. Wilson - 3/3/ Slide 1 COURSE SUMMARY A Design Study of a Compressor ring for A Neutrino Factory MT 2009 E. J.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Proton Drivers & Muon Sources at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation - Ring Coolers? - FFAGs? David Neuffer Fermilab.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Overview of Project X ICD and RD&D Plans David Neuffer material from Paul Derwent & Sergei Nagaitsev (AAC Meeting, February 3, 2009)
Proton Source Reference Notes for mu2e at Fermilab 1 Section 1: Compilation of parameters describing the existing Fermilab accelerator complex and the.
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
U.S. Plans for High Power Proton Drivers Steve Holmes Fermilab Workshop on Physics with a Multi-MW Proton Source CERN May 25, 2004.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Aug Project X ICD2 Briefing.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev AAC Workshop 2016
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab

2 Fermilab proton sources  Existing facility  Current intensity  Future “upgrades”- configurations  Protons for muon source – A-D configuration  Proton Driver – 8 GeV future source  1 to 4 MW 8 GeV SRF Linac  Need buncher ring to accumulate p’s

3 Proton Linac (H - ) 8 GeV? NewRing (P) H-H- t 8 GeV f Proton sources

“Proton Driver” Linac (H - ) 4 Fermilab facilities

5 8 GeV Accumulator/Debuncher Parameters  After ~2009, accumulator and Debuncher are not needed for Fermilab Collider  Can be used for other programs  Accumulator is being considered for momentum stacking from booster for ~NUMI  Stacked beam could also be used ParameterSymbol AccumulatorDebuncher Circumference C=2πR ave ~474m504m MomentumP 8.89 GeV/c Transition γ T γTγT betatron fns β x, β y, η max 47, 40, , 17, 2.2 Tunesν x, ν y 6.9, , 9.76 aperturea, b

6 Scenario overview  Protons from Booster injected into accumulator  Stack 1 to 4 booster turns, debunch (w/extraction gap)  ~4·10 12 n turns protons  Extract into Debuncher  Rebunch in Debuncher  to ~40ns rms single bunch  Slow extract to muon conversion experiment  over ~1.5s Booster Protons from Booster Slow extraction Transfer to Debuncher

7 Momentum stacking in Accumulator

COEXISTING WITH THE NEUTRINO PROGRAM Booster Batches Accumulator Recycler Debuncher 22 batches = s MI cycle 4.6  p/batch 4  4.6  p/1467ms = 12.5  p/sec 56  p/sec 0.1s1.367s NEUTRINO PROGRAMMUONS (NuMI +Muons) (NuMI) (Muons) (Alternative: 24 batches=1.6s MI cycle  11.5  p/s)

9 Longitudinal stacking in the Accumulator ΔE = 20 MeV

10 Bunch compression-Accumulator  Example: Compression within ~0.1s  A:Rf-60kV barrier bucket  Square wave rf  30kV also OK  B: h=4 rf 60 to 160 kV  Sinusoidal rf at~2.5 MHz  Start:±150°, σ E = 3.3MeV  ~4 batches  L = 6πσ t σ E = ~24 eV-s  Finish: σ < 40ns, σ E = 32MeV  Small dilution

11 Barrier bucket in Debuncher  γ T =7.6- more isochronous  Needs less rf but more time  Compression within ~0.2s  A:Rf-14kV barrier bucket  Square wave rf  B: h=4 rf 14 to 30 kV  Sinusoidal rf ~2.5 MHz  Start:±150°, σ E = 3.3MeV  ~4 batches  L = 6πσ t σ E = ~24 eV-s  Finish: σ < 30ns, σ E = 42MeV  Small dilution

12 multi-harmonic bunching  T = 7.5, C=504m  More isochronous, smoother harmonic buncher  Example: h=1, V rf = 6kV; h=2, Vrf = 70kV, h=4, V rf =200kV  0.073s for bunching

13 Needed to develop concept  Longitudinal buncher scenario  Injection/Extraction lines  Slow extraction line  Location of mu-e detector  Extinction calculations/methods improvements  Fermilab Workshop September  S. Geer organizer

14 Future Option: f Proton Driver  Fermilab may develop new proton source to replace “ 8-GeV ” Booster at a multi-MW level  Studied at Fermilab but deferred to focus on ILC  R&D continues on technology  deferral will be reevaluated as ILC develops …  Upgrade options  8-GeV SRF proton linac  Booster-like rapid-cycling synchrotron but higher intensity –Larger apertures, injection linac upgrade, deeper tunnel

15 4 MW Proton Driver Parameters (short list) 8 GeV Superconducting LINAC (1300 MHz rf) EnergyGeV8 Particle Type H- Ions, Protons, or Electrons Rep. RateHz2.5 to 10 to 20 Active Lengthm614 Beam CurrentmA25 Pulse Lengthmsec3 to 1 Beam IntensityP / pulse1.5E+14 (can also be H-, P, or e-) P/s1.5E+15 Linac Beam PowerMW avg.0.5 to 2 to 4 MW peak200

16 Proton Linac (H - ) 8 GeV? NewRing (P) H-H- t 8 GeV f Proton sources Transfer to debuncher

17 New 8 GeV Accumulator/buncher/stretcher  Type: FODO racetrack,  Superferric arcs  nonscaling  H - injection into NewRing (10Hz)  700 turns  Transverse emittance can be enlarged (ε N =120π mm-mrad or more 20mm-mrad rms )  Harmonic 4 buncher for ν- Factory, single bunch extraction (400ns spacing)  single bunch extraction mode  Also useful for PRISM/PRIME, muon collider, … CircumferenceC=2πR ave ~454m MomentumP8.89 GeV/c rf frequency, Voltage h=4 V MHz <1MV Slip factor η =1/ γ 2 - 1/ γ t Tunes ν x, ν y 6.9, 8.9 aperturea, b~8, 5 cm Linac injection

18 Space Charge Difficulty  Space Charge tune shift:  Parameters: N tot =1.5  10 14,ε N =120π mm-mrad  Emittance was increased to reduce δν  Booster-size Ring: 4 bunches, 4*10ns/1.5μs : B F = → δν = ~ : not too large  σ z = ~4ns, up to 40 Hz bunches on target  Shorter bunch possible  Smaller circumference proton ring could be better  C= 227m, 2 bunches; would obtain 20Hz on target

19 Bunching example (454m ring)  Bunch to short bunches with barrier-bucket rf within ~0.05s  V rf = 250kV, 5  pulse width  Compresses to ~5ns rms  Add h=36 rf to get <3ns  Compression not optimized  smaller ring better

20 270m Buncher  Bunch to short bunches with barrier-bucket rf within ~0.027s  OK  V rf = 250kV, 5  pulse width  h=2 bunches  Compresses to ~6ns rms  Add h=18 rf (2MV) to get <4ns  2ns bunches with h=4  Compression not optimized

21 Plans