Financing Workgroup Group Presentation Meeting Sept Chicago, IL

Workgroup Goals Integrate projects from other three workgroups into a portfolio Integrate projects from other three workgroups into a portfolio Prepare for a discussion on how to finance projects Prepare for a discussion on how to finance projects Determine fair funding scenario for continuation of dialogue Determine fair funding scenario for continuation of dialogue Research financing options Research financing options Draft agreement for Chicago Draft agreement for Chicago

Workgroup Members Scott Cassel, Facilitator Scott Cassel, Facilitator Dave Darling, NPCA Dave Darling, NPCA Rayna Laiosa, Benjamin Moore Rayna Laiosa, Benjamin Moore Susan Peterson, ICI North America Susan Peterson, ICI North America Robert Wendoll, Dunn-Edwards Robert Wendoll, Dunn-Edwards Bill Sierks, MOEA Bill Sierks, MOEA Mike Nechvatal, IL EPA Mike Nechvatal, IL EPA Irene Gleason, FL DEP Irene Gleason, FL DEP Marv Goodman, NCPD Marv Goodman, NCPD Barry Elman, U.S. EPA Barry Elman, U.S. EPA Steve Long, MA DEP Steve Long, MA DEP Suzette Thomason, Steel Recycling Institute Suzette Thomason, Steel Recycling Institute Lesli Daniels, Sonoma County CA Lesli Daniels, Sonoma County CA Shirley Willd-Wagner, CA IWMB Shirley Willd-Wagner, CA IWMB Leslie Wilson, SWMCB, MN Leslie Wilson, SWMCB, MN Lorraine Segala, Amazon Environmental Lorraine Segala, Amazon Environmental

Portfolio Projects Research Financing Options Research Financing Options Lifecycle Net Balance Study Lifecycle Net Balance Study Ongoing Project – EPA study on the possible management strategies for a national program. Ongoing Project – EPA study on the possible management strategies for a national program.

Research Financing Options Research the possible options for a national financing strategy should it be needed Research the possible options for a national financing strategy should it be needed Develop pros and cons Develop pros and cons Develop recommendations on model financing strategies that may be starting point for discussions to resume in 18 months. Develop recommendations on model financing strategies that may be starting point for discussions to resume in 18 months. Timeline 10/1/ /1/05 Timeline 10/1/ /1/05 Cost $5,500 Cost $5,500

Lifecycle Balance of Costs and Benefits for Managing Leftover Paint Will examine various leftover paint options and analyze their impacts on Will examine various leftover paint options and analyze their impacts on Socioeconomic costs and benefits Socioeconomic costs and benefits Environmental tradeoffs using life cycle analysis methodology (LCA) Environmental tradeoffs using life cycle analysis methodology (LCA) Management options Management options Liquid disposal w/ household waste Liquid disposal w/ household waste Drying and household waste disposal Drying and household waste disposal Reuse through swaps, etc. Reuse through swaps, etc. Use of existing HHW infrastructure for recycling Use of existing HHW infrastructure for recycling Other non-paint uses Other non-paint uses Timeline 10/04 – 3/06 Timeline 10/04 – 3/06 Cost: $250,000 Cost: $250,000

EPA Study Examine alternative mechanisms to manage a national system for leftover paint Examine alternative mechanisms to manage a national system for leftover paint