Hustler Magazine Jerry Falwell Presentation By: Rockford Stone.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Supreme Court of the United States 485 U.S. 46 Argued December 2, 1987 Decided February 24, 1988.
Advertisements

Section 3 Introduction-1
How does the First Amendment Protect Free Expression?
TORTS INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT. INTENTIONAL TORTS Intentional torts share the requirement that the defendant desires the result or knows to substantial.
First Amendment Rights. Freedom of Speech Freedom of Expression Absolutely Protected Speech Prior Restraint (PR) Void for Vagueness Least Drastic Means.
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
A closer look at privacy How Brandeis’s theories have affected media law.
DEFAMATION LAW IN IRELAND Augustine O Connell MSc (Comp Sc) MBCS.
2 Crimes & Torts Crimes Intentional Torts
Torts and Cyber Torts Chapter 4.
Censorship Knowledge is powerful, dangerous, and deadly!
Our First Amendment Rights
DEFAMATION CHAPTER 4: LIBEL AND SLANDER Communications Law. COMM 407, CSU Fullerton.
Gerri Spinella Ed.D. Elizabeth McDonald Ed.D.
Teachers and the Law, 8 th Edition © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Teachers and the Law, 8e by David Schimmel, Leslie R. Stellman,
1 st Amendment Presentation By: Group Two. New York Times Company v. Sullivan Final Ruling States: “debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust,
1 Privacy & Related Issues. 2 The 4 Privacy Torts 1.Appropriation 2.Intrusion 3.Disclosure of private facts 4.False light.
Unit 1 Chapter 6 Torts n What are Torts? n How are they different than crimes? n Offense against society vs individual.
Types of Torts Trespass Assault Battery Negligence Products liability Malpractice Intentional infliction of emotional distress Defamation Invasion of.
TORTS INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT. The Elements of an Intentional Tort 1. An intentional tort. 2. An injury. 3. Tort was the proximate cause of injury.
CHAPTER 4: THE BILL OF RIGHTS Integrated Government.
New York Times v. Sullivan The Case: Advertising space was purchased in the New York Times by a coalition of civil rights leaders The advertisement described.
A Free Press A Free People Journalism Seminar Mrs. Demos.
Jennifer Koch Civics and Economics Block 2.   Official Name: New York Times Company vs. Sullivan  Case Heard: January of 1964  Case Decided: March.
LS 500 Unit Nine Town Hall Saturday, February 11, 2012 John Gray Welcome! Are there any questions about the material.
Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. STATE FARM v. CAMPBELL 538 U.S. 408 (2003) Case Brief.
New York Times v. Sullivan (1963) By: Carmen Vaca.
Unit VII: The Courts Review p.s. Know your cases & amendments!
CHAPTER THREE 3-1 TORT LAW. TORT LAW IS BASED ON THE IDEA THAT EVERYONE IN OUR SOCIETY HAS CERTAIN RIGHTS Along With Having Certain Rights, Everyone Has.
Freedom of Press. “The press was to serve the governed, not the governors.” – Justice Black (NYTimes vs. U.S.) What does this statement mean?
Libel. Libel and the Court DEFINITION: Written falsehoods that lead to defamation of character (being false AND damaging is key). This is NOT a case of.
INTRO Q & A.  Proofread for spelling, mechanical, or grammatical errors.  If a sentence doesn’t make sense or is unclear, tell them so!  Look at the.
Intentional Torts Chapter 19. Intentional Torts To qualify as an intentional tort, the act must occur. Two Types –Those causing injury to persons –Those.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Torts Chapter 6. Basis of Tort Law What is a Tort? –A tort is a civil injury designed to provide a remedy (damages) for injury to a protected interest.
Libel Different types, how to avoid it This is how you keep your job.
The 1 st Amendment “5 “N-word” went to 4 real quick, gang banging 4 “N- word” still hanging”.
And Hate Speech. Dictionary.com defines hate speech as speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.
“Were it left for me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without government, I should not hesitate a moment.
6-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell (No )
A Crash Course in Press Law For the High School Press.
The First Amendment and Oregon Student Journalists Allison Marks, Adviser THE FOREST Forest Grove High School.
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties. Civil Liberties Protections against government Guarantees of the safety of persons, opinions, and property from arbitrary.
Com360: Defamation. Protection of Person’s Reputation Basic human dignity: protection of one’s reputation from unjustified invasion and wrongful hurt.
Harmonizing Constitutional Rules with Common Law Privileges “Fair report” privilege and “fair comment” privilege require a degree of accuracy Qualified.
Civil Law An overview of Tort Law – the largest branch of civil law Highlight the differences between tort law and criminal law How torts developed historically.
Intentional Torts  Intentional torts are actions taken with the intent to harm another person or another's property. The intent to harm does not have.
COURT CASE BRIEFINGS XAVIER CUMMINS MICHAEL VIZZI CHRISTIAN DALUSUNG ALYSSA NEWSOM.
1 st Amendment /Speech What are some limits on speech? What are some types/examples of speech that can be punished/made illegal?
Campbell Chapter 16.  “All sorts of ideas, even false ones, should circulate freely in a democratic society and the truth will eventually emerge.” 
Chapter 3 Tort Laws. Torts Torts - wrong committed by one person against another Tort Law - enforce the rights and duties Tortfeasor - person who commits.
What type of Speech is protected and what kind is not protected?
Damage to Reputation: Defamation, slander and libel.
Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell 485 U.S. 46 (1988) By: Hunter Tuck PLS 211 December 8, 2015.
BCOM 405 Slingshot Academy / Tutorialrank.com Tutorialrank.com For More Tutorials
Torts. Homework: read section titled: The Idea of Liability and The Idea of torts: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow - take notes on reading! Pages
Defamation: Constitutional. Defamation: The Constitution New York Times v. Sullivan 376 U.S. 254 (1964) Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of.
The First Amendment ESSENTIAL QUESTION How do societies balance individual and community rights?
Professor Ludlum UCO Updated last on 13th day of November, 2016
Freedom of Speech.
The Law of Journalism & Mass Communication
The First amendment Speech Press Religion Petition Assembly.
4 Court Cases By: Cody Simms.
Boundaries of Free Expression I (Libel)
The First Amendment Continued . . .
Warm Up Although each person's rights are guaranteed by the Constitution, no one has the right to do anything he or she wants. For example, the Supreme.
Texas v. johnson (1989) Snyder v. phelps (2011)
Presentation transcript:

Hustler Magazine Jerry Falwell Presentation By: Rockford Stone

Larry Flynt One of the World’s most renowned pornography publishers Controversial icon who challenged his American liberties on a consistent basis The creator of the controversial Hustler Magazine

Jerry Falwell A religious leader, political activist and television evangelist Started the Old Time Gospel Hour, a radio and television program He founded the Lynchburg Christian Academy in 1967 and Liberty Baptist College in 1971

Published in 1983 edition of Hustler Magazine The “Ad”

The Case Jerry Falwell sued Hustler Magazine Larry Flynt Publications for libel, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress for $45 Billion. Larry Flynt countersued for copyright infringement. The jury ruled against Jerry Falwell on the libel claim, specifically finding that the ad parody could not "reasonably be understood as describing actual facts about [respondent] or actual events in which [he] participated.“ The jury ruled for Jerry Falwell on the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, however and stated that he should only be awarded $ 100,000 in compensatory damages, as well as $ 50,000 each in punitive damages from petitioners.

The Significance This Case challenged the values and boundaries pertaining to the First Amendment of the Constitution The decision of the Supreme Court reiterated the previous standard that was introduced with the New York Times vs. Sullivan case, and placed first amendment boundaries on the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress "Debate on public issues will not be uninhibited if the speaker must run the risk that it will be proved in court that he spoke out of hatred; even if he did speak out of hatred, utterances honestly believed contribute to the free interchange of ideas and the ascertainment of truth." "The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it. Indeed, if it is the speaker's opinion that gives offense, that consequence is a reason for according it constitutional protection. For it is a central tenet of the First Amendment that the government must remain neutral in the marketplace of ideas."

Works Cited Fien, B. (1989). A Mislitigated and Misreasoned Case Hustler Magazine v. Falwell: The First Amendment on Trail. William and Mary Law Review, Jerry Falwell Biography. (2014). Retrieved 03 20, 2014, from The Biography Channel website: Laguzza, J. R. (1998). Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell: Laugh or Cry,. Public Figures Must Learn to Live with Satirical. Pepperdine Law Review, Larry Flynt Biography. (2014). Retrieved 03 19, 2014, from Biography Channel website: Linder, D. O. (2008). Famous Trails: Falwell v Flynt Trail Retrieved 03 20, 2014, from Famous Trails : Milestone Cases in Surpreme Court History. (2013). Retrieved 3 19, 2014, from Infoplease: Post, R. C. (1990). The Constitutional Concept of Public Discourse: Outrageous Opinion, Democratic Deliberation, and Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Harvard Law Review,