Jon Macy & Erika Hernandez Indiana University.  Research: no negative impact on business activity  Restaurants  Bars  Hotels  Hospitality industry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulating Secondhand Smoke in Public Parks and Outdoor Recreation Areas WHY? To protect public health, especially of children, from the negative health.
Advertisements

Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a State Clean Indoor Air Law -New York- Ursula E. Bauer, Ph.D. Director, Tobacco Control Program NYS Department.
Smoke-Free Policy in Kentucky: Aren’t We There Yet? DPH and LHD Nurses Meeting June 20, 2013.
Negative Health Effects of Secondhand Smoking: Heart Disease Eric L. Johnson, M.D. Assistant Professor Department of Family and Community Medicine University.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Tobacco Control: A Winnable Battle U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control.
2011 Nov 3 18:10-18:25 An exchange program, Catholic University & IIES, UOEH Issues of Tobacco control in Japan: -Secondhand smoke exposures in workplaces.
Smoke Free Mecklenburg Good for Health. Good for Business.
Indian Gaming in Montana One step to opening the door to new opportunities for the First Montanans.
1 Division of Gaming Legislative Audit Bureau December 2002.
Eliminating secondhand smoke where we live, work, and play Community Strategies:
National HBPA Summer Meeting National HBPA Summer Meeting “Table Games at Racinos”© Dr. Richard Thalheimer, President Thalheimer Research Associates Lexington,
Public Health Prevails Over Preemption in South Carolina
Nevada Taxable Sales Records and Jobs Reports for Restaurants and Bars Since the Implementation of the Nevada Clean Indoor Air Act  Restaurant & Bars.
Public Health Nursing Practice: Finding Evidence to Apply to Environmental Health Issues Searching for Smoke-Free Air.
Hashimoto: Casino Management: A Strategic Approach © 2008 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. Hashimoto: Casino Management:
The Influence of Labor in the Industrial Heartland.
Tobacco is now the world’s leading killer. We have the proven means to reduce tobacco use, but policy-makers are not yet applying these interventions.
to the Poor House The Economy & Social Work How the Economic Downturn Effects Social Service Agencies.
Breathe Easy Muskoka Smoke-Free By-laws. UBM Claims Economic Impact Sales down by 15.9% Tips down by 25% Loss of staff Where did these statistics come.
Rockefeller Center at Dartmouth College Policy Research Shop The Center for Public Policy and the Social Sciences Gambling Expansion in New Hampshire David.
Douglas Economic Outlook GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate.
ACS CAN and the CoC: Making a Difference Saving Lives ACS CAN and the Commission on Cancer.
The Effect of Prices, Programs, and Smoke-free Homes on Smoking Behavior in the 1990s Evidence from Population Surveys John Pierce, UC San Diego Wael Al.
The California Tobacco Control Program: A Model for Change TOBACCO CONTROL SECTION California Department of Health Services March 2001 c.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Secondhand Tobacco Smoke in Public Places Ana Navas-Acien, MD, PhD, MPH Johns Hopkins Bloomberg.
The Market Potential of the Four Gaming Zones of Kansas Presentation to Kansas Lottery Gaming Facility Review Board by Will Cummings / Cummings Associates.
Fiona Godfrey, European Respiratory Society Bratislava, 17 April 2007.
Dreams become reality - success with tobacco control means success with cancer control Christopher Squier College of Dentistry University of Iowa.
Kentucky is going smoke-free, one community at a time.
Tobacco: Health and Economics Dr. Joy de Beyer World Bank International Meeting on Economic, Social and Health Issues in Tobacco Control Kobe, Japan, December.
Campaign Success: Focus on Employees and their Health Dawn Berney, MPA Wisconsin Public Health and Health Policy Institute Teresa Ryan, BS Tobacco-Free.
Smoke-Free Laws: Economic Issues Michael R. Pakko, Ph.D.* Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis * The views presented here are my own, and do not represent.
COCHISE COLLEGE Center for Economic Research Economic Review & Outlook Douglas, AZ.
Cuyahoga County Health Alliance Tobacco-Free Policy Workshop Planning a 100% Tobacco-Free Campus Policy Cuyahoga County Board of Health August 24, 2012.
Impact of smoke-free legislation among smokers – Findings from the ITC Europe Surveys Ute Mons German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany.
The Big Picture: What Are the Key Approaches to Making Smoke-free Multi-Unit Dwellings the Norm (as quickly as possible): The California Experience Joanne.
Sierra Vista Economic Outlook National Economy  Sequestration.
Cochise College CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH Economic Outlook Douglas, AZ.
Benson Economic Outlook GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate.
1 Show Me the Money An Economic Evaluation of the Future of West Virginia Public Libraries.
A View From Above: The National Perspective on Becoming Smokefree American Public Health Association Conference November 8, 2006 Cynthia Hallett, MPH Executive.
Present by: Ahmed Alzabni Vevina (Ying CHEN) Christine (Zhuqing ZHANG) Somnus (Siyuan SHENG)
“General RIA Training” 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Session 13 Case Study Results, Based on UK Smokefree RIA.
Cochise College Center for Economic Research Economic Review & Outlook Sierra Vista, AZ.
Implementation of the Massachusetts Smoke-free Workplace Law American Public Health Association November 8, 2006.
Benson Economic Outlook National Economy  Recession ended June 2009, slow recovery since  : 8.7 million jobs lost  (May):
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B ASSIST Evaluation.
National HBPA Forum “Life After Slots” Thursday, July 2, 2009 Panelist - Joe Santanna.
Everyone Deserves to Breathe Clean, Safe Air. Today, there is solid and conclusive evidence that documents the serious risks that secondhand smoke poses.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section C Case Study: Ireland.
ACS CAN Advocacy Update Jen Hunt, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN)
1 “The Gaming Landscape in New England” Gaming Study Commission October 6, 2009 NH Center for Public Policy Studies.
Evan Blecher School of Economics, University of Cape Town The Economics of Tobacco Control in South Africa.
Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.
Implementing the Clean Indoor Air Act (CIAA) BOCC Briefing January 29, 2008.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Evaluating Smoke-Free Policies Andrew Hyland, PhD Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
The Story Behind the Data The Current Scene of Chewing Tobacco, Snuff, or Snus Among Wisconsin Adults Randall Glysch & Kyle Pfister Wisconsin Tobacco Prevention.
Impact of Smokefree Workplace Exemptions and Preemption on Worker Health Kristen Rohde, MA, Michael Stark, PhD, Stephen Hecht, PhD, Barbara Pizacani, PhD,
Smoke-free Casinos: The Colorado Experience Kimberly Hills Executive Director Colorado Tobacco Education and Prevention Alliance (CTEPA)
CLEAN INDOOR AIR & HEALTH PROTECTION CLEAN INDOOR AIR & HEALTH PROTECTION Amendment of Ch July 10, 2012 City Council Meeting - Smoking Regulations.
Building Momentum for Smoke-Free Ordinances National Conference on Tobacco or Health Chicago, Illinois May 5, 2005.
Trends in Gambling Revenue to the States The Civic Federation And Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Chicago, IL Lucy Dadayan April 2, 2015.
City of Stratford, Public Meeting, April 23, 2013.
Progress Against Preemption: Developments in the Fight to Restore Local Control Liz Williams, Project Manager Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights
State Of Maine Gambling Control Board
Logistics Facilities Ad-Hoc Committee
Smokeasy: A case study of enforcement and penalties of smoke-free indoor air bans in workplaces and restaurants in three states Ryan Patrick, J.D. and.
The Massachusetts mandate
Analysis of Fiscal Year 2003 Lottery Sales in the City of Pflugerville and “Racino” Sales Comparison At 93% prize payout, Racinos/VLTs venues require.
Tobacco Related Legislative Goals Smokefree Legislation
Presentation transcript:

Jon Macy & Erika Hernandez Indiana University

 Research: no negative impact on business activity  Restaurants  Bars  Hotels  Hospitality industry across borders  Restaurants and bars in a tobacco-growing community

 2003: Local smoke-free ordinances in Massachusetts had no effect on bingo revenues  : Conflicting findings on the effect of Delaware’s statewide smoke-free air law on gaming revenues at racinos  2008: Local smoke-free ordinances in Kentucky had no effect on charitable gaming revenues  2011: Ohio’s statewide smoke-free air law had no effect on the hospitality industry (including casinos) in Ohio and Kentucky border counties

 Massachusetts and Kentucky studies focused on charitable gaming (bingo)  Delaware studies had no comparison group and focused on video slot machine revenue  Ohio/Kentucky border study included entire hospitality industry  Unpublished Illinois study used only 4 years of data total and only 1 year after statewide law  10 years behind research on rest of hospitality industry

 Opponents of smoke-free workplace laws continue to argue that they negatively impact gaming revenues  Casinos first to be exempted from smoke-free air laws  Indiana Legislative Fiscal Impact Statement predicted negative economic consequences  More evidence needed to support policy advocacy

 OTB site in Fort Wayne, Indiana went smoke- free on June 1, 2007 due to local ordinance  OTB sites in Indianapolis and Merrillville, Indiana continue to permit smoking  Study objective: test the effect of the law on wagering at Fort Wayne site compared to the Indianapolis and Merrillville control sites

 Data  Monthly per capita handle (amount wagered) from 2002 to 2009 for the 3 OTB locations  Monthly unemployment rates for counties where OTBs were located  Analysis  Tested for shift and slope changes in per capita handle for each location after June 1, 2007  Tested trends in per capita handle for 2 smoking locations compared to smoke-free location

Seasonally adjusted per capita handle in US$ Fort Wayne smoke-free air law went into effect

 No change in trend in per capita handle at any of the 3 OTBs after June 1, 2007  Per capita handle decreased at all 3 OTBs from 2002 to 2009  Unemployment rate was a significant predictor of per capita handle  As unemployment rate increased over the study period, per capita handle decreased

 No change in trend in per capita amount wagered at Fort Wayne OTB after city implemented a smoke-free air law  No change in trend at two comparison locations  There is no economic reason for policymakers to exclude OTB facilities from smoke-free legislation  Workers and patrons at gaming facilities can be protected from secondhand smoke without fear of negative economic consequences

Co-author & statistician: Erika Hernandez Contributors: Tim Filler, Stan Glantz, Mary Lay, Kosali Simon