GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather
Advertisements

1 Belov A., Baisultanova L., Eroshenko E., Yanke V. (IZMIRAN, Russia), Mavromichalaki H. (Athens University, Greece), Pchelkin V. (PGI, Russia) Magnetospheric.
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Assume the axial symmetric CR density distribution with the minimum along with the axis of a cylinder Then the observed –G points toward the density minimum.
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
NMDB Kiel Meeting, 3-5/12/2008 On the possibility to use on-line one-minute NM data of NMDB network and available from Internet satellite CR data for.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
Petukhov I.S., Petukhov S.I. Yu.G. Shafer Institute for Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy SB RAS 21st European Cosmic Ray Symposium in Košice, Slovakia.
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather Erwin O. Flückiger Laurent Desorgher, Rolf Bütikofer, Benoît Pirard Physikalisches Institut University of Bern
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
1 Interactive DataBase of Cosmic Ray Anisotropy (DB A10) Asipenka A.S., Belov A.V., Eroshenko E.F., Klepach E.G., Oleneva V. A., Yanke, V.G. IZMIRAN, Pushkov.
SHINE 2008 June, 2008 Utah, USA Visit our Websites:
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Efficacy of Muon Detection for Solar Flare Early Warning Canadian Muon Workshop St-Émile-de-Suffolk, Québec, Canada October 17-19, 2011 NRCan DND Carleton.
ОПАСНОСТИ МАГНИТНЫХ БУРЬ И ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ МИРОВОЙ СЕТИ НЕЙТРОННЫХ МОНИТОРОВ И МЮОННЫХ ТЕЛЕСКОПОВ ДЛЯ ПРЕДСКАЗАНИЯ ПОДХОДА К ЗЕМЛЕ МОЩНЫХ МЕЖПЛАНЕТНЫХ.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
ESWW10, Antwerpen, 2013 Cosmic ray variations caused by magnetic clouds in the interplanetary disturbances A. ABUNIN,M., ABUNINA, A. BELOV, E. EROSHENKO,
Ultimate Spectrum of Solar/Stellar Cosmic Rays Alexei Struminsky Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia.
SHORT TIME VARIATIONS OF COSMIC RAYS INFLUENCE ON THE DURATION OF THE MACROSYNOPTICAL PROCESSES IN THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE I.V. Artamonova Saint-Petersburg.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
CME trajectory deduced from cosmic ray measurements K. Munakata, T. Kuwabara and J. W. Bieber.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT By Dr. A. Mahrous Helwan University - EGYPT.
1 IGY The ALERT signal of ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays: physics basis, the ways of realization and development Anashin V., Belov A.,
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database Karl-Ludwig Klein, for the NMDB consortium.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Contribution P1.05. To day is September 11, Just 7 years ago on September 11, 2001, around 8h45m ET…
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
The spatial and temporal distribution of solar and galactic cosmic rays S. V. Tasenko 1, P. V. Shatov 1, I. A. Skorokhodov 1, I. V. Getselev 1,2, M. Podzolko.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
20th ESA Symposium Lev Dorman (1, 2) for the Team (A. Belov, I. Ben Israel, U. Dai, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, N. Iucci, Z. Kaplan, O. Kryakunova, A. Levitin,
Radiation Storms in the Near Space Environment Mikhail Panasyuk, Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
O N THE INFLUENCE OF THE CORONAL HOLE LATITUDE AND POLARITY ON THE GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY AND COSMIC RAY VARIATIONS Abunina Maria, IZMIRAN, Russia Abunin.
Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy of SB RAS Transparency of a magnetic cloud boundary for cosmic rays I.S. Petukhov, S.I. Petukhov.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Understanding SEP properties through Neutron Monitor data modeling Neutron Monitor Network: a tool for revealing the relativistic SEP properties Ground.
It is considered that until now in the 24th cycle of solar activity 2 ground level enhancements of solar cosmic rays (GLEs) are registered: on May 17,
METHOD OF GLOBAL SURVEY (GSM) AND CORRESPONDING TOOLS FOR DATA PREPARATION Eroshenko 1 E., Belov 1 A., Abunin 1 A., Abunina 1 M., Oleneva 1 V., Yanke 1.
29 ICRC, Pune, India, 2005 Geomagnetic effects on cosmic rays during the very strong magnetic storms in November 2003 and November 2004 Belov (a), L. Baisultanova.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou.
Variability of the Heliospheric Magnetic Flux: ICME effects S. T. Lepri, T. H. Zurbuchen The University of Michigan Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic,
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
Forbush Decreases and Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections at Earth and Mars Mark Lester1, Beatriz Sanchez-Cano1, Emma Thomas1, Adam Langeveld1, Jingnan.
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
Alexander Mishev & Ilya Usoskin
Introduction to Space Weather
  V1 and V2 Measurements of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Outer Heliosphere and the Heliosheath during Solar Cycle #23   W.R. Webber (The.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
NMDB - the European neutron monitor database
Presentation transcript:

GLOBAL SURVEY METHOD: WHAT DO NEUTRON MONITORS SEE? Belov A.1, Eroshenko E.1, Abunin A. 1, Abunina M. 1, Yanke V. 1, Oleneva V.1, Mavromichalaki H.2, Papaioannou A IZMIRAN. Kaluzhskoe Ave., 4, Moscow, Troitsk, Russia, ; 2Faculty of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Oostende, 2015

CR variations as one of the important resources on Space Weather information

Neutron monitor network Since IGY NM invention (Simpson) – 5-6 now; Up to Super NM (NM64) -~ 55 operating now They cover whole the globe-NMN network They can operatively present data in the Internet resources: 33 of them input data In the NMDB in real time (

NMs remain as the main and best detectors for the galactic CR, with some advantages before the others: Long time and continue registration; constant location; Long time set of homogeneous data; High resolution of data accumulation; Large square of registration which provides high accuracy. The variation in the intensity provides valuable information on the heliospheric disturbances with characteristic scales of 0.01 to 100 AU, and processes in the heliosphere with characteristic times of 10**2-10**8s. the energy range from hundreds MeV to hundreds GeV. These high energies represent an extension of the low-energy ranges measured on spacecraft

Problems Being created for studying primary CRs, NMs don’t record primary CRs, but only secondary particles generated in the atmosphere in the cascade processes. Besides, GCR flux is affected by magnetosphere Need to have the global parameters of cosmic rays independent on the location of a point of observation on Earth, led to creation of special global methods which use data from a big number of the stations distributed on the globe.

Global survey method Counting rate variation for i - station can be written through the reception coefficients as: Eroshenko et al., Method of global survey (GSM) and corresponding tools for data preparation. Session 15, Poster 13. The parameters of GCR (A0, Ax, Ay, Az and gamma) in the interplanetary space were calculated by the data of NMN over the period for each hour. They are entered the database on Forbush effects (IZMIRAN) and used in different studies of solar-terrestrial relationships.

Long term modulation of the CR A0 Variations of the CR monthly mean values and model calculation. Upper curves-contriubution of different parameters in the long-term modulation model.

Vector diagram of solar-diurnal CR anisotropy (Axy) during the obtained by hourly NMs data after GSM. Valuable information on the long-term changes of the heliomagnetosphere structure and GCR distribution. Dramatic behavior appears when study shorter time intervals. FEs are the most interesting and informative short time variations Axy vectors Regular recurrence 22-y magnetic cycle 11-year cycle in the amplitude

Coronal hole effect Gigantic coronal hole in March 2003 and its influence on solar wind, cosmic rays and geomagnetic activity Variation of the background cosmic rays due to solar wind disturbances generated by CME and/or coronal hole What is the Forbush effect?

Forbush decrease is the largest galactic CR variation (~6700)sd 23th cycle The largest FE in the last cycle and over the history, and full 11-year CR modulation in the same scale.

Forbush effect is the most variable effect a1b1c1

CR asymptotic angular distribution on October 2000, by the NMN data. Yellow circles correspond to increase and red one – to decrease of the CR variations. Circle size is proportional to the magnitude of CR variation. Precursory decrease apparently result from a “loss-cone” effect, in which a NM is magnetically connected to the cosmic ray-depleted region downstream the shock Pre-decrease within the narrow longitude range and wide pre-increase. Precursors of Forbush effects and magnetic storms

Asymptotic distribution of the CR variations on May 1990 by NMN data Pre-decrease started to be observed ~6 hours prior the shock arrival Precursor -6 hours before the shock arrival (SSC) and start of the GLE and onset of magnetic storm in May 1990 The event on 3-5 October 1983, presented as a longitude-time distribution.

The event on 3-5 October 1983 by NMN data. The sharp transfers from minimum to maximum CR variations occur most in the o  and o  longitude regions, near usual probably direction of the IMF at a distance of Larmor radii. For protons of 10 GV rigidity on the quiet background of the IMF intensity (about 5 nT) the Larmor radius is about 0.04 AU. A shock at 500 km/s needs about 4 hours to travel this distance before arriving at Earth. So, these anomalies are most often observed in the last hours before shock arrival. The neutron monitor network can identify these signatures and therefore emit a warning of the imminent onset of a geomagnetic storm. Nonharmonical distribution of CR variations on the asymptotic longitude of NMs one hour before the shock arrival

Forbush effect is the most anisotropic effect It is during the FEs that the biggest anisotropy of the galactic CR is observed. For example, on February 15, 1978 in one of the greatest FE the first harmonic of CR anisotropy reached 10% (20 times bigger than normal). Here only equatorial component is plotted, but at the same time north- south component also varied in a wide range. Moreover, the second harmonic of anisotropy increased during the same hours up to ~10% that is two orders higher than its usual values. February 1978

Example of the fast event with well pronounced minimum in the CR density inside the MC Vector diagram and behavior of the CR density. Thin lines connect the equal time points on the vector diagram and density curve in every 6 hours. Vertical vectors correspond to the N-S anisotropy. Time passing by Earth the MC is shaded.

EAST WEST E E58, E E W W W79 CR density (A0) and anisotropy (Axy) during the FEs from remote sources

Ioannina Sept Compare vector anisotropy from the remote sources FEs in August 1989 (W60) and in July 1978 (E58) The increase of Axy is much more for FEs from the western source, but for eastern events on the Sun we see sharp change of Axy direction).

Statistical Analysis The storms in the solar wind, in the Earth’s magnetosphere and in the cosmic rays are closely related. Analysis of big amount events allowed the quantitative dependences to be found between the averaged characteristics of the interplanetary, geomagnetic and cosmic ray activity. These characteristics may be used in diagnostic of the solar activity manifestation Connection of the equatorial component of the CR anisotropy with the parameters of of the interplanetary space (Vsw, B, dA0) was studied on the large massive hourly data over the period of solar wind observation; In stable solar wind independently of SW velocity, a typical steady CR anisotropy exists with the magnitude of Axy=0.51÷0.53%. If some large enough changeS occur in the solar wind (increase velocity, changes A0 or strengthening IMF) the Axy increases significantly.

Statistical Analysis Connection of Axy with the solar wind velocity V and IMF intensity B was studied on the large massive hourly data over the period of solar wind observation. Different colours mark different ranges of anisotropy (right scale). I n stable solar wind independently of SW velocity, a typical steady CR anisotropy exists with the magnitude of Axy=0.51÷0.53%. If some large enough changes occur in the solar wind (increase velocity, changes A0 or strengthening IMF) the Axy increases significantly.

Connection of Axy vector averaged by the cells with the size 1nTx0.05 %/hrs with the changes of CR density dA0 and IMF intensity B. In the report: Relation of the vector cosmic ray anisotropy to the parameters of solar wind, Abunina, M. et al., ESWW12, session 15, p15. Little changes DA0 and B –zone of stable CR anisotropy Vector becomes unstable when one of these parameters (or both) significantly differs from norm. Vectors from the Sun are observed more often than to the Sun that is defined by the radial CR gradient

Statistical analysis Considering of many FEs shows that increase of amplitude and change of direction is a typical response of the 1-st order anisotropy to the shock and ejecta region. This essentially extends the capabilities of diagnosing of the solar wind structures. Statistical connections of the parameters of anisotropy with various conditions of interplanetary medium give the information about a degree of perturbation of this medium. Account of the size of Axy (separately or together with CR density variations A0) can change the probability of the quiet (Q) or disturbed (D) solar wind in tens and hundreds.

Main conclusion It is obvious that the variations of CR observed on Earth by neutron monitors give a valuable information about the processes happening on the Sun and in a heliosphere; Our task - to learn to take this information and to use it in the detailed analysis together with other available data; Especially important for space weather goals would be to make it feasible in real time by means of NMDB. Thank you

Sun Earth Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays by ICME

Changes of the CR angular distribution on the 6-9 September 1992, by the neutron monitor network data. Yellow circles correspond to increase and red one – to decrease of the CR intensity. Circle size is proportional to the magnitude of CR variation. A long precursor in the CR anisotropy is seen well in advance the Forbush decrease and SSC: predecrease within the narrow longitude range and wide preincrease. Precursors of Forbush effects and magnetic storms

Anisotropy of FD. February 1978.