Briefing for the EAC Public Meeting Boston, Massachusetts April 26, 2005 Dr. Hratch Semerjian, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
Advertisements

IDESG Online Plenary Meeting Wednesday, September 18 2:00 – 4:00pm ET Led by Plenary Chair Bob Blakley Welcome to the Online Plenary.
Information Technology Control Day IV Afternoon Sessions.
Writing Quality Specifications July 9, 2004 Mark Skall Acting Director, Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology.
TIA Engineering Manual 6 th Edition Preview and Overview.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
RC14001 ® Update GPCA Responsible Care Committee September 23, 2013.
United States Election Assistance Commission Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA.
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL
Election Assistance Commission United States VVSG Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) NIST July 20, 2015 Gaithersburg,
Testing Summit Sacramento, CA November 28, 2005 Barbara Guttman National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
Demystifying the Independent Test Authority (ITA)
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Voting Project Briefing for William Jeffrey Director, NIST September 26, 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST HAVA-Related Work: Status and Plans June 16, 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission HAVA 101 TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST Research on UOCAVA Voting Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology
Standards in Elections: NIST and the Help America Vote Act Lynne S. Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
Improving U.S. Voting Systems Security Breakout Session Improving U.S. Voting Systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute.
SAML 2.1 Building on Success. Outline n Summary of SAML 2.0 n Work done since 2.0 n Objectives of SAML 2.1 n Proposed Task List n Undecided Issues n Invitation.
Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,
Briefing for NIST Acting Director James Turner regarding visit from EAC Commissioners March 26, 2008 For internal use only 1.
NIST Voting Program Activities Update February 21, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Accessibility and Usability Considerations for UOCAVA Remote Electronic Voting Systems Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Auditability Working Group David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology r4.
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission EAC Voting System Certification TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 1: Techniques and Developments Zhong Chen SC1 Chair
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the UOCAVA Working Group John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.
1 The Evolution of Voting Systems Paul DeGregorio Vice Chairman Donetta Davidson Commissioner The U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
NIST Voting Program Page 1 NIST Voting Program Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, December 2011 Overview of December TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards
NIST Voting Program Barbara Guttman 12/6/07
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Roadmap Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
Moving To the Year 2000:Implementing 4010 Implementation Resolution Process Rich Emrich EDI Manager J.M. Schneider.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Other Resolutions from Dec 2009 TGDC Meeting John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Review of UOCAVA Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
Next VVSG Training Standards 101 October 15-17, 2007 Mark Skall National Institute of Standards and Technology
1 DECEMBER 9-10, 2009 Gaithersburg, Maryland TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Commissioner Donetta Davidson.
The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview Matthew Masterson Election Assistance Commission
Test Assertions What are they and why do we need them? Mark Skall 1.
Creating Accessibility, Usability and Privacy Requirements for the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Whitney Quesenbery TGDC Member Chair, Subcommittee.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Development of High Level Guidelines for UOCAVA voting systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Path Forward for FY11 UOCAVA Activities Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
Election Assistance Commission 1 Technical Guidelines Development Committee Meeting Post-HAVA Voting System Requirements – Federal Perspective February.
Next VVSG Training Security: Testing Requirements October 15-17, 2007 Nelson Hastings Alicia Clay Jones National Institute of Standards and Technology.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST-developed Test Suites David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
Update: Revising the VVSG Structure Sharon Laskowski vote.nist.gov April 14, 2016 EAC Standards Board Meeting 1.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Report from Workshop on UOCAVA Remote Voting Systems Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) Overview Standards Board Meeting Carlsbad, Ca – April.
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
Introduction for the Implementation of Software Configuration Management I thought I knew it all !
Electronic Filing of Differences(EFOD) System and Filing of Differences Task Force (FDTF) Air Navigation Bureau.
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Software Configuration Management
NCWG Terms of Reference NCWG April 2016, IHB, Monaco
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards
Performance Audit Subcommittee Project for ISSAI Level 4 review 66th INTOSAI Governing Board Meeting Vienna, November 5-7, 2014.
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
Presentation transcript:

Briefing for the EAC Public Meeting Boston, Massachusetts April 26, 2005 Dr. Hratch Semerjian, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology

NIST “Help America Vote Act” Responsibilities Chair Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) Provide technical support to TGDC in the development of voluntary voting system guidelines including –Security –Methods to detect and prevent fraud –Human factors, including technologies for individuals with disabilities

TGDC/NIST Method of Operation Plenary Sessions –Formal meetings held periodically to develop resolutions, review work products, discuss, and vote –First plenary (July 2004) established 3 subcommittees Security and Transparency, Human Factors and Privacy, Core Requirements and Testing –Public invited to attend and provided access via webcast, transcripts published Subcommittees –Comprised of TGCG members and supported by NIST staff –Gather and analyze information in support of development of voting system guidelines –Conduct bi-weekly teleconferences with occasional face-to-face meetings –Public provided access via Internet, transcripts provided NIST staff –Provide technical expertise and research –Develop work products as directed by TGDC resolutions, with guidance from subcommittee –Work products are submitted to the entire TGDC for approval

Timeline of TGDC/NIST Activities July 2004: First plenary session of TGDC September 2004: TGDC public hearings gathered information on human factors, privacy, computer security, transparency, core requirements and testing of voting systems October 2004: NIST posted voting software “hashes” for use by state and local election officials at National Software Reference Library Web Site: January 2005: Second plenary session of TGDC, 31 resolutions adopted defining NIST technical support tasks February-March 2005: NIST established priority of resolutions, drafted work products for most critical tasks in TGDC resolutions to provide guidance to States in complying with HAVA for the 2006 Election Cycle March, 2005: Third plenary session of TGDC, TGDC provided feedback and endorsement of NIST draft work products April 2005: Fourth plenary session of TGDC, NIST work products approved as the TGDC initial recommendations for voting system guidelines, to be forwarded to the EAC To be determined: Additional plenary sessions, as needed, to review on going work products and approve the second version of voting system guidelines

Developing an Implementation Strategy First goal is to develop the best long-term guideline possible –Building on the strengths of the VSS-2002 –Changing areas that needed improvement –Reorganizing the requirements Second goal is to provide guidance to states in time for the 2006 election cycle –Implies need to minimize changes to VSS-2002 –While also filling in VSS-2002 gaps Thus, two guidelines will be developed –An augmented VSS-2002 – Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Version 1 –A new redesigned voting system guideline – VVSG Version 2

VVSG Version 1 Improves the VSS-2002 by filling in gaps (accessibility, usability, security, and others) Addresses issues facing the States e.g., helping to ensure that installed voting system software is the software that has been tested

New Areas Addressed/Enhanced in VVSG Version 1 Conformance Clause Human Factors Security –Overview –VVPAT –Wireless –Software Distribution and Setup Validation Glossary Error Rates

Conformance Clause VSS-2002 did not contain a conformance clause Conformance is defined as fulfillment by a product, process or service of specified requirements Conformance clause is a high-level description of who shall conform and what is required

Human Factors VSS-2002 –Section addressed accessibility and section addressed human engineering –Appendix C addressed usability –Errata issued in 2 NASED technical guides VVSG contains a new section addressing human factors –Replaces the old sections and –Replaces Appendix C –Incorporates the 2 NASED technical guides

Security Overview VVSG contains a new security section labeled section 6.0 containing: –Overview (informative) –VVPAT (normative) –Wireless (normative) –Software distribution and setup validation (normative) Overview explains the VVSG approach to security Future versions of the VVSG will require independent verification

Voter Verified Paper Audit Trails VVSG does not require or endorse VVPAT VVPAT is one method to achieve independent verification – other methods exist Requirements are provided so that states that choose to implement VVPAT can implement them effectively

Wireless TGDC concluded that wireless technology introduces severe risk and should be approached with extreme caution VVSG includes a section on wireless that augments the general telecommunications standards in Section 5

Software Distribution and Setup Validation VSS-2002 contained requirements to support validation of software and setup of voting systems New section augments the VSS-2002 and also includes use of the NSRL as well as other mechanisms NSRL = National Software Reference Library

Glossary New glossary contains terms from the VSS-2002 as well as new terms needed to understand voting and related areas Each term contains a definition and its source, as well as an association Glossary is also available on-line and allows searches by term, by source (e.g., VSS, HAVA), by association (e.g., testing, security, accessibility) Web site -

Error Rates VSS-2002 Volume II, Appendix C –set certain error rates for voting systems VVSG –modified Appendix C to revise the procedures to test that systems meet the indicated error rates –Applies to errors introduced by the system, defined as a ballot position error rate, and not by a voter’s action Research is needed to develop standards for error rates that account for human error

Organizational Changes in VVSG Version 1 Best Practices for Voting Officials Voting Process Structure of Requirements

Best Practices for Voting Officials VSS-2002 contained requirements for voting systems and testing entities Requirements in VVSG for wireless, VVPAT, human factors, etc. depend on voting officials developing and carrying out appropriate procedures VVSG contains best practices for voting officials These requirements are not testable and conformance can not be determined Best Practices for voting officials are contained in Volume I, Appendix C

Voting Process VSS-2002 defined three major stages of voting –Pre-voting –Voting –Post-voting VVSG Version 1, new sections indicate which stage the requirements pertain to VVSG Version 2 will contain a more detailed voting process model

Structure of Requirements New sections of the VVSG contain a more structured approach Each requirement is numbered according to a hierarchical scheme –Higher level requirements are supported by lower level requirements –Higher level requirements may not be directly testable but can be “indirectly” tested via their lower level requirements

“Grandfathering” Issue When drafting our recommendations, should we be sensitive to the current and planned practices of the various states? Examples: –VVPAT –Good accessibility introduces new requirements Three sub-committee Chairs all agree that the TGDC should develop the best technical guidelines possible The EAC can handle any difficulties that arise during a transition to the new guidelines by issuing appropriate "grandfathering" rules This is not a one-time issue. Technology changes and thus specs change over time –Municipalities may always be out of spec

Summary of TGDC/NIST Activities 31 resolutions adopted at January TGDC Plenary requesting NIST to conduct research and draft standards At March TGDC Meeting, NIST provided 22 separate draft work products that responded to resolutions – NIST instructed to continue development of technical support and related work product consistent with these preliminary reports At April TGDC Meeting, TGDC endorsed NIST work products as the initial recommendations for voluntary voting system guidelines Initial set of recommendations will be called the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Version 1 –VSSG Version 1 = VSS-2002 augmented with new sections plus corrections VVSG Version 2 Plans –Need formal request from EAC to continue TGDC activities –TGDC subcommittees will continue to meet and gather information –Expect at least two TGDC plenaries to finalize VVSG Version 2