Individual Program Plan (IPP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. Chpt 7 ~ Differentiating Teaching ADAPT Strategy to Analyze and Differentiate Teaching for Individuals and.
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.
Gifted Education and Response to Intervention Update on Gifted Education Workshop August 2013 Toddie Adams, Marshall County Schools.
Purpose of Instruction
Parents as Partners in Education
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. What is an IEP?  An IEP is a documented plan developed for a student with special needs that:  describes.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
JHLA Junior High Literacy Assessment. The school year saw the first administration of the Junior High Literacy Assessment. The assessment was.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Introducing The Learning Team to Parents Slides can be downloaded by visiting Alberta Learning’s Web site at: Click on Kindergarten.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Improving Secondary Education and Transition Using Research-Based Standards and Indicators An initiative of the National Alliance on Secondary Education.
Partnerships for Supporting Student Success. Expectations for Participants As a result of participating in this in-service session, you can expect to.
Beginning Teacher Support Program (BTSP) Jed Stus; Executive Director of Professional Development & Support What Mentors Need to Know and Do to Start the.
Transition Planning Parent Information Meeting Brooke Gassman, Keystone AEA Parent - Educator Coordinator Lori Anderson, DCSD Transition Facilitator Stephanie.
Individual Program Plan (IPP) Module 3: IPP Implementation.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Technology Implementation Plan Our Community Christian School.
The Program Planning Process: A Guide for Parents
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Support for Personalized Learning Presented by Dr. Sarah Lee RESA 4 Technical Assistance Specialist A recorded version of this presentation will be posted.
D62 Response to Intervention
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Designing and implementing a developmentally appropriate state-wide Kindergarten Entry Assessment and K-3 Formative Assessment System: Necessary Considerations.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Jan W. Lanham Issues for Leaders—Sept, Response to Intervention RTI is: A multi-tiered problem-solving approach! A focus on instructional and social/emotional.
Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Teacher Quality Standards Beginning of The Year Self-Assessment.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
ED 564: Administration of Inclusive Schools Saturday, January 14, 2012 Introduction to the Course Faculty of Education.
BBSST: Building Based Student Support Team Blount County Schools James E. Carr Superintendent.
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
Applying the Skills for Proficient Problem Solving Instructional Intervention Teams Level 3 Training April 7, 2011.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
Self-Determination as a Guiding Principle in Transition
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Individual Education Plans.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
January 25, 2012 Special Education Opportunities Review Progress Report.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Working with other adults to support bilingual learners.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
North Carolina Read to Achieve
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Introductions Introduction
An Overview April 2012.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

Individual Program Plan (IPP) Module 1: Setting the Context

Something to think about… It is not only for what we do that we are held responsible, but also for what we do not do. ~Jean Baptiste Poquelin Molière

Programming Principles Programming for students with special needs is an ongoing, collaborative process involving program planning team members as outlined in the provincial Special Education Policy, number 2.3. The decision to develop an IPP for a student is based on where the student is functioning in relation to the PSP outcomes and not on cognitive ability. An underlying principle critical to the programming for every student is “only as special as necessary”. Throughout the program planning process, there is a focus on the development of student independence, including self-advocacy skills.

Programming Principles Determining the appropriate balance of remediation and compensation in programming for students with special needs requires ongoing focus and adjustment, as appropriate. Individual strengths and challenges are the foundation for the development of individualized student outcomes. Accountability for program development, implementation, review, and reporting is a professional responsibility of educators.

Provincial Context for Programming Student The Education Act and Regulations Special Education Policy Provincial Board PSP

Public School Programs Learning Outcomes Framework General Curriculum Outcomes Key-Stage Curriculum Outcomes Specific Curriculum Outcomes Essential Graduation Learnings

Special Education Policy Programming Policies 2.1: Use of Resources for Appropriate Programming 2.2: Program Planning Process 2.3: Program Planning Teams 2.4: Assessment: Parental Involvement 2.5: Appropriate Assessments: Qualified Personnel 2.6: Individual Program Plans 2.7: Transition Planning 2.8: Evaluation of Programs 2.9: Access to School Records

Supplementary Documents to the Special Education Policy Teacher Assistant Guidelines (1998) Challenge for Excellence: Enrichment and Gifted Education Resource Guide (1999) School Board Ministerial Appeal Guide (1999) Handbook for the Transportation of Students with Special Needs in Nova Scotia (1999) Bias Evaluation Instrument (2001) Supporting Student Success: Resource Programming and Services (2002) Transition Planning for Students with Special Needs: The Early Years through to Adult Life (2005) The Program Planning Process: A Guide for Parents (2006) Assistive Technology: Supporting Student Success (2006) Student Services Fact Sheets (ongoing)

Program Planning Process Policy 2.2

IPP: Essential Components – Policy 2.6 Summary of Strengths and Challenges Annual Individualized Outcomes Specific Individualized Outcomes Strategies and Resources Responsibility Areas Reviewing and Reporting Signatures ACCOUNTABILITY

Roles and Responsibilities Administrators Classroom Teachers Resource Teachers Parents/Guardians Student RESPONSIBILITY ACCOUNTABILITY