2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math 2006-2009 Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades 3-8 2 The percentage of students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Martin Middle School Academic Performance Data School Profile General: Information is for school year Grades Served: 6-8 Safe School Status:
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
9010 TWI Program -- Dec 2006 Outcomes from a 9010 TWI Program in California This program has been in operation for over 7 years, so its students are in.
1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1. Canadian Results PISA PISA 2012 by the numbers 3.
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
NAEP 2007: Reading and Mathematics, Grades 4 and 8 New Jersey State Board of Education Work Session Assistant Commissioner Jay Doolan Assessment Director.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Indian Hills Jr. High Review of Science scores West Des Moines Schools.
Attainment, progress and context by disadvantage / pupil premium
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report Including Challenge Index August, 2017.
Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Minnesota March 2015
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
What’s Driving Chicago’s Educational Progress?
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Colorado March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New York March 2015
Urban Charter Schools Impact in Washington DC March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Michigan March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Georgia March 2015
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Pennsylvania March 2015
ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers
Created by Jena Parish Austell Intermediate July 2011 School Faculty
Broken Arrow Public Schools District Assessment/Accountability Report
Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New Mexico March 2015
Central City Elementary School

2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Russell Elementary School By: Bridget Purdy April 2014
Presentation transcript:

2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1

Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students in New York State reaching Levels 3 & 4 showed consistent improvement over the past four years.

Math Total Public 3-8 Mean Scale Scores Mean Scale Scores showed measured progression over the past four years

2009 Math Total Public Grades 3, 4, and 5 4 Students are displaying proficiency at each grade level statewide, though there still needs to be improvement.

2009 Math Total Public Grades 6, 7, and 8 5 Students are displaying proficiency at each grade level statewide, though there still needs to be improvement.

Total Public Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 Math The percentage of students scoring at Level 1 statewide has decreased for each grade level over the past four years.

2009 Math Percentage of Students NYC Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades 3-8 Math 7 The percentage of NYC students reaching Levels 3 & 4 increased steadily over the past four years.

Math NYC 3-8 Mean Scale Scores NYC Mean Scale Scores showed consistent improvement over the past four years

2009 Math NYC Grades 3, 4, and 5 9 NYC Students are displaying proficiency at each grade level, though there still needs to be improvement.

2009 Math NYC Grades 6, 7, and 8 10 NYC Students are displaying proficiency at each grade level, though there still needs to be improvement.

Math Percentage of NYC Students Scoring at Level 1 11 The percentage of NYC students scoring at Level 1 has decreased for each grade level over the past four years.

12 Math Percentage of Grade 3-8 Students in the Big 5 Scoring at Level 1 Similarly, the percentage of students in the Big 5 scoring at Level 1 has declined over the past four years.

Math Percentage of Asian Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 13 The percentage of Asian students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 display improvement over the past four years.

650 Math Asian Students Mean Scale Scores 14 Mean scale scores for Asian students show steady improvement for each grade level.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Math: Asian Students Percentage of Asian Students at Levels 3 and 4 The percentage of Asian students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 show a majority of students at proficiency as they progressed through school.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Math Asian Student Mean Scale Scores 16 The average score of this year’s Asian 6 th,7 th, and 8 th graders has shown decline or plateau as they have moved from one grade to the next through school, even though more of those students are reaching Level 3 & 4. However, this year’s Asian students generally have higher average scores than Asian students in those grades did 4 years before.

Math Percentage of Black Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 17 The percentage of Black students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has increased over the past four years.

650 Math Black Students Mean Scale Scores 18 Black students made steady gains in scale scores for each grade.

Math Percentage of Hispanic Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 19 Similarly, the percentage of Hispanic students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 shows strong gains over the past four years.

650 Math Hispanic Students Mean Scale Scores 20 Hispanic students made consistent gains in scale scores for each grade.

Math Percentage of American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 21 The percentage of American Indian/ Alaskan Native students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 display improvement over the past four years.

650 Math American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Mean Scale Scores 22 American Indian/ Alaskan Native students showed scale score improvement for each grade.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Math American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Percentage of Students at Levels 3 and 4 23 The percentage of American Indians scoring at Level 3 & 4 has increased as they have progressed through school.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of * Math American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Mean Scale Scores 24 American Indians also increased their average scores on the tests as they have moved from one grade to the next.

Math Percentage of White Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 25 The percentage of White students scoring in Level 3 & 4 improved over the past four years.

Math Percentage of Female Asian Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 26 The percentage of Female Asian students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 increased steadily each from an already high proportion of proficiency.

650 Female Asian Students Mean Scale Scores 27 Math Female Asian students mean scale scores rose consistently for each grade level during the past four years.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Female Asian Students at Levels 3 and 4 28 Math The percentage of Female Asian students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 shows a high proportion of students maintaining and achieving proficiency as they move through grades.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Math Female Asian Students Mean Scale Scores 29 Female Asian students mean scale scores average significantly above the cut point. However, mean scale score level appears to plateau in the middle grades as they move through school.

Math Percentage of Male Asian Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 30 The percentage of Male Asian students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 increased steadily each from an already high proportion of proficiency.

650 Male Asian Students Mean Scale Scores 31 Math Male Asian students mean scale scores increased for each grade level during the past four years.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Male Asian Students at Levels 3 and 4 32 Math The percentage of Asian male students scoring in Level 3 & 4 as they move through school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic male students. But overall performance is still higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Male Asian Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average score of each class of Asian males has declined, except for this year’s 4 th and 9 th graders. But all students are achieving at higher levels than their counterparts 4 years ago.

Math Percentage of Female Black Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 34 The percentage of Female Black students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 showed positive growth for each grade level since 2006.

650 Female Black Mean Scale Scores 35 Math Female Black students mean scale scores have shown consistent gains since 2006.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Female Black Students at Levels 3 and 4 36 Math The percentage of Black female students scoring in Level 3 & 4 has increased as they moved through school over the 4 years. And all students are achieving at higher levels than Black females did in those same grades four years ago.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Female Black Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average scores of Black females also increased as they moved through school over the four years.

Math Percentage of Male Black Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 38 The percentage of Male Black students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has increased significantly for each grade level since 2006.

650 Male Black Students Mean Scale Scores 39 Math Male Black students mean scale scores have shown gains since 2006.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Male Black Students at Levels 3 and 4 40 Math The percentage of Black male students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 increased as they moved through school over the past 4 years – though there is evidence of variable progression. All students are achieving at higher levels than students in those same grades did four years ago.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Male Black Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average scores of Black males also increased- with variation in grades 5, 6, & 7- as they moved from one grade to the next through the four years of school.

Math Percentage of Female Hispanic Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 42 The percentage of Female Hispanic students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has shown strong gains for each grade level since 2006.

650 Female Hispanic Students Mean Scale Scores 43 Math Female Hispanic students mean scale scores increased since 2006.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Female Hispanic Students at Levels 3 and 4 44 Math The percentage of Hispanic female students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 increased as they moved through school over the 4 years. And all students are achieving at higher levels than Hispanic female students did in those same grades 4 years ago.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Female Hispanic Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average scores of Hispanic females are increasing. All students are achieving at higher levels than Hispanic females did in those same grades four years ago.

Math Percentage of Male Hispanic Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 46 The percentage of Male Hispanic students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has increased significantly for each grade level since 2006.

650 Male Hispanic Students Mean Scale Scores 47 Math Male Hispanic students mean scale scores increased consistently across grade levels since 2006.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Male Hispanic Students at Levels 3 and 4 48 Math The percentage of Hispanic male students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 increased as they moved through school over the 4 years, except for this year’s 6 th graders. All students are achieving at higher levels than Hispanic students did in those same grades four years ago.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Male Hispanic Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average scores of Hispanic males also increased as they moved through school over the 4 years – except for this year’s 6 th graders.

Math Percentage of Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 50 The percentage of Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has grown over the past four years.

650 Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native Mean Scale Scores 51 Math Since 2006, Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native students mean scale scores increased across grade levels.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students at Levels 3 and 4 52 Math The percentage of Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 increased as they moved through school over the four years.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of * Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Mean Scale Scores Math Female American Indian/ Alaskan Native students mean scale scores have shown progression as students move from grade to grade.

Math Percentage of Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 54 The percentage of Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has increased over the past four years.

650 Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Mean Scale Scores 55 Math Since 2006, Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native students mean scale scores rose across grade levels.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students at Levels 3 and 4 56 Math The percentage of Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native students scoring at Levels 3 & 4, though variable in grades 5 &6, increased as they moved through school over the four years.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native Students Mean Scale Scores Math Male American Indian/ Alaskan Native students mean scale scores have increased, except for plateaus in grades 5 &6, as students move from grade to grade.

Math Percentage of Female White Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 58 The percentage of Female White students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has increased over the past four years.

650 Female White Students Mean Scale Scores 59 Math Female White students mean scale scores showed progression across grade levels over the past four years.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Female White Students at Levels 3 and 4 60 Math The percentage of Female White students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 as they moved from one grade to the next through four years of school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic female students. But overall performance is still higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Female White Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average score of this year’s 4 th grade White females has not increased since year previous. But all White females are achieving at higher levels than White females in those same grades did four years ago.

Math Percentage of Male White Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 62 The percentage of Male White students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has shown improvement over the past four years.

650 Male White Students Mean Scale Scores 63 Math Male White students mean scale scores increased across grade levels over the past four years.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Percentage of Male White Students at Levels 3 and 4 64 Math The percentage of Male White students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 as they moved through school shows the gains are often smaller than for Black and Hispanic male students. But overall performance is still higher than for Blacks and Hispanics.

Class of 2018Class of 2017Class of Grade 3 in 2006 Class of 2015 Grade 4 in 2006 Class of Grade 5 in 2006 Class of Grade 6 in 2006 Class of 2012 Grade 7 in 2006 Class of 2011 Grade 8 in 2006 Class of Male White Students Mean Scale Scores Math The average score of this year’s 6 th grade White male students has not improved as they moved through school over the 4 years. The average score of this year’s 4 th and 5 th graders has improved very little. But all students are achieving at higher levels than students in those grades did 4 years ago.

Math Percentage of at Levels 3 and 4 66 The percentage of Students with Disabilities scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has increased over the past four years.

650 Students with Disabilities Mean Scale Scores 67 Math Students with Disabilities mean scale scores have shown steady increase across grades since 2006.

Percentage of Students with Disabilities at Level 1 Math The percentage of Students with Disabilities scoring at Level 1 has decreased significantly over the past four years.

Percentage of English Language Learners (ELL) at Level 1 69 Math Similarly, the percentage of ELL Students scoring at Level 1 has declined over the past four years.

Math Percentage of ELL Students at Levels 3 and 4 70 The percentage of ELL Students scoring at Levels 3 & 4 has shown improvement over the past four years, especially for the lower grades.

650 ELL Students Mean Scale Scores 71 Math ELL Students mean scale scores increased steadily across grades since 2006.